The FDA Globalization Act - Info You Need To Know
Kelly, from Southern Soapers, has gone above and beyond at keeping everyone informed on the latest from the FDA Globalization Act, along with businesses that have been cited and/or fined.
Here is the link to her website - she has some great posts on there, as well as two good lists, and also offers classes in things that you might want to take. She has been in business long enough to know what she's talking about and has several posts on her website; as well as the link to the Indie Beauty Network, Business Insurance and a good amount of other info as well. She also, I believe, has a link that will take you right to the Indie Beauty Network, which has information on the FDA Globalization Act - upcoming probably this year, though it was started in 2008, it ought to be passed in some form or another in 2009.
http://www.southernsoapers.com
She sent me, as well as the rest of her list, a notice the other day about a website that the FDA had already fined along with the link, here:
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2008/NEW01921.html
She received this link from Kayla, who owns and operates another website; Essential Wholesale - one that supplies materials for soap-making, lotion bases and various other things for home crafters. There are many of these sites, so chances are, there's one fairly close to you and you have to buy supplies somewhere if you're making and selling.
http://www.essentialwholesale.com
Anyways, Kayla alerted her to this. With the FDA Globalization Act going to be passed in some form or another, anyone making and selling things on the web needs to be extra careful. What with the peanut scare (which was/is all-too-true), and various other recalls, it just makes it a good idea to really watch what you put on your products, as for labeling and making darned sure that you're not making any claims that can be construed by the FDA as a medical claim.
Take real care when you're putting labels on your products and make sure that nothing you put on there can be mistaken for anything other than what you intend, and familiarize yourself with the difference. You could not only lose your business, small though it may be - you could be fined a lot of money, like the company above.
If you have a website, even if it's a free one, make sure that you don't cross that line when describing your products. Finally, when you name a product, at least do a few online searches to make sure that there already isn't a product out there with the same name. Why? Because it's probably got it's own trademark on it and you really don't want to be found in violation of that. It's the same with your website - check and re-check and make sure your web-name is unique. Same reason.
If, for instance, you claim that one of your products can help a specific illness, you are making a medical claim and are in violation of the FDA's current ruling on cosmetics-versus-drugs.
Kayla has a good write-up on her site which explains the difference between which is which, and if you go to the FDA site itself, under Cosmetics, you'll find the correct labeling instructions as well as their definitions.
Kayla's write-up, in .pdf format:
http://www.essentialwholesale.com/v/pdf/cosmeticsvsdrugs.pdf
As Kelly says, be careful what you put on your labeling; as well as how you label. Be careful of intended use of products and how you present your advertising. It could mean the difference between you having a business or not. It could also mean the difference between a huge fine or not and nobody wants to be put in that position, nor can most afford to be.
Finally and this is directly quoted from Kelly via email to me:
"I would just add a little more stressing that although many of us come into the business because we developed a product that helped a family members skin condition, we absolutely can not sell a product making such "drug" claims. That drug claims (healing, alleviating, remedying, relieving, anything that changes the structure or function of the skin or even prevents a problem from happening is considered a "drug'.) are seriously more what will get someone shut down than mislabeling what the ingredients are in their cosmetics. An example is vitamin E. Many folks actually put "Vitamin E" in the ingredient list.
The FDA says vitimins are 'heal promoting' and when you put them in the ingredient list as "vitamin e" they become the 'active ingredient', making the product a "drug". If you list the vitamin E as "tocopheryl acetate" or even "tocopheryl acetate (vitamin e)", than you are defining that the primary use of the vitamin e is COSMETIC, not DRUG. This prevents misbranding and also having your item categorized as a drug, two separate issues."
Even if you sell locally, for the most part, you may still get yourself in trouble.
Finally, another link for you to take a look at, from when this first started, in 2008, from the Handcrafted Soapmakers Guild:
http://www.soapguild.org/FDA2008.php
Thanks to Kelly, from Southern Soapers, for the info and for getting the word out. Feel free to share this info -- the more who are informed, the better off everyone will be.
Above all, be careful; be safe. Stay in business.
mn - 2009


Comments: 21
M~
I do not see any reason to not require detailed and correct product labeling.
Right now I am really upset because ingredients from foriegn countries can be added to food products and it does not have to say that the "modified food starch" is from China, as long as the product is made in the U.S.A.
See, some of us want to know what we are buying for our food and personal care products.
Just call me a liberal elitist pinko commie scum, but at least I'm not PETA or VEGAN. . .
I happen to totally agree with you, being one of the many who have too many allergies to count. What I did not and still wouldn't agree with in the FDA Globalization Act, was the huge amount of money that they expected every small business (including many that operated out of their homes) to pay to them, just to be able to stay in business. All that would accomplish, would to put many out of business, in a heartbeat.
And modified food starch, no matter where it's made, is usually genetically engineered, which can't be good. National starch has some that they carry the patent on, and one thing you could do is shoot them an email and ask them. I did that with ALL brands of milk when they weren't marking them as having no artificial growth hormones in them, or that they were and got responses back from all but one, which I don't buy to this day.
The rest have started awhile back, labeling their milk to say, no growth hormones at all. Me? I drink soymilk - organic, made in the USA. I'm allergic to milk, but my husband likes it.
Marilyn
And tell them.
I do intend to go look at the site and see if the Bill number is given. it will start with H.R. if was introduced in the house it will start with an S if it was introduced by a Senator.
It is very easy now to email our elected representatives.
Be brief, stick to the point. State your reasons for wanting or not wanting the legislation.
We now must all tell them that small business need a more reasonable way to comply.
This has devastated small organic growers.
It has become so expensive to be certified many now simply post a sign at the farmer's markets stating,
no pesticides used, sustainable agriculture, locally grown.
I won't be too much effected by this....
as I sell nothing that is edible...
but I do have to worry about where some of the stuff I sell is manufactured....with all of the poison paints used in China in the past I have really had to stop selling certain items.....just because of my ethics........
It's something that we should all be at least aware of, and getting the word out is important. Feel free to pass along, as though it might not affect you, it might affect someone you know.
Marilyn
I am allergic to so many foods. My honey bought me a TV dinner thinking I could eat it.
Sirlion tips and gravy. That is meat and gravy right. I started shutting down after the first bite. So I pulled the package from the garbage. Got a magnifying glass and looked at the fine print. It had pure corn protein and I am highly allergic to corn.