The Guardian -- The number of secular Americans is rising faster than any other religious group. But faith will continue to influence politics
In recent years, non-religious Americans have won a modicum of public acknowledgment. Not long ago, politicians insulted them with impunity or at best simply overlooked them. But the heightened public religious fervour of the Bush years led the country's infidels to organise as never before, turning atheist authors like Sam Harris into celebrities and opening lobbying offices in Washington, DC, just like religious interest groups do.
Politicians have responded. In his inaugural address, Barack Obama - doubtlessly realising that secularists constitute a big part of his base - described America as a "nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus ... and non-believers." Even Mitt Romney came to express second thoughts about leaving atheists and agnostics out of his high-profile campaign speech on faith. The United States is not Europe - it will likely be a long time before we have a publicly agnostic president - but it is becoming more tolerant of the godless.
It has to be: no religious group in the United States is growing as fast as those who profess no religion at all. The latest American Religious Identification Survey, which Trinity College published last week, shows that the number of non-religious Americans has nearly doubled since 1990, while the number of people who specifically self-identity as atheists or agnostics has more than tripled. An astonishing 30% of married Americans weren't wed in religious ceremonies, and 27% don't expect to have religious funerals. This suggests whole swaths of the culture are becoming secular, since one can assume that non-believers in religious families often acquiesce to traditional marriage rites and expect to be prayed over when they're dead.
The irony, though, is that even as the country becomes more secular, American politics are likely to remain shot through with aggressive piety. What we're seeing is not a northern European-style mellowing, but an increasing polarisation. In his recent book Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment, the sociologist Phil Zuckerman described the secularised countries of Scandinavia as places where religion is regarded with "benign indifference". There's consensus instead of culture war. That's not what's happening in the United States. Instead, the centre is falling out.
According to the American Religious Identification Survey, Christianity is losing ground in the United States, but evangelical Christianity is not. Just over a third of Americans are still born-again. Meanwhile, the mainline churches, beacons of progressive, rationalistic faith - the kind that could potentially act as a bridge between religious and non-religious Americans - are shrinking. "These trends ... suggest a movement towards more conservative beliefs and particularly to a more 'evangelical' outlook among Christians," write the report's authors.
In some ways, there's a symbiotic relationship between evangelicals and secularists. The religious right emerged in response to a widespread sense of cultural grievance stemming from the social upheavals of the 1960s and 1970s. Today's newly organised atheists and agnostics were mobilised by the theocratic bombast of Bush-era Republicans. More than ever, one's religion is tied up with one's political choices rather than family history.
That means faith won't fade into the background. If European secularism is defined by disinterest in organised religion, American secularism is largely defined by opposition to it. Thus non-believers in the United States are increasingly becoming an organised interest group, demanding their share of civic respect. The more they want to escape organised religion, the less they can ignore it.


Comments: 28
It has been said that 70% of church attending teenagers will leave their faith within one year of leaving the home. This is staggering. They have been taught in school that "Science" proves the Bible as wrong.
When we say there is no God we have no basis for just laws. With out the foundation of a creator God, anything goes.
For a person who is vacillating, or for people who are feeling skeptical about joining Christianity, the name calling and slandering which Evangelicals and Fundamentalists too often engage in causes many people to turn away and embrace the secular stance.
Seeing the Love and community between Christian congregants is an appealing draw, but witnessing the vitriol, insularity, condemnation and exclusionary attitudes can be a huge turn-off.
Evangelical and Fundamental Christians just too often push folks right off the fence.
You are free to practice your religion anywhere you wish, but not at the expense of other people's religions. We can have all the public prayer you wish as long as I get to pick the prayer. See the problem? You cannot pray your particular religious prayer at school over and above the prayers of others or no prayer at all, for those who don't believe. You cannot force the teaching of creationism in a science class because you may believe it, over and above an accepted science with empirical evidence. You cannot force your religions view of marriage on the citizens of the US at the expense of the rights of others. You cannot force my children to pray a prayer, say a pledge, be subjected to the falsehood of a 6,000 year old earth occupied by men and dinosaurs simultaneously, restrict their contraceptive use or control their reproductive rights because of your religious bent. I am a devout Christian, but I support the strictest interpretation of separation of Church and State to protect my religious beliefs from people that would insist on subjecting me to their beliefs. Here is what Tom said. Please read and try to understand that it is in your interest and protection that he wrote it.
"Because religious belief, or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life, freedom of religion affects every individual. Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the,"wall of separation of church and state," therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society."
~Thomas Jefferson: Author of the Declaration of Independence; Third president of the United States of America; Co-Framer of the United States Constitution..........
FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE FAITH
The government should never exercise control over any religious tradition, except in the prevention of harm to citizens outside of that tradition. Likewise, no religion should hold sway over the government that preserves the rights of all the people it serves. Regardless of how it is spent, government monies distributed to any religious organization cannot be prevented from promoting that religion or their proselytizing to the people it aids. A religions order cannot help being influenced by a government that finances them or their endeavors. Even the practice of tax exemptions for religious organizations should be scrutinized. Tax exemptions are always just another form of welfare.
For the protection of the faith shared by an abundance of US citizens, James Madison, Father of Our Constitution, Author of the Bill of Rights, wrote, "Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other sects? " ~Memorial and Remonstrance~
I don't doubt for a minute that you have seen or personally experienced name calling or even slandering by Christians. However, that being said your post makes a false generalisation of Evangelical and Fundamental Christians that borders on slander.
As for generalizations, I was as specific as an honest sharing of my experiences could be.
I'm quite confident that in the court of the Lord, I would not be considered as anywhere near the borders of slander; but rather well within the confines of a true witness.
Lee people that leave their religious beliefs in hard times never had any real beliefs. The Christian faith does not say life on earth will be all roses.
Science does not make any attempt to discredit religious beliefs in any way by studying how things work and advancing the human race to a better way of life.
Would you have a car today without science? Would you be living in the comfort of domestic heating or would you be out scrounging for a stick of wood or coal to put in your stove?
You can't decide how god wanted to create the world just to fill your own personal needs. Their are physical laws that make the universe as well as the earth work and without them their is nothing. Science allows us to advance and live a better life and does not try to disprove that their is a god.
Are the Amish people religious? What right did some person that started the Amish movement decide that their future generations had to stop advancing into society and to ride on the back of a horse was good but not to use a car or other means of transportation for their needs? The Amish people sell their goods nationwide but do they deliver them with a horse and buggy? No they use modern transportation to move their goods and all the while they proclaim in public that cars are no good.
Many people turn themselves into religious hypocrites to advance their causes. The radical Islamics like bin Laden and others. Limbaugh and his hypocritical slamming everything people believe in so he can make millions off uneducated people with his slime and drug dealing. Being a Christian does not mean anything special it just means you believe in a certain way of life and if you do believe you live that faith to the best of your ability.
Nobody in this world is perfect and the hypocrites need to stop trying to convince the rest of the world they are perfect and all knowing.
Your right to worship or not is your choice alone and protected by the constitution that defines the American government.
As I stated above their is only one Christian faith defined by the Christian writings and all the branches are just a personal opinion of the people that started these branches.
Personally I do not believe god has set America on a course of destroying his creation and if he wants to he is well capable of doing it on his own, I think its caused by corporate cons and political propaganda and lust to own the wealth that was given to another race of people.
What is an Evangelical and/or Fundamental Christian?
What do most people who consider themselves evangelical/fundamental Christians believe?
I think it is important to define the terms before a meaningful discussion can take place.
What are the fundamentals of the Christian faith?
It seems you are being critical of Evangelicals and Fundamental Christians without attempting to understand their perspective.
Well, for what it's worth, my various personal experiences, studies and involvements with Christian Evangelicals and Christian Fundamentalists have led me to understand the following:
1) Evangelicals generally feel called, directed or required to vociferously, passionately and convictingly spread their understanding of Christianity, in order to achieve the goal of converting (saving) any and all people who are other-than-Christian;
2) Fundamentalists generally feel required to inflexibly adhere, defend and promote one specific doctrinal interpretation of Christianity, as being the only one correct, proper and true authority for accurate Christian religious practice.
My experience has been that the majority of the people in these groups are good, hard working, kind-hearted folk, who would rather have more peace and less contention in their lives, the lives around them, and the world as a whole.
The best of both of these groups are friendly, understanding, accepting, embracing and engaging with people that believe, worship or practice differently; while the worst of these groups are coldly and condescendingly aggressive, abusive and/or apathetic towards other-than-Christian and other-than-right-type-of-Christian people.
Be advised: I am no expert.
It is, of course, the worst of these groups that are a turn-off.
Thankfully, they are but a few.
Sadly, they get a lot of attention.
I don't completely agree with your first two views about Evangelicals and Fundamentalists. However, I do agree that the few who consider themselves Evangelicals and Fundamental Christians that have condescending attitudes are a turn-off. These few are so often the ones that get the attention in the media. People begin to think all Evangelical / Fundamental Christians want a theocratic govenment. This couldn't be further from the truth.
And I assume you believe that as an athiest you are neutral on issues of morality and interpeting scientific evidence.
Secularism or should I say Naturalism is a religion all of its own.
When I was 2 I was diagnosed as having Temperal Lobe Epilipsy. This is a rather rare form of epilepsy. It can cause seizures, but not always, or on a regular basis. It also causes migraines. Now, in my case, it would cause migraines and vomiting on a fairly regular basis. Only when I was REALLY lucky did I have a seizure.
Until the age of 15 I lived in a tiny "town" full of "christians" next to an Ammish/Mennonite village. My parents are both atheists and I wasn't brought up with any particular religion.
When I was in 4th grade I had a seizure in the middle of music class. Now, no one knew what this was, not the teacher and CERTAINLY not the students. After which I had a migraine and vertigo and vomiting. My music teacher picked me up off of the floor and ran me to the nurse's office. My mother was found and came to get me.
When I returned a couple of days later I was informed that I was possed by Satan. The kids had gone home and told their parents what had happened and their parents decided that I was possesed, like Linda Blair. From there, I wasn't just possesed, I worshipped this guy.
Now, if you try to explain that you don't believe in Satan, and therefore can't worship him, to a "christian" you get all kinds of responses.
"You have the power of Satan around you" "You don't have to believe in him to worship him, he controls you" "One day, you'll find out you're the antichrist" "You should be burned at the stake" and other such nonsense. Now, that is my experience with "christians".
Now, my experience with Christians, or those that I would consider "Christ-like" are:
The ones that helped me feed my son when I was a poor single mom and didn't care what my personal beliefs were.
Who gave me clothing so that I could get a job, or go on an interview.
They're the ones who only wish me well. They don't try to tell me that because I seek a Goddess and a God and believe in there is more than one way to Heaven, that I 'm going to Hell.
She is my "sister" and is willing to discuss religious ideals with me without judging me. The "sister" who held my hand while I was screaming, and my leg while I was pushing and my son just seconds after he was born.
The people who love me, though we do not believe the same and still think they're going to see me in Heaven. Not because we believe the same things, but because they believe their God has the ability to "forgive" even after death.
These are the "christians" and the Christians that I know.
First, you don't have to be religious to have morals. My father is one of the most moral men I know, and he's the atheist you're talking too. When it comes to interpreting sscientific evidence, I'd trust him before most anyone else. He's also a scientist, an environmental engineer with a masters in Biology.
Secularism or should I say Naturalism is a religion all of its own. -Lee
You're right, Naturalism is a religion all it's own, it's usually known as Wicca. Those that follow it usually refer to themselves as Witches.
So I am trying to figure out what Evangelical and Fundamental Christian means to you. I don't think the Ammish consider themsleves Evangelical but maybe Fundamentalist. Mennonites might consider themselves both. So do you think all Ammish and Mennonites are religious nuts who blame Satan for most everything that goes wrong? Are all Evangelical / Fundamental Christians nuts who believe bad things happen to people because those people are Satan worshipers?
What does it mean to evangalize? What are the fundamentals of Christianity?
Athiest are not neutral on the subject of morals and science just because they claim they are not religious.
Their is no part of the Christian faith that says religious sects should become stagnant and stop progressing at any certain part of history.