In talking to legislators several weeks ago, President Obama noted that the minority party needed to be constructive and not just “blow things up.” A week before, Republicans dragged their feet and pretended to obstruct the economic stimulus bill, interested mainly in preserving their cushy Washington jobs. They can now report to their constituents that they held the party line, and that the bill was passed “over and above their objections.” However, they forced the plan to rely too heavily on tax cuts and not focus enough on the only kind of job-creation that government does at all well—projects that actually create jobs, like infrastructure improvement.
During recessions and depressions, people hold on to their money and use it to reduce debt instead of spending freely, expanding business or investing. This is exactly what is going on now. As a result, tax cuts do not create many jobs in such times. Taxes have fallen over the past eight years, and few are creating jobs now, not because they lack money, but because they lack confidence. More of what did not work will not work.
Now, thanks to the blind followers of a bad theory, whose claim to fame is the ability to parrot the same old trickle-down voodoo economics lines of their predecessors (for whom tax cuts also failed), the stimulus plan may not work as well as it might have. A number of Southern governors who want to refuse federal funding have joined the chorus. These governors complain that accepting federal stimulus funds will force them to help more unemployed people than they help now. They talk as if helping people were some kind of sin. Their unemployed constituents who need the help they want to refuse do not see them as “keeping the faith.” They see them as refusing to help their own citizens when they need it most. Ideology does not pay the bills.

While Republican representatives and governors are aiming to keep their jobs, and maybe return one of their own to the White House, they need to be aware of the dangers of undercutting the president. An overwhelming majority of adult voters thought Barack Obama was the man for the job. Those who disagree with his fitness for office are welcome to try to remove him from office. However, he remains the leader of the United States, and the majority of voting adults agreed with his agenda during the campaign.
If Republicans obstruct him from carrying out his campaign promises then call him a failure, they act in bad faith. More importantly, they risk the ire of voters when the recession deepens into a depression. To put it simply: one does not hobble a horse and then blame it for failing to run.
The president answers claims by conservatives that the budget will cause problems later by citing job creation, programs to help small businesses, and decreased spending on a costly war. Critics either cannot or will not be satisfied, and continue to pout that there are no give-aways for the idle rich class.
The Office of Management and Budget has released a plan that calls for the United States government to take care of the people who support it financially. This is part and parcel of the mandate voters gave Barack Obama in the November election. While Republicans may think that chanting the party line will help them stay in office, they should beware of looking like they are shirking their duty. The president has called on all Americans to end years of self-indulgence and work to recreate the American economic machine. Regardless of Republicans’ disagreement with the president, the country itself is facing problems that their tax-the-poor-and-help-the-rich ideology created. If things get markedly worse, and they will without some solid cooperation in congress, voters are likely to remember them as saboteurs.


Comments: 64 ( 1 removed by Ann Weaver Hart )
Rush, whether he knew it or not, was actually speaking for the Republican Party when he said that he hoped Obama would fail. And he wasn't talking about socialism because Bush was quite socialist. He was talking about the Democratic Party's efforts to improve the economy.
It's the nature of our money that tempts people into doing these things. There's no point in blaming the individuals because whoever was in those offices would do about the same things.
I dislike political parties and terms such as "bi-partisan" and "reaching across the aisle."
Representatives are obligated to represent their constituents, not their parties. Political parties are no better than street gangs. It forces people to choose sides when neither side has all the right answers. Political parties are about power when they should be working for the people. That is what we pay them the big bucks for.
Not only are the Republicans bonkers over a huge loss... but a huge loss in light of prejudices that work in their favor ... another element in the proof of all proofs .... that the GOP is truly the party of hypocrisy, failure, false images and corruption .
Never has the USA been so properly and continuously characterized as the world's laughing stock .. bad guy .. and economic weakling .... as in the past eight years .
For the second time in one lifetime ... the USA's Republican Party and its trickle down tricksters have brought the American economy and the world financial systems to their knees ...... after seven consecutive years of their special brand of false prosperity ... prosperity for the few ........the chosen..........the corrupt .
No Democrat does more to advance the Democratic Party than does the typical Republican.
He mocked McCain, and now he is trying to adopt McCain's ideas! Go figure...
Featured in the Triple Name Club.
Now if you can explain all that political corruption some way other than the effects of money please tell me what that explanation is.
When Republicans are in power, the Democrats aren't much better.
I'm getting a little tired of grownup games. The financial industry kept score with dollars and practically sank us.
The politicians keep score with votes and, I believe, can be accused of being just as greedy. It will be nice if Obama represents a change in the wind but it won't be until most of the congressmen have been replaced that we'll see the real change.
Yuh think?
At the end of the year, the less taxes taken out, the less you get back in refunds.
How's that good for the economy?
It's not.
I've been saying the same thing as you. I'm sick and tired of hearing people criticize yet offer no alternative solutions. The truth is that all their solutions are just a big circle that repeats itself over and over, feeding on itself again and again... we can escape that cycle with Benefitism.
Obama should shut them down, I took my money out of AIG, they never sent me a statement in an entire year! but when I had the financial advisor to check on it they said they sent them and they were returned! I have lived n this house since 1981 and funny, but when I changed my annuity the letter of 'regret' got through! Liars, all of them.
if the Southern states don't want the money others can use it, when their roads and bridges need repairing they'll wish they had taken it!
May The LORD of lords, The King of kings, The Creator of Heaven and Earth Bless you and your family & there Family in a Mighty Way, In the name of JESUS CHRIST.
Ann, Liberals disenfranchised for 8 years, AHH- jet plane Pelosi- and we lost the war Reid, took control of congress in 2002. All you selfish Americans who are using your own money to pay down your debts Liberal Ann says, stop that- go out and spend more. This is the liberal socialist mind set- Be Happy Don't Worry- the Wizard of OZ-BAMA, is here to rescue you.
Ann, once again stop the liberal winning-blaming republicans- OZ-Bama has all the votes he needs in his own party-to pass any bill. Ann, conservative democrats are his problem they are the one's who are refusing to go along with OZ-Bama and his trip down the socialist trillion of dollars Yellow Brick Road trip to Utopia.
So they can't change their own laws back again in two years? What kind of stupid excuse is that? They just don't want their poor people to get any money. Those governors don't get contributions from the poor folks so they can stomp all over them and not care.
How does the minority in Congress control Congress? The Republicans had control of Congress until 2007 and had the power of the filibuster to stop legislation in the Senate even then. Nothing could get through Congress without Republican approval and the Republican President's signing the bill.
If you really think that liberals were in control of our government the last 6 years you need to go back to school and find out how our government works.
To put it simply: one does not hobble a horse and then blame it for failing to run. I have met way too many people who love hobbling the horse and then blaming the horse for it. It is a sure sign of evil.
Yes, you are picking on anyone who disagrees with you, not just the Democrats. Now stop picking on us and prove you can do something constructive.
Don't worry, Mary, I am still miffed at Pelosi for not bringing impeachment to Bush in 2006.
Bob, helping someone a sin- we are selfish people for fighting to stop this idiocy of wealth redistribution.
Bob, how much have the American peoples money has been given to the poor since 1965, great society, food stamps, housing rents, public school failed education,medicaid- War on Poverty and other welfare entitlement programs have spent-wasted- TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS of Dollars taken from the "Selfish" American people- to help the POOR! RESULT A TOTAL COMPLETE CATASTROPHY!!
BOB, IT WAS NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO HOBBLED THE HORSE- IT WAS THE LIBERAL GOVERNMENT WHO NOT ONLY HOBBLED THE ECONOMIC HORSE THEY KILLED IT. So far the American people have given trillions to help the poor- You owe them an apology
Hahahahaha! micky d's having another fit - quick, call 911. Imagine giving their own tax money back to people in dire need during an economic crises. Imagine giving it to the poor instead of to the rich, who are swimming in million dollar bonuses and Swiss bank accounts! Savages..that's what they are! Savages! (Oops - should have written that in ALL CAPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
People like you never admit the obvious- trillions have been given to end poverty and poverty is worse now- Why is that, Sheryl??. Take a trip into some inner-city, Sheryl, and see what the liberal welfare state of government dependency has wrought. As I said before a Complete Total Disaster!! Which stripped people of their self respect drove fathers out of the home, kids going into gangs for leadership and respect, drug use and dealing- and winding up in prison. This spread the wealth mentality tried for over 50 years now must stop. There are better ways to help poor people than just sending a cold hearted welfare check. Doing the same failed liberal welfare policies over and over again and expecting a different outcome is the definition of INSANITY!
Who would have thought that the folks who acted like selfish tyrannical winners would also turn out to act like sore and bitter losers. Republican leaders can't see outside their competitive constructs. The idea of working together with anyone who opposes any of their ideas is beyond them.
Great Article, Ann !!
No, micky. The primary catalyst for all that you have described came about during the advancement of the yoke from our capitalist society.
Let us remember that some forty to fifty years ago a family could be well raised on the income of one wage earner, working a mere 40 to 60 hours per week in a manufacturing, industrial or office job. Today, raising a family well, requires BOTH parents to be employed, often at more than 40 to 60 hours per week each. Since both parents are now required to be absent from the home, in order to earn enough money to keep roofs over heads and bellies filled with food, the blessed nuclear family crumbled.
Capitalists exploited our Puritan work ethic so as to trap the working classes under debt while making business world leaders richer.
Kids turning to gangs for leadership and respect, using and selling drugs, and getting involved in crimes that end them up in prison has risen because parents are unable to be in the home, and thus engaged enough with their children, because they are too busy trying to earn enough money to be a mere decent provider.
For those who can't afford college and do not have some shining skill that will earn them celebrity, they too often turn to drugs, gangs and criminal behavior in order to gather bling, limos and laudable cred with their peeps.
With not much of a majority at all, and a Bush veto, I don't see where they had any power at all.
They do now.
Sheryl, it is types like you who have to come back to reality, helping people the way liberals have been doing it for 50 years is again, A Complete total disaster, failure and the waste of working Americans paychecks
This growing cycle of government dependency, simply has to stop. People need to be re-orientated and re-educated. Too many people are waiting for the government to solve their problems instead of taking the initiative themselves.
So the way to break the government failed dependency programs is not to keep repeating them, but by trying another way.
Sheryl, when liberals hurl foul epithets at you, it is because I have struck a nerve. I have pointed out the obvious errors of their ways, and liberals are often truth be told extremely close- minded and intolerant. Sheryl, there is a better way to help people- the liberal way has failed-50 years!!!. You need to become open-minded and tolerant of other solutions.
And the Dems are the ones that put the re-training dollars into the stimulus act.
"Sheryl, when liberals hurl foul epithets at you, it is because I have struck a nerve. "
Yes, Mickey D., you are on my last nerve. I'm cannot tell you how absolutely sick and tired I am of you and people like you re-making history, blaming the poor for being poor, kissing the asses of the rich, and heralding all capitalism like it was handed down from on high and ordained onto us. I'm an entrepeneur. Got that? I started a small business - investment management - with my husband and a partner. And I am telling you I know exactly what happened to get us into this mess, and most of it happened because the regs that were in place were ignored during the Bush years. The power brokers on Wall Street could do anything they damn well please, including screwing the global economy, and all they had to do was give lots of campaign money to DC and take reps out on their yachts and send them on golf excursions.
It's sick. I'm FOR capitalism, but the good, healthy, honest kind. So, don't give me any more of your crap, because I can tell you a lot more about the economy and who got us into this mess and how than you could ever dream. I'm AM sick and tired of people like you, spouting your 'liberal this' and 'liberal that'. Grow up and come down off your GOP cloud of hatred and propaganda. We are in deep trouble here in the US. Start acting like an adult and dealing with reality.
I assure you. If your ass was thrown out of a job because of this and you lost all your savings, you would be insane not to expect some compensation for all the years you worked to make a company grow, and put a little away for your family and your kids' education. No one is asking for a free ride. They're just asking for simple justice - a little decency for all the hard work and faith they put into the system.
My thought on typos is that I hope people will read what I meant and not what I type. And, I will return the favor!
We have more important issues than what keys we inadvertently press.
Actually, I really believe that our present conundrum can't be solved ideologically, but only pragmatically.
I feel the same way. Usually, I would want the government to stay out of things and let capitalism run it's course, but see seem to have replaced capitalism with crapitalsim, and I find I find that the socialists are more honest than the crapitalists.
We can get out of this mess without trashing either party, but by encouraging our representatives to stop taking lobby money and treat the citizenry with respect and act as though they want to find non-ideological solutions. We will be lucky to survive this as a country and society, even if they place their partisan ideas to the side.
I find that hard to call pragmatism, it sounds more like my ideology. Yeah, screw the partisan ideologies and do what is right.
health care insurers made big profits by treating only illness (when they had to) without paying attention to public wellness
While I don't want anyone shoving it down my throat about what I should do to stay healthy, the insurance companies should help those who volunteer for health maintenance. One area they are deficient in is psychological well being, which has a lot to so with physical well being.
Hoover financed the Bolsheviks = 1922 (thereby creating Cold War)
Prescott Bush financed Hitler = 1938 (thereby creating WW II)
Eisenhower = sat by and allowed Castro to assume power (furthering Cold War) + started Vietnam War
Reagan = called himself a Contra and financed war in Central America
Bush I = started war in Kuwait
Bush II = started war on Iraq
Republicans = war, terrorism, corporate welfare/warfare state
So then, we can assume that the best policy for prosperity is to tax as much as possible? How about 100%? Is the key to prosperity for one part of society to labor, and the other part of society expropriate the fruits of that labor, and redistribute according to their will and discretion, instead of according to those who worked to produce it?
Maybe we can find some other word for this arrangement, apart from "slavery," that would make the idea more palatable to the enslaved.
Why not? When income taxation first began in the U.S., it was 1%! Now the state parasite feeds off of nearly half of what we produce! apparently, if we concede the legitimacy of 1% slavery, then we concede the legitimacy of 50%. So why not 100%?
Surely, the superior species who inhabit Washington DC (and various state capitols throughout the land) -- homo politicus and homo bureaucratus -- why they are much more enlightened than us mere human beings; ever-so-wise and surely just as benevolent. Certainly they are much more qualified to spend our money than we are; this is clearly demonstrated by the fact that our prospects for prosperity are directly linked to how much of the money we earn is expropriated and redistributed by them.
Thank God for homo politicus. Who knows where our economy would be today, if everyone had been permitted to spend their own money on the things they felt they most urgently needed.