According to the New York Times, a recent study by the National Endowment for the Arts showed that "the proportion of overall literary reading increased among virtually all age groups, ethnic and demographic categories since 2002."
In an official response to the NEA report, book-blogger and avid reader Chris Steib said: HOORAY!
NEA chairman, Dana Gioia, cites a renewed "buzz around literature" as the reason for the spike in reading, thanks to national book clubs (Oprah), reading initiatives (NEA's The Big Read), blockbuster bestsellers (Mr. Potter, et al), and the efforts of devoted individuals (aw, shucks!).
Perhaps this Grapes of Wrath-like economy has driven us back indoors where all those dusty, unread books are begging for our attention -- or perhaps we've just found nothing interesting to watch on our 3,000 DTV channels. In any case, this is the first good news the publishing industry has heard in a while, as overall book sales slumped drastically in the fall (reported here last month).
So whatever the cause, let's hope the result is that percentage of readers keeps moving in the positive direction, and even after we claw our way out of this recession, literature finds itself at the heart of our culture once again.
Now what are you waiting for? Power down and pick up a book!
GATHERERS WEIGHT IN: Has this Steinbeckian economy increased your reading time? (And, secondarily, do you agree that Steinbeckian is a word?)


Comments: 11
Perhaps we owe a great debt of thanks to Oprah. She took this problem seriously a decade ago, and actually got to work on it. I may not like ALL the books she pushed, but she tried when others did not.
And, frankly, it doesn't matter to me. As long as that percentage of adults who read literature keeps going up.
Lately for some reason, I'm getting all kinds of literature from Nag's Head and the Outer Banks pretty pictures, also, I'm going to be getting a few new magazines, that were offered to me free, I will read most anything, but like "thriller's".
Southern Life is one that I'll be getting soon, I think.
And no, Steinbeckian is not a word- at least not according to Merriam-Webster. :)