This was originally published in March, 2007 during one of my periodic snits at the mismanagement of what started as a "site for writers". It might easily have been written today. "The more things change...."
Of necessity, writing is a lonely profession, unless you’re collaborating with someone else, in which case it’s both lonely and irritating. Since I opt to work alone, I avoid that particular hazard, but I often have a desire to “talk shop” with others who do this odd thing for a living. Pre-computer, I accomplished this by joining writer's groups, workshops and retreats, as well as keeping in close contact with the agents, publishers and editors who contributed to my livelihood.
Then along came the WWW and my formerly insular universe was suddenly overrun with self-styled writers who wallowed in their newfound ability to see their words (misspelled and banal though they might be) flying through cyberspace, for all the world to see and discuss. I wasted a lot of time early on, seeking message boards, groups and sites with whom I felt a commonality of skill and purpose. Next, the word “blog” entered my consciousness and I jumped on the concept with a vengeance. I added my work to several blogsites, developed a presence and a following and was moderately satisfied until I realized I had lost the adjective in my job title. I was still a writer, but since nobody was paying me for my work, I could no longer call myself “professional”.
I wrestled with this conundrum until one day, in mid-headlock, along came Gather. I was apprised that this was a site for professional writers who would receive compensation for their contributions. Such compensation, I was led to believe, was dependent upon both the quality of work and its reception by the intelligent, discerning membership who would read, rate and comment on it.
“Fabulous!” I told myself (writers not only work alone..they also converse with themselves). “I will become part of this creative community. I will write. I will read. I will enjoy the company of my colleagues. I will surround myself with clever, articulate people to stimulate and be stimulated in return. I will be their Parker; they will be my Benchley; together we will frolic amid our witty badinage, trading quips as we share our divergent views of the world. This Gather must, indeed, be a writer’s paradise!”
And it was, until I became aware of the facts. First, I discovered that the promised “compensation” actually had nothing to do with quality. Rather, it was based on some secret, impenetrable formula that dealt entirely in quantity, or the accrual of “gatherpoints”. As soon as this became apparent to the world at large, Gather morphed from “a site for writers” to a site for the greedy, the venal, the untalented, the unoriginal and the uncreative.
What had been a goldmine of intelligent discourse, clever repartee, and excellent prose became, almost overnight, a garbage dump for the no-talent, simple-minded, semi-literate, shameless carrion-eaters who now flock to the site for the sole purpose of robbery by fraud. They fill the pages with misspelled, ungrammatical non-content, gleefully flaunting their success in amassing money and points from a complacent management. Gather has become a giant piñata and all the kids in the “special” class are beating it to shreds, grabbing all the goodies they can before it collapses around all our heads.
In view of this state of affairs, a handful of us took a few days off to observe what, if any, difference the absence of actual writing would make. For an answer I looked at the “most discussed” list during the boycott period. Would you be surprised to learn that it had NOT ONE SINGLE ARTICLE that contained anything remotely resembling “creative writing”?
No, I was not surprised, either. After all, I know where most of the real writers went. The question is: will I let the slack-jawed weasels chase me off for good? My answer: not just yet. There are still a few laughs to be had, a few people of wit and intellect to whom I can relate and, mostly, a few more “payments” outstanding. Until I feel too suffocated by the stench of offal, I’ll stay and play. It's up to you how long my tenure will be.


Comments: 38
I sooooooooooooo miss Gather the way it used to be.
Is the old version of this still here? Maybe I should go and look what I said back then...
It had been a long time and I had lost my confidence. It's back and I'm still having fun.
I've come to appreciate the mix: a shooting gallery requires a row of ducks.
Anyone want to name a word that starts with a letter?
Good Morning. Good Afternoon. Good Evening. Nighty Night.
Yep, it started with those and went downhill from there.
Kumquat (for you).
I'm so stubborn that I'll cut off my nose to spite my face. Until Gather removes the rating system or their statement (with 10 being some of the best you've seen), I will be an obnoxious ass and use the rating as I believe they are meant to be used. And I will continue to be an obnoxious ass and remind people how they are supposed to be used. Consequently, I have some of the lowest ratings on the site while games have the highest. I don't really care, since I am honest with myself about my own work, and I know there is little chance any writer, editor, publisher, or person looking for any of those is scanning Gather's highest rated page for good work.
In my disillusionment, I find that my interest in Gather waxes and wanes like the tides or the phases of the moon. I know I should look for somewhere else to post my scribblings, but I haven't found the ambition to do that...yet. The reason is...I really LIKE the friends I have made here.
If you all leave, please tell me where you are going so I can tag along.
I joined Gather only recently by following the lead of a good friend of mine who’s a journalist.
I have absolutely no illusions regarding my writing , I do it simply to satisfy myself (without going blind ) and flex my neuron connections . I don’t care about ratings and I only take seriously comments denoting a good command of the English language . Points ? Sure , they can be addictive and I like them. I have seen the brightest and the sharpest fall prey and morph for a brief moment into some consumer poster child .
Bottom line for me ( as if anyone cares) is that I want to express my thoughts (without giving way to the voices in my head ) learn from the ones I admire and eventually promote and support intellectual excellence in any way shape or form I can .
That was the reason I wrote THIS article. I have been sickened during the last eight years by the denigration of intellect, the sneers of the ignorant at what they consider "elite" (anyone with a command of the language, apparently), and their exaltation of the below-average mentality. It was a sad day when this site decided to reflect the national obsession with Stupid, rather than stick to its original mission.
Very affecting, isn't it. :) The Semolina School (Joy's coinage) is particularly al dente.
I do have to laugh about your Dorothy Parker observations and aspirations because I have seen a few postings that reminded me of, if I could phrase it, Old World Gather. I read an article by you recently about snarky clever comments that made me laugh (I knew I was outdone after I read Janna’s comment) and I kept thinking about how some members of Gather are not so much Algonquin Roundtable as much as they are corner booth at Denny’s.
Is that a girl thing?
I've been hoping for this sort of 'G' educational recollection. I appreciate this article (and your snark!). I'm looking forward to following the links you've provided. Also enjoyed the evolution of a very interesting conversation here.
Still Learning How to Swim/ Ade
(and the inability to
Dame
Ok forgive all my typos and random punctuations.
I am going to beg since I am severely dyslexic. Yes, I can proof read, but this is not the office and not class. To proof read, I have to actually put my finger or a pencil on each word to see if I have the letters in the right place. I do not pretend to be a writer.
Apology aside.
I do enjoy your posts.
Obviously, I have moved on. I publish on several other sites and have cyberfriends in many places. I come back here to converse with a few people I feel close to, comment on their work and occasionally publish a piece I think they might enjoy. I have long since understood that the dream is gone, but I can't help mourning it now and then.
So here's a little intellectual challenge for y'all*:
How would YOU set up "... a site for professional writers who would receive compensation for their contributions ... dependent upon both the quality of work and its reception by the intelligent, discerning membership who would read, rate and comment on it." that would allow the various things most writers admire and demand such as artistic freedom in form and content?
Moderated Groups comes to mind ... though the Moderating does take some time and effort. Gather can't do all the work any more than the Post Office can screen your mail. Wouldn't it be very spiffy to build a Group that became a Force-to-Be-Reckoned-With? One might even keep tally of the number of accusations of Elitism as a guerrilla rating system. It doesn't address the compensation issue ... that is left as an exercise for the student :p
Ratings - "Since the ratings have become nothing more than a way to insult the writer's opinion or political stance and have nothing to do with the quality of the content ..." I would say that the opinion or political stance IS the Content. So how does one rate a poor presentation of very impressive thinking or a carefully polished work of intellectual gibberish? Separate grades for Style and Content?
(My own background is in the sciences where both situations are depressingly common.)
---------------------------
One thing I REALLY wish Gather would implement is converting this lame "Conversation" feature into a threaded forum. It's pretty hard to have a real discussion without a better framework.
-----------------------------
- ?
*I don't care what anyone else says. "Y'all" is the Second Person Plural pronoun that English has always needed. Yes, I know some people say it's singular ... but that's just silly. "All Y'all" is clearly redundant except when used for emphasis.