Gold fever sets in

By Antal E Fekete -- A landmark in the saga of the collapsing international monetary system was signaled on December 2, when gold went to backwardation for the first time in history.

Backwardation is a market condition in which futures prices are lower in the distant delivery months than in the nearest delivery month. The facts are as follows: on December 2, at the Comex in New York, December gold futures (last delivery: December 31) were quoted at a 1.98% discount to spot, while February gold futures (last delivery: February 27, 2009) were quoted at 0.14% discount to spot. (All percentages annualized.) The condition got worse on December 3, when the corresponding figures were 2% and 0.29%.

This means that the gold basis has turned negative. The backwardation continued and worsened on December 8, 9, and 10, as shown by the corresponding rates widening to 3.5% and 0.65%. It is nothing short of awesome.

Already there was a slight backwardation in gold at the expiry of a previous active contract month, but it never spilled over to the next active contract month, as it does now: backwardation in the December contract is spilling over to the February contract, which at last reading was 0.36%. Silver is also in backwardation, with the discount on silver futures being about twice that on gold futures.

This is a premonition of a coming gold fever of unprecedented dimensions that will overwhelm the world as soon as its significance is fully digested by the doubting Thomases. The worsening of backwardation must be viewed in the context of the gold price bouncing back from the lows of last week. It shows that the "gold bashing" on Friday was done in the December contract. It is quite revealing that the spot price bounced back more than the futures price. The bulls are on the warpath. They have unearthed the hatchet. They have stopped eating from the hands of the clearing members.

As I wrote on December 4 in my "Red Alert" the gold basis is a pristine, incorruptible measure of trust, or the lack of it in case it turns negative, in paper money. Of course, it is too early to say whether gold has gone to permanent backwardation, or whether the condition will rectify itself (it probably will). Be that as it may, it does not matter. The fact that it has happened is the coup de grace for the regime of irredeemable currency. It will bleed to death, maybe rather slowly, even if no other hits, blows or shocks are dealt to the system. Very few people realize what is going on and, of course, official sources and the news media won't be helpful to them to explain the significance of all this. I am trying to be helpful to the discriminating reader.Gold going to permanent backwardation means that gold is no longer for sale at any price, whether it is quoted in dollars, yen, euros or Swiss francs. The situation is exactly the same as it has been for years: gold is not for sale at any price quoted in Zimbabwe currency, however high the quote is. To put it differently, all offers to sell gold are being withdrawn, whether it concerns newly mined gold, scrap gold, bullion gold or coined gold. I dubbed this event that has cast its long shadow forward for many a year, the last contango in Washington - contango being the name for the condition opposite to backwardation (namely, that of a positive basis), and Washington being the city where the paper-mill of the Potomac, the Federal Reserve Board, is located.

This is a tongue-in-cheek way of saying that the jig in Washington is up. The music has stopped on the players of musical chairs. Those who have no gold in hand are out of luck. They won't get it now through the regular channels. If they want it, they will have to go to the black market.

Mish Shedlock published a disdainful criticism of my theory on the worsening backwardation in gold (see note), calling it "nonsense" (see references below). A friend of his owns a seat on Nymex (a branch of Comex) who had this to say: "I have seen countless commodities go into backwardation for numerous reasons, the most frequent being a radical temporary divergence between immediate and overall demand. I have seen backwardations that have lasted years. The article is based on the assumption that a backwardation will necessarily lead to a breakdown of the delivery mechanism. But for every breakdown of the delivery mechanism there have been thousands of backwardations without a breakdown. Only if and when an actual breakdown occurred would the conclusions that the author drew make sense."

Well, well, one can buy himself a seat on the Nymex for sure, and the price is hefty these days, but Nymex does not deliver the understanding of monetary science along with the seat. Nor does any university anywhere in the world.

Mish says that "there is nothing special about backwardation, period. OK, they are rare in gold. So what?" Here is what. There is a difference between "rare" and "non-existent". Backwardation in gold has been non-existent, and for a very good reason, too, as I have explained in my articles. (I also pointed out that there have been "hiccups", or short-lived instances of backwardation. They were temporary "logistical" bumps, always resolved within a day at most, and they never ever spilled over to the next actively traded delivery month.)

Mish needs to educate himself on the fundamental difference between a monetary and a non-monetary commodity before he can grasp the idea that lasting backwardation in gold is tantamount to the realization that "gold is no longer for sale at any price".

The bottom line is that there is no fever like gold fever. It is akin to St Vitus' dance that swept through the Christian world just before the year 1,000 AD, affecting all the people who expected the end of the world to happen at the turn of the millennium. It was far worse than the mania that swept through the world affecting all the people a thousand years later who expected the 2K disaster to happen.The coming gold fever must be distinguished from tulipomania in February 1637, when one single tulip fetched the equivalent of 20 times the annual income of a skilled worker. Gold fever is as different from a bubble as real gold is from fools' gold. It is visceral. It has to do with one's instinct for survival. It has no patience with logical arguments. It is highly contagious, ultimately affecting everybody. A bubble that never pops.

You may ridicule the idea that, during a prolonged backwardation, all offers to sell gold will be withdrawn. But a serious analyst must answer the question why hundreds of millions of people having gold coins under the mattress and in the cookie jar refuse to take the bait of "risk-free" profits offered by backwardation. Such a thing would never ever happen to a non-monetary commodity.

The only successful corners in history were gold corners, aka - hyperinflation. Keynesian and Friedmanite economists in the pay of the government thought that gold futures trading would permanently short-circuit the forces of gold backwardation, thus preventing hyperinflation from ever happening. They were wrong.

In an article "The Manipulation of Gold Prices" (see references), James Conrad, Professor Emeritus of Economics and former Dean of the School of Business Administration at the University of Indianapolis, argues that Bernanke is different. He understands that he needs a much higher gold price in order to increase the efficiency of his airdrops. There is no better way to distribute new money among prospective spenders than putting it into the pockets of the gold bugs. (Conrad admits that he is one.) This will induce a large spending spree, holding deflationary pressures back.

According to Conrad, Bernanke is well aware that the new money he is feverishly airdropping has not stopped and will probably not stop the bloodbath in the stock market. Further devastation of share prices will render pension funds insolvent. To prevent this, the dollar needs a massive devaluation, on the pattern of FD Roosevelt's tinkering with the value of gold. I quote: Anyone who reads the written works of our Fed Chairman will know that Bernanke's long term plan involves devaluing the dollar against gold. This is the exact opposite of the position of most prior chairmen. He has overtly stated his intentions toward gold, many times, in various articles, speeches and treatises written before he became Fed Chairman. He often extols the virtues of F D Roosevelt's gold revaluation/dollar devaluation back in 1934, and credits it with saving the nation from the Great Depression. According to Bernanke, devaluation of the dollar against gold was so effective in stimulating economic activity that the stock market rose sharply in 1934, immediately thereafter. That is something that the Fed wants to see happen again."

It is only a matter of time before gold is allowed to rise to its natural level. Assuming that about one half of the recent increase in Federal Reserve credit is neutralized, the monetized value of gold should be allowed to rise to between $7,500 and $9,000 per ounce as the world goes back to some type of a gold standard. In the nearer term, gold will rise to about $2,000 per ounce as the Fed abandons its hopeless campaign to support Comex short sellers in favor of saving the other, more productive, functions of various banks and insurers.Revaluation of gold, and a return to a gold standard, is the only way that hyperinflation can be avoided while large numbers of paper currency units are released into the economy. This is because most of the rise in prices can be filtered into gold. As the asset value of gold rises, it will soak up excess dollars, euros, pounds, etc, while the appearance of an increased number of currency units will stimulate investor psychology; and lending and economic output will increase all over the world. Ben Bernanke and the other members of the FOMC Committee must know this, because it is basic economics.

It is to be regretted that more of Conrad's admirable paper cannot be quoted here because of lack of space. To summarize: Bernanke is prepared to throw the issuers of paper gold at the Comex to the wolves, as they have become useless, even a nuisance, by now. Besides, the wolves must be appeased lest they devour whatever remains of the US banking and insurance system.

Read More Here