Let me start out by saying I am NOT a fan of Bratz Dolls. They dress in sexually suggestive clothing, wear WAY too much makeup, and are just NOT an appropriate toy for a child. That said, yes, my kids have the dumb things. However, I do have limits- I donate the clothing they come with that I find to be too suggestive. Meaning, they all either are bought wearing a long skirt or pants, and have a shirt that covers their belly, with a jacket or short sleeves or long sleeves on top.
Maybe that's a bit over board, but these are dolls marketed to young kids, kids who are 6 or 7. To see a doll dressed that way, they think it's cool, and I certainly don't want my girls dressing that way. Gillian is getting some for Christmas- I got an insane deal at Goodwill on a bunch which were almost brand new- their hair was still in their original styles, all were fully dressed, and each doll was only $.59. I did have to buy new shoes, and some new clothing on eBay, but I wound up with 9 dolls for her, full dressed, for about $2 per doll.
Since she's getting a Nintendo DS for Christmas, I couldn't spend much money on her at all, but still wanted her to have some other items to open.
I digress. A while back, Mattel filed a lawsuit against MGA, the makers of Bratz dolls. The head designer of the dolls worked for Mattel when he came up with the idea. He pitched it, they declined, however because he worked for them, they owned the intellectual rights to the design and name.
He left Mattel, went to MGA, pitched it, and they bought it. Well, a judge just ordered MGA to cease production, and destroy all the specialized plates, molds, and matrices that are used to make the dolls. They are also being ordered to forfeit the name "Bratz".
There is an injunction in place that will allow MGA to continue producing the dolls through early 2009, to allow them to get them out in time for Christmas. After that, my guess is they'll redesign and rename the dolls before putting them back on the shelves.
And here are some pictures of WHY I object to most of these dolls. These are clothes they come with, not specially made by people, but available on the shelves.



.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â

Â




Comments: 30
I don't care for Bratz dolls either.
I once babysat for a little girl who worshipped the Spice Girls (this was a while ago) and she made a comment about wanting to look like them to attract boys. I was 16 at the time and she was 10. She learned a real important lesson from her FEMINIST babysitter about "attracting boys" and why the spice girls were sh*tty role models. Her mother was REALLY HAPPY that I gave her that lesson.
Mattel is mad they lost sales. They didn't want to put the money into, I feel they made a mistake. They should just make a settlement and let Bratz continue. I doubt with what they are doing to Bratz they will see much of sales to the people who bought bratz dolls.
I think I will avoid Mattel products.
Joslyne is still to young and I do not plan on giving them to her. But once she is a school not preschool I am sure other girls will have them so we will have to fight that battle when we come across it.
Personally, I think Bratz dolls are more appropriate than some overly-endowed twit. Yes, some of their outfits are a bit much, but, even with some of their more risque outfits, they still seem more appropriate than Barbie.
We have one bratz doll- a baby bratz or something like that? She has on a short skirt but it is a tutu (she is a ballerina) so I am alright with it because I had a similar costume when I was in ballet. It's actually one of the few I am very happy with! Some of them look a little too much like prostitutes.