Whatever your political leanings, there can be no question that the election of Barack Obama is a miracle of self-realization, an inspiration to all that self-discipline, singleness of purpose and creative imagination can achieve astonishing results.
The arc of Barack Obama’s narrative is dazzling in its implications. We all know the story and marvel at its denouement. One can find parallels in history, both ancient and recent, in which the will and determination of a single individual finds a way to achieve what is truly an impossible dream.
“Yes, we can,” was exactly the right slogan for the Obama campaign. He certainly proved that he can indeed and his victory against extraordinary odds is a historic event that will be cited and celebrated for years to come. If all of the self-help and inspirational books ever written were piled to the moon, they could not convey how this man achieved the most powerful and most coveted political prize in history.
While we marvel at his achievement, many of we questers who seek through art or science to find the key to human behavior, puzzle over this miracle of aspiration. How the hell did he do it? To me, discovering that link to his inner world is the most interesting aspect of his victory.
Like most of us inspired by his journey, I yearn to know the crucial secrets of the inner man. Who on earth wouldn’t want to emulate him? To all of us, he is the ultimate role model.
I look for clues, unique symbols, characteristics, actions, words, body language and relationships. After all, I am an outsider to his world. I never met him and all I know about him is what his campaign let us know, what was reported to us through various information outlets, the television images of him in action as a campaigner and through his interviews and speeches.
Admittedly, my analysis of the inner man is purely subjective, reflecting my own life experiences and the projection and insight that is fundamental to the novelist’s art. Taking a crack at what goes on in the mind and heart of another human being is a risky endeavor indeed and I do it with some trepidation, although there might be an attempt to put a political spin on my analysis. No way. I assure everyone reading this essay that it is politically neutral.
For some odd reason I find Obama’s choice of clothes, particularly the white shirt, the ubiquitous white shirt he wears, one of the most important clues to his character. A white shirt is a unique symbol of self-discipline. Making color choices detracts from focus. It tells me that anything that interferes with his single-mindedness is simply unworthy of his time.
I’m sure a psychoanalyst might find another explanation, but I cannot get away from the notion that this is a man whose determination is so acute that anything that does not serve his focus is rejected. I do not say this in a pejorative way. Nothing great is achieved without total focus and I frankly and enthusiastically admire him for such discipline.
Then there is the matter of his exercise routine. He knows the true meaning of keeping his body tuned and alert and what we have learned is that nothing, absolutely nothing interferes with his exercise routine. How many of us yearn for such physical discipline?
I am also fascinated by his walk, the cool graceful manner of his walk. There is something totally unique in the way he moves. In some ways, he reminds me of the late John Wayne, an actor with a manner of moving that stands as a marker of his heroic character.
Observe his cool demeanor as he slowly moves to the stage to confront countless thousands. Imagine your own reaction when faced with such a normally intimidating and formidable situation. Think of the self-confidence required to perform this feat. What does he feel inside of himself? I truly believe that his self-confidence knows few bounds. Here is a man who truly believes in himself and is completely comfortable in his own skin.
His facial presentation is also unique. His smile is broad, attractive and exudes charm and ingratiation. It captures his magnetism and allows him to be self-deprecating about his big ears and other features of his face. I found it perfectly acceptable and interesting to characterize himself as a “mutt”, citing a biological diversity that we know from our DNA, is ubiquitous in all of us.
His speech is deep and soothing and the delivery of his words and phrases is impeccable. His oratorical ability has surely been carefully self-trained and his eloquence is formidable. With his resonant voice and phrasing, his speeches have been honed to hit the right notes at the perfect moments and they truly move people, an absolute attribute for a great leader.
It is also worth noting that his choice of mate offers yet another lesson in discipline. He is matched with a formidable, brilliant and strong woman who has quite obviously been extremely helpful in his rise, someone who is a true believer in his uniqueness. You can easily see that the discipline and work ethic that they have lived by is being transferred to their two daughters, both of whom they are trying to make as super achievers as themselves.
As a role model to all of us and especially to people of color, he can be inspirational by showing us what self-discipline can achieve, how a focused outsider who believes in himself and his mission can, with luck, astonishing luck, make it to great heights of success. He shows us by example that the two parent family offers the best alternative to rearing the next generation, a severe dysfunction in the African American community where most child rearing is done by a single parent. If his example makes even a small dent in this area, he will have gone a long way to improve the lot of his brothers and sisters of color.
Whatever he achieves in his governing, his message to all of us is profound. Indeed, he has already carved his legacy into the public consciousness.
It is no wonder that people are clamoring to witness his inauguration. If I were a person of color, considering their horrendous history, I would be camping out in front of the White House even now to get a glimpse of this man in his moment of glory.
When I think of the daunting problems that face him as President, I begin to despair for him and the rest of us. At this moment in our national history, the act of governing seems untenable. The issues debated during the campaign did not even begin to address our problems, some of which may be impossible to solve.
For example, the population of this country doubled in the last 50 years and is likely to double sometime in the next four decades. How can a country that is now 300 million cope with a population that will be 600 million in the lifetime of many of those now living. When you contemplate that situation, you realize that our country’s future is in peril and we will have to be enormously creative when we consider immigration, health care, our economy , our infrastructure, energy and the big elephant in the room, terrorism.
Worse, there are so many people needlessly slurping in the public trough, locked into entitlements that are not sustainable and others who are dependent on the public purse, that extracting them from this habitual form of largesse will be close to impossible. A largely incompetent and unpopular Congress is facing an avalanche of states, corporations and seekers of all stripes with tin cups looking for handouts.
Obama will need to call up all his reserves of self-discipline and persuasion skills to tame the appetite for giveaways by a dysfunctional Congress and the greed and endemic selfishness that is corrupting every aspect of our system. Shifting the balance to protect the truly needy will be a challenge, requiring steel nerves and restoking the talent of persuasiveness Obama brought to bear during his campaign.
For the record, I did not vote for Obama. As someone even older than John McCain I am, admittedly, locked into the ideas that have sustained us through the great Depression, World War II and the Cold War. I understand that mindset and the echoes and slogans of those historical moments. In that arena I was in sync with McCain. Unfortunately, my idea of change is to look backward and contemplate the changes that have occurred in my lifetime. Future change is not a happy concept for a senior citizen whose stake in the future is in the worrisome fate of his offspring, rather than the prospects of his own life on which the curtain is descending.
Nevertheless, the old fashioned verities still persist in my zeitgeist. One of these is respect for our President and the patriotic notions of flag and country. As a soldier I marched under that flag and followed the orders of my Commander in Chief and I will continue to do so under our new President.
With all sincerity, I wish him Godspeed and good luck on the treacherous journey ahead of him. …and us.


Comments: 56
I think your analyses, subjective though they are, match mine. I have much hope for the future of the country (as well as a little fear given the reported upswing in racial hostilities since the election).
But when did you get "old", Warren? You should have stopped that in its tracks. ;-)
Thank you for honoring our new president. In the same spirit, I will respect your non-Obama vote and just shut up right here.:)
I truly don't understand how it can be difficult for some not to see the condition of our country, our army, our economy, our people, our spirit, our future. If they could stand behind George W. and all that THAT entailed then THIS should be a piece of cake! I would list all of Bush's infractions and everything that he has done to basically destroy this country, but it would take too long and definitely be too political!
It does feel good to see someone (soon to be) running the country that is loved and respected. In my lifetime I can only compare it to JFK and Jackie in the 60's. Shouldn't our President be the most admired? the most respected? the most followed? I truly believe that he and his family should be.
We're just not used to having someone in the highest office in this land that is all of the above. Well, perhaps it's been way too long coming and I am very thankful to be alive to see it's rebirth. Thanks for a great article, Warren.
Some have said many are going to be seeking handouts. When we are in trouble out here, we work two jobs, give up luxuries, and sell off our property and prized belongings if we must. We make sacrifices. (Something many CEO'S know nothing about) We work together on projects that Truly will help. And we look for the facts to make sure it is right.
We may have heated discussions, but we go on, and whatever is decided we try to work on that instead of each other, something I am positive all opponents of this country love to see. I know you can read into that.
This was a great article, and I hope many read it. I too am "old". But fortunately it is only chronological. The same for you.. The only thing this article presents is fairness, and intelligence, there is no hint of age. Have a great week-end. Ellen B
Thanks for your support!
Barack Obama winning the election was a personal victory for him. It's also a victory for those of us who phonebanked, walked the streets, discussed, wrote, and lived this last election. He acknowledged that in his victory speech. He acknowledged that in his speeches even before he was elected. (I went to hear him speak twice.)
I'm happy to hear you are giving President Obama a chance. He'll work to move the US forward- and backward at the same time as we shake off the layer of ill will the current (and soon to be out the door) administration has garnered in its mishandling of everything. Won't it be cool to be respected in the World again?
Wisdom which seems to make Obama wise beyond his years.
Administration- the ability to manage which he did as a street level organizer and putting together an excellent campaign
Giving- the ability to give money or encourage others to give as witnessed by his ability to raise as much money as he did.
Encouragement, Obama has speech that seems to lift spirits and encourages others to strive and reach for the distant star. He adopted the motto Yes We Can and has written two books to date- all signs of his gift of encouragement.
Feel free to disagree or agree but these are some of my observations from looking at Obama and reading the Bible for years. I also feel he'll be one of the better presidents in history. Obama is in the position he is in because we need him as a country to be where he is now, that's how he has risen so fast.
Obama is an incredibly driven candidate, and is in my opinion well-suited to be one of the best presidents our country has had.
That said, I see a different miracle here. He's extraordinary, no doubt. But the miracle came from the voting public and those who put in soooooo many volunteer hours pounding the pavement, making phone calls, sending in $25 donations, putting signs up, attending meetings, and traveling to other states. The miracle was in the numbers of people who turned out to hear him speak. The miracle was in the form of the person who had voted Republican all their lives, and decided to give the guy with the weird name a chance, because they liked what they'd heard him say. The miracle was in someone I know who has been a racist all his life, yet walked into the booth and voted for Obama because "he seems like he'll make a better president." The miracle was when, during the primaries, a vast number of Caucasian people called in to a radio talk show, angry that the African-American host had claimed that because of the discrimination he'd encountered in his life, he knew an African-American would never be POTUS in his lifetime. The list is perhaps infinite.
But in other words, we have met the miracle--and it is us.
The American people can at least console themselves that they've done their part (campaigned, and then went out in huge numbers to vote and change things and try to put someone in office that seemed up to the task). Can't ask more of citizens really. It's now out of their hands (for four years at least).
interpretations. Somehow the ending of the American era has
out us in this confusing spot where all we have is our own unique
interpretations of what is going on ... projections.
For instance I was and am an Obama supporter, but I have no
idea what this man has in mind. As the probability wave collapses
to reality around him his amorphousness and fuzziness becomes
more physical and concrete. Your selection of the white shirt as
a symbol is an interesting one. You said it denotes focus, another
might say it means back to basics, yet another might associate
it with the black Muslims, yet another might not even notice it.
His choice of people from the Clinton administration is interesting,
and we certainly live in "interesting" times as the curse goes.
What is this man going to turn out to be. Savior as many hope,
or "Uncle Tom" to the whole country as some fear, or just an average
President trying to do what is just about the hardest job there can
be in the world right now?
This time in America can make the difference in 350 million people's
lives as to whether we fall under the yoke of tyranny or whether we
have it in us to come back from this, and if so, how are we going to
do that.
I want to have positive faith that things are going to be get better
in America, but what I have seen recently included the knifing of
our country in the back by the looting of the government with
expoloding debt, and the twisting of the knife by these expanding
bailouts that have no rhyme or reason by the very people who are
supposed to be responsible to the country.
The idea that people think God is going to sort this out when the
people who speak for God are all on TV and really just speak for
money or the kingdom of money is almost laughable.
I see little so far to inspire confidence in this change he has heralded. His appointments for government have been recycled professional politicians and academians, few that inspire much confidence. His slim record and total lack of experience in the private sector or accountable government also scare me.
That said, like you I will hope for the best. God knows his failures will hurt like hell at these times like we are going through. I will not do the whining, "he's not MY president" that so many muttered these last years. That serves no one, especially the country or its citizens. I would hope those who did not support him remember the damage done by those who held us up as a fractured land these last years, we don't need more of that.
Speaking of being a great communicator, you do an outstanding job with your writing if this is an example!
I empathize with your perspective as I am only a year younger than McCain. I too, am steeped in the feelings arising from the great depression. I grew up with beans we raised as the main course form the average meal and learned of responsibility and ethics from the example of my father. And I too, worry mostly about the effect that events of the day and the future will have on my children and even more on my grandchildren and great grandchildren.
I too, appreciate the example that Obama has given a generation of young people. 'There is no room in his life for the victim concept and failure being linked to every one not giving me a chance. Obama noted election night that his election proved that the American opportunity was not dead but a very active reality!
What I personally see in Obama is a very pragmatic man who relishes achievement above ideological positioning. He is very focused and I believe that is going to be a hallmark of his administration. The white shirt to me emphasizes neatness more than anything else and I believe that he will want all facets of his administration "neat" and orderly.
His selection of staff leads me to believe that he will work from a relatively centrist position but be willing to bend either way if it works. Also, the persons supposedly chosen reflect people who are ready to hit the ground running, to implement Obama's agenda. I don't believe they were chosen for their ideological positions as much as their experience.
After the campaign, Obama is well aware of just how formidable a campaigner Clinton has been and these skills should serve her well in promoting Obama's agenda. The treasury head is thought to be a pragmatist with a comprehensive knowledge of the subject and again, a pragmatic man who will get the job done.
And finally, you've managed to commit the ultimate sin and forced me to the dictionary to determine exactly what you were saying! Where did you learn "denouement?" Did you study in the George Will school of literary expression?
I think you and I might well have differing concepts on the details of what should be done, but in our assessment of the current situation with the president elect, I believe we share a common opinion!
One last comment, all of us in this nation have a vested interest in Obama being successful in correcting the economic problems, in keeping America safe and in restoring America's prestige in the world. If he succeeds, we all win, if he fails we all lose! Those who voted against him have as great a stake in his success as those who supported him and you seem to recognize this with your excellent and balanced article!
I was very interested in what you had to say about Obama.
I think your words are dead on. And, will prove that my vote, for the man is well justified.
He will be a great leader. We will all just sit back, and wait, and see.
The women always commented on how McCain had voted/spoke about privitizing Social Security. The men would talk about war.
I just wanted to say I am finally going through what is now under 6,500 pieces of gather new mail that is in my inbox on here. So with that in mind I have finally come to a piece of mail that was addressed to me in regards this article submission you have created to share with the gather community. Thank you for taking the time and sharing your piece with us here at gather. :o)
And I hope you have a Happy New Year... in 2009 :o)
I was a late convert. I had supported Mis Hillary. I was actually first impressed by Mis Obama. Her speech on CSPAN the night of Super Tuesday, was an exceptional piece of edification, I have not heard any better. I was leaning towards Mac until their co-interviews he kepted on re-iterating, I am a Federalist, I have read the Federalist Papers our nation’s first great debate. “Federalist” is code for States Rights over Federal, which is divide and conquer strategy aimed at weakening our Federal Government and making it ineffective. He also kept on saying I’ll keep those Bush tax cuts. To tax is to destroy, my education is economics, more supply side economics wouldn’t help us. This recession was started by the middle income earners wages not keeping up with inflation (Bush chose not to finance the Iraq war not by taxation, but through deficits which increases inflation IE -14% decrease in real wages over the past eight years. Since most taxes are indexed, that means most taxes keep up with inflation, which futher decreased middle income families real spending, what people can afford to buy. Inflation was further helped along by Chanies manipulation of the Strategic Oil Reserve. Creating speculative expectations in the oil market IE US was buying up shares to boost the price of crude. Add in the Bush’s 2004 repeal of local bankruptcy courts right to safeguard homes which was put in after the last great depression to keep people from losing the roof over their heads. Your home is still exempt from bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction (court can’t help you save your home). The Senate has yet to let any home bankruptcy extension laws to your principle residence, which would have solved the whole mess, by forcing the servicing banks (where you paid) (remember your loans were sold as soon as the ink dried to both a national and international mortgage derivative system, so your mortgage could be held in China for all practical realities. But we may now get it, not because you are asking for it, but CitiBank is! By the way the melt down didn’t occur, because the middleclass or poor who shouldn’t have been given loans, but were given because of some social mandate started to default on their loans (How can then two to three percent cause a meltdown? I heard that on talk radio, by the 38 million dollar man), but because real estate speculators who had interest only loans (A devise even Ronald Reagan wouldn’t keep, should have been a good indicator of a bad idea.) Their loans were coming up and their homes weren’t the roof over their heads and the speculators would loose only their improvement investment leaving the banks holding the lower then loan amount asset. Add in speculation on loan default markets, which was encouraged, by not limiting persons doing the loan default policies to those with a real interest. It is like you being able to buy life insurance on George Bush. Talking about making out insurance policies to grave stones. All the sound insurance policies were thrown out! Which worked only as long as the person holding the policy could pay. That brought down the worlds markets. Suddenly trillions of dollars in loan default swops were being called and big banks didn’t set aside enough money to cover.
The long and the short is that only demand will pull us out now, so $4000 tax credits to hire folks not only very negatively leverage the middle class more and again IE Ronald Reagan which help cause the downturn during the later part of Bush Senior’s tenor. We had no increase in mimimum wage at the same time we had those same tax breaks given the tax credits to the working poor with wage and incentive to increase wages above the crediting point those who pay taxes subsidize those business’s bottom lines. Which became take from the middle income persons and give to the corporations like Walmart. Only giving grants to local and state governments to update their fleets to the new fuel efficient vehicles will help the Big three or special car loans to folks to buy these new fuel efficient cars. Give money to the buyers. And how is reducing the UAW’s wages so they are lower than even the starting Toyota’s wage help? That only lowers demand, poor people don’t buy new cars! More Supply Side Economics thinking and it is sinking thinking. Demand is what failed, without demand there can be no supply, and only through demand will governmental policy succeed! Plain and simple.
I apologies for my ranting, but this still makes me mad and I am so off subject.
The long and short is that the more I looked at candidate Obama the more I found he was the right person for the job. Even though his policies don’t help my plans for 3Cp. He wants to go the wind instead. I was brought up to vote for the right man.
Today is the very first day of the rest of your life.
How will you spend it?
Our open doors immigration policy needs to be rethunk.
As an ESL teacher, I am daily reminded from my students (not by what they tell me as much as by their mere presence here = and they are largely intermediate/advanced students here on exchange with large, US-based multinational corporations), that they thought the US would be easier.
And of the illegals who are here and who think they can get cleaning and landscaping jobs easily, they really have no idea.
I tend to think that we should have some sort of amnesty for illegals already here, but need to rethink our immigration program.
The boom from the 90s through now has had and will have significant impact on the bottom line, crime, and much else.
And I never agreed with bilingual education or of letting people habla espanol aqui en los estados unidos, nostros hablamos ingles acqui.
Rue the day when we call on the phone and hear:
Por ingles, marquez el dos.
Even at the age of 66 goin' on younger, even as an old ex-GI, I had NO trouble voting for him when the time came. I stuck with Hillary thru the Primaries, but when he was nominated, he was, without reservation, MY candidate. Still is.