Regardless of how one feels about granting the interview which, incidentally, included listeners' direct questions to the Mujahid, the program was both groundbreaking and fascinating. Furthermore, Gardner said that "it is in the world's public interest to understand more about the Taliban."
Mujahid received special permission from the Mullah Mohammed Omar to talk to the BBC, which he did from an undisclosed location, and was asked some of the questions that BBC listeners had previously emailed to WHYS in addition to several of Gardner's.
Recurrent themes shared by Mujahid included the "foreign invasion" of Afghanistan and the control previously maintained by the Taliban when they were in power, even though he repeated "it's not about power" throughout the interview:
"The Taliban is not interested in having a parcel...we are not trying to show off power... It's about the whole country. We want to have a Muslim country that's not invaded by foreigners. The Taliban wants full control of the country, but not to show off...we want to bring civility and stop the killing of people and fighting in our country. Fifty-five percent of the country is under our control...Shari'a law solves peoples' problems. We want a free nation of invaders."When asked whether the Taliban would consider sharing power in Afghanistan, Mujahid said,
"We are fighting for freedom of our country from invaders. When we free it, we'll talk about power sharing."The discussion hit on the treatment of women in Afghanistan more than once. Mujahid said that keeping women at home helped control the prescence of AIDS and prevented the rape of young girls, but that they are trying to work on making things available to women:
"We were planning to given women rights, but our government collapsed and they invaded us...we are trying to work on making things available for women."But when pressed on the issue of allowing women to obtain a full education, he said,
"Now we are not in power in most areas...[have] no power in central areas. It's about when we are in power, we will decide. Again, we will look at conditions and environment. How is it? Then we will decide."Gardner brought up the fact that with regard to aid workers, Afghanistan had experienced serious problems even before the recent conflict. He asked Mujahid if he thought Christian aid workers should be working in Afghanistan. Again, the Taliban spokesman invoked the issue of control:
"These questions are about if we're in power. When we get in power we'll see how it goes. We never forced anyone to change their religion prior to this. But now I can't talk about it...until we're in power."Mujahid distinctly differentiated the Taliban from al qaeda and other groups who had blamed terrorist acts on them:
"Things happened in the country that the Taliban has been blamed for, of course we believe they were not right. This is a propaganda war against the Taliban which we say shouldn't have happened. We shouldn't be blamed. On the other hand, we brought security and peace to whole region...[and are] proud of those moments of Arab power. We did good stuff in Afghanistan...stand by them. Things the Taliban were blamed for and didn't do - of course we're not happy about it."Recently, Mujahid sent a message to President-Elect Obama indicating that if Obama were to alter the Bush strategy of decreasing troops in Iraq and increasing troops in Afghanistan, the war could be stopped. However, he told Gardner that he was not optimistic that this would happen.
Post-interview reaction indicated that most listeners found Mujahid "hedgy." Gardner said that critics would say there was a lot of denial on the spokesman's part, and that the Taliban seems to have no clear agenda other than "wanting to kick out the invaders." Even so, Mujahid gave a surprisingly lengthy interview, and conveyed a lot of confidence. Perhaps his claims that there exists an unfair propaganda war against the Taliban contain some truth, but did Mujahid, sanctioned by Mullah Omar, just employ the BBC for its own propagandist purposes?
Listen to the full interview here.
-------------------------------------------------------
Retired from a career in law and banking, Diana Raabe is a freelance writer/editor whose work has been featured on Gather.com for over three years. A member of The Loft Literary Center and the National Book Critics Circle, she blogs at The Raabe Review and, occasionally, Minnesota Campaign Report.


Comments: 23
Evasive answers, continuous referral to "not being in power"
and "we'll discuss this when we are in power",
plus it coming a week after the election.
The basic scheme for all actions is a fivefold division into obligatory, meritorious, permissible, reprehensible, and forbidden.
Many of the positions presented in Shari'a law make sense in regards to an orderly society. I'm just not comfortable with the cutting off of the hands for people who might by chance steal a loaf of bread to feed their children. Somehow, I don't believe any GOD would issue such a law to be perpetrated against his creation. The link between a God and Mankind takes place wholly within the mind.
Those who purport to enforce Shari'a law on behalf of their GOD blame the woman for enticing a man into raping her. The mind of the man is poisoned with lust prior to the introduction of any outside stimulus. Yet, it is the victim who is punished for somehow forcing the man to act upon his uncontrollable lust.
Any GOD who would punish a victim, in my mind is definitely flawed. Now, I'm not really blaming GOD but, those who misinterpret or misapply that which they perceive as the will of GOD.
The only true manner in which GOD's Laws can be enforced is by the individual on their own behavior. The only thing worthy of GOD's attention is the individuals content of their character. No other human-being has any right to enforce GOD's Laws on another.
Teach people how to grow the content of their character in ways that are beneficial to the whole and allow the benefits to multiply through example. Use stones to build bridges, not cast them at a sinner.
Thanks for this article, Diana!
"The Taliban wants full control of the country"
"When we free it, we'll talk about power sharing."
"It's about when we are in power, we will decide"
" . . . But now I can't talk about it...until we're in power."
I don't give a hoot about different "cultures", that jive don't jive.
I hope that's not a widespread mindset, among high ups there . . .
The 2nd issue is related: BBC listeners are intelligent and able to recognize propaganda of this quality as the lunatic raving that it is. They remember the gangs of Taliban beating women randomly in the streets of Kabul, and hear the intent to bring back that barbarism is they should regain power.
So: let anyone speak, and trust your audience to recognize evil when it speaks.
Blessings and best wishes - S.