I don't want to ruffle anyone's feathers here nor cause a 'war' but I am concerned about the allowance and availability of same-gender relationships being able to procreate and raise children. Love is not set in stone to be strictly between opposite genders; however, when there are little children lives to consider, don't you feel they deserve the 'whole raising experience that has both a woman and a man present to guide them in a direction allowing them to make choices effectively when they are all grown up ?'
I am wondering how many gatherites feel about this? Do you agree that two women or two men should be allowed to 'create' children using artificial insemination and raise those children OR adopting children and raising them without either a mother or father figure around ?
If you are truly a 'homosexual' then stay as such and don't get the 'best of both worlds' when you clearly choose a path to be without one or the other. True lesbian women, and true gay men, do not want anything to do with men or women, but they are quick to go to a 'sperm bank', surrogate moms or adoption agencies for what they need to become mommies, daddies and families . . .
So what are the views of gatherites on this ?


Comments: 15
First misconception, just because a person prefers to have a committed relationship with someone of the same sex (gender is a whole different issue) does not necessarily mean they don't want anything to do with people of the other sex.
BTW, sex is the physical aspect of a person and gender is the internal, the way they think/act/feel/behave.
Why should a heterosexual couple who can't conceive (some would say it's Gods will, if you want to introduce religion into this) be treated differently than a homosexual couple? For physical reasons conception can't happen.
Should a male (sex) who is effemiate (gender) acting or a female (sex) who is masculine acting or a "tomboy" (gender) be denied the opportunity to raise children because they don't pass the "norm" test?
Which is worse, having a child in a loving, stable homosexual home or a heterosexual home where one or the other (or both) parents are abusive (sexually, mentally, emotionally or physically), neglectful, often drunk or under the influence of other chemicals or otherwise mistreated? Now, I'm not trying to imply that all homosexual couples are perfect nor all heterosexual couples aren't, but there are enough "straight" dysfunctional to the detriment of the child(ren) homes that this is a valid point.
I think there should be options. Children who are raised in diverse families will grow up to better understand different types of lifestyles, and they will grow up to be more tolerent. Just because it takes an egg and a sperm for the biological procreation of children doesn't mean that gender really matters in raising them. As long as those children are loved, that's all that counts.
Gender is the way society expects people of a particular sex to behave and the way a person identifies themselves internally, and is often reflected in the way they behave/act.
If a male identifies himself with the feminine gender, wants to play with dolls, wear dresses and make up, etc. He is said to be transgendered, not transsexed. After he goes through the process to become female (hormones, etc) and the surgery at that point he becomes a transsexual.
Before (and probably after) the surgery this person is diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder (GID) which is defined as:
Gender identity disorder is a conflict between a person's actual physical gender and the one they actually identify him or herself as. For example, a person identified as a boy may actually feel and act like a girl.
People with gender identity disorder may act and present themselves as members of the opposite sex. The disorder may affect:
* Choice of sexual partners
* Display of feminine or masculine mannerisms, behavior, and dress
* Self-concept
Gender identity disorder is not the same as homosexuality.
Identity issues can occur in many situations and appear in different ways. For example, some people with normal genitalia and sexual characteristics (such as breasts) of one gender privately identify more with the other gender.
Some people may cross-dress, and some may seek sex-change surgery. Others are born with ambiguous genitalia, which can raise identity issues.
(source: http://www.healthline.com/adamcontent/gender-identity-disorder?utm_term=gender&utm_medium=mw&utm_campaign=article)
Also, when a child is born what is asked? What sex is the baby or what gender?
You used the term "same gender couples". So if you take a traditional marriage between one physical male and one physical female but the female is also male gendered (works on cars, hangs out at bars and gets into fights, and does mostly traditional male activities and very few to none of the traditional female ones) would you consider this a "normal" and "healthy" environment to raise children? A place where they have the "whole raising experience that has both a woman and a man present to guide them in a direction allowing them to make choices effectively when they are all grown up" ?
Or, conversely, where the male is very effeminate, cooking, cleaning, shopping, etc. with very little of the traditional male activities?
I'm still waiting to hear on why a traditional marriage with one "normal" male and one "normal" female but where the male abuses the children or the female is out getting drunk or whoring around (or swap dysfunctions if you want) is healthier for the children than being raised in a loving stable same sex union.
Why should fertility treatments be for the sole benefit of heterosexual couples who can't conceive? Do not homosexual couples also pay taxes and insurance premiums that help support the research and operation of fertility treatments? Why should they be relegated to second class citizens?