Experts: Plot detracts from race progress in South

This is the kind of radical action McCain brings out with his lies about Obama.

Sure Don,

Obama is not a native born American

Obama socializes with terrorists

Obama is "that person" using bigotry to put across his message

Obama supports attacking Pakistan

Obama was born in the Middle East

If you want more Don you will have to do a little research on what the media reports on McCain's campaign.

You're right Jack, he's stirring up trouble. I heard that his robo calls actually refer to Obama as someone who pals around with terrorists. Unreal.

Both sides of the political parties have their far, far FAR extremists. You cannot paint the entire Republican party with the same brush because of the actions and attempted actions of these two crazies.

That being said, I fear that this country is not read, 100% ready, to have a black man as the POTUS. There are enough crazies out there, without having to label them as a member of any one political party, that DO NO wany a black man running this country and ARE crazy enough to try and take matters into their own hands to alleviate that situation.

I don't like Senator Obama politically, I don't agree with many of his political proposals, but I do NOT wish harm to be fall him because of his race.

These loonies are inspired by the lie and hate McCain preaches in his no campaign that lost the election for him.

No, Jack, there you are wrong. If these loonies are inspired, it would have been from someone long before McCain ran for office, probably their fathers or other male members of their family. If what you say were truly the case, Then Senator Obama has been brainwashed by the lies his pastor has told him for the past twenty years.

They preach word for word what comes out of McCain's mouth and if he had run a real campaign instead of the slime campaign that lost him the election they would be acting like real people not just brain dead followers.

Uh Jack, could you direct me to where in your post, cut and pasted as it were, it indicates that these idiots were inspired by Senator McCain and if you don't mind where they were preaching word for word what Senator McCain said. Near as I can tell, from your post, there are NO direct quotes from either of these two would assassins. Thanks.

That's easy Charlie you can find it in everyone of his videos that tags Obama as anti American as well as his small groups of supporters where ever he stops to spread more anti American slime.

Both parties have their own propaganda, which they need to get elected. The Republicans, however, are way off the deep end in recent years. The campaign to paint Obama as a terrorist, muslim (which the ignorant think = terrorist), socialist, etc., are all a matter of using deception to exploit the ignorance of a segment of voters. Just look at who has been directing the last three Republican presidential campaigns. Karl Rove has done every slimy thing one could imagine, from planting a bug in his own candidates office to make it seem like their opponent did it, to calling redneck voters in SC to tell them to vote for Bush because McCain has a black baby, to leaving flyers in church parking lots telling churchgoers that Ann Richards had an administration full of lesbians. It's a strategy that is based on exploitation of ignorance and bigotry rather than the issues and what each candidate represents. It also is a reflection of the lack of integrity of any campaign that has to resort to throwing out the negative inferences to get voters to draw mistaken conclusions about the opponent.

McCain's campaign goes a long way past propaganda as he keeps inciting radicals to kill Obama.

Jack, that's still only your opinion, your article posted doesn't mention McCain, contains no statements by the perpetrators to the effect of why they were plotting what they did, in fact there are NO statements by them at all in your post. How do you equate, from what you posted, a connection to what you claim in your comments?

You only have to listen to his bigoted campaign speeches to find the proof. But then McCain followers do not see what they do not want to and very few of them can even discuss intelligently what he does say.

If you want to call me wrong Charles show me something to prove it like a McCain campaign add that is not loaded with lies and bigotry about Obama and being an American citizen and his relationship with terrorists. Obama is an intelligent person and the only presidential candidate that talks on issues and not on McCain's involvement with corporate cons.

Actually Jack, I think that the burden of proof is on YOU, to show me wrong. Would you PLEASE direct me (or any else here for that matter) to where Senator McCain advocated the killing of Senator Obama. PLEASE direct me to where I can read (or hear from a video) that these two would be assassins actually said that they were influenced and inspired by a Senator McCain statement/speech/exhortation to go and plan to behead black people, murder African-American high school students, and where they were brainwashed to attempt to kill Senator Obama (in top hats and white tuxedos no less) I have listened to both Senator McCain's and Senator Obama's speeches. Obama's do not make me feel like I want to share my hard earned money with the people who haven't worked for it and earned it like I have, and on the other hand, after listening to McCain's speeches I have no burning desire to go head hunting with Obama as my primary target.

If you cannot, or will not direct me to where you have gathered your information, then it is merely conjecture on your part.

Its obvious you have nothing but wing nut comments to make with nothing to back them up except your neocon boss slime campaign.

This same old knowhere nonsense is finished, either show something to back it up your claim or end it. Any further baiting will be deleted.

{sigh} You'll probably delete this comment, but here goes. Please show me which one of my comments or part there of which you consider to be "wing nut" I have no idea what you are referring to as "old knowhere (sic) nonsense" I haven't made a claim, except to say that what your responses were, were not evident in your post.

Unless I haven't read the post and your responses correctly I really don't understand them, I asked for clarification of the claims YOU have made in them. I have researched and failed to find any reference to killing Obama, nor anyone else, in any of the McCain statements that I can find on the Internet. I asked for further information, verifiable information, where you based your statements on, if for nothing more than to enlarge my knowledge and perhaps see your point of view, but without exception you've made wilder and wilder claims.

This forum is supposed to be for debate, not threats. Gather is for expressing opinions not for suppressing opposing points of view. You've never given me your definition of "neocon" despite me asking for several times. I ask for these things to better understand where you are coming from, but you, unfortunately, adamantly have declined the opportunity to do so. And on several occasions you have deleted my comments where I ask for a clarification, or an explanation of something you've posted.

Jack, I'm not, as you indicated, "baiting" you. I really want to know where you are coming from, where you get your information to establish your opinions. When I make a claim, such as where you said: "This is the kind of radical action McCain brings out with his lies about Obama." and am asked for a source I try to accommodate the person. But without fail, I can't get a straight answer out of you. I respect your right to express an opinion, something you have decided I don't have the same right to express my opinion.

I ask for further information, for clarification, for a source that I can also see what you have seen there, to learn and you respond with: "...either show something to back it up your claim or end it. Any further baiting will be deleted." That is an attitude that is hardly conducive to any exchange of ideas, opinions, or beliefs. If you accuse me of baiting you, when clearly I haven't, then you obstruct the free exchange of ideas, etc. I would like to ask Don and Pamela (the other respondents here on your post) if they think that I have baited you and where. If they do and point it out to me then I will apologize to you, but I really don't think that I have.