Campaign rhetoric, especially from Republicans, has become, not only vicious, but dangerous. The most violent words are being fomented by the self-described ‘pitbull with lipstick", Republican candidate for vice president, Sarah Palin. Her words, and to a lesser degree, those of John McCain, are becoming inflammatory, and some hotheads in their audiences are becoming inflamed. Cries of "treason", and "kill him", have been heard shouted from the crowd. Isn't rabble-rousing illegal? Isn't it like crying "Fire!" in a crowded theater?
When the target of their ire happens to be the first viable African-American candidate for president in America's history, reactions like that are seriously dangerous. Although it's been over 140 years since slavery was outlawed in this country, it has been only a little over 40 years that African-Americans really began to have equal opportunities, and even then at some personal peril. There is still a lot of racial discrimination and hatred out there being handed down from one generation to another.
I don't know why it is necessary to identify Barack Obama as a Black man, because by blood heritage he is just as a much a White man, and intelligent people come in all colors. He was raised by an unusually compassionate white mother and by white grandparents in Hawaii, the most unbigoted state in the union. He really didn't experience Black culture until he was in high school, and later at college in Los Angeles. His personal history does not contain the 400 years of injustice suffered by the average African-American. Bias against white people was never instilled in his psyche, giving him the ability to have clearer insight into the problems of this country and the world.
After graduating with honors from Columbia University in New York City, and Harvard Law School in Boston, he chose a bottom-rung job of organizing people in the churches of South Chicago to find ways to better themselves. He could have accepted a much more lucrative job offered to him by a prominent law firm in New York City. That demonstrates to me that Barack Obama is a good man, motivated by a sincere wish to help people.
Barack's Kenyan father abandoned him and his mother when his mother still in college and Barack was only two years old. He never really knew his father until he visited them in Honolulu for a month when Barack was 10 years old. That is the only contact he ever had with his Muslim father who died in a car crash in Africa. Barack Obama has only his middle name, Hussein, to remind him that his father's Muslim heritage was far different from his own Christian upbringing.
I didn't intend to go into Obama's biography, but maybe it's necessary to explain why I think it is not only slanderous but dangerous for the McCain campaign to suggest that Barack Obama is mysterious and subversive. It seems to me that because of his heritage, and the four years he lived as a little boy with his mother and an Indonesian step-father in Indonesia, Barack Obama is able to understand the problems of all kinds of people better than John McCain. The fact that he grew up in a modest middle-class home, and sometimes experienced deprivation when his mother had to resort to food stamps, makes him better able to understand the problems of people of all walks of life.
For the first time in our history a Black man has been able to rise above the fray to be a serious contender for the position of President of the United States. He is by far the best student and best educated candidate of all four candidates. He has demonstrated that he has the composure to withstand the assaults he knew would come at him when he offered himself as a presidential candidate, and that he has the intellect to counter-attack within the bounds of civilized debates.
After declaring at the beginning of this presidential campaign that this would be a civilized debate - no dirty politics - McCain failed to persuade the public he would be the better man for the job, and he abandoned his good intentions. Now, in the last few weeks before the election, he has sunk to the status of a bottom feeder. Nothing is too low and dirty to use against his opponent if he thinks it might stick and resonate with the still-undecided voters. These are acts of a desperate man.
To raise interest and commitment to his candidacy, McCain presented Sarah Palin as his choice for Republican candidate for the vice presidency. Although almost unknown in the lower 48 states, Palin has aroused passions both pro and con with her attractive appearance, everlasting smile, and vituperous speeches. She draws the crowds that John McCain failed to interest. All that is to her credit, but her words are becoming more and more vitriolic and of a nature to incite violence. As the governor of Alaska she seemed qualified, but by interviews and the nature of what she has to say in her speeches, she is losing the backing she had at first.
Sarah Palin, and other elements of the McCain campaign, are inspiring a violence we have experienced before. Violence is never far below the surface in some people. The political violence that has broken out before in our history has resulted in death and cruelty not appropriate in a democratic society that prides itself in peaceful settlement of the differing opinions. Violent words, especially when they are lies, are apt to turn passion for or against a political candidate into murder. Remember Jack and Bobby Kennedy? Their lives were cut off before they even had a chance to accomplish the good things they hoped for in this country. And there have been other successful and unsuccessful assassination attempts on our presidents, and presidential candidates.
There are evil people out there, as well as a lot of nut cases, just waiting for the right words to justify their impulses to kill. The words being expressed in the McCain campaign now are coming close to that point. How can our honorable old hero, John McCain, justify such low-down smear tactics in order for him to fulfill his desire to be President of the United States before he dies of old age?
We can only hope he and all others culpable on both sides will see what is liable to happen if we have three more weeks of lies and distortions, They should cease those tactics before they unleash violent forces that will harm our country. We are already experiencing severe problems in these perilous times of wars and financial collapse, and we don't need the additional disaster of civil strife.


Comments: 21
Not to defend Palin but I just dont think she is smart enough to realize what the ramifications of her words.
However, no thrust could be made if no sword were provided by Obama himself.
I've seen, and heard, rallies for years. These types of venues will bring out the crazies every time..and you really don't have to have a candidate say all that much.
Unless, of course, you're trying to say that Palin somehow manages to mind control the crowds and incite them to violence?
(CA - It doesn't become you to offer a deaf ear...just as it doesn't become John McCain or Governor Palin)
someone who is just lipstick, and false facade on the outside - pleasing to the eyes,
may be a pig in her heart.
Bush's connected to Rove.
Bush's connected to his grandfather.
Bush's connected to the Saudis.
McCain is connected to Bush.
The problem is onlhy pointing to the "connections" undefined
scary nefarious term on one side, with the pretense that the
other side is better or cleaner.
The tactic is useless, unfair, used by either side, but the
Republicans consistently use unfair cheating tactics like
this, like swiftboarting Kerry.
Kerry served the country, Bush didn't, Bush has no right to
impugn Kerry's loyalty, patriotism or use thugs who will lie
for him to do it.
She is married to a man who for most of seven years (1995-2002) was a registered member of the Alaska Independence Party (AIP) which advocates Alaska secede from the Union. Founded in 1973 the AIP originally advocated the use of other than peaceful means to achieve succession, but its official position now advocates achieving its goals via the ballot box. There’s one problem with that, the United States Constitution makes no provision for states seceding from the Union so I am a little mystified about how the AIP’s goal could be obtained by peaceful means since it is highly unlikely that the rest of the United State would go along with the idea.
As recently as this year a videotaped a speech Sarah Palin prepared was presented at that party’s convention in which she said, “"Keep up the good work," Makes me wonder what she means when she says “Country First” The speech may be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwvPNXYrIyI
It has also been reported that the AIP has links to Iran.
The following links are provided for those who want to check the story out.
http://www.americablog.com/2008/10/palins-pals-in-alaska-independence.html
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/07/palins_unamerican/
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-aip3-2008sep03,0,6399468.story
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaskan_Independence_Party
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/us/politics/04party.html?ref=politics
There’s more but for that more Google, “Alaska Independence party
What really chills me is to see the weird, out of place grin on her face and the faces of those behind her on the stage and those in the crowd as the camera pans across it. It would seem to me if these really serious charges were being seriously made, all in attendance but especially Palin herself would be seriously concerned. Instead she has this surreal grin on her face. It makes me wonder about her sanity. Is she just focused on how "cute" she is and that the audience loves her, or is she really putting "country first?" Looks to me that she's focused on the "cute" factor.
Obama is a wonderful and intelligent man - he is intelligent - I guess it takes intelligence to recognize same.
Very wonderful post as always Ruth.
Salud
American candidate. Actually it is McCain who was born in a foreign country, but as a child of a Navy man, he was born an American citizen.