Do you find your stories flat, your characters one-dimensional, your plots without depth? Is your story there but not THERE? Have you read a novel or watched a movie that you found okay but unremarkable when you thought back on it?
Let's turn our discussion tonight to impact, that oomph factor that should be present in our writing.
It's easy to write about something--to tell the details--but it's so much more difficult to draw a reader into the depths of a tale as if she were experiencing every action and emotion. But isn't that what we want? For our readers to cry and laugh and fear along with our lead characters? We want them to be surprised and tickled. We want them to escape the world of carpools and divorces and endless business meetings. Like Calgon does, we want to take them away.
We ensnare readers by allowing them to feel characters' emotions rather than telling about them--this goes back to the show vs. tell discussion.
We pull readers deeper by giving them someone to root for--a well-developed character with clear goals is necessary here.
Our plots must be both interesting and involving--we need topics and events the reader can get lost in.
Our language must be bold and placed before the reader without apology. This is not the time to hold back over fear of Aunt Bertha's reaction to our writing or worry over what the boss would think. Readers want an escape from the ordinary. Maybe Susie can't cuss in front of Aunt Bertha, but she might long for a character who's not afraid to tell her own Aunt Bertha off and does so in graphic terms.
Readers need more than reports; they need sensory experience. We enmesh readers by involving their senses over and over and over again.
Readers live in an ordinary world. (No matter what they do, it's normal to them.) They want to visit the extraordinary, do and say what they can't in their own lives. Give them the depth they desire and crave. Don't be content with surface reporting. Create a world and compel them to enter. And then pull them deeper. Wrap your storyline and weave your characters around the reader so he can't get away. And won't want to.
We can keep readers at a distance so they never experience the worlds we create. They can be watchers rather than participants. But they'll never be satisfied with that. It's not enough to create a world and people it with shadows. We need to create doorways that readers can tumble through. And then we need to make our worlds so compelling that the reader seeks not an exit, but a path deeper into our tale. So he can experience what the characters do. So he can touch and hear and feel them. So he can escape the ordinary and be bigger and bolder and more valuable. . . At least for a time. At least while he lives in your story. At least for the moment.
Readers may enjoy a book as a beach read or for an afternoon's pleasure. But they may also use it as distraction--while waiting in an emergency room, as a way to hold back fear on a plane ride, as a means of escape from the pain of a debilitating disease. As writers, let's give them a place of escape. A diversion. Hope. And let's do it with depth and passion. The readers deserve no less. Certainly our stories deserve nothing less.
In what other ways can we weave impact and depth into our fiction?
The group No Whine, Just Champagnewill discuss impact and depth during our Live Discussion on Thursday, October 9th at 9:00pm ET. Hope to see you there.


Comments: 99
For me, as a reader, it's mostly about the characters; I have to care about who they are. And interesting, believable dialogue is a key ingredient in any book I covet.
I love books that engage me so much I feel like I AM the character. As a writer, that's what I want to achieve. Am looking forward to all of your suggestions on how to do that in tonight's chat.
Basically, my plots are flat, and need some serious infusion of showing, and not telling. I tend to drag out sentences, and have trouble editing. It takes many people and critiques for me to finally see how to cut it down, making it flow better.
He exited the highway, taking the road that led to Forest Highland Subdivision where he’d grown up. He knew every straightaway, every curve. Beyond this hill, the subdivision would be laid out before him in a valley, and he’d be able to catch a glimpse of his mother’s home, a green-roofed single-story dwelling that looked like a child’s Lincoln Log house.
He rounded the hill and slammed on the brakes.
The road ended six feet in front of him.
And the subdivision was gone.
I admit that I have. And then I found I'd lost the moment and the oomph. I try to not do that anymore. Write it. If I have to change it later, I can. After all, I'm the only one to see the first draft. Can't shock myself.
I'm not big on cussing, and only use mild words.
So, that's the only thing I hold back writing, is foul language.
I also hold back (or, to be more precise, don't want to go there in the first place) because I hate the modern way of using violence as a way of escalating tension. It seems cheap to me, a cheat.
In one of my rough draft novels, the one I referred to that I couldn't use curses..
A killer is on the loose, and I can't hold back on what he does, because it's integral to the plot. This fiend is very sick, mentally, and I have to show that throughout.
Or in other words, the scenes in one of my WIP's where the family is together and they are showing every one of their differing personalities.
They are showing how much they can tease and taunt each other, but, have that underlying love that shines through.
For example, a toddler is trampled by a horse in one story. The rider had no care for the child. But I don't paint the scene of the trampling. I instead show them burying the child and the effect it has on the mother, the villagers, and the protagonist. I think it works well for eliciting emotion in the reader.
The opening is the most difficult thing for me.
Soldiers on patrol. Jungle dense. Leader shot.
Soldiers kill. Guerillas attack. Soldiers killed.
Bodies slaughtered. Total butchery.
Then restructure the scene based on this poem.
And picking up on what you said, Beth, about holding back because in real life we're all about making our surroundings pleasant is a valid point. We might also hold back because we're afraid readers might think we, personally, are the emotional characters. For example, say you've created a back-stabbing character who feels murderous toward school teachers, do you then worry (subconsciously or consciously) that readers might think it is you who feels this murderous rage toward school teachers? Somehow writers have to get past that vulnerable feeling that the character is a reflection of him/herself and magnify the emotions of their characters.
Sentence construction and rhythm, as Pat showed earlier, can be worked to create a lasting impression. Throwing a new character into the mix and watching how the other characters react is good for creating something new and different. Switching direction, injuring or killing a character, running into a problem can all add oomph.
Making a change of almost any kind will bring life to a scene. Too long a description, a dialogue or monologue gets boring and will be unremembered. A character in one place or thought pattern or dilemma for too long drains the oomph from a story.
And we've touched on distance. If a reader can't identify with at least one character in a story, he can't pretend he's in that story. A character has to pull the reader in. The reader has to need to know what's gonna happen next. If the character holds the reader away, never revealing emotions or dreams or fears, the reader can't engage. And readers today have so many choices for entertainment. Why not assure that they are entertained with your words? Isn't that what we want?
One of the sons, Alex, got shot in the shoulder, and his personality has always been brash, but, sarcastic. He has deep seated emotions, and in every word and deed, he shows his displeasure with the world.
With repercussions coming out later.
I do use things such as weather and situations to cause trouble, but that's not my major antagonist. And sometimes my bad guys win. This is how I can have a series with my medieval stories :-)
I'm just cynical. I've read too much, I think.
That will shake things up a lot!
Speaking of which, contrast is a good way of adding depth. Don't just describe a yellow flower, show it amongst the purple petunias, perhaps. Yellow is brightest next to purple.
(I told you I was cynical tonight.)
But people do like some sort of predictability. I'm surprised that many like a sameness, however. You can be predictable--happily ever after--without writing the same story again and again.
At home I want bills paid and good food and friends that are healthy and family without turmoil. Very different needs. I just need to remember to leave home life behind when I'm at the keyboard.
Emotion magnified, scene enhanced, and plot thickened
For example, the newest Indian Jones did nothing for me. A few laughs, but nothing special. I need relationships or characters to relate to. Then when something happens, I'm invested. The last Pirates of the Carribbean was the same. The second was nearly as bad. But what made the first so good were the characters and the way they played off one another. Movie two was silly graphics and move three? Well, let's say I've slept through it half a dozen times. Nothing to hold my attention or get me excited.
We all know about hooking the reader in the first sentence, the first paragraph, the first page, and most authors can do that. But the secret to a readable book is one hook after another, each more compelling than the last (so that first hook can't be the most incredible on in the story, though it has to be interesting enough to catch a reader). And those hooks up the tension.
I hate to admit it, but car chases, action scenes, special effects all put me to sleep. Literally. I don't think I've ever seen Ronin all the way through. I like the characters and the story, but I can do without the interminable car chase. Or maybe not. It does put me to sleep, which is a good thing! Violence in books does the same thing.
But great stories always wake me up.
And relationships is what adds depth to any kind of writing, books or movies.
Pat, what about the opening of The Fugitive? That movie had me on the edge of my seat--literally--for an hour. Talk about thrilling. But we had character and action and implausibles and humor and crashes and the kitchen sink. I wouldn't mind being able to create that sort of tension for my readers.
Pat, as always, delightful to take part in these great discussions.
Good night, all.
(See my strategy here? I say what I want, even if it's not on topic, and then I add a tagline to show how on topic it is even though it wasn't.)
Thanks for stopping by, Jill. Your icon (and words) always brighten the discussion.
Great discussion. Thank you everyone for participating. See you next week!
And am I totally out of touch? Who won the DB contest? I think I know but was there an article with that info? Did I miss it or is it not up yet.
I'll be back on Gather on Oct 20th. You all take care. Buh byeeeee.