Days ago I wondered, why aren't the two men who are sitting, United States Senators, and running to assume the presidency of the United States, actively involved in the proposed, largest in history, government bailout and economic initiative that we are about implement? It would only seem logical that their potential leadership as presidents be applied in this process.
This past Wednesday, John McCain took to thinking the same way. He announced that he would suspend all of his normal campaign activities, including a scheduled debate on foreign affairs, in order to actively participate in shaping the rushed legislation to correct the economic woes that exist within several sectors of the financial market . He called upon Barack Obama to do the same.
Contrary to the opinion of critics and liberals, this was a move that called for a cessation in the political pugilism of a campaign and replace it with action. The economic policy initiative being worked on here is a an expensive proposal that requires due diligence and attention. By suspending the political exploitation of the issue to participate in the process and allow for proper attention to it, John McCain has once again put country first and shown us that he is serving a cause greater than self.
John McCain has been in the lead on this issue since 2005 when he put forward Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005. It was a measure that would have prevented the lack of proper regulation and recording practices that allowed the current crisis to get to this point. Democrats, including the current chairmen of the house and senate committees responsible for such legislation, blocked it.
Liberals Chris Dodd and Barney Franks are the Chairmen of the committees which oversaw the very aspects of the process which led to the crisis we are now in. Suddenly they are working together, holding hearings and trying to hammer out a solution to a problem that has now exploded. Where have they been prior to this? For them to suggest that John McCain is not needed to solve this crisis and that he need not to suspend his campaign to address the issue properly is preposterous. He is a sitting Senator, as is Obama. Since 2005, McCain has tried to avoid the problem we are now facing and led the way to prevent it. For the last two years, his first years in the senate, Barack Obama has campaigned for President. I would suggest that of the two, John McCain is the more rational voice on the issue. His actions to postpone that which would distract from the dire attention needed for this bailout package are not only right, they are prudent.
Detractors claim that this a political ploy. They suggest that a President must be able to handle more than one issue at a time. That is true, however, a President must also be able to demonstrate that he can properly prioritize issues and actions. A president needs the instincts and judgment that allows fellow Americans to understand the urgency of a situation. When 9/11 struck, we accepted it's obvious importance as the most immediate concern to our nation and we accepted the postponement of other priorities in order to focus on the main concern. The failing of certain sectors of the financial market does not compare to the tragedy and horror of 9/11 but it does represent the necessity for the same type of urgency for action and attention.
I am concerned with the rush of pork barrel spending, legislators to craft a 700 billion dollar legislative initiative. I understand the need for the relatively quick development of the initiative but quick is not what the government is good at. They botch up things that they work on for years, yet we are suppose to be confident in something that they throw together in days.
That being said, since there is the need for congress to quickly come up with a package that corrects certain wrongs before they start infecting other areas of our economy, I want them to spend the few days in question working on it, focused on it and not distracted from it. I want McCain's input and leadership on this issue. I want attention to detail that opposes any last minute, unaffiliated, pork barrel measures added on to this bill. I do not want to see the crisis used as a political game with bumper sticker slogans being used to solve the problem.
If this budget bailout package is not worked out in time for Friday's, than so be it. The work to create a truly proper and effective bailout package will still need to be done and I would not mind the two candidates applying themselves to it. One of the two will inherit an administration that will have to deal with the results of this legislation and I prefer them to work on it. I do not want them to be debating foreign affairs while our nation deals with the most drastic measures in the history of economic affairs.
You can call McCain's suspension of regular campaign activity a ploy but I call it a judgment call that demonstrates his sincere sense of responsibility and desire to put country first. Barack Osama's "call me if you need me" attitude democrats the judgment of his "above my pay grade attitude. Both men are elected representatives in the United states Senate and both men have responsibilities to that position. Barack Obama is taking that responsibility lightly and putting his campaign for president first.

Rules Of Washington
If it's worth fighting for, it's worth fighting dirty for.
Don't lie, cheat or steal...unnecessarily.
There is always one more son of a b----h than you counted on.
An honest answer can get you into a lot of trouble.
The facts, although interesting, are irrelevant.
Chicken little only has to be right once.
"NO" is only an interim response.
You can't kill a bad idea.
If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you ever tried.
The truth is a variable.
A porcupine with his quills down in just another fat rodent.
You can agree with any concept or notional future option, in principle, but fight implementation every step of the way.
A promise is not a guarantee.
If you can't counter the argument, leave the meeting.


Comments: 54
IMHO, they should move this first debate to Washington DC so the candidates can be available for votes or needed discussions. Neither of them chairs a major committee, so DC is not hampered by their also making appearances.
The country must hear, however, how these gents plan to take the country forward. We have a right to know if they have a plan.
There is no need to cancel the debate, unless McCain is too scared to participate. He knows he will have his ass handed to him on the whole debacle, and he is part of the problem.
This problem is for the elected leaders to fix, Bush and his gang broke it let Bush and his gang take the slack for it not the nominated candidates that will inherit the problem from this socialist fool.
78% of the public says no bailout and that is the only reverent opinion in the whole mess. As usual Washington could care less what the public wants or needs because they are still busy grabbing our wealth to take with them on their way out the back door.
57% of Public Favors Wall Street Bailout
"By a margin of almost two-to-one the American public thinks the government is doing the right thing in investing billions of dollars to try to keep financial institutions and markets secure."
http://people-press.org/report/452/public-favors-bailout
4* When you think about the problems on Wall Street, is it better for the government to step in and rescue the financial markets or is it be better to let the companies that made mistakes go bankrupt?
30% Step in and rescue the financial markets
50% Let the companies that made mistakes go bankrupt
20% Not sure
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/
Asked whether the government should use taxpayer dollars to rescue financial firms whose collapse could have adverse effects on the economy, 55% of the poll's respondents said they did not believe the government should be responsible for funding a bailout plan.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/la-na-econpoll24-2008sep24,0,622218.story
Don't see those numbers you quote.
Get over yourself.
If foreign affairs is 'McCain is most superior in' he should be willing to debate instead of spending time in DC getting in the way.
He is running from his past.
Let's hear it!
Debra
We already know Barry doesn't have a plan.
Get a brain, Vote McCain!
I googled "projecting your own negative attributes on others" and came up with this enlightening web page that you should read. It will help you to get in touch with your "Dark Shadow" and "Bright Shadow". I hope it helps. :)
http://www.ata-tarot.com/reflections/04-15-03/sun.htm
Hey I just came up with a nice one along the lines of your intelligent lingo "You want pain - vote McCain" - pretty good, huhh?
Obama "I'd have to say the U S Senate.
McCain "I'd have to say rice, I always say that, you know I was a POW."
Ask and you shall receive. Obama's Ego:
1. The audacity of ego - Boston Globe, July 20, 2008
2. Obama The One
3. And then we have this laughable gem:
And just for good measure, why don't you google "Obama ego" and you'll see there are plenty who are saying the same thing.
Hmmmmm.... who's projecting now? Anywho, I'm just tired of YEARS of mud slinging from these moonbat libs. The gloves are off, no love lost.
Barack Obama's ego deflates him - Charles Krauthammer
Barack Obama wants to speak at the Brandenburg Gate. He figures it would be a nice backdrop. The supporting cast - a cheering audience and a few fainting frauleins - would be a picturesque way to bolster his foreign policy credentials.
What Obama does not seem to understand is that the Brandenburg Gate is something you earn. President Ronald Reagan earned the right to speak there because his relentless pressure had brought the Soviet empire to its knees and he was demanding its final "tear down this wall" liquidation. When President John F. Kennedy visited the Brandenburg Gate on the day of his "Ich bin ein Berliner" speech, he was representing a country that was prepared to go to the brink of nuclear war to defend West Berlin.
Who is Obama representing? And what exactly has he done in his lifetime to merit appropriating the Brandenburg Gate as a campaign prop? What was his role in the fight against communism, the liberation of Eastern Europe, the creation of what George Bush 41 - who presided over the fall of the Berlin Wall but modestly declined to go there for a victory lap - called "a Europe whole and free"?
Does Obama not see the incongruity? It's as if a German pol took a campaign trip to America and demanded the Statue of Liberty as a venue for a campaign speech. (The Germans have now gently nudged Obama into looking at other venues.)
Americans are beginning to notice Obama's elevated opinion of himself. There's nothing new about narcissism in politics. Every senator looks in the mirror and sees a President. Nonetheless, has there ever been a presidential nominee with a wider gap between his estimation of himself and the sum total of his lifetime achievements?
Obama is a three-year senator without a single important legislative achievement to his name, a former Illinois state senator who voted "present" nearly 130 times. As president of the Harvard Law Review, as law professor and as legislator, has he ever produced a single notable piece of scholarship? Written a single memorable article? His most memorable work is a biography of his favorite subject: himself.
It is a subject upon which he can dilate effortlessly. In his victory speech upon winning the nomination, Obama declared it a great turning point in history - "generations from now we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment" - when, among other wonders, "the rise of the oceans began to slow." As economist Irwin Stelzer noted in his London Daily Telegraph column, "Moses made the waters recede, but he had help." Obama apparently works alone.
Dishonesty is nothing new in politics, Winston Churchill said "A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on" and Adolph Hitler was quoted as saying "Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it" which probably explains why some modern day politicians keep repeating the same lies over and over even after they have been debunked. Factcheck.org a non partisan group that debunks misleading ads from both campaigns has called the latest ads by one candidate for president "particularly egregious".
Have the lies already worked on you? Have you already fallen for the propaganda? Valdimir Lenin the former communist leader of the Soviet Union knew a thing or two about propaganda. He said "A lie told often enough becomes truth". So have you been falling for the empty propaganda that some politicians have been spewing in our direction? Or are you going to stand up and show the world that American voters are not as stupid as some of our politicians take us for.
It is time for voters to put aside the wedge issues that the campaigns and lobbyist always use to manipulate and trick us into voting against our own best interest. Put aside abortion, gay marriage, wars, religion, etc. We will not have a country to be able to fight for or against those issues if the economy gets worse. Our current economy is destroying families, causing mental breakdowns and hardship for millions. Put aside party lines, put aside racism, put aside it all and think of your country as a whole. One thing I think everyone can agree on is that America wins when the economy works for everyone. Get educated, learn the truth, vote smart, and help spread the word.
Dishonesty is nothing new in politics, Winston Churchill said "A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on" and Adolph Hitler was quoted as saying "Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it" which probably explains why some modern day politicians keep repeating the same lies over and over even after they have been debunked. Factcheck.org a non partisan group that debunks misleading ads from both campaigns has called the latest ads by one candidate for president "particularly egregious".
Have the lies already worked on you? Have you already fallen for the propaganda? Valdimir Lenin the former communist leader of the Soviet Union knew a thing or two about propaganda. He said "A lie told often enough becomes truth". So have you been falling for the empty propaganda that some politicians have been spewing in our direction? Or are you going to stand up and show the world that American voters are not as stupid as some of our politicians take us for.
It is time for voters to put aside the wedge issues that the campaigns and lobbyist always use to manipulate and trick us into voting against our own best interest. Put aside abortion, gay marriage, wars, religion, etc. We will not have a country to be able to fight for or against those issues if the economy gets worse. Our current economy is destroying families, causing mental breakdowns and hardship for millions. Put aside party lines, put aside racism, put aside it all and think of your country as a whole. One thing I think everyone can agree on is that America wins when the economy works for everyone. Get educated, learn the truth, vote smart, and help spread the word.
But bringing this talk down to this level again is just another lame distraction from you because you don't have much else to say. It really is about who wants to get what done and who will do the work that you believe in. I personally agree with Barack Obama's vision, his ideas, his positive attitude, his politics, his strength and I trust that this strength make him a great leader. I would also be extremely proud to ham Barcak Obama represent the USA when he meets with world leaders. I believe that Barack Obama will choose the right people to lead this country into a new direction. I disagree with what Bush and McCain stands and hope for the sake of my children that they will not be chosen for another 4 years.
Last night's disastrous meeting in the White House points to a fundamental flaw in ideology within the Republican plan, and the only way to get beyond the deadlock right now, in my opinion, is bring this nearly trillion dollar tax-bailout out in the open where it belongs. To the people. Let Obama and McCain debate their ideologies, for that is the level of where the problem exists. What is McCain afraid of? That he'll lose some of his and his wife's investments in corporations that have engaged in short-selling?
More than ever, the electorate has the right to hear without delay directly from the two, of whom one will execute the economic affairs of America for the next 4 years, what the differences are between the Democratic and Republican plans.
Was it this?
John McCain did nothing to help... he only hurt the process
(that was a consensus opinion from one side after the meeting)
This election process must not under any circumstance be delayed. Bush and now McCain are showing their true colors when it comes to democracy and the Constitution. Bush has attempted to destroy *it* with this stupid thing a good detective agency could have worked out long ago, bin Ladin's terrorism, and now McCain's so afraid of the democratic process, he'd like to control the whole process personally.
Let's get this debate in Mississippi, a state that McCain feels he's already won, on track. What's McCain afraid of?
He certainly has nothing to contribute to Capitol Hill in resolving this mess on Wall Street. He showed that last night.
Apparently when he found he was not part of the various committee's which are working to resolve this problem and was not allowed inside the meetings he waltzed over to the House of Representatives and found a band of merry men to follow his commands.
Why is John McCain involved with House Republicans ?
You do realize the financial obligation to produce this debate is from private sources who have already spent 5 million dollars. You do realize companies have lined up their commercial time to be broadcast during the and after the debate ?
This is simply not something you can just call off and do another day.
Most people are suspecting he is doing this so the time allotted for the Vice Presidential debate will be sequestered to allow 3 presidential debates and NO vice president debate.
I want the debate to go on. John McCain does not want to campaign right now because he knows economic issues are not his strong point. By suspending his campaign and trying to skip this debate he is showing that he is incapable of leadership during a crisis. I don't want a president whose approach to problems is to hide.
Investors could make arrangements with the current residents who are paying on the mortgages so that way they won't lose their homes--maybe change things where they're just renting instead of buying the house if necessary. That would be a whole lot more manageable that having the Treasury Department sort out the mess, which could take a whole lot longer. It's an alternative to what was originally proposed, and I think it's a good idea to be considered in this.
Acorn? You mean the voter fraud people? Bailout money for ACORN?
Anywho... THE DEBATE IS ON... moonbats prepare for the final death knell of your candidate.
"The Dems can pass this bill without any help from the Republicans. If its such a great idea, why don't they just pass the bill and take all the glory for saving the country?
Winston Smith, Sep 26, 2008, 1:53pm EDT"
Winston I dare say that the Dems do not have a filibuster proof majority in either house so they really can't pass anything they want to. In addition this was supposed to be a bipartisan effort and appeared to be headed that way until McCain and the Republican legislators decided to rebel after an agreement had already been announced. Remember this whole thing was requested by the Republican administration and now Republicans won't support it. That sounds like a Republican problem to me so let them work it out.
Investors could make arrangements with the current residents who are paying on the mortgages so that way they won't lose their homes--maybe change things where they're just renting instead of buying the house if necessary. That would be a whole lot more manageable that having the Treasury Department sort out the mess, which could take a whole lot longer. It's an alternative to what was originally proposed, and I think it's a good idea to be considered in this.
Patricia G., Sep 26, 2008, 9:17am EDT "
So Patricia how would this work. If a $150,000.00 loan is pruchased for $60,000.00 how much does the government insure it for, $60K or $150K. Does the Mortgagee now have a $60k loan he can now afford or a 150K loan that he cannot afford and his house is only worth about 100K. If so why would we want to insure it?
I am afraid the large majority of these loans have balances that are far greater than what the home would appraise for.
This sounds like an idea but I would have to know a lot more about it.
I think a better idea would be to nationalize all the banks involved and sort it out from there. I know, I can here conservatives across the land wretching but hey you gotta do what you gotta do. On man's socialism is another man's solution to the problem. If it works I don't give a rat's patootie what you call it.
He himself said he doesn't know squat about economics.
Today, Denmark's number one bank - Den Danske Bank - lost between $150 to +$300 million due to outstanding what it calls *loans* to Lehman's Brothers. In an interview today on Danish TV-2, its director - who stated that the Lehman loss represents only the tip of the iceberg to a possible total Danish economic collapse - was asked what would happen to the world if America does not find a solution to this crisis. He stated that he dared not even use his fantasy to describe a worse-case scenario. He further stated that this whole mess sits squarely on the lack of common sense federal regulations in America, and that the US has a serious obligation now to the western world, in coming up with a quick solution.
Personally, I feel that the problem in Denmark (and other places in Europe crumbling, ie: England, due to this VERY REAL domino's effect) sits squarely on our own government's hand-in-glove participation for the past 7 years in the Bush (and now McCain) agendas with elitist economic policies and the war in Iraq.
Denmark's 8th largest bank, and second largest mortgage holder - Roskilde Bank - already has already collapsed at the time of the Fannie/Freddie implosions, and was salvaged by law via our National Bank, which is like the US Treasury.
Today, I had to council one of my therapy clients who was on the verge of a nervous collapse from watching TV news to perhaps spread out her pension investments into several banks, so that her funds would be fully insured.
He never said 'squat'.... and neither candidate has industry experience... you know nothing about it, just another liberal hack repeating talking points. Good work though with the copy/paste.. you got that down pat ;)
In the real world, Obama won the debate in the immediate polls after, and on all points including foreign policy.
For the first time we could see the two for their very different ideologies, and in that setting of divisiveness, only Obama rose to any presidential presence in reaching across the divide to bridge the gap of the old man still hooked since youth on the world being an exclusive boy's club. Seems there might be 6.7 billion people other than McCain in this world, and more importantly to the debate, 305 million Americans who resonate more with the potentials of the future than with the dinosaurs of an extinct epoch.
Don (Obama puts the "O" in dim-O-wit) H., Sep 26, 2008, 10:39pm EDT"
Don H. - Do you live in some sort of let's pretend world. A world where if you keep telling lies that they miraculously turn into the truth. You are pathetic.
Sounds just like the Black Vulcan on Star trek.
omg he looks like the Black Vulcan.