The text of the Bailout Act is out. And Section 8 is egregious:
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.
Call your Congressman or woman and demand that this will not stand, otherwise Congress will have literally just ceded its last bit of power, that of the purse.
Like Stirling said, this is the Constitutional moment, if you ask me. Do you really want Congress to cede it's power of the purse? Think long and hard about this, Democrat or Republican. This is the moment when our republic is a stake.
Nota bene: As a Conservative friend of mine just said in an email, "It's not good at all. It's basically a transfer of the unlimited power of the Executive in wartime to spending matters. Taken to its logical extreme, it's the end of Congress."


Comments: 27
As the saying goes, "Act in haste...."
Reminds me of the hurry up and sign - patriot act.
When in Crisis Mode, we always give away the farm! Fear sells well. The Brand: Maverick will save us!
We are a Republic. These are our elected leaders appointing good men and good women to jobs that must be done. Perhaps this is a continuation of “The Greatest Robbery of all Times.” Woe be Us.
Yet until congress acts, it can't really be challenged. Actually, until it gets signed into law, then it will be challengable.
I don't hear more attractive alternatives being floated about.
And actually, yes, the government should do nothing. Sometimes doing nothing is the best thing to do, as opposed to recklessly scaring people to death and moving ahead with a bailout that is anathema to everything you Conservatives stand for. I'd laugh at you if it weren't so dire.
Gather Broadcasting: Have it your way
Yes! 35
The article is an excellent alternative to simply bailing out the banks. I like the idea of creating a Trust to buy up the bad mortgages, converting them to fixed rate conventional 30 year ones, and tying them to the property so that unscrupulous borrowers and lenders can't scam the system. The proposal would allow people to stay in their homes, but would discount the mortgages being bought by the government. It would give taxpayers some of the profits from a sale in exchange for getting a safe, secure mortgage.
This is tantamount to war and the war must be swift. Paulsen must do the right thing but he damn well better do it very quickly. This is much more than 700 Billon dollars. It will be as I've stated elsewhere in Gather, equal to threading a needle while riding on a roller coaster. Too many cooks and this baby's going to burn -up like a deck of cards in a crematory. Swift, decisive or Depression. Paulsen must keep foreign money to support our enormous debt, save the dollar from further distruction and keep world stock markets calm. That doesn't allow for nickle-dime debates. Reason: the foreign markets are very weary of our financial state. No trade with foreign countries, falling stock prices, no government barrowing from the usual sources and it could get very, very nasty. We need to be able to later review what Paulsen did. And that will be done by surrogate, publically honored responsible advisors. You and I will never see the "deal". Unfortunately a negative imagination will tell you why. I worked for major Wall Street firms for over 25 years as a securites debt specialist. This is huge and complicated. Debate this one and we'll be debating in Hell. I wish it could be done your way. It can't. I understand your anger and anguish - regulation is not a four letter word. Let's make sure this doesn't happen a third time. (2nd time-bank failures - mortgage related early 90s.)