While the campaign for President rages on, people are taking sides for many different reasons. Some are choosing their candidate based on their perception that one candidate or the other agrees with them on issues that they are passionate about. Some voters are basing their decision on experience or trust in their candidates intentions. Others are voting simply based upon their party affiliation. There are even some reckless and bigoted individuals voting along ethnic or racial lines and others who are voting based on age.
A majority of people are basing their decision on more overall factors that look at the big picture and determine their vote factoring in issues, the candidates voting records and history along with their honesty and abilities.
Be it history, affiliation, color, one issue or many issues, the determining factors that account for the decision of each single voter varies.
From the managerial point of a campaign, the name of the game is getting more votes than the opposing campaign. In doing so a campaign manager must look at the demographic breakdown of the electorate and ascertain their likely supporters in those demographics. The reason being that in order to win, you must maximize persuasion and voter turnout among the demographics that are inclined to support your candidate.
There are many different aspects that factor in to demographics. First of all they must be registered voters. You can appeal to someone who has a strong opinion but if they are not registered to vote, their opinion does not matter. You have regional concerns and the mathematics of the electoral college. You have party affiliation and religious backgrounds as well as racial demographics and age. Of all these, and even more demographic breakdowns, age, happens to be one of the most crucial.
It is a fact that out of all specialized categories of voters, senior citizens are the segment who are most dedicated in an election. It is a group that exceeds all other cross tabs including race, gender or religion.
Senior citizens cherish their vote and they use it. There are many reasons for this fact. One deals with the fact that people of retirement age have entered into a less fast paced lifestyle and are not bogged down by long commutes to work and trying to meet deadlines in between addressing all the needs of their domestic lives. This gives them more time to focus on the issues and pay more attention to them. Other reasons deal with the fact that with their age also comes the revelation of the importance in their vote. They have come to learn that the leaders of our nation have more of a direct impact on us than other citizens think or understand. Unlike some younger voters who still feel invincible and detached from the effects of Washington, D.C., senior citizens realize the direct impact that Washington has on us.
Because of these points, senior citizens are the most important voting block in almost any election and most definitely in any national election. They comprise approximately 12.5 percent of the national population. More importantly, they comprise an even larger percentage of the voting population. 79 percent of this population registered to vote in the last election and even more have registered for this election. That is the largest percentage of voters out of all other demographic groups. Furthermore, of the 79 percent who can vote, more than 71percent actually cast a ballot, accounting for the highest voter turnout of any demographic.
All this points to one thing. When you combine the issues with the likely voters on Election Day, senior citizens are one of the most important groups that a campaign can appeal to. They listen and they vote.
In this election, Barack Obama has burst on to the scene and there is incredible enthusiasm for him. Especially among so-called young voters. It is often pointed out that the size of the crowds that turnout at Obama events are humungous. I will not disagree with that but I will suggest that it has little bearing on the election. Many of these young voters do not vote. Come Election Day, they often find themselves preoccupied with other happenings in their lives and the level of importance that some of them put on their right to vote often pales in comparison to some truly less important trend of the moment. The crowds that show up for Barack may be large, but how many of those people are registered to vote? How many of them who are registered will actually make the effort to vote?
Barack Obama's appeal to the youth vote is admirable. We need all voting age citizens to vote and many do. But the fact remains that the most reliable voters are 65 and older. It is a point not ignored by John McCain and his campaign which has not simply geared his efforts to the "hipper", younger part of the electorate as does Obama. McCain's appeal is rooted in accomplishments and examples and he directs it to all Americans, including seniors.
That being the case Barack Obama is losing this election based upon not only his lack of accomplishments to point to or the incongruity of his policy positions but because the direction of his campaign is tactically wrong. He is relying on a segment of the electorate that has paid little attention to the real issues. A segment of the electorate that thinks it knows all that they need to know by getting their news from MTV. Admittedly, there are many young and first time voters who pay more attention and are not swayed by Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears or Matt Damon. That is why the youth vote is not monolithic in it's support of democrats. Neither are golden agers. But the older, reliable, likely voters are more conservative in their thinking. They also are not as open to change as is the x-generation and VH1 or MTV crowd.
This does not bode well for a candidate who has taken his campaign to the streets of Germany and promotes change without having a record of bringing about any reform. Older citizens take pause and wonder if the type of change being offered is the type of transformation that Jimmy Carter brought to them when they were younger and lived through economic times far more difficult than we may have today. The retired voter is not impressed by commercials geared to the youth vote and claim that John McCain is out of touch because he doesn't use e-mail. First of all John McCain doesn't use email because the improper setting of broken bones during his Vietnam experience handicapped him and left him without the dexterity to properly use a keyboard. Secondly, many in the older generation don't rely on e-mail, yet they are still in touch with the issues and the reality they live in.
According to many polls, experience is one of the most important qualities that people 55 and older look for in a candidate. Currently, polls have shown that this age group leans heavily to John McCain for that reason. They see in him someone that brings vast experience to the ticket and in his running mate they see someone who actually has experience in governing. All are qualities that they do not find in Obama. It is a point hammered home by Pennsylvania, which has the second largest senior population in the nation. In Pennsylvania's Democratic primary for President, Clinton overwhelmingly defeated Obama in large part due to the senior population and their focus on experience.
It is also interesting to note that the three states with the highest population of seniors are also battleground states in the presidential election. Among them are Florida, which has the highest concentration of voters 65 and older.
These factors do not offer great optimism for an Obama victory. His ambiguous calls for change, his lack of experience and accomplishment along with his attempts to make McCain look out of touch and feeble do not necessarily appeal to one of the largest and most reliable group of voters in the nation.
The political professionals on the Obama team will realize all this in time. And when they do, they will pull out the DNC handbook and resort to their usual tactic of trying to scare senior citizens. They will try to scare them into believing that John McCain will steel away their social security benefits. It is a tactic that they have used in every election cycle since Reagan and it is a tactic that has failed them. In fact, it is a play on their fears that has often offended seniors and backfired on democrats. But rest assured, the democrats will panic and play that game again.
In the mean time Barack Obama should sit down and asses his campaign. He should look at the voters whom he is trying to appeal to and try to address them properly. Instead of mocking age, he should try to point out all that his age brings to the table . Instead of promoting change for change's sake, he should develop and articulate an economic policy that would strengthen the economy and allow people to keep more of the money that they earn. Instead of appealing to Germans in Berlin he should appeal to Americans and outline his direction for keeping us safe. Instead of using text massages to make announcements such as who his running mate will be, Barack should address the people properly. Perhaps a good way to do that would be to accept John McCain's call to joint town hall meetings with the people, where the two of them can address the people, together, in real life, not online and scripted.
In the end, the campaign that has been best at putting forth their vision to all the voters and has been able to best support that vision with real results, will win the day. However, it will not be won by continuing in the direction that the Obama campaign is going. It will not be won by trying to appeal to the youngest and most unreliable voters and offending the oldest and most reliable voters.


Comments: 55
<div style="">
Glitter Text Generator</div></div>
Nothing he says makes sense. I've never heard any other ways in which he'll be able to pay for everything he's promised. He's simply telling people what they want to hear and nothing more.
Some nice points.
I think the failures of Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers and AIG Insurance suggest to most Americans that what we need in government is some honest oversight and not just deregulation as the Republicans have traditionally advocated.
The economy isn't fundamentally strong. The fundamentals of the economy are not "the workers" as McCain infers to dodge his comments. His record as part of the Keating 5 does not add to his image as a reformer of banks and S&L's. Rather he has a record of being part of the problem and not part of the solution.
Furthermore, is anyone on the Republican side still talking about privatization of Social Security?
Palin is an attractive and youthful candidate. But her glow is fading and America feels the pain of the economic disaster we are experiencing, they will not vote for continuing the same party in power. They will vote for change.
That means Obama.
I guess you don't recall the results of the Keating 5 investigations which did not censure or commit McCain of anything.
I guess you also do not remember that in 2005, a year before Obama entered the Senate, John McCain, co-sponsored a bill to reform the regulatory process of FannieMae, FreddieMac and other financial institution. In it, at the time, he said that the risk to taxpayers was becoming increasingly evident and that we needed to better regulate the extent of risk that these institutions are taking.
I guess you forget that democrats blocked that bill.
I assume you also forget that Obama's top two economic advisors were on the boards of FannieMae and FreddieMac and that as the former chairman of FannieMae, one of them left his position with a profit of over 80 miliion dollars.
In forgetting all this, are you suggesting that the people advising Obama and who were a part of those two housing institutions downfall, indicates a change for a better?
I put more faith in the man who warned us about this situation and proposed regulatory reforms to avoid it three years ago than Obama who is taking the advice of the men who led us into the problem. I and John McCain have no problem with regulation and I believe we need proper regulation that monitors for overextended risks. However I don't think that overregulation and taking free out of free markets is the answer. Appropriate regulation and safeguards are however needed.
You should also note that regulations brought about by the Clinton administration in the 1990's are also a major part of this problem. They created regulations which required that a certain amount of loans "must" be extended to a set percentage of high risk recipients in low income neighborhoods and categories. These regulations required monetary risks be extended based on ethnicity and color not affordability.
As for Sarah Palin, yes she is attractive and youthful but in addition she is accomplished and unlike Obama she has done what she talks about. Palin detractors have tried to smear her on every front. They have attempted to create falsehoods ranging from her banning books to pretending to have given birth to a child that was her daughters baby. They have tried to suggest that she has not controlled budgets or reformed government. Yet all of these stories have been proven to be attempts to smear her.
The people of America will in fact be voting for change. They will be voting for the change that McCain-Palin offers in the shape of reform, reform of the business as usual, old boys network of one hand washing the other politics in Washinggton D.C.
It is interesting that the candidate running on change, Barack Obama, picked Joe Biden to be his running mate. In his first decision as a presidential candidate he reached into Washington, D.C. and picked a man right out of the liberal establishment who has never oppsosed his party or stood up to them. A man who has been in Washington for almost thirty years and did nothing to reform any of it.
John McCain has stood up to his party and challenged them and who has sponsored reforms in government reached outside of the beltway to pick his running mate. He picked someone who is not a part of the old boys network, someone who has changed government and who has fought corruption even when it existed in her own party.
Change is not a word. It is not a man who practices business as usual and takes advice from insiders who profit from mishandling financial institutions. Change is a process that must be undertaken and John McCain and Sarah Palin have undertaken that process and succeded at it.
Where is the change that Obama offers? It certainly is not in the same old rhetoric that he spews.
This is w/o a doubt one of the most well-written and cogent article I have read on Gather to date... or at least in a very long time.
There is another salient point I would like to make to reinforce your argument about the significance of the +45 voting block. History!
Many of the voters in this particular age bracket have had the benefit of at least 8 to 10 Presidential election cycles. Many have seen it all. Many realize that "change" comes no matter who gets elected! Many older voters can reflect upon the impact that various Presidents have had upon their lives in comparison to where they are at this time. Older voters are much less inclined to accept the slander, slime, and the sound bites as they shrug it off with a simple "I've heard that all before."
Older voters do not buy that Bush/McCain - McCain/Bush advertising strategy because history tells them that the Bush Administration is an abberation and a black mark on the Presidency as no one has ever known / seen in their life time. Oddly enough, that reinforces McCain's promise of "reform."
Voters of older generations had been or have known men/women who served in Vietnam and did not come home or came home to derision. Older voters want a war hero in the White House. These same voters may have had fathers or mothers who had served in WWII during a time when service to our country was an honor.
Retirees and older voters simply do not want to partake in the "wealth distribution" schemes of the '60's and '70's. The entire McCain / Palin platform of giving voters a greater voice in keeping their money and less taxes is very appealing to folks that have to live on Social Security or fixed incomes.
Finally, young people who graduated from college in the late 60's or early 70's do not buy into the "is our country ready for a black President" racial divide. Older voters don't buy into "playing the race card" political strategy of "I don't look like the other Presidents on our currency" because we have known great Afro-American leaders! Obama has made a big mistake "playing" that card because he is not qualified or experienced enough to claim the mantle of greatness. We have the benefit of knowing how to judge a man by the "content of his character and not the color of his skin."
I think you have really hit on the critical issue in this election with respect to demographics:
+45 voters. They are far from a "silent majority."
Soozan, you ahve Pookah have made some excellent points here also. I have considered, but not to the extend you mention here, the effect of the combination of McCain's honorable service, the effect of my father's service in the Army Air Corp in WWII at Iwo Jima, the effect of the treatment of the Vietnam vets, and my own son's service in the Army. I know I have a great pride in our armed services and in McCain's honorable service time. But McCain's understanding of the military mindset and Obama's complete lack of same as place a large role in McCain's favor for me. Albeit not the only reason I favor McCain/Palin 08, however a big one in my personal book.
Obama, on the other hand is not slipping in the polls, and is gaining; further, people believe that Biden was chosen not only to help Obama win but also because he is well qualified.
Bernanke does not hold the power that Greenspan has.
And remember it is the Republicans, beginning with Reagan who got us into this economic mess.
We will all suffer, globally for a decade or three.
Think it was 35 years ago?
Nope.
Guess again.
I''ll be back later to see if anyone guessed under whose administration that occurred and in what year.
Who pushed the deregulations of savings an loans causing the 500 billion bailout you are still paying for? Reagan...correct
Who pushed deregulation act---gramm- leach...1999 that has caused this economic disaster? GOP....voting for it...correct
Who is lying in the ads and running a campaign that dishonors eveything he has done in the past...McCain...correct
Who has made the worst first decision by letting the party elders choose a woman unfit to be vice or pres....for him...?
McCain
The only reason he is still in the game, is the lies and the right wing radicals on radios and other medium who in disservice to their country are willing to accuse a man of things that are untrue.
The very soul of this nation is in danger...
The GOP has mutated in to the evil empire..fascist regime....and actually the democrats reminds me more of the gop in the 60',
If you really care for your country educate yourself and read good stuff from good people.
Remember....think for yourself ...better nations in the past have been overcome by astute and false propaganda.
Why? too many americans have lost the ability for critical thinking and be leaders, they rather follow.
Q.So suddenly the government is in the business of intervening in corporate America. What does that mean?
A. The Republicans - their own philosophy blew up in their face. They were so extreme in their in sistence that there be no government intervention that they have wound up provoking far more government intervention than the Democrats ever would have.
Q.Was any particular regulator asleep at the wheel, allowing these problems to escalate?
A. Alan Greenspan wasn't asleep, he was walking around saying no, no, no, no, no. He didn't forget not to regulate. He believed as a matter of fundamental ideological principle you shouldn't regulate.
Q.What about the Securities and Exchange Commission?
A. They were not as active as they should be. In fact in 2003 and 2004, when I first became the ranking Democrat on the committee, we had tried to give them some more money and the Bush administration resisted it.
Q.What about the role of the Democrats, given that they control Congress. Should they have foreseen this?
A. Well we've been in control for a year and a half. We came to power and within three months, the committee I chair passed a bill to increase the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And by the summer of 2007 had passed a subprime bill.
I do also...my husband spent 30 years in the navy and retired as a commander.
His father died on a ship while in the navy of TB and left a 13 year old boy and 3 other children with a young widow.
I understand your support for McCain but unfortunately it is misplaced.
Most veterans organization do not support him because he has consistently voted against them.
There are many site from VETS who will tell you that.
His voting record is dysmal for Iraq supplies and support for education.
Written by Colonel Richard Klass, USAF (ret.)
Tuesday, 02 September 2008
When it comes to supporting veterans in Congress, the choice between Barack Obama and John McCain couldn’t be clearer. Here’s how Obama has demonstrated that he is the candidate best suited to restore the sacred trust with America’s veterans.
Barack Obama immediately chose to serve on the Veterans Affairs Committee upon entering the Senate.
In his 25 years in Congress, John McCain has never served on the Veterans Affairs Committee.
Barack Obama fought, cosponsored, and voted for the bipartisan New GI Bill of Rights.
John McCain and the Bush Administration opposed the New GI Bill, and McCain skipped important votes on it – TWICE – because he was too busy campaigning
Obama helped pass 10 key veterans bills since 2007, including three bills he personally introduced which 1) prevented veterans with PTSD or TBI from being wrongfully discharged and 2) protected family members from being fired for taking time off work to care for wounded service members. Obama has also sponsored 36 additional veterans bills since 2007, reaching across the aisle consistently to work with Senate Republicans.
John McCain seems to take veterans support for granted. McCain has failed to endorse numerous efforts sponsored by Barack Obama and Senate Republicans, including:
* The Veterans Suicide Prevention Act, which passed with support from 11 Republicans *
The bipartisan Traumatic Brain Injury Act, which passed unanimously *
* S.773, with 61 cosponsors including 28 Republicans, which allows military retirees to pay health insurance premiums on a pretax basis and reduces TRICARE supplemental premiums *
* S.961, with 59 cosponsors including 22 Republicans, which provides benefits to people who served in the merchant marine during World War II *
* S.1838, introduced by both Republican senators from Texas, which provides veterans hospital service in the Rio Grande Valley so veterans do not have to drive 250 miles to San Antonio *
Barack Obama voted for a bipartisan 2006 amendment that would have provided consistent funding for veteran's health care, while taking into account changes in the veterans population and inflation, by closing corporate tax loopholes and delaying tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.
John McCain voted against the amendment.
Barack Obama voted for a bipartisan 2005 amendment that would have provided $500 million dollars per year from 2006 to 2010 for readjustment counseling, related mental health services, and rehabilitation for veterans with mental illness, PTSD, or substance use disorder.
John McCain voted against the amendment.
Barack Obama received a B+ on the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America scorecard of priority votes in 2006.
John McCain received a D.
Barack Obama supported 80% of the legislative priorities of Disabled American Veterans in 2006.
John McCain supported only 20%.
Barack Obama voted for 14 of 15 legislative priorities of the Vietnam Veterans of America since 2005.
John McCain only voted for 9 of 25.
John McCain has broken faith with our soldiers and veterans. Our veterans deserve a Commander in Chief who will honor our sacred trust. The record is clear; Barack Obama is the leader we deserve.
Veterans Group Endorses Senator Barack Obama for President
Written by Press Release
Wednesday, 20 August 2008
Washington, D.C. –The Council for a Livable World’s Veterans Alliance for Security and Democracy (CLW-VETPAC ) announced its endorsement today of Sen. Barack Obama for President.
“Veterans understand what is needed for national leadership,” said Paul “Bud” Bucha, chairman of the group’s advisory council and a Medal of Honor recipient. “Barack Obama has demonstrated the judgment, energy, integrity, and temperament to be an outstanding commander in chief.”
“We are supporting Senator Obama because of his hard work on issues that are important to veterans and military families, especially health care and education,” said Lorin Walker, vice president of CLW-VETPAC. Walker pointed to Sen. Obama’s proposal for a Military Families Advisory Council as a great step forward in caring for military families.
“The differences between McCain and Obama on veterans issues are clear,” Walker added, noting Obama’s support – and McCain’s opposition – to the New GI Bill of Rights. “On veterans’ issues, Obama is the winner.”
“Senator Obama has strongly supported the legislative priorities of many non-partisan veterans groups while McCain has voted against them,” said Col. Richard Klass (USAF, ret.), president of CLW-VETPAC, noting that Sen. McCain receives low scores, especially in comparison to Obama, on legislative scorecards put out by the Disabled American Veterans (DAV), Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) and Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA).
According to Klass, Sen. McCain has proposed limiting VA health care to those with direct combat wounds only, the first step in a misguided attempt to privatize VA health care and dismantle one of the best and most cost effective health care systems in the country.
“Senator Obama honors this nation’s sacred trust with its veterans,” concluded Klass. “Though Senator McCain heroically kept faith with his fellow prisoners of war in Vietnam, he has broken faith with his fellow veterans at home.”
Lorin Walker and Col. Richard Klass will be available for interview and comment at the Democratic National Convention in Denver. Contact information is below:
Lorin Walker: (425) 681-8661
Col. Richard Klass: (703) 868-7809
On Tues., Aug. 26, CLW-VETPAC will host a "Future Leaders of America" event and press conference to honor all the veterans running as Democrats for Congress. Find out more about the event here.
###
CLW-VETPAC was formed in 2004 by American veterans and military family members to promote the principles and values for which members of the armed forces have served, fought, and died. Working together with the American People, CLW-VETPAC embarked on a "search and rescue" mission to promote national leadership that will help us rescue America's future from policies that threaten our national security, our civil liberties, our country’s economy and, indeed, our Constitution. CLW-VETPAC intends to help our comrades explain to America why the Democratic Party is more qualified to protect America in a post 9/11 world.
Council for a Livable World's Veterans' Alliance for Security and Democracy - 322 4th St., NE
Washington, D.C. 20002
202.543.4100 -www.vetpac.org
And they do not feel McCain is anything but the same as Bush. McCain says he will shake up the old boys network, but he put most of the lobbyists in office and now on his staff.
I am 67 and I vote. I also read and pay attention to what my elected representatives do in office.
I saw statistics on the news that Freddie Mac contributed money to Obama and on the list Obama was second... McCain accepted 0... I like McCain and what he stands for???
Lea, I'm not about to call someone from the DNC to ask them their view on McCain and veterans policies. Despite your view the "most veterans" are against McCain, the statistics don't hold up.
And I don't care about the number of times, nor the percentages of the times voting. I care about the content of the bill supported and the reasons a bill was not supported.
Additionally, I cannot support someone who would turn his back on infants, born alive during a failed abortion attempt, and not even consider medical intervention either to allow the child to live, or at least died in a dignified manner free from pain. How can you? How can you feel that this is ok? I don't care what your stance is on abortion, this is just wrong. We don't want animals to suffer yet it is ok for an infant to suffer?
There are exceptions, of course, but I do agree that the majority see that the proposed 'change' of the Democrats is not necessarily in our best interests. I'm 50+, early retired and did my own 'change', I didn't wait for the government to come and rescue me by making the changes I wished for. I moved from the Northeast to the deep south, retired, got my priorities together and am quite comfortable. In the three short years since I've incorporated these changes, ALL my family and friends who are still up North have told me more than once that this move was probably the BEST thing we've done for ourselves and our teenager. Yeah, there's quite a bit of jealousy there. That's the problem....people want 'change' but they don't want to pick themselves up and do it, they want someone else to do it for them. Dangerous territory in my opinion.
Now I realize that not everyone can do what I did, but they do need to realize that if there's something in their lives that they don't like, they need to find the gumption to try to rectify their situation on their own. Stop calling on the government to do it for them.
This is what I think the 'older generation' has learned through experience, and I believe you're correct, the majority of us WILL vote for McCain because we want to see that life experience in our highest leader.
Money? as in the BILLIONS SQAUNDERED IN IRAQ?
You seem to be for privatizing bidness loss....we are now the USSA but we can't have health care?
WAKE UP HONEY!!!!
LMAO
Oh, louis, louis. You bet I mean after they are born. Check the Born-Alive abortion law and how Obama did not support giving these living aborted infants medical care. Even if it is to provide pain relief to allow them to die in comfort.
Louis, did you ever stop to consider that not everybody who supports McCain/Palin 08 is a Republican? Are you old enough to remember Carter's administration?
Thank you for this most excellent article. It is among the best I have seen on Gather. You can tell when you have hit a homerun by the lefties who show up to try to discredit you.:)
I will vote for McCain for many reasons but a few of them are:
He has convinced me he is the most experienced and best qualified to run this country by reducing government spending, and thereby preventing the state from controlling even more of American life. His is definitely the best tax plan where he proves he is for the
"American Working Pubic."
He will ensure that America wins in Iraq and teach potential enemies not to attack America (whether Iraq did so directly is irrelevant to the point). And it will reassure America's allies around the world, many of whom, as in Iraq, risk their lives for America and liberty, that America will never abandon them.
He will appoint conservatives to the Supreme Court and to federal benches, thereby depriving the left of its most powerful weapon in reshaping America in its image.
The war on Islamic Fundamental Terror - McCain understands that you cannot attack terrorism in the courts or by ignoring it. The strategy is working and it will continue to take time. McCain understands this strategy and will advance it, but also will correct tactical errors without fear. He advanced the change from "small footprint" to "the surge" and was right.
I am going to vote for McCain/Palin and while I will not be happy about some of McCain's likely actions, I will accept them in lieu of the alternative.
".......Another group that Obama appeals to is the middle class, no matter their age. His economic plan will benefit them the most -- tax cuts, incentives for small business, affordable college tuition with incentives that reward community service, health care for all Americans, child care for working families and single parents, equal pay for equal work for women......"
WOW! How about reading the McCain/Palin site for postition statements and policies instead of trying to shove Obama sound bites down everyone's throat?
GROW UP HONEY.
YOU DON'T. IT'S NOTY IN THE CONSTITUTION ACCORDING TO THEM.....SO NO PRIVACY!
as in limiting GOVERNMENT? YOU have rights......of privacy and every other as they are not given by the state...but by the creator....they are innumerable and inailienable....yes I know that's Jefferson.....but that's what the founders believed....Thomas and Scalia believe ifit's not written in there....it's not yours......incorrect.
I'm sure most Americans would be reviled by your and their position on privacy.....
but go on...be a Christian Republican.....neocon fascist.
You should understand now! Especially trash (something worth little or nothing) because that describes your comments! There!
You want some current news on what the Republicans are doing right now and what they've been doing in Wassilla for the past few weeks? Tune in to kudo1080.com (broadcasting from Anchorage)
This is no way to run a campaign........and it's certainly no way to run a nation.
I would see this as a valid opinion if I were extreme left politics. No, John McCain wouldn't want to sit on a throne. I believe you are thinking of Obama.
I kinda feel that way about Obama's Rush Limbaugh debacle.
I am with Cathi in that not only am I not a republican but I will be voting for McCain for the same reasons that she is.
"I'll stick to my guns and bibles. I'll continue to value life. I'll continue to hold a firm belief that a good defense is a better offense. And I'll continue to believe that lowering taxes on individuals and then raising taxes on business will only cost me more money. Economics is stimulated with spending. But purchasing at an overinflated rate because of Obama's tax increases on business does not make sense." (Thank you Cathi!)
Cathi, ALL opinions are valid.
if your brain is outside your scull....the only time 'born alive' abortion is used ....YOU ARE NOT ALIVE!
so please continue the lies.....and cling to your superstitions....but then follow tha all the way thru....and don't use any medical breakthrus that don't conform to your beliefs.....
All opinions are valid...all facts are not.
There is an old saying...."you can take a horse to water but you can't force him to drink"...Palin and McCain could screw up a two car funeral...and there is no doubt in my mind, the more that comes out about the wall street financial fiasco - the worse he is going to look... almost as bad as Ms Palin letting the world know she can see Russia from Alaska!
If they want to loose - fine - just dont expect the taxpayer to bail them out when they do - and THATS whats wrong right now...the risk takers...who had no rules to follow are getting bailed out by the little guy and its not just democrats this time...a lot of them are Republicans.....and I guess if they don't mind - then they will stay with the same program that has been in place for the worst 7+ years I can remember in a long time...
http://www.gallup.com/poll/108034/Candidate-Support-Age.aspx
Looks like the older folks are behind Obama as well.
Well folks that how it is around here, now we got a blackman running things down at the meat market now and they say he pretty good, knows alot about meats and things use to work up there in Chicago. They say he could have played in the NBA, just think we did even let em' play baseball and now they'll take a team to the World Series, they not only play well but can coach in the NFL and sure enough, they have already taken a team to the Super Bowl. Maybe this Sen. Obama might just be the Tiger Woods of politics and we all know Tiger is just about unbeatable.