It seems now that the threat of violence that may be ensue from any perceived offense or slight against the Muslim community throughout the world can squash creativity and openness even in the U.S. Random House one of the premiere publishing companies in the U.S. recently pulled and halted publication of the book "The Jewel of Medina" by author Sherry Jones over concerns that it might provoke and incite acts of violence my the Muslim community.
My question is where were the concerns of Catholics and their perceived offense over such books as the "The Devinci Code"? Perhaps if other religions were so easily moved to violence over cartoons, books and songs that place them in a negative fashion, then portraits of the Virgin Mary covered in elephant dung would not be so easily accepted.
Censorship by violence or expected violence, we are all doomed.




Comments: 12
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/20/arts/20arts-MORETROUBLES_BRF.html?ref=arts
Appearently they would prefer to keep the tensions about their religion going.
Well what can you expect. Most of these people are fed from childhood to hate everything and everyone, even themselves, which is why they live in such a violent world.
Would we paint all Catholics as pedophiles because some priests were pedophiles? Would we paint all Christians as murderers because some of them feel it is okay to murder doctors who provide legal abortion services?
Focus on the real problem...let's think rather than make blanket statements.
After sending out advance editions of the novel THE JEWEL OF MEDINA, we received in response, from credible and unrelated sources, cautionary advice not only that the publication of this book might be offensive to some in the Muslim community, but also that it could incite acts of violence by a small, radical segment.
We felt an obligation to take these concerns very seriously. We consulted with security experts as well as with scholars of Islam, whom we asked to review the book and offer their assessments of potential reactions.
We stand firmly by our responsibility to support our authors and the free discussion of ideas, even those that may be construed as offensive by some. However, a publisher must weigh that responsibility against others that it also bears, and in this instance we decided, after much deliberation, to postpone publication for the safety of the author, employees of Random House, booksellers and anyone else who would be involved in distribution and sale of the novel. The author and Ballantine subsequently agreed to terminate the agreement, with the understanding that the author would be free to publish elsewhere, if she so chose.
The Random House Publishing Group