“Bathroom behavior is an example of inelastic demand.”The price of fuel is killing the airlines. They are left with only two choices: “fee-for-all” or “free fall.”
The “fee-for-all” alternative is to charge for services that used to be free to contain the airline cost hemorrhaging. The “free fall” option would halve fuel costs by shutting off all engines mid-flight and coasting to a deadstick landing, as soon as the PR people come up with a more passenger-friendly term than “deadstick.”
The airline industry conducted extensive market research with focus groups of frequent fliers, occasional fliers and “you couldn’t pay me enough to get in one of those deathtraps” non-fliers (who, for the purpose of the airline’s next prospectus, will be referred to as “future fliers.”)
Surprisingly, it was a tight race between safety and pay toilets. Tipping the scales was the realization that half-fuel flights would be like riding a roller coaster: the screaming would start once the plane started down and continue until it was safely at the ramp. This would amount to 7 plus hours of yelling on the New York-Tokyo run, making it impossible to enjoy the soundtrack of “King Fu Panda.”
Once the decision was made to charge fees for previously free services, the airlines put on their thinking caps. They had already started charging fees for the major free services such as meals. To survive they would need to be creative and come up with a potpourri of smaller services to charge for.
The airlines were up to the task. There is nothing like the threat of imminent unemployment to motivate a group of previously fat and happy corporate executives. They even came up with an upscale term for what they were already doing: “a la carte pricing.” You think you are in a fancy French restaurant — until you look down at the tuna slamwich on your tray table.
Here are the fees you will be paying in the near future — some you probably expected and some you never saw coming:
* Luggage: Most airlines have already instituted a charge for a second checked bag and some airlines have announced charges for the first checked bag.
Insider Scoop: Expect by 2009 to pay for carry-ons though this fee will be disguised as a rental fee for storage: $10 for the overhead bin and $5 for the space under the seat in front of you.
* Entertainment: Passengers have been dodging around headset fees by plugging in their own earphones. Shortly you will have to buy a rubber “headset adapter” to avoid being shocked by the electric current now being wired into the seats.
* Seating preference: “The early booker gets the worm” was once the motto of frequent travelers. No more. Soon, if you want a window, an aisle or a little more legroom, you will be ponying up a few extra dollars for the privilege.
Insider Scoop: One airline is considering auctioning off seat preferences in the gate area before each flight. Management sees this as a way to raise even more revenue and to provide some excitement during the otherwise boring gate wait.
* Charging by the pound: This is one fee that makes economic sense. The heavier the plane, the more fuel is burned. Southwest already charges for two seats if you’re so large you cannot lower the armrest.
* Bathroom privileges: In the economic model of supply and demand, bathroom behavior is an example of inelastic demand. An aisle seat with extra legroom is a luxury. Having to go to the bathroom at 30,000 feet is a necessity. There is also the opportunity to have a tiered pricing structure for bathrooms depending upon … I’ll let your imagination take it from there.
Painful as they are, travel costs are not what bother me most because I have options. What I worry about is the resulting fee frenzy that will be kicked off by the airlines charging for what was once free.
I look around and I see the group of service providers who are most affected by rising costs and can do the least about reducing them: governments — state, local and federal.
What’s it worth to you to move to first place on the 911 phone queue when your house is on fire?
###


Comments: 151
LOL
Jim
Instead of "least funny" maybe we could say "Ill-timed."
Have a great trip.
If I do not respond to your comments it is because I cannot — nothing personal.
Furthermore, I have noticed that when I buy my 32 inch waist trousers, much larger examples of the same trousers with more stitching required and more material, are selling for the same price. In other words, I am subsidising the trousers of obese. Surely this is wrong?
If people were charged for clothes based on the amount of material used, I wonder if that would have an effect on waistlines around the country.
The alternative is that the heavier I was the skimpier clothes I would pay to maintain the price — and that would be wrong on so many levels.
and, Mike, I don't want to ehar any morea about your 32 inch waist trousers. :)
I suspect the airlines won't care where we come out on this. For the moment, you and your tiny butt are safe.
Way to go, girl!
Here's how it would work. Pilots have only so many flying hours in a month. Say you are flying to Australia and your pilot only has 4 flying hours left at take-off. You get the choice, either kick in for over-time or chance an uncontrolled landing.
Sounds fair - and economical.
I'm afraid you're right, Kathryn.
I also have no idea why men's prices don't go up. I'm sure there's a funny answer in there somewhere but I'm still a little jet-lagged and the caffeine hasn't kicked in yet.
Interesting and novel idea, Greg.
As a pilot, I thought you were going to suggest we can decide when we get there wther to use an air traffic controller or not.
I was once on a flight landing where there was a big storm coming. The pilot said over the intercom, "They're shutting down the airport but I convinced the controller we're were equipped to handle it."
I thought, "Shouldn't we have all voted on that?"
Did you have a favorite air traffic controller who got fired?
I bought a large bottle of water before getting on the plane for the last flight - still it's a rip off.
then they said you may have something to drink but you must request it...
Thinking about doing what never dreamed of doing before...Driving to our ski trip location!
If we chose to fight back, I'm sure we could come up with enough penalties to compensate for these ridiculous fees. Next trip for me will be by train.
Re: the airlines......it's why I like to drive!
Gather Broadcasting: Have it your way
This takes you in the back door. If you’ve already been, don’t click again.
Seems California-Hawaii has gone from about $300 to $900 no that therea re only two airlines. Know some resort people there and they say winter bookings are dismal.
I shudder to think, Judi.
I probably should delete your comment so an airline exec doesn't read it :)
A F, it is a calculated risk.
Bert,a positively brilliant idea.
(ATM machines play recorded sound when you think it's counting out your bills.)
Dianne, that's excellent.
Back charges. That's how we'll combat the fee frenzy.
You think your car is expensive to run these days!
Rest easy
Rest easy
Oh, and btw, perhaps you should bring your own favorite parachute with you.
Definitely the pay-to-pay has a lot of pitfalls.
(Maybe you should patent it first).
Actually I used miles and flew United to Newark and then drove to the mountains with one of my daughters.
Fun article.
Or charge extra for the right to recline your seat - and sell seats in the areas where the seat doesn't recline to those people who actually want to use their laptops without having the screen crushed by the person in front of them.
The upshot- the real food they serve now is better than when they served the whole plane. I actually ate a meal. I usually pick at the fruit and rearrange the items, but this time I actually consumed it. Hmmm... does this say more about the improvement in airline food or the quality of food I experienced in those locations?
By imposing baggage fees, preferential-seating fees, and other charges for things that used to be, if not free, buried in the ticket price, the airlines are attempting to appear as if they can still offer low fares - only because they don't tell you what doesn't come with that fare any more.
Maybe we should all talk "nice" to the airlines.
We know they need to charge fees. We should be lobbying for the fees we want to pay rather than the ones we don't want.
As a past owner of a small plane, I can tell you that for the little guys, Weight & Balance is a critical — and I mean critical — issue.
I don't know why they're taking the fee approach — but then I never understood why a seat was so much cheaper if I stayed over a Saturday night.
Except for the private Air Marshall. Can you employ hjim for a period before and after the flight?
The only difference between the two is, when my wife and I flew from Stansted to Glasgow on Ryanair last spring, one of our bags was over-weight and we would have been charged for it - but the agent at the desk suggested we re-balance things and get it under the weight limit. Here, it doesn't matter if the second bag weighs 1 lb. or 100, you're paying for it.
When I heard about the luggage charges I just shook my head. When we travel we have 3 checked luggages and three MORE carry ons! Can you imagine those fees now? SO GLAD I take the train now!
The news about flying with less fuel is baffling at best. Why risk everyone's safety to avoid buying gas that you KNOW you will be buying later anyway? It makes no sense!
Hang on to that vacation time.
PLEASE email us immediately if European airlines start charging for the loo.
Now your idea scores even higher — unless they're built like an air marshall in which case ...
To carry it a step further, I am reminded of: A diaper-proof terrorist defense
I think the long distance fares are going to be pegged to the avgas prices.
Good for you.