They were hunter-gatherers. Nomads. Early groups were small; a family or two. The more successful ones developed a set of informal rules for cooperation, increasing their chances for survival. These rules were passed down from generation to generation by word-of-mouth. Don’t kill your companions or steal from them. Don’t seduce their mates. Treat other people as you would like to be treated by them. Common sense rules that allowed groups of people to cooperate and live together. It was a dangerous world and there was safety in numbers if they could learn to cooperate.
These rules were not always followed by all members of the groups. Sometimes arguments turned into fights, and people got hurt and killed by other members of the group. A favorite ax disappeared from its owner’s tent. Women had children that didn’t look anything like their mate, but bore a striking resemblance to another member of the group. The offenders were sometimes subject to criticism, but there were no formal rules for punishment, so usually nothing was done.
Other bad stuff happened. People got sick and died, were mortally injured on a hunt, etc. The others sometimes wondered, “Why them and not me? Is something protecting me? What happens when they die? What will happen to me when I die?”
Naturally, nobody wanted to die, although they knew it was going to happen eventually, and the fear and uncertainty of that inevitable event led to the development of myths. Nobody knows how religion got started, but here is one possible scenario. It is similar to the Christian myths in that it involves three wise individuals, but, as you will see, my three characters are a bit different from the Three Wise Men of the Bible. So I called them the Three Wise Guys. I think you will see why as the story unfolds.
These three guys all belonged to the same nomadic group. The group was a little larger than most, and quite successful. The Three Wise Guys were close friends, and they often talked about how fortunate their group was. They speculated about why that might be. The First Wise Guy (WG1) thought that there might be a Great One who was watching over them and protecting them. They also talked about the individuals who did bad stuff and got away with it. WG1 said that was wrong, and, after thinking about it for a long time, he thought he saw a way to stop it. They needed a set of rules that everyone had to obey. He offered to carve the rules into a set of stone tablets, but WG2 said, “Why should anybody follow your rules? You are just a member of the group. You cannot expect others to do what you say.”
They argued about it for awhile, and finally WG1 made a brilliant suggestion.
“The rules need to come from the Great One who watches over us. If he made the rules, then everybody would listen and obey. I must go out into the wilderness to make the stone tablets, and then return and say that the Great One gave them to me.”
They all thought that was a good idea, but WG2 still had some reservations.
“If there is no punishment for breaking the rules, even though they come from the Great One, people will still break the rules."
This was a problem. How could they convince the Great One to punish people who defied the rules? And then WG2 came up with a clever solution.
“Everybody is afraid of dying. What if the Great One said that anybody who breaks the rules will be punished when they die?”
And then, WG3, who had remained silent until now, showed that he was the wisest of the three.
“Punishment is not enough. There should also be reward. So the Great One should also say that anyone who obeys all the rules will be rewarded when they die. But even that is not enough. Not everyone in our clan believes in The Great One, so some of them will not be willing to follow the rules. We need to think of a reason why everyone should believe in Him.
They thought and they thought, and then WG3 hit upon the idea that would insure the success of their scheme.
“The Great One must say that when people die, a part of them does not die, but continues to live forever. This will make everybody very happy, and they will want to believe in Him. And then he must say that the reward for obeying His rules, or the punishment for breaking them, will also continue forever. Nobody will dare to break the rules.”
And thus was religion born.


Comments: 46
But you are still missing the point of my apocryphal story. Try reading it a little less literally.
How so Borgie?
The story was great and the first comment priceless! Absolutely priceless.
Jim...it's not exactly a theory...more of a speculation with a wink...and a bit of a tweak.
You posted on a slow Gather weekend. If you had published when people are at work, they would have had more time for Gather. :-)
Sometimes, each family in a community had one child who strongly resembled the guy from the next valley over—a well-known traveling merchant dealing in ointments and creams.
Sandy, I can't speak for others, but I've worked hard and long for many years with no time to pee, so I understand your question. My situation is probably a bit different because I'm partnered with someone on the aspect of his business that I manage and control for him. Certainly, there are times when I have meetings and other times when I really must work intensely, but it's definitely not your usual, must look busy even when you're not, sort of circumstance. I know you were/are in the healtcare field, and my Mother was an RN, so she finds my freedom somewhat an enigma as well.
I immediately thought of the first comment in this thread.
The story is just a silly little tale, of course, but the points I was trying to make were:
1. Morality is a natural outcome of human efforts to survive. Religion is not the source of morality, as many people mistakenly claim.
2. Religion arose as a means of controlling society. The idea of a supernatural power who punished wrongdoers is very powerful. Thus, religion could be thought of as mankind's first political organization.
3. Religion uses the natural fear and uncertainty about death to both attract followers and to control them...a truly brilliant strategy when you think about it.
My opinion Deb on your question about the faithful being afraid of dying? I would have to say that my thoughts on it are that possibly because they aren't that faithful after all and uncertain of that promised life after death up there in that glorious place called heaven or hell.
I'm a Christian and must say I'm not afraid of dying personally, I can't say that I would go willingly but if ya gotta go, ya gotta go.
Fortunately, Christian beliefs have not prompted similar actions by the followers...at least not yet. Um, well, there are those murderers of doctors at abortion clinics...
Could it be said that ALL real knowledge is derived from "informed common sense?"
I suspect Borgie is yet another alter.
1. Morality is a natural outcome of human efforts to survive. Religion is not the source of morality, as many people mistakenly claim. (i'd word it, "...a natural outcome of human efforts to survive as a peaceable unit.")
2. Religion arose as a means of controlling society. The idea of a supernatural power who punished wrongdoers is very powerful. Thus, religion could be thought of as mankind's first political organization. (in the sense of Big Religion--Catholocism, etc.--i agree wholeheartedly..or is that "hard-heartedly"?... -but i'm loath to say that Little Religion--"belief", if you will, in an Otherworld and Big Fella--stems from a control. seems more likely that stories and circle-songs took on a life beyond the bonfire--became applicable in scenarios like WHOA! -That Arrow Almost Hit Olek The Wise One, But Did Not DO So! He Must Be Touched By The Great Spirit!
and so-forth.)
3. Religion uses the natural fear and uncertainty about death to both attract followers and to control them...a truly brilliant strategy when you think about it. (i concur.)
It's in the same basket of irrational beliefs...but maybe not quite as consciously manipulative as the organized "big religions."
I would say YES ... and go so far as suggest it would tell folks to stay away from religion and await true spirituality which would be the natural culmination of such common sense were it not derailed by believing "others" instead.
The frailties of the human gods were a problem. How could these "gods" be wounded or killed IF they were gods? How could they age and die? Hmmm...more powerful gods were needed. Invisible gods...gods would could be hidden and who could be mysterious. The remote god was born. The remote god could dole out special powers or could grace certain people...who could challenge those with the special powers? No one but those with special connections could even communicate with god.
And then the transcendent god was created. Some folks still had special insight and were allowed special communication with the transcendent god, but everyone could ask to help or guidance or a favor...without having to go through a third party. This pissed of a bunch of holy guys...they were losing their monopoly. This god of the Hebrew Bible and His followers created quite a problem for those in control and this is where the conflict of authority forced the attempted suppression of the god of the Hebrew Bible.
It is all about control...I don't disagree. It's still about control, but religion is now a business. In fact...I believe the business of religion has become more important than the political control of religion. The new religion is business and money...that is the most powerful control.
It's a very powerful message that religion delivers...immortal life can be yours. Just go to church, fill that collection plate, and BELIEVE!
It amazes me how many people buy it. I honestly don't understand how they could buy such an obviously (to me) human invention.
That was the main purpose of this piece...to show the human origins for beliefs in supernatural beings. But I have no illusions about changing any minds...much as I would like to.
"Records" show that . . . ? Sure they do Bert, sure they do . . .
I'd give you some excellent book references on the subject, but I am sure you know all about those books and have read them from cover to cover.
Is there no God in Israel that you should consult the records of men? Who are you serving?
-Mark
If one accepts the fact that religion is a human construct, designed to further the political power, wealth and prestige of religious leaders, it is easy to see how the "fruit" will have all of the flaws that are inherent in the inventors...greed, jealousy and the unfortunate human trait of desire for power over others.
Mark,
If I want scientific data, I will consult scientists. If, for some reason, I should want information about religious myths, I would consult ancient religious literature. I serve nobody...except Reason.
Just curious, Mark...does your god live in Israel?
Are you a literalist?
-Mark
I serve nobody...except Reason.
Hey Bert, didn't I see Reason buying lottery tickets down at the 7/11 this morning? Say, what is his shoe size anyhow?
-Mark
(Borgie is the Borg Mother aka Alexia A. aka Amber.)