While the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, signed by President Bush last week is "... aimed at resurrecting the housing market from its worst slump since the Great Depression and stabilizing the two largest mortgage finance ...".

... it also contains a provision that requires credit-card processors to disclose the dollar amount of payments their merchants received from them. This provision extends to online-payment processors, like PayPal, Google Checkout, and Revolution Money Exchange. The fine print? This provision will impact merchants who make more than 200 sales per year totaling more than $10,000.
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, "The law is designed to crack down on merchants who are under-reporting their revenues ... It is expected to raise about $10 billion over 10 years." The article suggests that that some merchants feel the rule will overstate their card revenues because the gross amount reported to the IRS won't reflect refunds they pay out. Carol Guthrie, spokeswoman for the Senate Finance Committee, says these can be deducted those amounts when filing tax returns.
While the law doesn't go into effect until 2011, those who exceed the 200 sales/$10,000 threshhold may want to ensure they are either complying with reporting now, or have a plan in place to move that direction.
Another potential hit to the little guys.


Comments: 19
With ebay/Paypal's plans to implement even more policies (designed to ruin more ebayers in coming months), those currently attempting to make their monies through ebay, will be LONG GONE BEFORE the government's new provision is in effect.
Let's see...ebay is pushing sellers to offer "Free Shipping", so ebay can receive more revenues by charging sellers fees, which includes the amount the seller pays for shipping. Paypal (owned by ebay) fees are already based on the entire amount, including the shipping price. Now, the government will be taxing the small sellers on the total price, including the amount which sellers pay to ship items.
All of this WHILE ebay evades many government regulations by CLAIMING to be "just a venue" and WHILE claiming Paypal is "not a bank".
'Looks to me like the government is "barking up the wrong tree". How about actually forcing ebay & Paypal to comply with government regulations and taxing ebay/Paypal as the entities they truly ARE, rather than what they "claim" to be?
If someone is doing a eBay business, business proceeds are taxable. I am sure the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 provision was designed to help catch those who were attempting to run a business on the side, evading the taxman, and the government has a right to arm itself for enforcement.
My concerns are two: 1) 200 transactions seems a low threshold if, in example, someone is downsizing -- the recordkeeping needed to "prove" that items are not being sold for profit would be quite a burden, and 2) it concerns me that this "taxation" provision is part of a "mortgage and real estate incentive" bill, which is an odd fit.
While I haven't personally sold on eBay, it does make me plan to keep receipts for items I might recycle through something like eBay later so I have the requisite proof.