Once again the courageous writer at SAVAGEPOLITICS has banged the proverbial nail right on the head. Below is an excerpt from this excellent piece on the "Change" we can expect from the self grandizing prophet, the great half white hope, the king of flip flop, Barack Hussein Obama.
As many new tales as he may try to spin, there remains the undeniable evidence thatthe majority of American voters actually cast their vote in support of his opponent, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. But Barack and his "new politics" won't let facts like that stand in his way of the (formerly) democratic process. Haven't you heard? There's a new rooster in the henhouse that thinks he can out-fox We, the People.
But The People have noticed what Barack fails to see and hear. The narcissistic euphoria that keeps this false prophet happily and recklessly staggering from photo-op to photo-op seems to have clouded his highly touted ‘visionary judgment'. His supporters are now beginning to grumble about his flip-flopping reversals on the very principles he offered as "Change We Can Believe In", but the opiate called self-aggrandizement keeps their discontented voices from reaching his ears. To the dismay of Obama Camp Officials, it seems more and more apparent that Mephistopheles is slyly and slowly moving over to our side; all within the details of the carefully crafted contract that they all agreed to. What's that old saying? "Be careful of what you wish for?"
Kool Aid, rainbows, unicorns and flower-strewn magical paths to nowhere can offer no help to keep his sheep in lock step. Meanwhile, the specter of Larry Sinclair is manifesting more and more visibly on Barack's Brokeback Mountain Trail to the White House. I hear that Mr. Sinclair will be participating in some media events soon that are sure to be entertaining. Add to that the fact that some of his more generous and zealous donors are now holding out while opting to see what happens, it becomes clear that the Democrats are in for a long and bloody battle. The up side (for us) is that Obama is so drunk on his own perfume that he still tenaciously clings to the audacious hope that nobody will abandon his ship, no matter what he says of does.
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 23
Sorry friend, we are on to your tactics .
sisterrosetta Says:
May 23, 2008 at 9:16 pm
Hello, zach jones
Please see following link for info regarding Larry’s polygraph. I have literally been posting this link for months now. And yet I still keep reading that Larry failed twice. Balderdash!
https://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?num=12036%2081407
On Page 2:
“I also evaluated the second series using the computer algorithm PolyScore (v. 6.0). It evaluated the charts as No Deception Indicated, and calculated the probabilityof deception as being less than .01 on a scale from .00 to 1.00.”
“So the PolyScore algorithm (that Ed Gelb so hailed in his polygraph report for Wendy Ellis) found Sinclair truthful with a less than 1% probability of deception! But in this case, Gelb and Barland (who cannot have been unaware of the firestorm of controversy that would have resulted had they found Sinclair non-deceptive with regard to this question) somehow reached a completely opposite conclusion!”
One commenter wrote that Larry had been sandbagged. Indeed, he was.
You may also find this of interest:
Trinity people aren't speaking up either because they don't want to be the one to stop the first black president or they are scared to talk.
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=18616
HillBuzzBlogspotCom wrote:
June 30th, 04:15 PM
Adrienne -
I told you exactly what I have been told by people in the gay community here who have said there are definite open secrets about BHO. I've never remarked on the Sinclair stuff for one solid reason: it does not make sense with what the gay community in Chicago tells me. Not saying it couldn't be true, but that's not BHOs' M.O. here.
Being on the down-low means you only fool around with other married guys on the down-low, and there are enough successful, wealthy down-low members of Trinity, who are married, and thus have as much to lose if they rat out the other guy who is on the downlow. Some are athletes, some are other high profile men in the community, and some are not even members of the church, but elected officials themselves, in other states (that start with "M", like in Michelle) or other cities (that start with "B", like in beard).
The people I have spoken to who know Trinity well, and know open secrets well, say people aren't speaking up either because they don't want to be the one to stop the first black president or they are scared to talk....HOWEVER, they said they are positive that, after he would become President, that the open secret will no longer be a secret, and that the carefully-arranged down-low secret pacts will collapse, because the media will have an incentive to create the most sensational sex scandal to ever hit the White House: the first bisexual president.
In short --- and let's see if this clears things up --- there are people who know open-secrets who are staying quiet because outing a presidential candidate is not something they want to do, but outing a president, and exposing him as a bisexual, would be something they'd see as important, because it's a step towards having an openly gay president.
Think James McGreevey....yes, his administration collapsed when he came out, and he came out only because his affair was being telegraphed, but McGreevey still served, briefly, as an openly gay US governor. That's a step towards having other openly gay governors in the future -- ones not tainted with scandal, preferably. Outing Obama as a candidate will keep him from being elected....outing him if he becomes President means the US will have its first outed bisexual/gay president.
There is no putting that genie back in its bottle.
I don't agree with any of this Adrienne....I am just telling you what I hear on a regular basis here in Chicago.
Obama has never played fair, and he has already flip flopped more than that other loser, John Kerry.
What is the problem here?
Truly sick people.
Can you say White Power Party - that's what I'm seeing.
If you actually find something I would be surprised. The media couldn't, Hillary couldn't and McCain has resorted to lies, and deciet, because he couldn't.
What's the difference between an attorney and a shark?
One is a ravenous, man-eating, bottom sucking loser.
One is a fish.
Don, do you have fins?
And speaking of bigotry George W., I saw what you wrote to Kerrell.
The liberal koolaid sucking bimbos have now become the name police.
DO NOT USE BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA'S MIDDLE NAME!!
Well turdmunchers, the last time I looked the 1st amendment was still in place. I guess you and Barack Hussein Obama will change that if he wins.
HUSSEIN HUSSEIN HUSSEIN HUSSEIN HUSSEIN HUSSEIN HUSSEIN HUSSEIN
Sister Rosetta,
I went to the site and read all the statements about Obama possibly being bisexual. Since I have very little contact with anyone other than heterosexuals I didn't realize that the gay community felt as they do about him. Thanks for the info.