Bill Bishop, author of "The Big Sort," says we are now more likely than ever to live in neighborhoods with people of the same religious, economic and political background as our own.
Are we subconsciously or deliberately drifting towards other like-minded people, or is this simply a fresh realization of how people have always lived? Do these communities change the nation? What if we consider redistricting?
Tonight The Current's Steve Seel and guest Bill Bishop will discuss what "The Big Sort" means for us this election year. This Policy and a Pint event will be held in MPR's UBS Forum. Bishop also appears on MPR Midmorning (11:06 a.m. ET) with guest Jim Gimpel to talk about the problem of political sameness.
This is an open discussion. Your related articles are welcome and your comments may be quoted as part of http://www.mpr.org/your_voice
________________
Julia Schrenkler
Interactive Producer
Minnesota Public Radio
American Public Media
Objects in Mirror
NOTICE! THE POLICY & A PINT EVENT IS SOLD OUT. There is a waiting list - contact the Citizens League for more information.


Comments: 6
Yes we are Julia living in clusters, and in communities that have many others of folks that we think to be like minded.
'Do these communities change the nation?'
I really don't think so, however, I do understand that the folks that are more liberal seem to live together, and the more conservative folks that are also of a similar religion seem to live in communities together.
For example, we’re where we are now in St. Cloud because my ex wife is a Lutheran and this is a large Lutheran community.
However, me? You could forget that. Because I’ve known way too many Jewish and Homosexual folk and have been friends with way too many of them, and I even understand the quite Liberal Neo-Con community and agree with their primary purposes so forget it. I fit better in the LA community than here in St. Cloud, but even so, that is not to say that I don’t like it here in St. Cloud for I do. How could someone that was raised in the Congressional faith not.
Taken on an individual basis, there's variety, but stepping back to bird's eye level, there's little mix.
I think your questions assume that we know our neighbors, or at least think we do, which it seems to me is not always true.
This is one of the aspects of Bill Bishop's whole thesis that I feel like we didn't delve into enough on Thursday night. Do we have to be out there talking with our neighbors in the grocery store in order for our ideological homogeneity to really make a difference regarding the overall national political discussion? In Bishop's book, his point is that we don't. Put simply, when we live in ideological clusters, we vote in ideological clusters -- and so, we elect representatives who are just as doctrinare as we are. In order for those folks to keep their seat on the school board / in the state house / in Washington, they have to make us happy. Ergo: legislative deadlock.
What do you guys think about this thesis? Is it that simple?