Obama finally took John McCain's advice and hopped a plane to Iraq and Afghanistan. But did it make the Republicans happy that he did? Nope.
A couple of McCain surrogates popped off on cue. Joe Lieberman:
"If Barack Obama's policy in Iraq had been implemented, he couldn't be in Iraq today," Lieberman said, adding that Obama "was prepared to accept retreat and defeat."
Rudy Giuliani with John McCain at a baseball game:
"It's turned out that if we had caved in the way Barack Obama and the Democrats do, we'd now have a defeat," the former New York City mayor said. "America would have a defeat rather than a possible victory. And I think the fact that Barack Obama is kind of making his first tour, in essence, of the world, gives you an indication that John McCain is the man with the experience."
Hmm. I think that somebody was handing out cue cards with "OBAMA=DEFEAT" on them.
During the Obama Iraq visit, Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki appeared to back Obama's call for a 16-month timetable in an interview with German magazine Der Spiegel over the weekend. An Iraqi government spokesman said Saturday that the prime minister's comments to Der Spiegel had been "misunderstood" and "mistranslated." The White House said al-Maliki has made clear that any withdrawals would be conditioned on "continuing positive developments." But in a brief statement Sunday, the magazine said it "stands by its version of this interview."
Look, if Obama is being accused of seizing the fruits of Republican toughness and determination, then let the Republicans go ahead and claim the fruits first. Oh no, can't do that, we need to still hold the Iraqi's hands, until we bring a few soldiers home for our October surprise because McCain needs an electoral boost. Can't bring the troops home now, because improving conditions on the ground are a great reason to keep them there as a counterweight to Iran. Obama lacks experience, hmm. George W. Bush lacked experience, perspective, good judgement, a sense of humor, any interest in bridging the partisan divide, and the basic honesty of admitting to the american people what our intelligence system did not know about Iraq. Did that bother any of you back in the day? No? Then stop whining about Obama now.
I understand that what's done is done. We can't get the 4000+ lives back, undo the 20,000 cripples, put back the trillion dollars borrowed from China because we had to lower taxes in wartime. I'm okay with that, really. Why aren't you guys okay with saying goodbye to all that, it was your idea! You seem to have the idea that if we manage to stay in Iraq until it becomes a carbon copy of the USA, all the sacrifices will not be in vain and we can then have a victory dance. It does not work that way. We have to leave someday. Maybe we can leave a minimal strike force of 5 or 10 thousand guys to hunt Al Qaeda cells in the desert and keep the Iranians nervous, but if the Iraqis do not want that, how can we stay in defiance of their wishes? Do you forget that this war was supposed to liberate them? We are not in a position to dictate terms, we are only in a position to negotiate and make requests.
What we do about Afghanistan is the next question. The fight against the Taliban, which was the original sequel to 9/11 and which was interrupted by a long detour through Iraq, is back on. We could try to undo the detour by excalating the fighting in Afghanistan by sending in many thousands of soldiers, but it is not entirely clear that the solution lies there. Read up on Afghanistan. We need to figure out what to do there. It should be noted that the key development in Iraq was not the surge. The key development was the creation of the Sons of Iraq, or the Awakening, or whatever you choose to call the armed Sunni groups that decided to stop killing Americans and start killing Al Qaeda. That's what we want in Afghanistan, but it is very unclear how to get there. The problem in Afghanistan is partly the presence of the Taliban kill squads crossing over from havens in Pakistan that the Pakistani government is no longer interested in combatting. But another problem is that Afghanistan's rural areas have not seen the rule of law or institutions of civil authority. We chased out the Taliban, shook hands with a few warlords, installed Karzai, and flew to Iraq. Its a mess.
Victory is not when you kill more "bad guys" than they kill of you. No, victory is when the shooting stops.


Comments: 22
It should be recalled that McCain has been baiting Obama to visit the middle east for weeks now, but like I say, once he went all hell broke loose.
Rob, thanks!
Anne- Thanks!
Ron- In some ways i do consider McCain dangerous. i appreciate that he is on paper less right wing than Bush, but he now seems intent on demonstrating that he is just as right wing as Bush. McCain has a well documented temper, and can blow up big time when he feels like doing so. I don't see Obama that way. I have a nervous feeling about McCain's management style. Where I see Obama gathering a group of bright people together to band on ideas until they get it right, I see McCain as sort of a one man band whose advisors and organizers come and go with great regularity. I do not have a clear idea what a mcCain administration would look like, do you? Will he give the right wing all it wants in exchange for tolerating him as a candidate, or will he say screw you I won, and try to govern strictly according to his own conscience without any reference to the powers that be of Republican land?
that last one seems a bit absurd, not going to happen.
Jim G
The US did not support the Taliban. The US suported the Mujahideen factions. The US stop supporting the Mujahideen when the Soviets left in 1989. Taliban was created 5 to 6 years after the US left.
You are partialy correct. If the US did not support the Mujahideen and Soviets won the war there would be no Taliban or Al Qaeda.
As far as Mujahideen vs. Taliban, it's semantics. Where was Bin Laden back then. Right in the middle fighting along side the Mujahideen. The Taliban movement (Taliban means Students of Islamic Knowledge Movement) is one of the Mujahideen sub groups.
So yes, the US did support the Taliban by supporting the larger group.
"America's Chickens, are coming home, to roost." Who said that?
Jared,
Reverend Wright
You got that right.
What happened here is another example of the old saying, "be careful what you ask for, You just may get it". McCain asked for Obama to go to the Middle East, he does and it turns into yet another slap in the jaw for McCain. So of course his buddies have to go up with their usual slash and burn politics to try to save face!
Define "win." Can you? Neither Bush nor McCain have.
I agree with David, Bush and McCain can not define what it is to win over in Iraq. There is no defeat in facing the truth. We lost when we accepted Bush's lies.
I would rather have an intelligent, thoughtful, strong and gracious President who will choose reality over well Bush.