The deficit balloons.
The stock ma
rket is in the dumps.Banks are failing.
The dollar is in free-fall.
And yet Republicans and Republican-sympathizers are trying to use the strategy of 'the Democrats control the House and Senate---so blame THEM.'
If it were that simple.
Republicans have blocked a record number of bills in the Senate by using cloture votes to stop consideration of legislation---cloture that requires 60 votes. More than the razor-thin majority of the Democrats.
As this newspaper report relates:
"The trend has been evolving for 30 years. The reasons behind it are too complex to pin on one party. But it has been especially pronounced since the Democrats' razor-thin win in last year's election, giving them effectively a 51-49 Senate majority, and the Republicans' exile to the minority.Seven months into the current two-year term, the Senate has held 42 "cloture" votes aimed at shutting off extended debate — filibusters, or sometimes only the threat of one — and moving to up-or-down votes on contested legislation. Under Senate rules that protect a minority's right to debate, these votes require a 60-vote supermajority in the 100-member Senate.
Democrats have trouble mustering 60 votes; they've fallen short 22 times so far this year. That's largely why they haven't been able to deliver on their campaign promises.
By sinking a cloture vote this week, Republicans successfully blocked a Democratic bid to withdraw combat troops from Iraq by April, even though a 52-49 Senate majority voted to end debate.
This year Republicans also have blocked votes on immigration legislation, a no-confidence resolution for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and major legislation dealing with energy, labor rights and prescription drugs.
Nearly 1 in 6 roll-call votes in the Senate this year have been cloture votes. If this pace of blocking legislation continues, this 110th Congress will be on track to roughly triple the previous record number of cloture votes — 58 each in the two Congresses from 1999-2002, according to the Senate Historical Office.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., forced an all-night session on the Iraq war this week to draw attention to what Democrats called Republican obstruction.
"The minority party has decided we have to get to 60 votes on almost everything we vote on of substance," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. "That's not the way this place is supposed to work."
Even Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., who's served in Congress since 1973, complained that "the Senate is spiraling into the ground to a degree that I have never seen before, and I've been here a long time. All modicum of courtesy is going out the window."
But many Republicans say the Senate's very design as a more deliberative body than the House of Representatives is meant to encourage supermajority deal-making. If Democrats worked harder to seek bipartisan deals, Republicans say, there wouldn't be so many cloture votes.
"You can't say that all we're going to do around here in the United States Senate is have us govern by 51 votes — otherwise we might as well be unicameral, because then we would have the Senate and the House exactly the same," said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
To which Reid responds: "The problem we have is that we don't have many moderate Republicans. I don't know what we can do to create less cloture votes other than not file them, just walk away and say, 'We're not going to do anything.' That's the only alternative we have."
So it is a nice try to just 'blame the Democrats'.
As this article points out:
"Since the Democrats won their razor-thin majority back in 2006, the Republicans have now used the filibuster a record 80 times to halt any legislation offered by the Democrats. Even with the small majority of 51 to 49 that the Senate Democrats have today, it still takes 60 votes to pass a Senate bill that would also over-ride a possible filibuster or a presidential veto. Based on these numbers, the Republican Senate leadership has decided to only "rarely" allow any "moderate" Republicans to vote on the Democratic side of an issue, whether the legislation is good for the country or not. All the Republican Senators have to do today is open up the debate on the Senate floor and keep it going until the Democrats eventually give in and give up. This action virtually stops the bill in its tracks, and they then move on to other bills or new business.
As has recently become a routine in the Senate, the Senate Republicans, with the aid of a couple of conservative Democrats, successfully obstructed the passage of a global warming bill that would have required major reductions in greenhouse gases. The measure fell 12 votes shy of the 60 votes needed in the Senate. It has since been pulled from consideration by the Democratic leadership.
Such action would normally strike a more depressing note if it had not become the Senate norm over the last 2 years. Republicans in the Senate have filibustered ~80 pieces of legislation in the current session of Congress. (This is an all-time record, and the session isn't over yet.) Not all of these attempts to block legislation have ended in success. A few bills actually have passed, but this latest rate of obstructionism has been historic, far surpassing the previous record of 62 filibusters."
But the Republicans control the Presidency, block legislation in the Senate, and the President has packed the Supreme Court with Conservatives.
Give credit where credit is due.
And give me a break, will you?



Comments: 12
I heard about a book on Book TV today that spells out how the current generation of Republicans has forsaken the main principles of their party by doing exactly the oposite. Some of those principles are a balanced budjet, no foreign entanglements, and smaller more effective government. The book is "Train Wreck" by Bill Press
While Harry Reid says there aren't enough moderate republicans, the same can be said for the democrats. Neither side wants to give in to the other. Since the democrats control BOTH houses, they should be leading the way in compromise and not blaming the republicans for their ineffectiveness.
And that Obama was a weaker choice than the party base is willing to admit.
The Democratic party played block and blame from 2000-2005.
You are correct, the partisanship comes from both sides of the isle. I will acknowledge that the Republicans have to party discipline down to a science and punish those who fail to go along more than do the Democrats. But the days of bipartisanship seem to be history. Perhaps, if this nation were attack by a credible aggressor it would unite the nation and reduce the harsh partisanship.
Wait...I thought Obama was "the most liberal democrat in the senate?"
"The real news is that the moderate faction is taking over the Democratic party."
Actually, the real news is that the American public, and even republicans themselves, are soundly, decidedly rejecting the rightwing extremism of today's defective, heavily damaged GOP.
"The Democratic party played block and blame from 2000-2005. "
Name a piece of legislation that democrats blocked during that period, please.
Please. What utter nonsense. The democrats have been bending over backwards for the republicans during this entire disastrous 8 years. Even when they've SAID that they were going to stand on principle, they've ended up caving in and capitulating in the end.
Contrast that to the way that the 110th congressional republicans have behaved, particularly in the senate, where, in the first year alone, they set an all-time record for the number of filibusters from any TWO year senate session.
Democrats have been far TOO willing to play along with these filthy republicans, which is why this nation is in the mess it's in today. The patriot acts, the lousy FISA bill, monstrously damaging tax cut welfare handouts to millionaires, an illegal an unnecessary war and occupation, massive corruption, fraud, and utter incompetence at all levels of and branches of government, infrastructure collapsing, education system failing, millions of jobs shipped overseas, illegal renditions and torture, etc., etc., etc., etc. NONE of this would've happened had democrats stood in opposition to the wicked, diseased, anti-American, republican agenda.