- Slam the president of your country.
- Slam your country.
- Gather (pun intended) all your friends who hate our country together and have them comment over and over again how much our president is wrong and how they used to be Republican but now are Demagots!
- Be a leftist or socialist it's all the same dribble.
- See evidence here: Featured article on Gather:
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977395842
Â
Gosh! I hope I didn't offend any idiots who want Obamagot to win. Do you thinik this will get featured? Darn!Â
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 55
I'm feeling the same way on the gather front....
I love gather, but I'm trying to avoid the political bit...
Why pick between the two worst when you can vote for someone who stands for the Constitution, smaller government, low taxes, and non involvement with the affairs of other countries?
I am just trying to keep my head down around here anymore. A simple question about gardening or something turns into a free for all on how it is Bush's fault that someone's cucumbers are growing well!
Go home to your horned friends.
Ooh, I like that. lol
I think the problem is not that there are more liberal writers or more liberal readers. It is that the people who write the opposite side don't care about facts or writing well. They slop out a pack of lies or an irrational opinion and publish.
He didn't personally attack you in his article. Didn't start ranting about hating the US, so where do you get this from? #3 Gather (pun intended) all your friends who hate our country together and have them comment over and over again how much our president is wrong and how they used to be Republican but now are Demagots!
Now, I have yet to read the comment thread but am still at a loss as to why the article is so offensive to you. If you disagree with him that's your prerogative.
I see just as many articles against Obama here, many of them just reprints of the same false e-mails that have been circulating over the last year so find it difficult to sympathise with your concerns over how feature articles are chosen.
I prefer to read political articles that cite reliable sources over those that repeat the same hysteria over and over again, no matter which side they are on.
My experience in forums, with politics, is that the same old folks argue about the same old stuff over and over and freakin' OVER. Neither accepting that they aren't going to change the other's mind. So, they end up just tossing insults and namecalling... plus telling the same old lies over enough to start believing it's truth.
I still stand on the wish that our ballots had a NONE OF THE ABOVE on the selections. Then.. when "NONE..." wins, we could start all over and hopefully get someone the majority actually wants and is honest, instead of being just a pure politician. And that goes for both major parties.
I guess it's all a good way to vent, anyway.
The group: We Comment Back
I've seen many articles with the right's view featured. I don't see the bias.
I will say this. The many who support McCain will not be featured. Why? Look at their articles.
Go home to your horned friends. "
Brilliant discourse. What's the matter cupcake, not enough hugs from Mommy or to many from Daddy?
"Go home to your horned friends.
Ooh, I like that. lol "
Shocker.
Nice ideal Dale, but who fills the chair in the interim? Would you let, say, some King from La La Land sit in that chair in DC while another election is run or do we let the chair's current occupier stay?
Barbara B., Jul 14, 2008, 12:47pm EDT
Spot-on. It's quite obvious who owns and runs this site. It is also quite obvious that those same fools make all of the "editorial" decisions, as well...
outrageous fun
Now, I must go back to being good.