Yes, it's oil, but maybe we shouldn't get too excited.
Spurred by an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar and a moderation in the rhetoric over the Iran situation, the price of crude has swooned by over nine dollars per barrel in the past two days. This is bringing a very welcome degree of hope to drivers struggling to digest the price at the pump which, nationally, reached an all-time high this week.
And there are reasons to believe that the anticipation of a further reduction in the cost of oil may be justified. For example, the data suggests that the burden it has imposed on the world may have been exaggerated by manipulation and by speculative investing, a possibility that likens the oil crisis to the bubble that has now burst in the real estate sector.
In this regard, columnist and automotive expert Ed Wallace has followed up his two earlier articles on Business Week's Viewpoint website with a third article two weeks ago. His first two articles had clearly shown that there was ample oil avaiable and the global supply and demand data did not justify the price increases we had experienced.
In his most recent article, Wallace summarized the events of the previous week that impacted on the oil market. Remarkably, his analysis showed that what was reported in that one week added nearly 2 million barrels per day to the excess oil capacity already on the market. This additional surplus was derived from both cutbacks in demand and from increased production from the major oil producing nations.
Wallace also reminded us that current statements out of the Bush administration calling for increased production are not unlike the red herrings we heard during the California energy crisis seven years ago.
At that time, for example, Dick Cheney told PBS's Frontline on 5/17/01 that California's soaring electricity prices were the state's own fault, and were caused by a lack of supply and "unwise" regulation. In time, of course, we learned that the true cause was the pattern of criminal manipulation engineered by Enron. As Wallace said, we came to realize that Cheney's statement and others like it were nothing more, apparently, than the administration's attempts to "deflect any blame for California's suddenly stratospheric electrical costs away from their Houston friends."
So we would be well advised, according to Wallace, to put little reliance on anything the Bush administration has to say, these days, on the subject of energy.
But that does not necessarily mean that the current, artificially-stimulated oil price is destined to collapse anytime soon. Despite the conflicting indications provided by the data as pointed out by experts like Ed Wallace, the largest body of economic thought on the issue today clearly sees an oil price that will relentlessly continue to climb, with no light at the end of the tunnel.
For example, Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst for the Oil Price Information Service, a leading markets-tracking company, was quoted in yesterday's L.A. Times as saying that oil prices "might drift a little lower this week, but we'll be higher a month from now and oil will be above $150 before the end of the year." Kloza's view represents what might be called the conventional wisdom of the day.
This raises the possibility of an unthinkable scenario. Many of us believe that what has been happening is just temporary and that - like a bad dream - it will soon go away. After all, didn't the crisis in the seventies subside?
But what if it doesn't? What will it be like if the prices we are seeing for oil, as well as for many of our agricultural products and for some of the metals, remain in the stratosphere and even continue to climb?
It doesn't take a great deal of intuition to realize that such an eventuality would cause a drastic change in the world as we know it, particularly for our children and grandchildren.
Just imagine the long term impact. Many aspects of the type of life we have known would be turned upside down.
Suburbia, for example, might slowly die from the outside in as its inhabitants gradually succumb to the transportation costs associated with long commutes. At the same time, municipalities would be hard pressed to solve the dilemma with mass transport systems that neither they nor their taxpayers could afford.
Another obvious area of change would be in the transportation field itself. People would increasingly tend to travel less and a significantly fewer number of transportation companies would survive. What would be left of the airline industry would revert to its second childhood, serving only the wealthy.
Mail and the movement of both packages and products would be subject to such significant cost increases that alternatives would have to be found. Messages would be conveyed largely through electronic means, including the internet. And every urban area would become more diversified and less dependent on the shipment of products from elsewhere.
Under the circumstances that would exist with a continuing increase in global shortages of fuels, foods and metals, it is easy to imagine a world where people would live much simpler lives, close to their work, often walking or traveling by bicycle, and growing much of what they eat, either on their own properties or on communal lots. A broken item that would today be discarded would be taken to one of the myriads of repair shops that would spring up.
Some observers see much more far reaching consequences. Nicolas van der Leek, a prolific correspondent in the energy field, predicted in an OHMY News article entitled "The New Oil Order" on 6/30/08, that, among other trends, we could expect to see a reversal of globalization, the demise of capitalism and an increase in civil unrest.
In addition, according to van der Leek, there would be a fairly rapid transformation of the Fortune 500 list with many deletions, additions and changes in rankings.
Whether the global crisis that exists today turns out to be a temporary situation that will eventually return us to normal times, or whether it will become a long-term burden that will turn the world we've known on its ear, one thing is becoming increasingly clear. We are dangerously near the tipping point.
On Saturday, Bob Herbert, writing in the New York Times, said of the economy: "...the anxiety seems more intense than the usual concern for a cyclical downturn. Something fundamental seems to have gone haywire."
Herbert cited a recent book entitled "A Letter to America" by David Boren, a former U.S. senator, currently president of the University of Oklahoma. As Herbert said, Boren's "sense of alarm in the opening paragraph could not have been clearer."
Boren's book begins with these words: "The country we love is in trouble. In truth, we are in grave danger of declining as a nation. If we do not act quickly, that decline will become dramatic."
As we proceed through our daily lives struggling as individuals to deal with the realities that confront us and as we become increasingly numb to the repetitive nature of the downward spiral that swirls around us, we must not lose sight of the fact that time is running out.
No one nation, or single leader, can solve the global problem. Domestically, greed-fueled pursuits can be put aside and new priorities can be established. But to be effective, the United States, which is still the world's strongest nation, must use its influence to inspire an international effort to bring conditions under control.
Failure to do so in a timely manner may bring catastrophic consequences.
Dave McGill, News Correspondent
Dave's column, "The Contrarian," generally published every Friday, to Gather Essentials: News will sometimes present a contrary view to various aspects of the news, or an alternate take on the conventional wisdom of the day, and will occasionally appear on another day of the week
Dave has been a senior officer of an eastern insurance company, involved in economic projections and investment strategy, president of a Midwestern mortgage banking company, and a financial consultant in Southern California, serving clients in the field of commercial real estate development.
You can find all of Dave's "The Contrarian" columns at: http://gather.com/thecontrarian...... Keep up with Dave's other postings and Gather activity by joining his Gather network - just click here: http://atadaskew.gather.com........ You'll find Dave and other News Correspondents, plus celebrity content and plenty of other News experts at News.gather.com.


Comments: 80
Smart cars, anyone?
Great comments. The Republican strategy of 'drill here and now' is deceptive. Drilling here would be helpful if we OWNED the oil. Instead, we put out leases, major international oil companies drill and the oil is sold to the WORLD. So it would be a drop in the barrel so to speak.
Keep up the great work!
Demagogue David presents nothing but PREDICTIONS from people with vested interests in making sure THEIR prediction is the one people listen to, and act upon.
That's easy to do, when the consumer has already been filled with fear by self serving prophets of doom and gloom.
Oil is going down in price again, FOR A REASON. The dollar is rising again FOR A REASON. I know some people don't like to look at the FACTS and instead focus upon their own fears and imagination about the future, but sooner or later they will be forced to see the world for what it is--- awash in oil AND the fear mongers that lie about the amount of oil available.
Make no mistake, speculation drove the price of oil through the roof, and a dramatic downturn of oil futures means the price will continue to drop.
"The world as we know it" isn't going to be changing anytime soon, no matter how much fear you allow yourself to irrationally swallow.
No one "owns" oil, and leases are about the only way free markets allow such commodities to be exploited. It is certainly SOP around the world for any country with oil inside their borders.
The rich are getting richer and the poor are struggling more.
It's the same-old--same-old under Republican domination.
The price of gas will probably not come back down. As I recall, the price did not come back down after the gas crisis of the 1970s, it only quit rising so quickly and dramatically. Gas will likely remain at $4.00 per gallon for the foreseeable future. The stresses this will create within our societies will indeed be heady.
At least H-burton had enough money to build a spankin' new office tower in Dubay.
The message continues to be clear, America's rich care only about raking in more money for themselves; and have very little, if any, concern for their country and-or their fellow citizens.
The power brokers of the "Do as I say" generation have been replaced with the power brokers from the "Me" generation; and they continue to tell people to "Do as you are told" although now said for their personal gain. It is sad that the new generation does not have the same morals and ethics (patriotic, humanitarian, religious) as the "Greatest" generation had.
The term "Conservative" just doesn't mean what it used to anymore.
Times are certainly changing.
Here are prayers for our future.
Thanks David.
The major problem with this is the way the US has declined in credibility over the past 7 years. We must act now, but we must be sure to elect a next administration that will help remedy that problem making it possible to constructively influence the world in oil, commerce, human rights, and other areas.
This isn't the 60s, it's a completely new century in fact, and very little of what occured in the 60s, is relevant to the complexities of our current world. Nothing is the same, and such comparisons are futility in action.
Pretending to be Chicken Little, screaming "the sky is falling the sky is falling," happens to be the default position for the emotionally based "common sense" thinkers of the fringe left--- as they do little to solve any REAL problems, and continue to peddle fear instead of solutions to the ostensible problems THEY percieve.
I also cannot help but think that we will be seeing documentaries in a few years that explains how we were ripped off by what will turn out to be the same people who ran the Enron scam and bid energy up in California during deregulation. Time will tell, but the way we waste energy there is no real energy or oil shortage.
> the United States, which is still the world's strongest nation
What does that even mean anymore? Strongest in terms of nuclear missiles? Military might? How strong are we going to be with no oil, and lots of hungry unemployed people sitting around doing nothing?
The price of oil may go down temporarily, but not for long. China has a rising middle class that increasingly is using cars and every kind of laborsaving device common in the U.S. Soaring demand from rising nations in the Far East are putting demands on crude oil supplies never seen before. Unless alternative power sources become common soon, we will pay increasingly prohibitive higher prices for gas and everything else. I don't think there is any happy ending coming to bail us out this time.
I am intrigued by the suggestion that Globalization may be reversed until we have an alternative power source that is not oil.
I didn't bring up the 60s, the author and some comments from others brought it up.
The fact is, Californias can't prove a word of their "Enron is evil" rant, and REFUSE to place the blame for their energy problems where it belongs, with "gray out" Davis, their former governor.
Speculation drove up the price of oil, certainly NOT supply and demand. Demagogue David himself admits this.
I play no violin, that's the role of the prophets of doom and gloom.
*chuckle*
I've just published an article "The Folly of a Missile Defense Shield" that reinforces many of the points made here.
We were warned many years ago about the danger of our petroleum dependency and did not do anything about it. Now we are warned again and our response this time is not much different: drill off-shore, attack Iran, drill in ANWAR and to hell with Kyoto.
The money-makers sure have it down: divide and conquer the only power capable of stopping the greedy, the American electorate.
Of course it offers solutions for today's problems so if you like to complain don't read it.
Here is an interesting paradigm of sustainable living for the long term - experimental as it is.
and why do the liberal idiots always pretend what is happening in Europe is important to us ??? *ROFL*
On the other hand, if the price continues to climb at a rate far above what most nations can handle/absorb, all bets are off and I don't know where it leads?
People won't be grasping at the alternative energy "straw" forever, I can wait.
It's amazing how many ignore these facts and refuse to learn the facts. Of course McCain will not tell them that the oil drilled will not automatically go to the US. It will be "auctioned" on the world stage and only a fraction of it will go to US consumers. All it does it increase the supply and China and India can double their demand. Then what? Exxon and Shell refuse to sell to them or the traders just increase the price.
As Dave wrote, this isn't about oil. It's about ignorance and pure, unadulterated greed. We went to the moon almost 40 years ago; we should be light-years from here by now. Our species has a penchant for self-destruction, and all this chatter will never change that.
For those of you who believe in God, well, she's a bitch, and probably getting bored by us.
Oh, that's "all" it does eh ??? *ROFL* I wonder how you see into the future....
Do we have a "global crisis?" Or are things just following the logical and relatively natural path? The oil problem of hte seventies didn't "just go away." It subsided because the goal of the contrived "shortage" had been accomplished. You'll notice that the price, having gone to .75 per gallon, never declined, proving the adage that there was a shortage of .39 per gallon gasoline, but that there was lots of that .75 per gallon fuel available!
Now we have succeeded in getting the price of gasoline over $4.00 per gallon and hopes that it will stabilize there! I'd say, mission accomplished! There may be no further need for crisis at this time. However, until we allow drilling in the ANWR and off shore it may well continue.
"..Californias can't prove a word of their "Enron is evil" rant.."
Maybe Californians can't, but Enron's former chief financial officer did plead guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit securities fraud on Jan. 14, 2004.
Will you tell us that his plea was bought or coerced by these Californian blame dodgers that you reference? Maybe tell us that he was waterboarded into changing his plea?
decide to try to make money on alternatives after having been
burned last time in the 70's.
You want to oil to fall in the medium term ... blow up Ahmadinejad.
Remove the doubt that Iran can or will screw the entire world up
by slamming them into their place and shutting the yaps of their
idiot radical element for good.
but just for the hell of it - f-you jjack
Boren is right to be concerned, as our country sits on a vast supply of energy - oil, gas, coal, and nuclear - and cannot muster the political will to exploit them. Instead, our political leadership is risking our economy and our standard of living by listening to a minority of our citizens at the extreme left of the political spectrum.
Because of the irrational behavior of our political leadership, I believe Boren's fears that "we are in grave danger of declining as a nation" are indeed warranted. There is no known cure for stupidity.
Alternatives will be necessary as hoarding oil will commence, once we all find that we have burned up way too much oil and those that have it won't sell it. That's just plain ole human nature.
What a moron *ROFL* The title of Demagogue David's article is straight out of a tune from the 60s, you idiot *ROFL*
And from "Bill's Spirit" another 60s tune has been referenced-- Bob Dylan to be precise *ROFL* Times are certainly changing. Paraphrased, of course.
Enron's former chief financial officer did plead guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and conspiracy to commit securities fraud on Jan. 14, 2004
And pray tell, how does this impact California's bad decsions via gray out Davis.
Will you tell us that his plea was bought or coerced by these Californian blame dodgers that you reference?
One thing has nothing to do with the other.
Apparently Billie boy's spirit doesn't even know he's referencing Dylan when he does it *ROFL*
What it is ain't exactly clear
There's a man with a gun over there
Telling me I got to beware
I think it's time we stop, children, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
There's battle lines being drawn
Nobody's right if everybody's wrong
Young people speaking their minds
Getting so much resistance from behind
I think it's time we stop, hey, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
What a field-day for the heat
A thousand people in the street
Singing songs and carrying signs
Mostly say, hooray for our side
It's time we stop, hey, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
It starts when you're always afraid
You step out of line, the man come and take you away
We better stop, hey, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
Stop, hey, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
Stop, now, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
Stop, children, what's that sound
Everybody look what's going down
*ROFL* perhaps billie boy's spirit isn't old enough to see past the end of his nose, or maybe he's sooooooooooooooooo old he's senile *ROFL*
Wherever you roam
And admit that the waters
Around you have grown
And accept it that soon
You'll be drenched to the bone.
If your time to you
Is worth savin'
Then you better start swimmin'
Or you'll sink like a stone
For the times they are a-changin'.
Come writers and critics
Who prophesize with your pen
And keep your eyes wide
The chance won't come again
And don't speak too soon
For the wheel's still in spin
And there's no tellin' who
That it's namin'.
For the loser now
Will be later to win
For the times they are a-changin'.
Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.
Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is
Rapidly agin'.
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'.
The line it is drawn
The curse it is cast
The slow one now
Will later be fast
As the present now
Will later be past
The order is
Rapidly fadin'.
And the first one now
Will later be last
For the times they are a-changin'.
I wonder if billie boy's spirit even knows who Dylan is *ROFL*
First line--- The U.S. reached peak oil in the 1960s
Then the second--- The World will reach peak oil in the next decade
First of all, "peak oil" is defined by a "plateau" of oil production, followed by a sharp decline. The ONLY reasons oil production declined in the USA is because it was cheaper to buy it elsewhere AND irrational government regulations and standards. No one can demonstrate we have LESS oil today, than in the 60s--- in fact it is easily demonstrated we have MORE oil since the 60s because more reserves have been found.
Ditto for the rest of the world. Consumption hasn't reached a plateau, and in fact, consumption of oil has INCREASED worldwide, and every prediction says it will only grow.
We keep finding new oil reserves, and some people want to suggest we have less ???
*ROFL*
The only thing that's going to change, are the delusions of the few fear filled morons of the world. Even that might be asking too much *chuckle*
Lonely are the brave that admit the truth openly *chuckle*
Our problems are not lack of oil, they are bad management. When we can get rid of greedy self-servinig idiots in power and replace them with some civic minded humanists, or some scientists and engineers that understand these concepts energy shortages will be a thing of the past.
We are held prisoners of people who gain by putting the world through hell.
jJack is exactly right about the title being a reference to one song from the 60's, but, as I said in the comment for which I'm being ridiculed, there is no reference to the 60's in David's articles, nor in any of the comments above my first comment.
So, thank you for miss-correcting me.
As for Enron and California, please note that I only answered your assertion that there is no proof of the evil that Enron committed. Maybe if you offer up some specific claim about how Davis ruined the state I'll bother to respond to that point; or maybe not. LMAO
What will always stick in my mind is the recording of two Enron employees cutting up about how much money they were making from the turmoil they were stirring up in California by manipulating the flow of energy.
In all seriousness, my question is ... most oil producing countries are pumping oil at maximum capacity yet there is a usage reduction of 2 million barrels. Where is that excess capacity going.
I recently read that Buffett is buying heavy into railroads. I wonder if that would be a sign that alternative modes of transportation may be here to stay. It would make me a proud American citizen to see the people make this decision for the government. I'd like to see it go even further. Green is good.
He's the guy at the back who took the bad acid.
The 60s damn near killed this nation with all of the stupid "if it feels good do it" crapola.
What will always stick in my mind is the recording of two Enron employees cutting up about how much money they were making from the turmoil they were stirring up in California by manipulating the flow of energy.
Probably because your imainged the whole scene, complete--- within the confines of your thick head.
This article is more about Clinton, but does a good job of placing Davis at the scene of the crime so to speak-- you know, the guy you Californians ELECTED--- he's placed in the same "Enron bed" most of you people accuse Bush of being in.
This article deals directly with gray out davis himself--- though only mentions briefly the energy issue, and instead focuses on the all around general reasons why he's considered corrupt and to blame for the problems in california.
This guy doesn't much like Davis, and connects him directly to Enron--- see ???
This is the out and out accusation against gray out davis, delivered by huffington herself. All that money he got from Enron bought Gray Out Davis, YOU KNOW THE GUY YOU ELECTED ! ! ! !
If you don't have an inside man to bribe, it matters very little if you want to rip off the public.
Enron owned Davis.
Here's Wallace's news items covering just one week:
"[U.S.] demand for oil over the first five months of the year was off 2.5%* from last year." —American Petroleum Institute, June 18, 2008, Associated Press Online (*Translation: We are using approximately 525,000 fewer barrels of oil per day.)
"Iran has 15 [oil] supertankers idling in the Persian Gulf capable of storing more than 30 million barrels of crude." —Bloomberg, June 16, 2008
"Thunder Horse started pumping from a single well on Saturday…and on schedule to have the field online by yearend. Thunder Horse alone will increase overall U.S. oil and gas production by 3.6%. Add British Petroleum's Atlantis platform that started up last year, and the boost grows to 6.4%." —Houston Chronicle, June 16, 2008
"Asian refiners cut West African crude oil imports in June. Asian imports will fall 36%* to 830,000 barrels a day this month from May's 1.3 million barrels per day." —Bloomberg, June 17, 2008 (*Translation: Another 470,000 barrels a day of mostly light sweet crude rejected by the market.)
Saudi Arabia's Role
"Refiners across Asia said on Monday they were not likely to buy more Saudi crude at current prices, highlighting the kingdom's challenge in attempting to contain soaring markets by promising extra barrels. The world's top exporter is set to increase output to 9.7 million barrels per day in July. The extra 200,000 bpd, if confirmed, would come on top of the 300,000 bpd it promised to pump this month." —Livemint (part of the Wall Street Journal Digital Network), June 16, 2008 (That's another 500,000 barrels of oil apparently not purchased.)
"Daily shipments of North Sea Brent crude…will rise 8.6% in July. Tankers are set to load 175,097 barrels a day of Brent crude next month, up from 161,300 barrels a day scheduled for June." —Bloomberg June 9, 2008
"'[U.S.] Drivers Cut Back by 30 Billion Miles:' Americans drove 22 billion fewer miles from November through April than during the same period in 2006-07, the biggest such drop since the Iranian revolution led to gasoline supply shortages in 1979-1980." —USA Today, June 22, 2008
"South Korea's May Oil Consumption Falls on High Price" —Bloomberg, June 20, 2008
"Faced with increasingly severe fuel shortages and the prospect of power failures during the summer air conditioning season, the Chinese government unexpectedly announced a sharp increase* late Thursday night in regulated prices for gasoline, diesel, and electricity." —The New York Times, June 20, 2008 (*Translation: Gasoline and diesel prices in China increased by 18% immediately to cool demand.)
I'm left scratching my head in confusion after reading jJackie Midlite's comment quoted here.
So I suppose, according to jJackie's comment, that all of the job losses in the automotive and airline industries were due to the self serving prophets of gloom and doom and not because consumers quit buying gas guzzeling SUVs and the airline industry has taken a hit because of the high fuel prices?
Keep in mind that this is the same dope smoking retard who tried to downplay the mortgage crisis.
1) we helped in building our own worstr enemy with developing OPEC with the rest of the Industralized Countries.
2) We need to find a way to remove ourselves from being reliant on oil from other countries.
3) We are the strongest of the Industrialized Nations and we cannot even put our collective heads together to solve this problem
America is becoming weak, not because of outside influences, but because of ourselves. Our Politicians divid this country for their own power plays, and so many let them do just that. Big Business is not the blame here, they are feeding an issue we as a people have started ourselves.
Its past time to quit crying about the problems and start dealing with them as America has for over a century. SWe have been the Country everyone looked to when things went down the shitter, now they don't have that because we won't get our collective heads out of our asses.
That is the problem in the nutshell.
HUbert's Peak is not theoretical. The Worlds oil reservers are known, country by country though some, like Saudia Arabia inflate them. See TheOilDrum.com and PeakOilPrimer. U.S. reserves are tiny and all the oil in Alaska would meet about four percent of current demand.
Perhaps she is going through ' the change ' ?
You tell me is it to the Saudis benefit to tell everyone that oil is getting short, or that they have it pouring out their ying-yangs? Obviously if people thhink there is a shortage they react and bid the price up.
Here is a excerpt from a page:
The peak oil theory, first espoused by Shell Oil geoscientist M. King Hubbert in 1956, has come under increasing criticism in recent years, as repeated predictions of world oil depletion have failed to match empirical data documenting increasing reserves.
For instance, data produced by the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration currently shows 1.3 trillion barrels of proven oil reserves worldwide, more than ever in recorded history, despite a doubling in world oil consumption since the 1970s.
In what has become a contentious worldwide debate over whether peak oil is fact or fiction, Simmons dismisses statistics that are not consistent with his depletion models.
The Energy Information Administration "has been as inept at forecasting oil outlook in both production and prices as anyone," Simmons told WND in an e-mail, "yet so few ever remember their awful forecasts."
Hofmeister explained to the CNBC audience why he believed Simmons' hypotheses were too narrow.
"In other words, Simmons is looking at conventional oil only," Hofmeister said. "In the industry, we look at unconventional oil as well."
Unconventional oil is a reference to oil that is not found as crude oil in reservoirs contained in sedimentary rock layers just below the surface of the earth.
An example of unconventional oil is the oil sands in Alberta, Canada, from which oil is produced.
When President Bush took office on Jan. 20, 2001, the price of oil was approximately $24 a barrel, too low for the oil sands to be converted to oil economically.
But now, with the price of oil hovering near $100 a barrel, conversion of the oil sands has become economically feasible. Canada has become the largest supplier of foreign oil to the U.S., supplying the U.S. with more than 70 million barrels of oil a month, according to current EIA statistics.
There are a lot of variables and where there is money to be made who is going to try to make things clear and stable?
No one knows when we are reaching that peak, and what the shape of that peak will look like.
Didn't say it was, I talked about the plataue, and there is no sharp decline, but a gradual one after the plataue is reached. Well, according to the silly peak oil theory nutcases.
HUbert's Peak is not theoretical.
Of course it is-- we're well past the original date set, by several decades for the USA.
M. King Hubbert first used the theory in 1956 to accurately predict that United States oil production would peak between 1965 and 1970.
Accurately ??? *chuckle*
The USA now knows of MORE OIL reserves than we did during that time frame. Hence, Hubbert was working with extrapolations of known data, but not complete data, and therefore his time frame, and in my opinion his whole theory is called into question.
According to the Hubbert model, the production rate of a limited resource will follow a roughly symmetrical bell-shaped curve based on the limits of exploitability and market pressures.
The problem with that is, the "exploitability" constantly shifts like the sand trapping the oil-- or the shale trapping the oil, or whatever--- because new technologies come along to change the equation of "exploitability."
The same is true for "market pressures." These pressures are fluid and dynamic and are also contantly CHANGING beneath their feet.
The central features of the Hubbert curve (that production stops rising, flattens and then declines) remain unchanged.
See the "flattens" part, you know, a plataue.
Just like the sister, faith based science of global warming, peak oil is a theory whose time hasn't really come, but some people still believe in it anyway.
Sorry to say, but the dramatic decline of America not only as world power but as a nation of wealth and influence is already underway. Could it possibly be stopped? Well, yes it could. But so much has to happen so quickly to stop it that it is unlikely that it will be stopped. It is more likely that George Bush will admit all his intentional transgressions against the constitution and other laws of the land and of the global community, resign from office and turn himself over to the authorities to stand trial for his crimes.
Don't expect the price of oil to drop significantly before January 21st, 2009. If nothing else, Bush will continue to manipulate fears to increase the profits of his colleagues in the oil patch.
It is very interesting to imagine the long term impact and what would happen to the suburbia and urban areas.
And why are the oil companies making so much money? What's up with that? It's so obvious it is sickening.
people will adjust to such prices as they have to other disruptions in the past.