Hope you all had a great weekend and an enjoyable 4th for those from the US! Well I did promise that Gayle and I would be giving our honorable mentions in our last challenge posting. That would normally mean that two more photos would be singled out for recognition but, in this case, there'll be only one. We don't discuss this before selection so that's just the way this one worked out. We both thought to give recognition to Roy's European Skipper.
Gayle: I chose Roy's moth on a tall grass stem image because it had very good clarity showing wing patterns and other details....the way he framed the shot gave an appealing diagonal to the composition....the DOF (depth of field) was excellent blurring the BG to keep focus on the moth.....nice perspective,too,which included full length of the moth...
Doyle: I liked the superb use of depth in this one because it accented the moth quite well and the blade of grass, crisply providing us with scale and a great diagonal line through the composition. The clarity is very nice, providing texture too.
_____________________________________________
Well, Gayle, my talented co-moderator, and I have gone through all these images and have tried very hard to make certain each received some sort of critique or a word to let you know we were there. While we do try to give some serious, very intensive critiques there are times where an image might get a seemingly passing critique and other times where somebody gets this real, lengthy, detailed analysis.
Some might wonder why this is. Well...umm...I can tell you that it has nothing what-so-ever to do with who posts the image so don't feel singled out. It really has to do with the image. Can someone see a way that it can be improved? Can someone suggest a way to get over some stumbling block? Maybe a reminder about the importance of rule of third compositions? The idea is to provide the guidance (kindly) that you think might help improve the shot. Keep in mind, these are all opinions. You need not agree. If it makes you feel easier to give a critique, you could start with a brief encouraging intro and then explain how you "might have done this shot if it were mine" or "did you consider trying...?" and then remind them it's just your opinion. Critiques aren't all about how a shot can be improved. They're ALSO about what works in a shot. Or both. It's all about what works for YOU and how YOU would improve it if it were yours so there's no wrong or right.
So we'd like to see you all give and accept critiques. Try not to be defensive. It discourages honest critiques. Suggesting ways an image might be improved is not even close to the same thing as saying the image is poor. When people react defensively to a critique it makes other people want to avoid critiquing and you end up with a string of "nice shot" comments which won't help growth and growth is what this group is all about. There's LOTS of those other kind of groups out there.
We'd ALSO like to recognize a critique each month because we KNOW that's a lot of effort, a lot of putting yourself "out there". This month we'll mention two since there's only the one HM.
Bobbi K.'s critique on Roy's European Skipper.
Roy H.'s critique on Heather W.'s Stink Bug.
July 2008 Intense Photography Challenge
Shoot a "Still Life"
- The still life shot needs to be items selected AND arranged by you not something you see sitting on the shelf at the local grocery store on the canned food aisle. ;P
- The still life also cannot include flowers (unless they're dead). Note that dried flowers would be considered dead while cut flowers would be considered dying! Ok . . . Heather admits to a bit of a morbid thingee going on. :)
- These photos must be Black & White.
The deadline will be the last minute of July 31st, Gather time. Do NOT do any editing after that as that will change the date even if it had been in earlier. This deadline is final. :)
________________________________________________________________________
Gayle and I have greatly appreciated the effort we've been seeing from such enthusiastic participants and the fun the members of this group have been having is encouraging. Really, we'd like to recognize all you guys and do . . . The honesty from the submissions and the ability of people to respond to the various challenges is very cool. Keep up that good work! :)
________________________________________________________________________
So shoot, post, review others, critique, learn and have fun!
If you're not a member and wish to Join:
Go to the Groupspace here and click 'join' on the left side!


Comments: 22
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Oh, I'm thinking my job requires sobriety too . . . besides, although it might be fun think about this: This could end up being named still life Honorable Mention:

And think how embarassing that would be for me to have to blame it all on Gayle! :P
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
As mentioned . . . it's opinions. I certainly have awards on photos that aren't even close to some of my unawarded photos and I'm betting Gayle has the same . . . (I know she agrees with me about mine). Sounds like an interesting month to come!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
I love how I am learning from this group.
I have pretty thick skin and hope others do to when it comes to a critique. And I hope my critique would be corrected if in error too. Otherwise, I wouldn't learn.
I'm getting ready to put some of my photos in the county fair so I am really excited about getting to be on the judging end of this contest before then, so I can start thinking like a judge and maybe get into the heads of the ones for the show LOL
Heather, I really enjoyed your suggestions on my black and white still life images. Receiving feedback on each image was instructive.
And Roy, congrats on HM. Hey, did you see Zoom-it is doing a Bird theme this week?
hey, bring Marny along...more the merrier...umm, at least in this case cause i know Marny is sane like moi...hehehe
and yes, you would be very embarrassed to have to blame yore bay bay 2 for your choices while under the influence...so just continue to say "NO" unless it be party time!
Heather > i agree that photo-art (creative editing) is subjective,but not straight photography...the more you learn the more you will notice when key elements all come together to create a decent comp....lighting,contrast level,placement within your framing of shot,clarity/exposure,DOF and other techs are not subjective....the more you study photos the more you will notice what works and what doesn't....sometimes it is a matter of applying the rules,or breaking them in such a way that it still works for the subject matter....
good luck at the fair....having been on both sides, i can tell you the more professional the contest,the more one has to meet the exacting specs required....hope the judges have experience and a good eye....
Monkey gurL (Jenn K.) > get to postin' some B/W still lifes! ;>
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~