Over the last several days, I have published Parts I, II III, IV, V and VI on this subject. If you have not already read them, I ask that you please click on the following link(s) before continuing and read the first six parts of this 7-part article:
Part I, Alien Abductions: Why are "The Greys" here and what do they want with us?
Part II, Alien Abductions: Why are "The Greys" here and what do they want with us?
Part III, Alien Abductions: Why are "The Greys" here and what do they want with us?
Part IV, Alien Abductions: Why are "The Greys" here and what do they want with us?
Part V, Alien Abductions: Why are "The Greys" here and what do they want with us?
Part VI, Alien Abductions: Why are "The Greys" here and what do they want with us?
Now on to Part VII: Conclusion
Based upon considerable study, I feel that, for me, the following conclusions represent the most logical and likely portrait that I can make of the so-called "alien abduction phenomena":
1. The "aliens" that appear to be abducting people on an increasing basis all over the world are probably not "alien" at all -- rather, it is far more likely that they are Earth-originated human beings from our own future.
2. These "future humans" appear to be from sufficiently far enough into the future so as to account for the differences in physical appearance between present-day humans and these so-called "greys".
3. They also appear to have mastered sophisticated technologies such as those associated with time travel, aerodynamics, genetics, bio-mechanical engineering and telepathy.
4. Due to:
a) Diseases or psychological conditions brought on by overpopulation, or
b) Repercussions from chemical or biological human birth control methods (or both),
human reproduction will dwindle to such a low level in the distant future that it threatens the future survival of our species.
5. These travelers from our own future (the so-called "greys") are scientists who have come to our present (their past) to conduct experiments on living human subjects to attempt to establish the best course of action to take to raise the rate of human procreation in their time.
6. It appears that, in their research into human reproduction, these "future human scientists" may be trying to determine:
a) Exactly when, where and how the decline in human reproduction began.
b) What biological/chemical factor(s) were (or will be) responsible for that decline.
c) What the contributing factor(s) are to the present robust state of human reproduction.
A Parting Word:
I'm fully aware that, upon reading any or all of the installments of this 7-part article, there will be those people who will brand me as a "nut case" of the highest order; however, I am also greatly comforted by the fact that, if and when they do, I would join the ranks of such innovative thinkers as Copernicus, Leonardo Da Vinci, Newton, Christopher Columbus and Albert Einstein all of whom were, at some point in their lives, branded with a similar dubious label...
It appears, however, that the passage of time has vindicated each and every one of them...
--end--
Author's Note: Edited 07/05/08 at 11:13 pm PST to repair links.
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 17
I think your conclusion makes a lot of sense.
Good job.
"Hot Earth chicks"... LMBO, DeM!
It's plausible as a theory. I can't say that I have come to a conclusion on this matter. It is incredibly fascinating, but at this point all I will concede is that yup, I believe we are being visited and they are experimenting and influencing us on a global level.
Thanks for this brave series.
Another thing I've always wondered about was the general "humanoid" form that the aliens took... they may look different but they always seemed to have two arms, two legs, a similar stance to ours... mouth, two eyes... and I wondered, is it just our limited imagination which concocts these similar beings? But you have offered an explanation.
Thanks for a fantastic read.
Awwww... Ron.... You, TOO, my friend! You, too.... :o)
No, Alison, I have not. I have seen a couple of "UFOs" in my life ("UFOs" in the classic interpretation of the word that is that I have yet to be able to identify them as any "known" objects). I have, however, heard and read many accounts of abductions from those who claim to have experienced it and, obviously, I have studied much of the material available on the subject. As I said in the first installment, though, I used to think exactly the same way MOST people think about this but my curiosity and naturally investigative tendencies impelled me to weigh the "pros and cons" logically and dispassionately in order to settle the matter in my own mind.
CF: (first of all... very funny...) and, secondly, I don't think you are amongst "the few" to be undecided on this phenomena... Rather, I think MOST people are "undecided". I merely sought to point out some of the evidence and theories involved in this highly fascinating subject and bring them out as much I could to anyone who would listen... Thank you for "listening", my friend... :o)
Julie: You voice some of the same inconsistencies that piqued MY interest in this subject -- the things about it that sent up "red flags" in my mind and prodded me to investigate further... Thank YOU for "hanging in there" with me and having an open mind... I appreciate it very, very much!