Talk about your fashion police. A new law in Japan requires companies and local governments to measure the waistlines of citizens between the ages of 40 and 74 annually as part of a national campaign against obesity. The New York Times reported this ambitious (some would argue Draconian) new program in a front page article last week.
Concerned about the rise in what they call "metabo" (short for metabolic syndrome, described in a previous blog) among middle aged Japanese adults, the government will require men whose waists measure greater than 33.5 inches and women whose waists measure greater than 35.4 inches to participate in a dietary counseling program. Waist size is an inexact, but reasonable estimate of risk for diabetes and other obesity related health problems. Japanese companies and local governments failing to measure a certain percentage of their employees or citizens, or failing to successfully encourage them to lose inches from their waistlines, risk stiff financial penalties.
I suspect this new law will draw a mixed reaction among Americans. On the one hand, it seems the ultimate "nanny law," an intrusion by government into individuals' most personal choices about what we eat and how we look and feel. Since our colonial beginnings, Americans have always valued individuality, personal freedom, and all you can eat buffets. On the other hand, in the past few years, obesity among Americans has been recognized as a societal problem, both in its causes and effects. It's difficult to lose weight when our food supply is glutted with processed food made from government subsidized corn sweeteners, when McDonalds has concessions in schools, when health insurance companies are more likely to pay for gastric bypass surgery than gym memberships, and when poor neighborhoods lack safe recreational areas or supermarkets stocked with fresh produce. And it's difficult to define being obese as a purely personal choice when, as the Centers for Disease Control estimates, obesity related illness and disability cost $200 billion annually.
So, could an "anti-fat" law ever be passed in America? I doubt it—even the Japanese law has, according to the New York Times report, produced much grumbling and some noncompliance. Americans, being far more obese (the average American man has a waist measurement of 39 inches and American women average 36.5 inches) and wedded to a high fat diet than the Japanese, would have a much tougher time with such a law.
And yet, most people don't want to risk diabetes and heart disease and certainly don't wish these obesity-related health scourges on their children. We might welcome some help from the government, but there will be disagreement about the form that help should take. Strict limits on smoking in public places and high cigarette taxes have drastically reduced smoking rates (and, some would argue, have made smokers feel like social outcasts), but I think similar efforts to curb eating behavior would meet with more resistance. Personally, I'd rather see government efforts go toward building playgrounds and subsidizing organic vegetable gardens than lining us up to face the tape measure. What do you think?
Dr. Suzanne Koven practices internal medicine with a special interest in weight issues at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and teaches at Harvard Medical School.
Weigh Less
Two out of every three Americans are overweight. Excess weight can raise your risk of several chronic diseases, including heart disease, stroke, and certain cancers. Start lowering that risk with Weigh Less, Live Longer: Strategies for successful weight loss, a special report from Harvard Medical School that helps you personalize an effective weight-loss plan. Equip yourself with all the tools you need to lose weight safely and, most importantly, keep it off.
Do you want to maintain a healthy weight? Connect with others with similar health concerns and issues. Click here to join the group.
This content is not intended to substitute for personalized medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from your healthcare provider. Read our full disclaimer.


Comments: 15
But I think your idea of more play grounds and organic veggie gardens is also a great idea. I would also really like to see better public transit options ... whenever I'm in a city that has good public transit, I end up walking a lot. We walk to the bus stop/train station/subway station to get onto the bus/train/subway, and then we walk to where ever we are going after wards. It would be great exercise!
I am an English teacher and writer, living in Japan, and one of my (very slim) students was talking to me about this particular law, a couple of weeks ago. Apparently, he is 1" too big around the waist (although you'd never guess it), and so he is busy doing sit-ups every morning and playing tennis on weekends to loose that extra inch.
I asked him for his opinion on these new laws, and he said that he didn't mind. Although I wasn't convinced, as the Japanese are notorious for keeping their true feelings to themselves.
I then asked him if these government fines applied to smokers. Apparently, they don't, which is interesting, considering the huge number of smokers in Japan. Cigarettes are incredibly cheap to buy here, and there are rumors that the tobacco companies have helped to fund certain political campaigns.
But no, doctors who are doing your company medical check-up are not interested in whether you inhale toxic smoke - just that your belly is not flat.
Don't get me wrong, obesity is a huge problem in the west, but here in Japan (the land of tiny people with cigarette addictions), weight is really not a problem.
To my mind, this new law is all about the government making a token effort towards employee health.
Janna,
Hoodia Gordonii