Congratulations on winning your appeals court ruling against Child Protective Services (CPS) in Texas. Some of you may be reuniting with your children right now. Best wishes for a speedy return to normal life and healing the trauma you have suffered.

Many Americans are relieved to see the government rein in a state agency and make it obey its own rules. They know that if CPS can take your children on an anonymous caller's say-so, their own children are far from safe.
CPS was unable to prove to a judge that your children were in danger. It failed to show that it had tried to preserve the integrity of your families, as its rules state, and has now been ordered to give your children back to you. This in no way undoes the harm caused to your families, but it is the best they can do. High government officials supported the CPS move, and their opinion is evident in the papers CPS filed in support of their actions. Those papers claimed that yours was a "pervasive system of belief that condones underage marriage and underage pregnancy." The word "pervasive" is rarely a positive one.
Sadly, many Americans do not know how to live and let live. Over the last 30 years, politicians have subtly encouraged intolerance, by seeking approval and endorsements from conservative religious leaders, themselves rarely paragons of tolerance. When these politicians had gained the power they sought, they found themselves beholden to others who were less enthusiastic about the rule of law than they were about furthering their own interests. In the end, these so-called public servants have turned over an inordinate amount of power to a base of people who would like nothing so much as to abolish the separation between church and state. Our secular nation, which was intended to allow freedom of or freedom from religion, is in grave danger from such people.
Unfortunately, the message these people spread is one of fear. They tell us that those who are different would destroy our way of life and that they hate our freedom. The actions of CPS seem to indicate a distaste for freedom much closer to home.
Nor is the intolerance limited to religion. America has become the great busybody, attempting to interfere with and regulate everyone except itself. Those who do not subscribe to our ideas about economics, government, drugs, or sexuality are equally likely to find themselves in our gun sights. The problem you faced was less religious than sexual. The cultural fascination with all things sexual almost guaranteed that you would receive governmental ministrations.
It is a sad irony that the underage pregnancy rate among your teenage girls is much lower than the national average. Americans may not condone teenage pregnancy, but they certainly practice it. They seem blind to that fact, as to the idea that many cultures both arrange marriages and permit girls as young as 13 to marry. They overlook that their own scriptures mention that Mary was a young girl betrothed to Joseph, who was a much older man. Nor are you the only people practicing polygamy in this country. Some Muslims, whose religion also "condones" plural marriage follow the practice. In short, Americans overlook the plank in their collective eye in order to remove the mote from yours.
As you try to establish some normalcy in your life, there is a tiny bit of history you ought to be aware of. In 1993, the children of another group whose religious ideas were far from the mainstream were placed in the care of CPS. These children had indeed been physically and sexually abused, and in this instance, needed to be removed from their home. Unfortunately, at least 17 children were still in the home when the FBI stormed it on April 19, 1993.
You have won this battle. Don't be misled into thinking you have won the war.


Comments: 55
Amen to that!
If our government wants to punish someone, they need to arrest the menwho perpetrate the crime, not the children.
It's about time smeone gave CPS an overhaul
It was a sham Folks !! They lied, Look at the rate of teenage pregancy in outr own culture DE hur !!
I don't want any one's views forced upon me and I appreciate the separation of church and state because I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want to be the government's religion of choice. HOWEVER it is not freedom FROM religion -- getting mixed up here is what causes many problems.
10 4 u
We allow freedom of religion because we accepting country and let everyone worship as they please; so long as they do not actually and maliciously harm another. We do not endorse one specific religious but we do not abandon God either. There is a fine line of balance.
Separation of church and state, I thinks, is exactly this. We do not promote one religious as the only or best or supeerior, but at the same time we are not without faith: our pledge of allegince says under God, and our money say In God We Trust. But which God? God of Christian, Muslim, Jew, Hindu, or even the ungod of Atheis? I believe there is onely one God, and that not necessarily only one religious must be right. I believe firmly in freedom of religion buts that is because America is supposeds to be a land of freedom and toleration, and acceptances. Not a land where one group superior is but one where all are accepted and God is not forgotten.
I disagree with the practice of forcing a young woman (girl) to marry someone that is old enough to be her father. It's not only out of touch, it's somewhat immoral and reeks of child molestation.
It's sad that the court said they had to go back home. At the same time, some of the stipulations that were placed on the mothers to get the kids back are fair, in my opinion. I want to go one step further and allow for these arranged/forced marriages to be annuled.
while it may not be for YOU to say how these people should live, there are still laws which Both Parties (FLDS and CPS) need to follow.
But those who sit idle while children are EVEN POTENTIALLY ABUSED should be ashamed, and held responsible.
WE MUST ALWAYS ERR ON THE SIDE OF THE KIDS!
I detest Big Government, and Civil Rights Violation such as we have witnessed these last 7 years under Shrub.
That does NOT GIVE A PASS TO PEDOPHILES OR ABUSERS.
At least lets get the correct ID"S ;IE; the right child with the right parent.
If the issue of "morality" is cast aside, it is definitely the job of the state to protect children from abuse and from harm, the problem here is that the children in harm's way are exclusively young women who are just reaching adulthood, and they do have a right to protection from forced marriage or coerced relationships, and it is the obligation of the state to provide that protection.
I m sure there r cases of forced marriages but just coz we don't agree with it have to be forced into such marriages, female members of FDLS mite be very much ok with it.
I work with many Indians & surprisingly all of them had arranged marriages which I thought they were forced into. But I learned that was not the case & they always wanted to get married that way and r very happy. I can't imagine myself doing it but juts coz I can't doesn't mean rest of world is being forced into it.
Regarding age... some states have 18, for some it's 16 with parental consent. Who's to say what's exactly the rite age? If Canada institutes minimum age of 24.. does that mean we Americans r evil for havin it at 18? Many in rural Africa get married at puberty as age is not what matters to them, infact they don't even track it.
When was the minimum age instituted?
Thank you for sharing it.
This situation was fraught with sticky problems to begin with.
It is just a huge problem when the law justifies taking ALL children from an entire community, because some adult members of the community are anonymously alleged to have been abusive to some of the children.
The majority of those wives, children and husbands were likely innocent, yet they all suffered as if guilty.
Most of us might not understand the appeal of a semi-cloistered 1800's lifestyle, but I certainly can. Imagine not having to worry about drive-by shootings, or someone's loud music as you sit on your front porch. Imagine not having to worry about kids taking guns to school, or being pressured by any of their peers to do drugs.
Personally, I could never see myself joining one of these communities. I'm spiritual, not religious; which is to say that I resist dogmatic authority figures. But I certainly can understand why other folks might embrace it fully. There's a lot of secure feelings, both physical and emotional, that can be found and enjoyed with immersion in a cloistered or semi-cloistered community.
Here's hoping the abusers are found and prosecuted, and that the innocent will heal.
As long as we have money mongrels in any level of power, the problems won't go away.
I hope those poor children are able to adjust in a world that is now foreign to them and the innocent ones from that community are al reunited.
GT
You will FALL for anything!
Thanks for taking a stand.Bravo to you.
How odd it is that the very system that just returned these children to "abuse", (which it is, no matter how you look at it) claiming all sorts of inane reasons for doing so, have NO PROBLEM passing laws and telling a women what they should do with their own bodies!!
We should not interfere with this "cult", but we must NOT refuse to allow them to interfere in our OWN bedrooms, with our OWN bodies.
The state does have the right to dictate "minimum standards" of conduct. Protecting children is one area. It needs to balance its approach and actions, however. The draconian sweep of the FLDS compound was ill-advised in any circumstance unless they were actively drinking poison (or something similar to the Jim Jones mass suicides). Investigate, then move. The largest indicator that this was not adequately investigated or planned was the lack of identification. Any disaster recovery group knows that, if people can communicate, identification should be done as close to the entry point as possible. The method used will make it much harder to interdict if viable information is obtained in the future. This is a chilling thought.