Zuni image of man-woman
Hurrah! for the California Supreme Court and Schwarzenegger's decision to respect the ruling...
As a European baby boomer, I grew up within a fundamentalist Christian church and went for 12 years to conservative private schools in various countries.
The male role models of my childhood dictated that homosexuality was perverse and that gay and lesbian people were predators. And yet, suppressed in all this ... (this is for another article)
When in college and having just finished my freshman year, I visited New York City for the first time and had my first "known" encounter with a gay person. I had a meeting with a professor at an office near Riverside Drive in Manhattan. Not being savvy of this American city, I got there in the car quite a bit early, so I parked at a cul-de-sac that overlooked the gray Hudson River and the Henry Hudson (West Side) Parkway through a quaint hillside of trees, and sat on a park bench. Listening to the songbirds and contemplating a professor's summer offer to join his team investigating DDT pesticides and doing bird banding, a man approached and sat on the same bench. I was of course very worried, but he seemed so warm in his eyes, and when he softly said, "Nice morning, eh?" I immediately wondered -- contrary to what I'd read about NYC's violence in distant newspapers -- if all New Yorkers could be such peacefully good people.
A superficial conversation ensued, until suddenly he moved his little behind closer to me and looking me in the eyes, said, "I would so love it if you'd let me cook you breakfast..."
My heart skipped several beats! For a moment I was frozen beyond words.
He was a "homo." My story would wind up buried in the New York Times as a couple of paragraphs about a mysterious, partially eaten victim corpse floating on the Hudson. My mom and girlfriend would wonder forever what had happened. Having recently had a meniscus operation on my knee from a bicycle racing incident, I could only hobble up from the park bench. But instead of going to my car, since that would leave me vulnerable as I fumbled with the keys, I stumbled towards a big church by that cul-de-sac. I dared not look behind as I heard, "Wait... why are you going? What have I done... Please... talk to me..."
But I just struggled up those stone steps to the church, since in the Europe and Canada I was accustomed to, no churches then were ever locked due to an old sanctuary philosophy. But these oaken doors did not budge.
The man paced undecidedly on the pavement between the park bench and church, so I hopped hurriedly on one leg towards where I could hear traffic. I looked behind half way up this street. Not seeing him but believing him to be lurking, I used both legs to pump me forward. My knee hurt so much. Eventually I came to a busy thoroughfare going both ways (Broadway), and parked myself on the cement island. There I waited, until I saw what I was waiting for, and madly flagged down the approaching blue-and white.
The driver pulled over to the middle, turned on his flashing lights and rolled down the window.
Excitedly, I related to the cops how grave my situation was, and that it would be in the public interest to capture this man.
His partner leaned over and asked where I came from. Perhaps my accent.
When I answered, the driver looked at me and asked, "Would you like to do New York City a big favor?"
"Sure," I said.
"Go back to your car, put the keys in the ignition and go back to where you came from."
"But... bu... bu.... I mean, at least follow me back to my car so I can safely get into my car."
The driver's window was already rolling up as the two broke out into a huge laugh and drove away, leaving me with my mouth wide open.
Well, I did go on to study DDT and birds and all that...
And later, when I was studying all sorts of cultures –- learning among a million other things that homosexuality has been an accepted part of those human societies in the ancient past that peacefully survived longest -- and learning to become a better writer of sagas, my best friend for a couple of decades, another professor who was to have taken over JRR Tolkien's post at Oxford were it not for a leukemia diagnosis, turned out to be gay. He was the kindest, most loving and intelligent man I have ever known... and not once did he ever suggest we become intimate. His empathy, common sense and problem-solving capabilities were only paralleled by the most intelligent person I've ever known, a woman.
As the years have gone by and my work became more directly focused on researching reducing human suffering and violence, it no longer amazes me to learn that there is a very high percentage of gay people actively and very successfully engaged in problem solving the stupidity in the world. Not once in my life have I been interested in a gay experience... but I honestly wish the world were far far more gay. It is among this "group" of human beings that I have most consistently found the teachings of Christ to be manifest. Not in words, but in action... especially in how a lesbian or gay pair raise their children.
Among some native American tribes, there exists a third gender, a gay and transgender one that is termed berdache (eg: winkte, among the Lakota), and due to their nurturing nature, were often relegated the role as the teachers of children. Berdache, by the way, is an ancient Persian term, which like the accepted term for the Di´neh people, "Navajo," is tongue-in-cheek derogatory. But it scientifically denotes an uncomplicated and simple acceptance within a particular society of a transvestite/homosexual gender. Homophobia is an unknown among these very successful societies. There are biocultural and neuroscientific reasons for all this, but that would be another discussion.
And so, when I read the other day, that the California Supreme Court had ruled that gay and lesbian marriage unions were as legal as the hetero type, I thought to myself, There's hope for America yet.
The title to this article, by the way, was carefully chosen.
There has been a national strike in Denmark for a couple of months, so my participation at Gather has been and will continue to be sporadic in the coming weeks.
For a deeper understanding of this subject, please go to this article, God, also a carefully chosen title.


Comments: 30
Once again, Bent, I am amazed and impressed with your writing prowess and your gentle nature.
And I see you are writing very much to the point.
You know who loves ya baby - Sharon
Lora, yes, the family structure in America is on a fatally collapsing course... but I can tell you from direct observation all over the place, that children generally experience far more stability in their lives within an openly acknowledged transgender family. I know that my writing this likely will raise the hackles on some people who think (not feel) that homosexuality is wrong. Often, people who have anxieties about homosexuality walk life with deeply suppressed, genetically designed (or God-created, if one is a fundamentalist) homosexual tendencies. If the concern is the collapsing nature of the American family structure, we ought to celebrate the California court ruling, since now we will have far more stable family structures. There is a hugely successful, support and healing network within the international gay-couple community, there to share advice, support and professional guidance etc. in ways seldom found anywhere else in Western society.
When I was 19 and first away from my west coast rural environment, the Navy sent me to Chicago right out of boot camp. It was there I was approached by my first ever known homosexual and was propositioned to boot. It was there that I bought, at a downtown auction, what I "thought" was a "real" diamond ring that I intended to present to my girlfriend as soon as I got home as a proposal for marriage ... it was also there, probably on a different weekend liberty, that I was caught up in a street scam that very cleverly relieved me of every penny that I knew I had on me ... and soon discovering that I had been had, I found a street cop that I told the story to very excitedly because the guys were just around the corner and really needed to be caught ... and he really wanted to laugh at me, I could tell, but he just said to either forget it or go to the station and file a formal complaint ...
Some things, some of us, do learn over a lifetime ... :-)
I have been pessimistic about our nation for quite some time...and fearful of the rise in political power of the Religious Right. In countless ways, their self-righteous, intolerance causes untold friction and anger in the world.
But lately...with things like this...and the emergence of Barack Obama...I feel that we are turning a corner, and better days are coming...for our nation, and maybe even for all people on the planet.
I hope I live long enough to see us started down that path.
The union of marriage in its present state, and for that matter historically, is one of economics. Irregardless of the couple, they should be accorded the same financial benefits: health insurance, estate bequeathments, and legal signatory rights.
The only just ruling is one that levels the field for all Americans. Either eliminate all benefits of marriage and require separate civil documents available to all to receive them or accord the benefits of marriage to all Americans who wish it.
I really am quite neutral on all of the homosexual thing in that I agree that some of the kindest people I have met are of that persuasion ... but not all for sure. I have never had such an experience and the thought of it is naturally very repulsive to me on the emotional level alone and thus I could never even contemplate the idea any further.
I do agree with Donald that as a society we are going overboard in the idea of "political correctness" in the changes towards "acceptance", something we tend to do every time we make change ... but as the pendulum swings, it probably settles down eventually.
As for what has been called "gay marriage" ... I have no problem what-so-ever with legal unions of consenting adults and what they do to consummate such union within the privacy of their own homes ... what any of them (gays) do in public, especially the flaunting of their relationships in the face of the public, most especially in their "parades" is disgusting beyond belief to me and should not be allowed at all.
None of my views are related to spiritual/religious/political or any other factors, only my own personal opinion. The "sport act" of recreational sex is to me an extreme perversion of our natural gifts that has been taken way too far in so many instances and most of that being done as a form of extremist ego gratification and probably with NO otherwise redeeming qualities by any other standard ...ick, Ick, ICK IMnsHO. :-(
But as for the long term effects of gay legal unions, possibly even the adoption of children in certain RARE occasions, no real problems come to my mind. As I have already said, what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms I could care less ... what they do in public may well bother me a lot. As for the long term otherwise, they cannot propagate between the same sexes, so the lifestyle will not naturally reoccur that way ... but then, who knows, I suppose they could make arrangements within their own "two" communities to "help" each other out from a "purely pragmatic" relationship for "only" that purpose ... who knows, I hate to think about it ...
Am I prejudiced, am I bigoted, or am I just expressing the natural and normal human concerns that far too many are afraid to, due to peer pressure based upon political correctness ... I do not really know ... and I really don't give a tinkers damn what anyone thinks about it all ... to each their own as long as they cause no harm ... and of course that becomes a subjective opinion and viewpoint and no two people will ever completely agree anyway ... so there ... :-)
Now IF society appreciated them for what they are "inside", and they were thus allowed to appreciate themselves, and not spend a closet life in shame and guilt, THEN the public acting out, as "in your face" world, type behaviour, would NOT be an issue either.
Maybe they are a part of Gods design for our universe, to bridge our present egotistic gap of duality, based upon the perfect male and the perfect female, that we are all "supposed" to be, at least so encouraged by Madison Avenue ... which creates all kinds of excesses as well as even more discouragement and depression in those who do not "match up" to the image ... so all just either have sex, if they can, and overpopulate the earth, while the others go to war to depopulate it ... if God can get enough neutrals (gays) into our society, maybe we can do less populating along with less destructing ... after all, very few of them are Hawks, and they cannot procreate IF they stay true to what they are ... !?!?!? :-)
If one were to look at pure nature, one observes all sorts of homo- and bisexual activity, from the little fruit fly that can be triggered into homosexual activity by either manipulating its genes or introducing certain biochemical scents... to frogs who can change sex if a particular sex is locally missing, to fathers who become mothers, to certain swan species whose population is more than 20% gay even to the point of forming a threesome relationship in the rearing of their young, among many matriarchies in monkey societies, to even among the male elephants as they wander in male groups and become more gentle through such relationships.
Homo- bi- and all sorts of transsexual activity has been observed over the entire spectrum of nature and the logic in it has to do with behavioral patterns that are enhance the overall health and survival of the species. It's not at all a complicated subject, even in the recorded history of humanity... until a particular religion in man turns into a political agenda. By political agenda, I simply mean, a manipulation of facts in order to control a particular group of people in my opinion, which is one shared generally by most of those who objectively study the readily available empirical evidence
The homophobia you talk about in this article is certainly something that is still being used to indoctrinate youngsters via some fundamentalist philosophies and religions, but this is changing and even the Roman Catholic church is lightening up and has asked families not to reject the gay people in their lives, even as they reject the lifestyle ("sin").
Now that there are two states in which gay people can get married, only forty-eight more to go. I'm all for registering 'families' too. Why can't two people of the same sex who are not lovers also establish themselves as a family unit? Well, the state of Oregon is allowing them to register, but this will not give them the federal rights married people enjoy.
Tolerance, as you've noted in your post, is the key word.
And I couldn't agree with you more about your conclusions.
A fine, well written article.
Over many years I have come to the same conclusions.
Gay is not a choice, you are born that way.
Just surprised that the Donald didn't suggest we eradicate that gene.
I do sense however, that being approached when one is vulnerable has been the turning point in his condemning all gays. That person was wrong and evil, but it had nothing to do with being gay - there are people that live for sexual gratification - gay or not, and they will prey upon the vulnerable.
Exodus 20:14
Exodus 20:14 I keep seeing this comment on anything having to due with gay marriage. I don't see it's relevance.
Great article Bent!