How A 15-year-old Scandalized A Nation
Miley Cyrus did the unthinkable. She had the unmitigated gall to grow from a child to a woman without going through a graceful transition period where the American public could approve.
The daughter of Billy Ray Cyrus (think Achy-Breaky Heart and television's Doc) is the runaway star of Disney's Hannah Montana, about an ordinary girl who makes it in the big time as a singer. With a fortune in Hannah toys and accessories in the marketplace, Miley had become the poster child for the clean and safe young American girl, a role model for all young girls with dreams.
But Miley crossed the line. She reached physical womanhood without becoming of legal age. With her parents at the photo shoot, she posed for Vanity Fair magazine's June issue. I'm almost embarrassed to say this, but she posed with one shoulder and part of her back bare. Actual skin showing in the photo.
The fact that Miley and anyone else in the world would bare more skin in a bathing suit on a beach was irrelevant to self righteous American bigots. In the magazine picture she clutched a silk sheet around her and her hair was slightly mussed. Obviously Miley would be teaching young American girls who looked to her as a role model, an ideal, that sex is the right thing to do, the bigots claimed.
Oh, the dreadful degradation that Miley would bestow on American girls would stagger the imagination. Girls as young as three years old would see their idol as a shameless hussy and want to be like that themselves. Why three year old girls would be reading Vanity Fair, where many other models would be seen wearing far less than Miley, remains a mystery.
So does the claim that a bare shoulder and part of her back is sexually stimulating. Unless the bigots themselves find it stimulating.
Why parents who would not want their daughters to read the magazine would read it themselves is another mystery. Or I should say, hypocrisy.
Parents who know next to nothing about children want someone to blame if their daughters descend into sluthood and Miley fit the bill perfectly. Miley's embarrassment and claim that the photo was not to her liking and the distance her parents (who had approved the shoot with controversial photographer Annie Leibovitz ) put from the photo's publication was just what the scandal-lovers wanted.
The photo looks suspiciously like an art picture from the 1950s. Yes, art, not Hustler. Only Miley wasn't nude. But art doesn't matter to the bigots. Bare shoulders are all that's important.
The hypocrisy of the bigots boggles the imagination of anyone who observed the situation without emotion. The politically correct bigots wanted someone to suffer. They found Miley. She's a sweet girl, she should do the trick nicely.
All parents of young girls should take the time to explain to their daughters the grief that Miley Cyrus and her parents will experience. Not because Miley did something wrong. Because fame brings shame in the United States of America.
That's how it works. Tell your daughters about how cruel the morality police bigots can be.
Don't bother telling them about the sins of the bigots themselves, the ones they keep hidden away. Those sins don't get published in Vanity Fair anyway.
Bill Allin
Turning It Around: Causes and Cures for Today's Epidemic Social Problems, a guidebook for parents and teachers who want to make their children aware of the cruelty that prejudice can do to people so they can avoid it where possible.
Learn more at http://billallin.com




Comments: 16
It's suddenly a crime for people to be..human..or rather, people whom are perceived to be 'role-models' to be human instead of some unreal fantasy where kids stay kids forever and the world is all innocence and puppies in an never-never land controlled by the parents.
Like you said to grow up without the public's permission.
These 'idol's' of todays youth can't ever be allowed to grow old it seems, to forever stay a Lolita (as it were) in the eyes of parents. To never grow up and change and to stop being the person they were as children and into what they become as adults. If the ones whom the children look up to or idolize grow older then that means that the children are growing older as well. Can't have that. Can't have adult thoughts actually being 'thunk' by a near adult.
Soon they'll be faced with the fact that their little boy or girl is going to want to have sex or to become an adult with all the responcibilities and benefits that implies, to actually make a decision for themselves without a parent standing over their shoulder telling them what they the parents want them to think.
Nice article
I wonder if this 'pose' will be repeated by young girls all over America in the privacy of thier bedrooms, looking in the dressing mirror ?
The mere fact that people will sling a fit over a bare back showing, and not sling a fit over a presidential candidate lying about sniper fire is completely baffling to me. Leave Miley alone, and look at what is really important here in this time.
This is obviously part of the management plan of her top tier agency and Disney. You have a major star for 'tweens and early teens who is growing up. Her audience will shun her in the next couple years as they turn to more mature artists (rappers, Beyonce' and Christina Aguilera type acts) and abandon anything that smacks of little kid music. At the same time, she will soon be "too old" to have any draw for 10-12 year olds. Her Mgmt. is looking down the road at that and repositioning her to make her more palatable to teen and early 20's.
Entertainment concerns could care less about what outrages mom, dad, grandpa, or grandma. They don't fuel her market. Parents don't listen to this stuff. Does it piss you off mom and pop? Newsflash: It's suppose to. Remember Elvis, Buddy Holly, Zeppelin, The Stones, Beatles, Sabbath? How'd your folks feel about them? My mom threw my Beatles records in the trash. That elevated them to Champions of the Young status with me. Artists my parents hated? What could be better?
It isn't your music, it's not your singer, and the bigger gap between your approval and the artist in question the more closely the target market will identify with her. Whatever you think, it's a smart business decision. Note. This happened after the H.M. movie sales peaked. It's a stepping stone to phase two.
I have had many arguments with friends and people who would rather have their children watch bloody dismemberments or murders than watch a loving sex scene. I'm not saying that small children should watch sex but if I had to choose? Yeah, a sex scene over blood and gore. I will also say now that I love zombie movies so I am not anti-gore, just would rather my kids saw a love scene over a violent scene.
I also agree that this may just be a stepping stone to a lasting movie/tv career for Miley Cyrus.
Good art has always been controversial. Leonardo's Mona Lisa is arguably the most famous painting of all time. Who cares why she is smiling? But her smile has occupied the minds of borderline art idiots for centuries.
Bret W. may have nailed it. Teen idols fade quickly unless they "mature."
Sexuality, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Anyone who sees an adolescent girl inviting others to have sex with her in that picture should seriously evaluate their own moral values and sexual stability.