Hillary clinton declared USA would stand by Israel
and would react were Iran to strike an attack against Israel
and react strongly
Does Hillary clinton have to apologize and if so
to whom exactly?
To the extreme Moslems that deny the holocaust ever existed
and claim that the terrorists shooting missiles into Israeli territory
are like the millions of Jews murdered in the holocaust?
To the enemies of the state of Israel who have been trying to destroy
israel for the past 60 years ?
or to the Americans that feel that America should be neutral
like Britian thought they should be neutral when signing a treaty with Adolf Hitler
handing him Europe on a silver platter?
To the Americans that feel that Israel has caused nothing but trouble but ignore the fact
that if it were not for Israel the middle east would be ONE great sea of extreme Moslems
with some moderate Arabs drowning and being killed ?
So who exactly was offended ?
Iran who builds up nuclear power plants right under the watchful eyes of the neutral UN
who signs deals with European countries for millions that will supply weapons against Israel and the USA ?
Should Hilary Clinton apologize to Europe for actually believing the tons of evidence that Iran
plans and declares an attack against Israel and the USA in the future?
or perhaps Hilary Clinton should apologize for not saying those statements
SOONER
because sooner or later something will happen
when there is a bomb being made
sometime somewhere it will explode
to paraphrase Anton Chekov's words
"When a gun appears in one scene, it will go off in another scene of the play"
So perhaps Hillary Clinton should apologize to the media for once neglecting to hide
behind the acceptable lies and masks and for saying it out loud and clear,
a statement which does not seem vague or confusing .
Sorry but Hillary was saying it like it is
you are either with us or against us .
It is up to you to decide now.


Comments: 7
limits, clear messages and limits
Israel could end the violence in Palestine by dismantling the settlements, the apartheid wall they are building, negotiating resettlement of the thousands of Palestinian from whom they took land, and learning to live in peace. Herzel thought as much when he encouraged Israeli settlement in the 1940's. He felt the wealth, experience and opportunities the Jews carried with them could benefit everyone living in the land. It has gone so terribly wrong, and continuing to preach hate and violence only serves to perpetuate that. How very sad.
black and white? well that is what it is when it comes down to it
Iran may not have attacked anyone directly but it is a known fact that Iran supplies the Hizballah,
and as for land, why dont you give up your home?
give back your land that you stole from the indians and go back to europe where there are plenty of moslems , i am sure you will like it very much ,
as for jews and money,
sorry to disappoint you, it is a sterotype, we dont all carry gold
and i dont have gold teeth either
what is black and white is how you and others see israel and the middle east
a one sided provacation , and the arabs are innocent lambs
the problem is having no first hand knowledge you are brain washed by the media
thank god some people can think for themselves
it is in fact just that simple, you are either with or against
and one day the choice will be made, in fact it should have already been made
the apartheid wall you call it has prevented 95% suicide, now if your mother or child was in a shopping center , on the way to buy food, you would not want her to be blown away by a bomb , or would you rationalize it like some rationalize 9. 11 and blame the victim for it?
in any rate as you are brainwashed by the media, i dont see much point in this discussion
thanks for the low rating, i was spoiled by the ten,
and i appreciate all opinions, yours exposes a deep ignorance
take a trip to gaza and smell the coffee
Israel already was there, been there done that , i dont think anyone is waiting around idle . Hilary was just speaking her mind
Also, you misunderstood my reference to Herzel. HE said the Jew's wealth could benefit all in the land. I did not have ANY intention whatsoever to invoke that tired old stereotype made famous by Shakespeare's Shylock. I don't see how my quoting one of your own "founding fathers," as it were, could be construed as saying as much. HE made that point, and I agree with it.
Hizballah was created as a direct response to Israel's attack on south Lebanon. While supplied by Iran, it is not directed by Iran, anymore than Israel, supplied by the US, is directed by the US. It seems just the opposite is true, US policy is intimately tied with Israel's interests.
Your concerns about violence are perfectly reasonable. But the same applies to innocent Palestinians living and dying under the infinitely more sophisticated weaponry the US has supplied Israel with. The "collateral damage" from laser guided "smart bombs" sheds blood as easily as a homemade kytusha rocket. No, actually, probably better.
Hillary should step down from the campaign. She and her husband do not represent a change from the neo-con agenda that is enflaming the middle east.
perhaps because the history of the area goes way back , and the aggression of the arabs towards the jewish population goes back to the times before the state of israel
the whole business in lebanon started because the terrorists attacked israel not the other way around,
the whole dispute started because the arabs would not accept the UN declaration to divide the land to two countries , they wanted it all ,still do ,
i think that you need to read history not newspapers
with all due respect
Hillary speaks her mind, obama has a preacher who is racist as a role model .
neo con is just another phrase that supposibly explains but does the opposite
what does this phrase mean really?
neo nazis with a twist?