It is said that, "In God All Things Are Possible" OK, I can see that but I would like to add to the statement "And Complete"
So, "In God All Things Are Possible And Complete" This is no trivial addition for it makes allowences for linear time and dimensional space, to be over. Lets face it, friction was a bad idea anyway, getting back to the above statement though, if all things are complete in God then we, even though from our perspective we cannot see it, we must also be complete. We ARE creations withIN Him are we not, so we ARE complete.
This is REAL liberation from the confines of our linear superstitions of hell and damnation, sin and guilt, and the multitudes of other insanities perpitrated by political and religious groups to keep us in line.
Think about it, "In God All Things Are Possible And Complete" Heaven is here and now, but for the acceptance of this statement...
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 43
Tell me about "In God All Things Are Possible" ; Where did you get it and what weight does it carry? It was interesting to see you believe in a God. I wasn't sure. & not sure, of course, what that God is. Just fishing to understand you better. I did enjoy the article. Of course we don'tthink quite alike ... makes it interesting.
But it carries no weight at all for me because I believe the scribes that either wrote or translated the verse, conveniently left out the last and most important part of the statement: "And Complete"
Had they not censured Jesus words here, they would not have been able to lord-it over Christendom as they have done for the last 2000 years. By leaving out the words, "And Complete" they set the scene for the belief in the incompletion of spiritual man, he was a dirty, rotten, filthy sinner and needed the Church to find absolution, it was a mere political ploy to keep control...
There is absolutely no need for mankind to stay bonded to religion of any kind, ultimately the union between God and man was never broken anyway "They are still complete".
The only true healing of the mistaken idea that it was broken, is personal not societal and the remidy is forgiveness.
Each one comes to the remembrance of God in the quiet of his own forgiven and forgiving mind. There's noting complicated about it and no need for the superstitious rituals of appeasement religion offers in its quest to fleece the populous.
As to my belief in a God as you put it, this is not really communicable in words Judy, we live in a concrete world of separate things that can never really unite. My experience of God is not of this world because not separate, it is abstract, it is, if you like the true unifying factor that shows me the Spirit beneath the separation, the true unity that is present withIN ALL things.
The natural (and complete) "balance", the (+=-) is as "perfect" as it gets, and that varies for the needs of the moment ... we who know our truth of Spiritual connection are as perect as needs be ... the human orthodox definition of perfection is dualistically a linear quality that is unreachable by "those" (dualistic +/-)) standards. Only by association with the Spirit (=) in Trinity (+=-) does one have perfection. IMnsHO.
Having "passed trough" such perfection at one time and space, I know it to be true, but now I chop wood and carry water, that being much less in comparison, but far more useful for "this" time/space.
So I could say that I have (maybe ?) experienced "heaven", but I am sure not in it now (consciously anyway) ... which does leave me some hope for a future time/space enjoyment.
And, I would expect that anyone who considers their present reality as a "heavenly" experience has very low expectations of what could be ... :-)
The Heavenly experience is Abstract it is, underneath the consciousness and ALWAYS available... It is what AWARENESS is!
Indeed, anyone that considers the physical realm "as a "heavenly" experience has very low expectations of what" ACTUALLY IS underlying EVERYTHING!
Thanks for posting to
Point Karma !
I understand that it is difficult for some to imagine that God could actually direct the writing and preservation of something like that Book, but that does not mean it's actually rational to discount the possibility. If God is really God, and not some sort of invention of men's minds, then by default, He can write whatever Books He chooses, by whatever means He chooses, and keep such things intact. If you wish to worship a God that "sorta" can do such things, you are of course free to do so. This, to me, appears no different than simply believing God is ineffectual and sloppy, and I don't know why anyone would call such a Being God.
The God I worship does just as He pleases, and our votes don't count at all. He's the one that Book speaks of, and if that Book is corrupted beyond trustworthiness, He is not real. You calling the parts you like, His handiwork, and the parts you don't, corrupted by mere men, makes no sense whatsoever to me. One might as well just write their own book, and leave what they know over a billion human beings consider sacred to them, in peace. That you don't, is very rude, and not at all respectful of others, from my perspective. It is egotistical, I think.
Every time I'm this sanguine I have to stop and wonder: is it God, or is it my fiber supplement?
"insanities perpitrated [sic] by political and religious groups to keep us in line."
Well it didn't work, did it, hurmmmft! You're clearly out of line.
I'm so grateful that God has made the world perfect, that means the best I have is good enough!
"...God has mad the world perfect"
Apparently the the nonsense has been made perfect, AWH. But don't let the dissonance bother you. Have a nice day.
Robin, I think at last I have found a home. For here is the truth. I have never taken the Course, but I think I know so much of it, due to my own readings. When things slow a bit I will join in and see what I can glean from this excellent work.
Elsie, I believe we can make a Heaven here on earth by our own attempts to be kind and good and true to our beliefs.
namaste