"The problem is that 90% of energy is fossil fuels. And that is such a huge business, it has permeated our government," said James Hansen, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York. He added that "both the executive branch and the legislative branch are strongly influenced by special fossil fuel interests."
"The industry is misleading the public and policy makers about the cause of climate change. And that is analogous to what the cigarette manufacturers did. They knew smoking caused cancer, but they hired scientists who said that was not the case."
"Government public relations officials", he said, filter the facts in science reports to reduce "concern about the relation of climate change to human-made greenhouse gas emissions."
In a paper submitted to Science magazine, Hansen calls for phasing-out coal emissions and taxing their emissions until they are phased out. The paper further calls for reforestation and notes that biochar, produced in pyrolysis of residues from crops, forestry, and animal wastes, can be used to restore soil fertility while storing carbon for centuries to millennia.
Commenting on his paper, Hansen told the Guardian that the EU target of 550 parts per million (ppm) of C02 - the most stringent in the world - should be slashed to 350ppm. At levels as high as 550ppm, the world would warm by 6C, the paper says. Previous estimates had suggested warming would be just 3C at that point.
Hansen's team claim their research offers a more accurate assessment of the threat than recent reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), as instead of using theoretical models it is based on core samples from the bottom of the ocean that provide evidence from the Earth's climatic history.
It also takes greater account of recent evidence showing the effect of so-called feedback mechanisms, such as the process whereby the melting of icecaps to be replaced by ocean reduces the albedo effect meaning more heat is absorbed and the ice retreats still faster.
"If you leave us at 450ppm for long enough it will probably melt all the ice - that's a sea rise of 75 meters. What we have found is that the target we have all been aiming for is a disaster - a guaranteed disaster," Hansen said.As ice sheets recede, the warming effect is compounded. Satellite technology available over the past three years has shown that the ice sheets are melting much faster than expected, with Greenland and west Antarctica both losing mass.
Hansen said that he now regards as "implausible" the view of many climate scientists that the shrinking of the ice sheets would take thousands of years. "If we follow business as usual I can't see how west Antarctica could survive a century. We are talking about a sea-level rise of at least a couple of metres this century."
Target CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim? - James Hansen et al.
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/2008/TargetCO2_20080407.pdf
Earth in crisis, warns NASA's top climate scientist - AFP
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g2Wkbo6PcynAVeJzSPWDQZaWAI8g
Climate target is not radical enough - study - The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/apr/07/climatechange.carbonemissions
NASA scientist calls for stricter emission targets - BusinessGreen
http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2213637/nasa-scientist-calls-stricter






Comments: 20
And taxing the Coal and other companies that pollute by adding CO2 into the air, is also a very good idea.
The testing of the air is essential in reducing the CO2 and should start sooner by the companies rather than later. Also the taxes should be put on now by congress.
But knowing that the congress can't do anything, this election cycle is an important time to also elect the folks that will do the job necessary in congress to set the tax laws for the polluters
Thanks for posting this Sam.
The Power and extent of the companies cannot be overlooked...
The Industry must be held accountable...
What Role will they play???
(Will we see the difference between a 'Patronizing' approach to doing something vs. genuine honest action???)
How much will we hold ourselves Accountable: to put Pressure on the Companies, our Government, as well as ourselves (our own behavior)???
Thanks for the information you provided here Sam...
Best,
DJE
What Could get done if the Industry was involved in a Genuine Honest way???
Can we expect them to Get involved in that way?
(Ok that was two questions)
Andy Revkin has an Interesting Article in the NY TImes:
"A Shift in the Debate Over Global Warming"
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/weekinreview/06revkin.html?ref=environment
"What is needed, Mr. Sachs and others say, is the development of radically advanced low-carbon technologies, which they say will only come about with greatly increased spending by determined governments on what has so far been an anemic commitment to research and development. A Manhattan-like Project, so to speak."
the current news and links on Terra Preta (TP) soils and closed-loop pyrolysis of Biomass, this integrated virtuous cycle could sequester 100s of Billions of tons of carbon to the soils.
This technology represents the most comprehensive, low cost, and productive approach to long term stewardship and sustainability.Terra Preta Soils a process for Carbon Negative Bio fuels, massive Carbon sequestration, 1/3 Lower CH4 & N2O soil emissions, and 3X Fertility Too.
UN Climate Change Conference: Biochar present at the Bali Conference
http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/steinerbalinov2107
SCIAM Article May 15 07;
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=5670236C-E7F2-99DF-3E2163B9FB144E40
After many years of reviewing solutions to anthropogenic global warming (AGW) I believe this technology can manage Carbon for the greatest collective benefit at the lowest economic price, on vast scales. It just needs to be seen by ethical globally minded companies.
Could you please consider looking for a champion for this orphaned Terra Preta Carbon Soil Technology.
The main hurtle now is to change the current perspective held that the soil carbon cycle is a wash, to one in which soil can be used as a massive and ubiquitous Carbon sink via Charcoal Below are the first concrete steps in that direction;
S.1884 – The Salazar Harvesting Energy Act of 2007
A Summary of Biochar Provisions in S.1884:
Carbon-Negative Biomass Energy and Soil Quality Initiative
for the 2007 Farm Bill
Bolstering Biomass and Biochar development: In the 2007 Farm Bill, Senator Salazar was able to include $500 million for biomass research and development and for competitive grants to develop the technologies and processes necessary for the commercial production of biofuels and bio-based products. Biomass is an organic material, usually referring to plant matter or animal waste. Using biomass for energy can reduce waste and air pollution. Biochar is a byproduct of producing energy from biomass. As a soil treatment, it enhances the ability of soil to capture and retain carbon dioxide.
http://www.biochar-international.org/newinformationevents/newlegislation.html
There are 24 billion tons of carbon controlled by man in his agriculture and waste stream, all that farm & cellulose waste which is now dumped to rot or digested or combusted and ultimately returned to the atmosphere as GHG should be returned to the Soil.
If you have any other questions please feel free to call me or visit the TP web site I've been drafted to co-administer. http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/?q=node
It has been immensely gratifying to see all the major players join the mail list , Cornell folks, T. Beer of Kings Ford Charcoal (Clorox), Novozyne the M-Roots guys(fungus), chemical engineers, Dr. Danny Day of EPRIDA , Dr. Antal of U. of H., Virginia Tech folks and probably many others who's back round I don't know have joined.
The International Biochar Initiative (IBI) conference held at Terrigal, NSW, Australia in 2007. The papers from this conference are posted at their home page; http://www.biochar-international.org/home.html
.Nature article, Aug 06: Putting the carbon back Black is the new green:
http://bestenergies.com/downloads/naturemag_200604.pdf
Here's the Cornell page for an over view:
http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/biochar/Biochar_home.htm
University of Beyreuth TP Program, Germany http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/?q=taxonomy/term/118
This Earth Science Forum thread on these soils contains further links, and has been viewed by 19,000 self-selected folks. ( I post everything I find on Amazon Dark Soils, ADS here):
http://forums.hypography.com/earth-science/3451-terra-preta.html
Terra Preta creates a terrestrial carbon reef at a microscopic level. These nanoscale structures provide safe haven to the microbes and fungus that facilitate fertile soil creation, while sequestering carbon for many hundred if not thousands of years. The combination of these two forms of sequestration would also increase the growth rate and natural sequestration effort of growing plants.
All the Biochar Companies and equipment manufactures I've found:
Carbon Diversion
http://www.carbondiversion.com/
Eprida: Sustainable Solutions for Global Concerns
http://www.eprida.com/home/index.php4
BEST Pyrolysis, Inc. | Slow Pyrolysis - Biomass - Clean Energy - Renewable Ene
http://www.bestenergies.com/companies/bestpyrolysis.html
Dynamotive Energy Systems | The Evolution of Energy
http://www.dynamotive.com/
Ensyn - Environmentally Friendly Energy and Chemicals
http://www.ensyn.com/who/ensyn.htm
Agri-Therm, developing bio oils from agricultural waste
http://www.agri-therm.com/
Advanced BioRefinery Inc.
http://www.advbiorefineryinc.ca/
Technology Review: Turning Slash into Cash
http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/17298/
3R Environmental Technologies Ltd. (Edward Someus)
WEB: http://www.terrenum.net/
The company has Swedish origin and developing/designing medium and large scale carbonization units. The company is the licensor and technology provider to NviroClean Tech Ltd British American organization WEB: http://www.nvirocleantech.com and VERTUS Ltd.
http://www.vertustechnologies.com
Genesis Industries, licensee of Eprida technology, provides carbon-negative EPRIDA energy machines at the same cost as going direct to Eprida. Our technical support staff also provide information to obtain the best use of biochar produced by the machine. Recent research has shown that EPRIDA charcoal (biochar) increases plant productivity as it sequesters carbon in soil, thus reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide.
http://www.egenindustries.com/
If pre-Columbian Kayopo Indians could produce these soils up to 6 feet deep over 15% of the Amazon basin using "Slash & CHAR" verses "Slash & Burn", it seems that our energy and agricultural industries could also product them at scale.
Harnessing the work of this vast number of microbes and fungi changes the whole equation of energy return over energy input (EROEI) for food and Bio fuels. I see this as the only sustainable agricultural strategy if we no longer have cheap fossil fuels for fertilizer.
We need this super community of wee beasties to work in concert with us by populating them into their proper Soil horizon Carbon Condos.
Erich J. Knight
Shenandoah Gardens
1047 Dave Berry Rd.
McGaheysville, VA. 22840
(540) 289-9750
shengar@aol.com
The old saw; "Feed the soil not the Plant" becomes;
Feed, Cloth, provide a furnished house, waste & water system, community center, health insurance and Job security to the Soil not the Plant!!
Let us all Please incant ritual supplications for a smooth transition to these new agricultural protocols.
Just for fun I leave you with The Terra Preta Prayer;
The Terra Preta Prayer
Our Carbon who art in heaven,
Hallowed be thy name
By kingdom come, thy will be done, IN the Earth to make it Heaven.
It will give us each day our daily bread and forgive us our atmospheric trespasses
As we forgive those who trespass against the Kyoto protocols
And lead us not into fossil fuel temptation, but diliver us from it's evil
low as we walk through the valley of the shadow of Global Warming,
I will feel no evil, your Bio-fuels and fertile microbes will comfort me,
For thine is the fungal kingdom,
and the microbe power,
and the Sequestration Glory,
For ever and ever (well at least 2000 years)
AMEN
IMO the solution will be a mix of several renewable energy sources but the main source of energy will be solar based.
I have long advocated a pledge for scientists similar to the Hippocratic Oath in medicine, urging scientists to speak out when they come across research findings that are important for the public to hear about. Such a pledge can prevent that scientists are inappropriately silenced under the pretense of national secrecy, corporate loyalty or commercial confidentiality.
Mind you, I do see a case for secrecy, such as in situations where there is genuine risk of public safety, e.g. in cases of experimentation with nuclear, chemical, biological and other weapons of mass murder. But rather than proposing to censor scientists and control their research, I'm convinced that more openness is the way to go. More openness will lead to the global commitment we need to stop producing such weapons. Openness will allow the press to verify what's going on in laboratories and expose those who seek to impose their will upon society by resorting to terror and the threat of mass murder.
Similarly, there should be more openness and discussion into the effectiveness of policy proposals to deal with global warming. James Hansen is a scientist who has decided to speak out on this, and his words have received far too little attention. I may not agree with everything that Hansen proposes, but I do applaud his initiative, as discussed in my recent post on James Hansen's Fee and Dividend proposal.
1) Thou shalt not have any other Molecule before Me
2) Thou shall not make wrongful use of the name of Biochar, It will not acquit anyone who mis-charactorizes it's name
3) Observe the Fallow days and keep them, as Sustainability commands thou
4) Honor your Micro Flora & Fauna , as the Soil Carbon commands you, so that your days may be long and that it may go well with you in the land that High Soil Carbon has given you.
5) Thou shall not murder the Soil Food Web
6) Neither shall thou adulterate the Soils with Toxicity
7) Neither shall thou steal Biomass from the Soil Food Web
8) Neither shall thou bear false witness against your neighbors Biochar, or about Thy own
9) Neither shall thou covet your neighbor's Fertility
10) Neither shall thou desire your neighbor's house, or field, or Pyrolysis Reactor, or farm implements, or anything that belongs to your neighbor, as thou may Create thy Own
Soil Carbon Dream
I have a dream that one day we live in a nation where progress will not be judged by the production yields of our fields, but by the color of their soils and by the Carbon content of their character.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day, a suite of earth sensing satellites will level the playing field, giving every farmer a full account of carbon he sequesters. That Soil Carbon is given as the final arbiter, the common currency, accountant and Judge of Stewardship on our lands.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made forest, the rough soils will be made fertile, and the crooked Carbon Marketeers will be made straight, and the glory of Soil Sequestration shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see a Mutually assured Sustainability.
This is our hope.
My apologies to Dr. King, but I think he would understand my passion
Erich