Part 3 of the Series A Short History of Abortion and Contraception.
Read earlier parts first: Part 1 Cavewomen and Contraception Part 2 Bronze Age Birth Control
Readers who prefer LARGER TEXT when reading long documents onscreen can find a more "eye friendly" copy of this at Greenteeh Multi Media Publishing HoBC Part3
We covered in Part 2 the spread of attitudes from the Patriarchal religions to Northern Europe and eventually through colonisation to sub - Saharan Africa, The Americas and Australia. Tribal cultures were viciously suppressed and Judaeo-Christian or Islamic culture imposed.
So where did this put birth control?
Under the proto-fascist regimes of the patriarchalism, while technology advanced rapidly driven by the needs of constant war the healing arts which were the speciality of women were driven underground by the new priestly elites who jealously guarded their privileged place in the hierarchies. Who cared if princelings died, when a King might have several wives and many slaves at his disposal there was always another child coming along.
In Greece, Rome and Northern Europe had been different. The women still had powerful Goddesses to protect them and were more feisty as a result. Not that the nobility actually believed in the gods and goddesses, but plenty of assassins and poisoners could be found who for a modest fee would give divine retribution a helping human hand.
The most effective of the early contraceptives, Silphion had quickly become extinct through over cultivation and over harvesting of the wild crop but another plant of the same family, asafoetida was found to be almost equally effective and easier to manage as a commercial crop.
While Silphion grew only in a small area around the city of Cyrene (in modern Lybia) asafoetida could find ideal growing conditions in many areas around the Mediterranean Sea and could be cultivated successfully.
Other plants of the same family were also used for their contraceptive effects and it is a ubiquitous genre, species being found from Scandinavia and similar latitudes to the tropics. Modern scientific research has proved the anti-fertility properties of this family of plants in controlled tests.
As previously reported, one common vegetable that regularly finds its way onto modern dinner plates belongs to the same group as Silphion and Asafoetida. Other plants of the genus are widely used in food flavourings and condiments. To be effective these plants have to be prepared in a certain way and given in controlled dosages at the right time in the female cycle. But the Roman, Greek and Middle Eastern women knew that and so did the wise women of the North European Tribes.
Throughout the centuries The Roman Empire ruled most of the western world, secular concerns were paramount. Trade, law and order, tax collection and power were the concerns of the Empire. Religion was not suppressed as The New Testament would have us believe; The Romans tolerated any form of worship so long as it did not challenge the authority of the state. This was unfortunate in a way because Rome had many chances to eradicate totally the ideas of certain crackpot sects whose followers believed that prayer was the only cure acceptable to their God for any ailment, that the rigours of childbirth were a punishment meted out on women by their God, for the sin of being women. (remind yourself in the footnotes to part 2 of this series how God had created the first woman from the filth and scum left over after he had finished the rest of creation and you get a picture of how loony this sect were.)
These fanatics also believed that all babies were a gift from God, to attempt to control the process was an abomination and to give medicine to ease pain was an insult to God. And like all fanatics there was no reasoning with them.
Truly human nature does not change a lot over the millennia.
Fortunately the might of the Empire had stood between the fanatics of the Middle Eastern religions and the comparatively civilised pagans of Northern and Western Europe where things remained unchanged until the spread of Christianity.
One thing the Christian faiths have always excelled at to their discredit, is the rewriting of history. Read the conventional versions of history and it is easy to get the impression that immediately after the death of Jesus, Christianity spread out from Palestine and in a few decades the whole world, except for a few awkward tribes of pagans and the barbaric heathens of Africa and Asia had become believers. The reality was not like that. A form of Christianity was being practised in Ethiopia and the Nile Valley before the date given for the birth of Jesus and two early Christian chroniclers in Britain (Columbanus and Gildas Britannicus) along with others who lived in France and Spain, tell us that Christianity was already established in Europe before the first missionaries arrived.
When the Roman version of Christianity did arrive, apart from a few outbreaks of fanaticism prompted by power struggles within the Church of Rome, it had no trouble living with the tribal lore of the various lands. In fact throughout the period known as The Dark Ages, a period during which The Vatican tried to suppress all forms of science and any art that was not directly concerned with the glorification of God, one of the lifelines that helped us rebuild civilisation was the monastic society of Western England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland. The monasteries kept their distance from the political machine run by The Pope and his Cardinals and Bishops.
The monks took a very different view to the secular church of what actually constituted worship. Their meditative and creative activities and simplistic, communal lifestyle owed much more to the pagans of the Celtic Fringe than to the diktat of Rome.
One of the skill sets the monastic orders took on from the Druidic culture was the healing arts.
As the learning of the Druids survived in the monasteries of the Benedictines, Dominicans and Cistercians the sciences and arts of the other early cultures was preserved in the Arab world where early Islam revered knowledge and science and provided a much less hostile environment
for the those with an enquiring mindset that was driven to challenge the status quo.
Islamic physicians and Christian monks continued their researches then and must have been willing to trade knowledge with the witches and wise women and guarantee their secrets would be kept. That was the only way to gain information from an oral tradition, the women did not reveal the secrets even under torture. Often however, aware the promises of freedom in exchange for confession were false, they gave their oppressors false information knowing they were going to be killed anyway. The monotheists idea of freeing a witch was to release her from her sinful life.
We lose touch with the Islamic world at the time of the crusades but know through documented accounts that the knowledge of contraceptive herbs survived in folklore through both the outbreak of Catholic fanaticism that led Pope Innocent III to instigate the Inquisition, that assault on human rights, justice and sanity that was responsible for the deaths of millions of innocent people over the centuries; and the Protestant reformation which was even harder on the great mass of ordinary people that the excesses of Rome had ever been.
While The Vatican and the Bishops had condemned herbalists, birth control and many other folk traditions such as dancing around the Maypole, Welldressing and Halloween celebrations as witchcraft and devil worship the country priests in their parishes were happy enough to turn a blind eye and the poor people, practised in keeping secrets from exploitative rulers such as the Romans understood that what the priest did not know would not hurt him.
Such burnings as there were tended to occur in urban areas and the victims were women who had in some way offended a church or state official. Accusing a woman of witchcraft was much the simplest way of eliminating her.
The protestants changed all that. Protestants were a breed apart, pious, self-righteous pokenoses who thought the best way of getting to heaven was by sending other to hell.
In the era of Witch hunting, which stretched from the inauguration of The Inquisition to the dawn of the Age of Enlightenment in the mid eighteenth century a huge number of women were killed because they were suspected of being witches. Estimates of five million are probably exaggerated but no more so than the underestimates of apologists for Christianity. These people use pseudo-scientific claims to suggest there were only around fifty thousand documented executions of women convicted of witchcraft.
That of course is a typical Christian distortion, a lie by misrepresentation. It is perfectly true not very many women were convicted of witchcraft; most of those accused were acquitted. But that actually makes the case against the witch hunters worse.
There were many ways of trying a witch, none involved presenting a judge with evidence and lawyers for defence and prosecution contesting the case the case. One of the most popular was ducking.
Trial by ducking involved the accused either being tied to a weighted chair and lowered into water until it covered her head, then held there for up to ten minutes or having a girdle of stones tied around her middle and then being thrown into a pond or river.
In these cases if the witch came up alive or floated on top of the water it was because Satan looks after his own and she was "proved" guilty and executed.
If however she died, she was not free to go about her normal business without a stain on her character because the witch hunters knew Satan as a treacherous swine who would betray even those who had served him loyally. So they took the dead body of the acquitted witch and hung it just to be on the safe side.
Another way of trying a witch was to throw her off a church tower. If she was a witch Satan would bear her gently to the ground and she would then be proved guilty and killed. If the fall finished her off, well we have already seen that the justices were wise to Satan's tricks so they examined the evidence for proof (and "the word of a Gentleman" was proof enough, and they took her and killed her again, by hanging. Witches you see were not officially dead until they had been hanged no matter how actually dead they were. Satan was such a trickster that just because someone had not been found guilty of being a witch it did not prove she was not, nor had she ever been in league with The Dark Lord.
Some people might be thinking "hang on, weren't witched burned? Well yes but not as punishment, only to find out if they were guilty or not. If The Devil protected them from the fire they were guilty. In this case though there was no hanging, the witch who died was innocent and left the flames without a stain on her character, though there were probably quite a few on the ground where she had been burned. There is another example of warped logic here. Satan would surely protect his servant from fire as it is his own element so obviously the alleged witch who burned could not be guilty. It was nothing to do with there not being much left to hang of course.
One way for a witch to earn a quick and merciful death was through confession and repentance and a great source of free public entertainment was the public torture of witches. Many held out against the most agonising tortures though, refusing to save their immortal souls according the chroniclers. That is not so strange when we know that once the confession was obtained, once the accused woman had branded herself a witch, her children, siblings, parents and friends would be forever tainted by association or very possibly arrested, tortured and killed simply because you can't be too careful with stuff as dangerous as witchcraft.
The Witch hunting and burning era drew to a close gradually but by the end of the seventeenth century the worst was over. The Renaissance had begun in the fourteenth century, not in Italy as is usually claimed because the Christian world had picked up the Roman penchant for spinning history to put the establishment in a good light, but in Northern Europe. Forget the rubbish about Francisco Petrarch single handedly starting the movement, in Britain, Ireland, France, Germany, Holland we had never forgotten how to write great literature and create great art. We have the works of people like Chretien de Troyes, Wolfram of Eschenbach, Gwion of Ceredigion, the anonymous creators of epic poems such as Beowulf and the works of Irish monks who from the 6th to the 12th century retold the Irish folk legends in fine verse with a thin veneer of Christianity to keep the Bishops happy.
The renaissance was nothing to do with the mawkish, self pitying and excruciatingly sentimental sonnets of Petrarch, it was a rebirth of learning as societies began to wiggle out from under the dead hand of patriarchal hierarchies.
Man's most important invention was the wheel, but in second place we must surely rank the printing press. Although it did not become apparent for over two centuries the printed word would be the main weapon in winning back for the mass of people freedom of thought and control of our lives and the right to think for ourselves and make our own choices. For women the battle was far from over, those freedoms have taken longer because of entrenched male attitudes.
Further reading and websites for ancient history:<BR>
www.perseus.tufts.edu online archive of ancient texts.
http://classics.mit.edu/ Home of the largest online archive of classical literature
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/cv/index.htm Internet Sacred Texts Archive</A>, sacred texts from all over the ancient world
http://www.hinduwebsite.com/vedicsection/vedaindex.asp Hinduism Website
The Ayurveda, Bhagavad Gita, Ayur Veda, Rig Veda, Maharabharata and more
http://www.orgonelab.org/contracep.htm
Oregon Biophysical Research Lab
http://www.sisterzeus.com/Silphio.htm Sister Zeus website - Silphion page
History Books and Research Papers:
A History of Britain vol 1 & 2 - Simon Schama
The Myth of Eternal Return: Mircea Eliade (trans Willard Trask) Princeton 1994
Illustrated World Religions: Huston Smith
1) The Way Of Aminal Powers
2) Myths of the Primitive Hunter Gatherers
The intellectual Adventure of Early Man: H & H.A. Frankfort, Chicago 1947
The Epic of Gilgamesh (traditional - search for Gilgamesh)
The Zend Avesta (traditionl - search for Avesta)
The Golden Bough: Sir James Frazer
The White Goddess : Robert Graves
The Mythology and Rites of British Druids: Edward Davies
The Republic: Plato
The Virtues of Women: Plutarch
The Heritage of Persia: R.N. Frye.
other books too numerous to list have been referred to in preparing this article.


Comments: 35
I would beg to differ on this statement. Men relished the power of the witchhunt and it was resurrected by McCarthy in the post-WWII hearings by the House Committee on Unamerican Activities, held to sniff out & prosecute so-called Communists in the US. Arthur Miller's play, "The Crucible", is a wonderful analogy between the state of the US in the 50's and the Salem Witch Trails of 1692 in New England.
I'm just being straight with you here, Ian. Let the facts speak for themselves and leave the baiting out of it. The only purpose it can serve is to offend those who disagree and thus your objective can't be to inform nor discuss, just to insult. At that point, you're just a demagogue and all you're going to get is people screaming at you or egging you on.
If that's your objective, so be it. But you're smarter than that.
I knew that, but "communists" did not have pointed hats :-)
Actually there was an acknowledgement to McCarthyism in the line it did not prove she was not, nor had she ever been in league with The Dark Lord.
You're right, but we get to that in part 4
point A, point b? we passed those long ago in part 1 & 2. And we get to the conclusion in part 4. In part 2 I wrote of how devotees of male dominated monotheistic religions suppressed women by persecuting those who knew how to use herbal contraceptives efficiently. The idea of witches was formed to give a sheen of religious legitimacy to the torture and execution of women who gave raspberry leave to ease childbirth and asafoetida as an early stage abortificant. This persecution of herbalists (witches) continued until the eighteenth century.
So in fact you lose me, I cant see how such a well researched piece of writing that merely presents the facts, some of them in a tongue in cheek way, could be read as a rant.
What ws it upset you, my reference to proto fascist regimes? Don't forget the fasces, an axe with a bundle of sticks bound round its handle to symbolise the unbreakable authority of the Empire, was an Emblem of Rome.
I part 4 we look at women in the ninteenth and early twentieth century who were prosecuted for publishing information about birth control. The prosecutions were demanded in all cases by Christian Churches.
The four part series is in fact a single essay, a chapter from a book I am preparing and while various parts can be discussed it is futile to venture opinions on the whole and whether it achieves its objective or not before the final instalment is even posted.
What on earth makes you think I was trying to make an academic point? I was trying to make a political point about human rights.
I use the word fanatic several times in order to emphasise the mental condition of the people responsible for the suppression of witchcraft. They were fantics, they saw the Devil hinding in every bush. The word is also used fequently in mainstream history when this era is being described so I'm not unique in this.
And BTW calling a fanatical person a fanatic is not calling them names. If it was I would not get away with it on BBC national radio.
Along with the BBC (British Broadcsting Corp) I also contribute to the publications of a national newspaper group. These two organisations are known for having the among highest editorial standards in the world. Neither however are afraid of controvesial journalism. I think I have all the guidance on style I need thanks. I also know the audience I am aiming for here and, trust me, I am not expecting to convert any evangelical Christians.
Right, well witches were herbalists, practitioners of folk medicine. Now I guess you know raspberry leaves (or an extract from them) are still used pre birth in conventional medicine.
And one of the medicines given by witches brought to trial was willow bark tea for headaches and migraine. At the time of the notorious Pendle Witch Trials (see links) where the women were accused of giving "magical potions" including willow bark, physicians were prescribing for headache a poultice made from dried horse dung mixed with cat's urine be applied to the forehead.
But doesn't everybody know this stuff? I cut it from the article to avoid making it overlong.
What I was trying to bring out here because I am not writing about herbalism but about human rights crimes against women. So it seemed more appropriate to highlight how, if the torture and murder of women had not been involved, the witch hunts of the 17th century would have been comically surreal.
At the time I think Lewis made those comments the memory of Alistair Croweley was very fresh in the memories of the British upper classes. AC was not however a Satanist as they are depicted in movies and fantasy novels, merely a seeker of Hermetic wisdom as Isaac Newton had been.
The people who tortured witches in the eighteenth century were so fanatical in their "war with Satan" they were able co convince themselves these women worked with him just as Bush and Blair managed to convince themselves there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Thanks for bringing that in as your comment might help people understand the connection between 17 & 18 century witch hunters and modern fundamentalist Chistians is not of my invention.
Druids and Quakers. I like it. There is quite a strong similarity in their approach to life if not actually their belief systems.
Protestants were a breed apart, pious, self-righteous pokenoses who thought the best way of getting to heaven was by sending other to hell.
There's nothing objective at all. The word 'pokenoses' is nothing other than an insult. You've obviously put a great deal of time and work into this. It's a shame to have an otherwise intelligent and informative article colored by your obvious hatred for the subject. Facts speak for themselves and if you're trying for a political point you would be better served to avoid the tactics employed by those you obviously despise.
You are a rabble rouser, and Stephanie and AC are right about your overuse of pejorative terms if you are trying to win people over. But that makes an assumption about your goal for this piece, and I haven't a clue about that. Nor do I care, actually.
When I write stuff for Gather, I am either trying to entertain (travel, music) or convince (politics) or raise Hell (religion).
I think you are just trying to do the latter...and I love it!
Bert B., Apr 2, 2008,
Sandy is right. My political views are nearly identical to yours.
But I also agree with those who object to name-calling. This makes us liberals look bad. It's a lot like what the conservatives have been doing to us (here in the US, anyway) for the last 8 years.
If you were attacking me I would not care. What you are attacking is the fact that I have not written the piece the way you would have presented it had it been yours. You must remember it is not, its mine.
The series is not an academic piece, I am not an academic historian, it is entertainment based on factual history.
Steph made a valid point in saying she felt I had not given enough detail about how the suppression of folk healing, "witchcraft." had affected society. She did not know I have covered that very aspect of the story in the opening paragraphs of part 4, the concluding part of the series.
You ask would I submit this piece to the BBC. Actually most of stuff about witch hunts, including the phrase you highlight was cut and pasted from a script I did for a documentary on The Pendle Witch Trials (see links in main article) broadcast some years ago.
One of the things guaranteed to irritate me when I post historical, scientific or environmentsl articles on these "post anything" glorified blog sites is that someone will come along and accuse me of not being completely detached and objective. This seems to overlook the fact that I am an unashamed populist, a rabble rouser as Bert puts it (which I take as a compliment) a satirist and an entertainer. Somehow detached objectivity does not fit into those categories.
And finally you should never forget, its only Gather.
After almost three decades it has not yet sunk in with America's liberals that if you respond to aggression with sweetness and light the aggressive buggers will walk all over you.
If you recall Bret W was in one of my threads ranting about liberals being soft. I slapped him down hard with a combination of insults and ridicule and when I removed some of his comments because they were totally off topic I had him crying about censorship.
In this case the people I am disparaging have been dead around 350 years so they're not going to feel insulted whatever I say. Their succesors of course are every bit as nasty. If liberals are not prepared to be just as sharp tongued and at the same time smarter, the enemy are just going to keep walking over the resistance.
Ann, I have been called a Satanist and a paedophile here for posting about pre-christian paganism. There is now way I'm taking that and as we used to say when I played Rugby football, "get your retaliation in first."
It is a great way of discouraging the opposition.
Thanks, the history is carefully researched. The mistake being made by some is in reading this as an academic history when it is in fact unashamedly political in its aims. The intention is solely to inspire people to vigourously oppose the por life campaing and support the right to choice.
It will not achieve much here but at other sites around the web will get many thousands of readers.
Thank you thank you thank you, I get so sick of criticisms that I am not objective, don't provide enough references etc. etc. as if I am submitting a project at college.
A piece such as this can only ever be opinion, it it was academic history it would be colourless and very boring - and the facts are well known enough anyway.
As a robust attack on the "pro - life" (anti - choice) position it works fine for me.
We Buddhists don't understand retaliation (even when it's done proactively!), because bad actions cause bad karma which eventually returns to the doer of the "evil" deed.
But perhaps this is why Tibet and Myanmar (Burma) have endured oppressive goverments for so long.
I agree with you, Ian, but I prefer William F. Buckley's attack approach over Bill O'Reilly's (the latter of which Bret adheres to). Being a Brit, I think we silly Americans expect you to be able to use the glorious English language in its highest forms as your sword against the aggressive ignorant, not stoop to their level of name-calling. Make them look up the words in a dictionary! It will keep them busy and stop them from making inane comments on our articles. : -)
When I wield rapier wit they just don't understand me and assume I'm a scardey-cat liberal, so I have given it up and just attack like a berserker with my more primitive boradsword.
Bais na gloire :-)
There is a passage in Siddartha's writing that goes something like this:
It is always wrong to kill so how can a soldier defend his land. It is simple, if the soldier kills to preent others being killed, to defend his land and his people, then the soldier is doing his duty and will suffer no ill. But if the soldier kills for gain or to achieve power then he is wrong and will suffer the consequences.
Siddhartha Gautama, the best known of the Buddha (the little fat bloke is not him but a Chinese Buddha. It was in a little book of his sayings I had years ago, but I have no idea now what the title was.
The proof that buddhism is not entirely pacifistic lies in the continuance of Gurkha regiments in the British Army. The Gurkhas, from Nepal are Hindu and Buddhist tribesmen who are renowned as fighters throughout the world. As defenders of the tiny nation of Nepal from the Muslim Persians, Afghans and Moghul Empire and the Chinese, these guys had to be serious hardcases.
Gurkah regiments
I haven't time right now to research tem for you, but a serach on gurkha + buddhist will yield many results.
I am disappointed that I can take sentences out of your article, change two words, and insert it into the script for The O'Reily Factor and no one would notice. Demagoguery is the same no matter what side it comes from. If you're happy contributing to the cacophony of noise, go right ahead. But you're just contributing to the problem. If your perspective is "I'm right and you're wrong and I'm going to call you names while I prove it", you're no better than those you oppose.
Sure everyone knows about the Roman Empire, the Witch Hunts, but what I do here is give it a new perspective by relating it to the suppression of women's rights to control their bodies.
The references, which I have at my fingertips s oits no work including them, are included because some friends have asked for links to pursue for their own interest and some critics have in the past said that by not including references I indicate that I have just made stuff up.
I don't take the reference to O'Reilly as an insult if it is intended as such, I know nothing of the guy. We could of course take Stephen Colbert to task for not being politically correct but I think he is great. Of course you could (or at least I could) take sentences out of almost any article and change two words to change the whole meaning. So again we are left wondering what is your point exactly - which is a question I usually ask of critics from the rabid right.
You didn't like the article, OK fine. Lots of people here and elsewhere do and that's good enough for me.