|
by
Alan D.
Member since:
January 25, 2008 OBAMA SPEECH ON RACE AND UNITY
March 18, 2008 11:06 AM EDT
(Updated: March 18, 2008 01:14 PM EDT)
views: 259
|
rating: 7.8/10
(28 votes)
|
comments: 81
OBAMA SPEECH IN FULL: A MORE PERFECT UNION Tuesday, March 18th, 2008/ 10:17:53 ET Philadelphia, Pennsylvania "We the people, in order to form a more perfect union." Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787. The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations. Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time. And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time. This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren. This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story. I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible. It's a story that hasn't made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are truly one. Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans. This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either "too black" or "not black enough." We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well. And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn. On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike. I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed. But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam. As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all. Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS. In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity: "People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters....And in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those stories - of survival, and freedom, and hope - became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't need to feel shame about...memories that all people might study and cherish - and with which we could start to rebuild." That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America. And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and the bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years. I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe. These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love. Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias. But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality. The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked through - a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American. Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried. In fact, it isn't even past." We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow. Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today's black and white students. Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments - meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today's urban and rural communities. A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one's family, contributed to the erosion of black families - a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods - parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us. This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What's remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them. But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it - those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations - those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician's own failings. And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races. In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch. They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time. Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism. Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding. This is where we are right now. It's a racial stalemate we've been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy - particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own. But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union. For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances - for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives - by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny. Ironically, this quintessentially American - and yes, conservative - notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright's sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change. The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It's that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country - a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen - is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope - the audacity to hope - for what we can and must achieve tomorrow. In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper. In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world's great religions demand - that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well. For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle - as we did in the OJ trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies. We can do that. But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change. That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can't learn; that those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time. This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don't have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together. This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit. This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should've been authorized and never should've been waged, and we want to talk about how we'll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned. I would not be running for President if I didn't believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation - the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election. There is one story in particularly that I'd like to leave you with today - a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King's birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta. There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there. And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that's when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom. She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat. She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too. Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother's problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn't. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice. Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they're supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who's been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he's there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, "I am here because of Ashley." "I'm here because of Ashley." By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children. But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins. END
Tag:
obama
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
More by Alan D. |
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16865, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 81
And Alan, thank you for posting this. Of course, most of the people that need to see this probably won't bother to read it.
"The Country that I love" but not his wife. Too much garbage. I don't trust him anymore. To think, I'd sooner have Hillary than Obama with his racist advisor. If a white presidential candidate had the ties he has, he'd be crucified here and in the media, so why now do we say, "Nice speech." He's an orator and so will be the Anti-Christ. Garbage in; garbage out! Beware!
When did you trust him. At least cut the crap. We can click your name and read your previous posts.
Ladies and gent. These are the same people telling us he was a Muslim. Now, he is Christian, with a catch. What's for tomorrow. He went to Afghanistan on a school field trip?
These are the cynics who want to divide our country. Yeah he talked about you guys in the speech. If you read it, you would be answering to how he characterized you. He pretty much said you are America's worst enemy. What do you think about that?
I think it was from the heart. The reference to his grandmother really touched me. I have those people in my family, I will never reject them. I have people like that who are not related to me by blood.
Obviously his pastor is like family. He brought him to Christ. You wanted to disqualify Obama because he did not believe in Christ. Am I the only one noticing the hypocrisy?
Forget about who you are going to vote for. What about starting to solve ( I DID NOT SAY SOLVE) race relations? This guy can. Not Al Sharpton, not Jesse, but this guy can START IT.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
My post would have been titled, The Making of a President -- a Powerful Pre-presidential speech on Race.
EVERYTHING, but EVERYTHING that the Senator is being recorded for posterity AND for history.
I already know that the people flagging my articles are those who cannot accept his Presidency. I am saying that, "for the record." They shall be the dissidents of the future. I need not take notes; no one need take notes, for Homeland Security the NSA and the FBI shall be doing that and handing them over to the Secret Service and other law enforcement agencies.
So you thought that "free speech" was alive and doing well in your city? Well, think again! Think again! There's an old expression in law. No, I won't give it to you; I changed my mind. Just keep on bad mouthing Senator Obama. . .!
Senator Obama believes in the freedoms of this country, by the way.
But the people who are sworn to protect the President? Well now, there's another story. They have a job to do, and by golly, they are going to do it! And they are going to want to know about people and what they have been saying . . .even about a "Senator Obama" This is going to be fun: to see those who never thought they would be, be the dissidents of the future, the enemies of the state.
The speech was nothing short of brilliant.
Wow.
Of course, I'm joking but don't be surprised if Hillary pulls that in order to stop the media from talking about the speech and later recant.
I want a president that is unafraid to show me his dark side. I want to know that my president is as human as I am.
I want our future to include the ending of wars, the unity of neighbors, and the cure of illness. I believe Barack Obama can lead our nation to accomplishing these things. I don't think he will tolerate anything less.
I see him as my president already. The man is great. He's got his flaws like every human. He surely shows how to respond to fire while maintaining his cool.
His reaction is a lot better than "SHAME ON YOU FOX NEWS"
Wow, Hillary is the original shady lady, now we find she wants us to know she practically guided Bill every step of the way. How shallow, to take credit for her husband's terms in office. But then again, this is the only true "experience" she has had, as first lady and short term Senator.
But enough about her. It's not about her. It's about this country and everyone of us who are sick to death of watching this once great country slide into the gutter of failed hopes, dreams, and bad wars.
We all pretty much stand shoulder to shoulder now in the last line of defense of our way of life. We are all colors and belief systems but we are not rich, or greedy or jaded. We are Americans, and Barack Obama's eloquent words showcase his eloquent combination of principles and vision which will make us One in saving our country from the likes of politicians like McCain and the Clintons. I am so proud to support him for President.
You have to be a lunatic who reside in the state of DENIAL to look at +145 pledged delegates, +120 overall delegates, no revote in Florida, probably no revote in MI and keep on talking Hillary's nomination. She is history. I am only talking about John McCain now.
http:/my.barackobama.com/hisownwords
You may want to make note of it.
Can you imagine trying to decide what to say in this situation? And the end result was a positive, uplifting message. Sometimes I wish that Obama would explain himself in more detail but I realize that in our system of "news" reporting and the inability of so many to think critically of what is being presented and the response to it, that explanations either fall on deaf ears (as Chris W. just mentions) or are twisted.
I think Senator Obama passed the challenge.
We need MORE time to know this man and what he stands for and I dont care how good his speeches' are....that dose NOT guarantee an honest, good, leader....
Mr. Bush had some good speech's in the beginning too.................especially the one that convinced so many to approve our going into Iraq.
Reverend Wright is just one of many who voiced his frustrations, and instead of looking the other way, Barack Obama increasingly became inspired to help alleviate these frustrations. What may have been divisive can be used as tools of unification!
Change requires commitment, creativity and challenge.
Triumphs of Humanity: Creativity, Compassion & Commitment
I have belonged to several black churches. I have never heard Hate Speech. Obama is incorrect that hate speech is typical of black churches.
James Fellows of the Atlantic, who lives in China, watched it and was very impressed:
This was as good a job as anyone could have done in these circumstances, and as impressive and intelligent a speech as I have heard in a very long time. People thought that Mitt Romney's speech would be the counterpart to John Kennedy's famous speech about his faith to the Houston ministers in 1960. No. This was.
At Tapped, the American Prospect blog, Kate Sheppard compared it to Martin Luther King's famous "I have a dream" speech:
King's speech may have been more powerful rhetorically, but this speech really laid down the complexities of race in America in a way that someone with Barack Obama can appreciate in unique ways.
More reaction...
Fellows's colleague at the Atlantic, Andrew Sullivan - an Obama supporter - was effusive:
It is a speech we have all been waiting for for a generation. Its ability to embrace both the legitimate fears and resentments of whites and the understandable anger and dashed hopes of many blacks was, in my view, unique in recent American history.
Eve Fairbanks at the New Republic's The Plank put the speech into the context of Obama's campaign:
I do think Obama defined his candidacy more in terms of race today, but I guess from my perspective that's a good thing. His calls for 'change' always left me a little cold: change what? After hearing his speech, the 'what?' feels clearer.
Ana Marie Cox on Time's Swampland blog wonders if the speech worked:
Who was Obama talking to? Who was listening? Would any working class white person change their mind after listening to this speech? Would anyone who had decided that Obama has been tainted by Wright now be swayed to vote for him?
On the progressive-left blogosphere, reaction was more muted than in the conventional media. At OpenLeft, one poster headlined it "incredible," and commented: "His biggest gamble is to treat the subject with the depth and seriousness and complexity that it deserves."
Jerome Armstrong at MyDD struck a different note, and was highly critical of what he saw as the politics behind the speech:
What Obama wants to do is pivot it back to Clinton vs Obama, and get the Republican attack on him through Wright off the table, so he's equated Wright and Ferraro multiple times in the speech.... This is pretty ugly and unfair though of Obama, to equate statements by Ferraro with Wright. Obama goes on and on about how great a person Wright is, without a single kind word about Ferraro, just rubbing it in further. I believe the campaign has reached a new low.
Over at the National Review's The Corner - always a harbour of differing opinion - there are some strong reactions or counter-reactions. Charles Murray - that's right, the author of The Bell Curve - posted:
Has any other major American politician ever made a speech on race that comes even close to this one? As far as I'm concerned, it is just plain flat out brilliant - rhetorically, but also in capturing a lot of nuance about race in America. It is so far above the standard we're used to from our pols.
But several others at the Corner were less impressed. Stanley Kurtz replied:
Far from pulling a Hubert Humphrey or a Tony Blair and casting the radical left out of the party, Obama seems to see his job as getting the rest of the country to adopt a stance of relative complacency toward the most egregious sorts of anti-Americanism - all under the guise of achieving national unity.
Over at Daily Kos, a series of open threads on the subject racked up over 2,000 comments from readers. One, from a reader in Britain, read:
Here in the UK, that speech could never have been made. While racism certainly exists here, it is never acknowledged in the way that Barack Obama just did in his speech. I am heartened by seeing such an honest and heartfelt examination of the issue, and have never been as proud of my country as I was today, watching from abroad.
First . . . Find your 'Cap Lock' key. You can do it . . . it's on the left side of the keyboard.
Second . . . educate yourself.
"THE WORLD WILL BECOME MUCH WORSE FOR ALL OF US IF HUSSAIN GETS IN. HE COULD STAND ON HIS KNEES AND SPIT WOODEN NICKLES AND I WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR HIM. "
Who is Hussain? Barack Obama has a middle name that Sounds like Hussain . . . just like Hillary Clinton has a middle name that Sounds like Saddam! LoL! Standing on knees and spitting wooden nickles? We're voting for President, not Best Ringling Brother's Circus sideshow act . . . Sheeesh!
Isn't funny how the uninformed, the ignorant, the lazy and the bigots will NOT vote for (Fill in Democratic Candidate Here___________________) but they will instead vote for McCain? The fact that these people will NOT vote for Obama is a plus in my book . . . just as it's a negative when we look at who they endorse. You'll note there are usually no intelligent reasons given either. Shocker, eh?
"You have to be a lunatic who reside in the state of DENIAL to look at +145 pledged delegates, +120 overall delegates, no revote in Florida, probably no revote in MI and keep on talking Hillary's nomination. "
Jared . . . one might be tempted to agree with you. However, you DO realize the DNC loses all power and the credentials committee may still seat the delegations if they choose to, don't you? The real fight will be on who sits on the credentials committee and will the argument that the nation should ALL speak, including those two states, prevails or not. That decision has yet to be made and the people who sit on that committee have yet to be appointed.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
"If a white presidential candidate had the ties he has, he'd be crucified here and in the media,"
Not true, Carol. Please check out McCain's ties and come back when you are more informed.
Anyway, I liked Obama from the first time I heard him...intelligent, well-spoken, honest, compassionate, wise, clearly focused, a true leader. He's got my vote as well as all the members of my family, my friends and many of the associates I talk to about him. We desperately need someone like this right now in our country....Bush and his Republican Congress have devastated this country. It will take determination, perseverance and intelligence to start putting us on the right path again. There is no way that McCain even touches him in these areas.....and his 100 years in Iraq will surely bring us crashing down within a couple of years.
Credentials Committee
Elected to chair the Credentials Committee are Alexis Herman, James Roosevelt, Jr. and Eliseo Roques-Arroyo. Alexis Herman served as U.S. Secretary of Labor from 1997 to 2001. She served as DNC Chief of Staff for Chairman Ron Brown and later was named CEO of the 1992 Democratic National Convention. Since 2005, she has served as a Co-Chair of the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee and also served as a Co-Chair of the Commission on Presidential Nomination Timing and Scheduling. James Roosevelt, Jr. is President and CEO of Tufts Health Plan, a Massachusetts based Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) and was formerly Associate Commissioner for Retirement Policy of the Social Security Administration in the Clinton Administration. He is the chief legal counsel for the Massachusetts Democratic Party and Co-Chair of the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee. Eliseo Roques-Arroyo, a native of Puerto Rico, served as Executive Assistant to Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Senate Minority Leader Miguel Hernandez-Agosto and to Puerto Rico Delegate to Congress Antonio J. Colorado. He is a former Executive Director of the Democratic Party of Puerto Rico and presently a member of the DNC.
Released Jan 14 of this year for 2008 DNC convention
http://www.demconvention.com/dnc-elects-standing-committee-leadership-for-2008-democratic-national-convention-2/
Roosevelt Jr who sits on the credentials committee said he has not been able to find a way to agree to change the rules of the game in the midst of it. This is a paraphrase. Other than that, yes you are right. It's up to the committee. But even with those delegates she won't catch up. She will still be there making the popular vote argument. My argument is based on the fact that I believe that they will never take it away from Obama with 1 more pledged delegate. I am even more convinced of that after the speech yesterday.
As it happens, I agree that it seems VERY unlikely at this point . . . even with a bigger than projected win by Clinton in Pennsylvania (which Obama's staff has also predicted and discarded as unimportant). I can see no reasonable outcome other than an Obama lead in the delegates. This would also give him control of the committees if played right and neither of the candidates are unaware of this nor are they likely to absent mindedly overlook the raw political details that go into convention work. Clinton has more experience in these things . . . but Obama is not without experience or skilled advisors either.
It's my hope that they can work this out before the convention . . . but I hope to win the lottery too (and don't buy tickets). LoL! So . . . barring something as yet unknown or some VERY skilled maneuvering at the convention by the Clinton team . . . and particularly after seeing his response to the pastor 'controversy' . . . I think his nomination is a foregone conclusion.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
Carol, how about John McCain and his ties to Rev. Hagee and Rev. Presley? The media has not gone after McCain about those two radical bigots.
Jared, I don't, even when I think there is little hope of influencing people who choose to remain uninformed. I believe there are many who read but don't comment, maybe because they are timid, learning or unsure. I would hate to think that a young person who is seeking information happens upon a thread where some outrageous comment goes uncontested might walk away thinking there might be some merit to that statement since no one contested it.
I agree Carla, I think this must be heard. I've came across a translated version that I am mailing to friends overseas. I've received feedback from Europe and they can believe we have someone like him running. Many people under 30 only know George W. They were kids during Clinton years, so you can understand how they view a US president.
As I said, it was a fine, substantial speech. I think Obama made the right personal choice to write it and give it. However, is he ready for "prime time" ? Not yet.
I am not voting for McCain based on principles. I think we engage in punditry too much. When comes the general and he is on top the ticket the differences on principles will be pronounced. At that point I think readiness from prime time will be far less important than the economy that John McCain admits he does not understand, the war in Iraq, where he wants to stay forever, shipping jobs overseas (he just helped 40,000 US jobs go to Airbus in Europe).
Obama hasn't shown he can connect with people . Fine speech won't be enough. He may learn to or he may not. Adlai Stevenson had the same weakness as a candidate. Obama is young and he can change. Maureen Dowd was right in noting, after this speech , he is becoming less "grandiose." But he isn't there yet.
The speech on race was excellent , yet it was intellectual. It didn't talk down to people, which was a brave choice in a political context. The essence of the rhetoric of his Pastor was to speak truth to power in his mainstream black church and to take his statements literally or as incendiary, hate talk is not correct. Obama tried to deal with this for a largely non-black audience. I feel many black leaders may feel he could have done more. Andrew Young , who is supporting Hillary, for one.
It is unfortunate that race became an issue in the form it did . Obama had to speak to it . I think he made a good choice to do so as openly as he did.
What is still lacking is his ability to not be perceived as living in an ivory tower.
If not are you telling me to consider voting for McCain?
I just don't see the point you are making but telling me he can't connect to people, obviously he connected with me, and by citing Andrew Young. Do you really think I care about what Andrew Young thinks?
Andrew Young: "Bill Clinton has been with more black women than Obama." You expect me to take into consideration of what that guy says. The guy who owes his political career to Slick Willy.
I would hope for a younger candidate, one of his generation. He is a question mark, as a candidate and as a possible president.
Andrew Young is a savvy politician. Whether he supports Hillary or not is another matter. Her candidacy has other difficulties.
Whether he seems electable or not is a question. There is a lot of time. How can you have voted already?
I am to be considered an ''enemy of the STATE"? GOOD GRIEF!!!! Oh, My...that would Surely get MY Vote, NOT!!!!!
But he had to say it now because he is not standing to be head of a black supper club but president of a country where most white people have probably never had dinner with a black family, let alone gone to their church. For those who seriously believed that everyone had bought into and benefited from the American Dream - those who did not hear, could not understand or would not listen - it was news that some were disaffected, not just with what America has become, but what it long has been....To that extent, the speech probably worked. He acknowledged white disadvantage and black alienation. He refused to disown Wright for the same reason he refused to disown his own white grandmother - because good people in bad societies will sometimes say and do bad things. He acknowledged there were problems and then said Kumbaya. He hoped for better times and said everyone had to do his bit."
Wright is a respected leader and scholar by many, nationally and internationally. He doesn't need Obama to defend him. He is also mainstream. The sort of sermons that speak of black liberation are not unusual in many black churches. They serve a purpose in that context. They do not incite conflict or racial discord but express the frustration with social injustice and affirm a positive goal . Taken literally, they may seem negative to some. Obama rejects the language of those sermons and makes clear he doesn't accept the rhetoric of the black liberation theology which developed in the 1960's. Wright speaks in the language of an older generation.
Anyways, the speech convinced Richardson!
http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/21/the-full-story-behind-rev-jeremiah-
wrights-911-sermon/?iref=topnews
What convinced Bill Richardson to support Obama? He likely sees that the conflict between Hillary and Obama is threatening to ruin the Democrats, and backing Obama is best for the party at this point. Whether it gets him the VP offer remains to be seen. ( I thought Richardson was the best presidential candidate of the group.I think John Edwards had a better chance of winning the election than Obama or Hillary. )
Obama's speech got praise from the intelligentsia. I don't think it will go down well with the voters n Pennsylvania. College students may be reading Obama's speech years from now in textbooks, and discussing its structure and nuance. But I don't think the speech will do Obama much good with voters in 2008. He has become perceived more as a "black candidate" now , whereas up until a few weeks ago he was not thought of as black or white. He may be able regain the earlier view of him but it won't be easy. He has to connect better to the the people than he has so far.
All I know is I don't want Hillary to be the nominee. She is a good candidate but Im tired of the whole Bush/Clinton/Bush, then another Clinton, No!
Who are you for Clarke?
I don't whom I'd vote for yet. I 'm against McCain. I am glad Nader's running because there is a chance he will have to be included in the election debates - no bets on that. I agree with his ideas a lot , but voting for him is another choice - as is not to vote.
Perhaps Nader would give votes to McCain. I think it's difficult to say. I don't blame Nader for Gore or Kerry's loss, although many do. I thought Bloomberg might get more votes than McCain if he ran as a third party candidate. He has apparently signed off now, although he was seriously considering it. There are many leaders from both parties who would have supported him.
The people are not being informed of the issues and the situation so far by any of the present candidates or the media in my view. This is understandable from the point of view of the politicians.They are already viewed negatively as a whole.
It is like being in a vacuum, as between WWI and WWII. Now its a question of different regional groups - East and West, North and South working toward right relations. The United States has to redifine its place and at the same time its own domestic chaos and divisions, which the government in DC seems incapable of doing. The states are having to lead and perhaps this process will be the future. A mentor of mine, George Kennan, pictured a division of government authority to several regions, perhaps four or five. Big countries have disadvantages compared to smaller ones. A dumbed-down police state is less attractive.
I saw him - thanks - I could not have said it better myself! Salud.
he left his racist church, so is he a non-Christian now???