Jesus was accused of breaking the law by healing a man on the Sabbath. He had just preached about the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. Have you ever encountered a situation where you decided that it was the spirit of the law that was more important than the letter of the law?
by
Carla G.
Member since:
September 19, 2006 Discussion Topic #29: The Letter of the Law vs the Spirit of the Law
March 07, 2008 10:57 PM UTC
(Updated: March 07, 2008 11:01 PM UTC)
views: 0
|
comments: 18
Jesus was accused of breaking the law by healing a man on the Sabbath. He had just preached about the difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. Have you ever encountered a situation where you decided that it was the spirit of the law that was more important than the letter of the law?
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
|
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Version 18247, "Zach"; Copyright © 2013 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.




Comments: 18
I think a lot of what you are asking hinges on what Jesus told the Pharisees in Luke 11:42:
"But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone." KJV
I think Matthew 23:23 says it even better:
"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone."
This entire subject is one that has troubled me and confused me for a long time. We are taught that we are saved by Grace, yet the emphasis always seems to be on pleasing God and maintaining our salvation through works and obeying "the Law." Most people believe "the Law" is nothing more than a strict list of rules and regulations that God demands us to obey---no if, no ands, no buts, no gray areas---Otherwise, we get on God's "bad side" and He becomes angry with us and punishes us.
But we must fully understand and appreciate why "the Law" was given to us by God in the first place. I don't believe that God gave us "the Law" as a "Do-This-Or-Else" kind of a thing. I believe "the Law" was given to us for the same reasons that we tell our children to look both ways before crossing the street or to not play with fire.
Everything that God does for us is good and ultimately for our benefit. I believe, if He tells us not to steal, or to murder, or to commit adultery, it is primarily to save us the grief and negative repercussions that may ultimately result from engaging in those activities.
When, as Christians, we apply "the Law" and our rigid attitude about it towards other people, things like mercy, love and understanding inevitably get squeezed out and everything is seen as either black or white. Such as, if they are obeying "the Law" they are right and if they are not obeying it, they are wrong. And, if they are wrong, then they are "sinners". And if they are "sinners," then they are bad people who we end up seeing as being less than ourselves (based on the fact that we strive to obey "the Law"). In this instance, "the Law" becomes a separator of people instead of a common denominator that unites them together.
It is related to the idea that Christ presents in Mark 2:27, about the Sabbath being made for man, not man for the Sabbath. I believe the same can be said about "the Law." God did not create us for the exclusive obedience to "the Law". It is "the Law" that was created exclusively for us. We are not here for its sake, it is here for ours. And this is a crucial aspect of "the Law" that I feel most people completely miss.
Or did I misunderstand the question? Does this question only apply to scriptural matters? If so, I apologize. Anyway, this is only my opinion. namaste
Is this how he wants us to view the Sabbath? In my estimation ... no. I see God as so much bigger than this. I see a God of love and mercy, and I think the last thing He wants us to be focusing on are things like this. I am no longer a member of that church, but I do respect the ones that continue on there. They are very much convicted and there is something to be said in that.
I have asked the question, would I steal if my children were starving? No, I'd get another job. If that were still not enough to feed the three, then, yes, I guess I would steal.
Would I kill if my child was hurt. No, I'd try to trust in the law to handle it. BUT, would I kill to save my child? Yes. (Sorry, but yes, I would.)
I had to face that question in my 40s. A kid (probably drug problem, according to the cops) was trying to break into our house, and over a period of about 3 weeks. My 3 were snug in their beds, and I didn't sleep at night, on patrol...LOL! I sat on the piano bench and cried when I realized I'd be willing to do that level of harm to keep my children safe.
This is one of the reasons that I never understood the study on Abraham, willing to sacrifice his own child. Nope. Just can't buy it.
Still thinking about this...it's going to bug me all day! LOL!
Thanks for the connundrum. You never fail to stimulate thought.
Blessings on you and yours
Wilka
I really think that you have gotten some wonderful comments here so far and I especially like BERF's from the "religious" perspective.
We need to turn that idea on its head. A "law" is only valid if it can be applied in accordance with the principle on which all rules are to be based. - the Golden Rule. In a Christian context, that's what Jesus is written to have said.
If a "law" would lead us to an action outside of the relationship of "agapé" and the guidance of "Do Unto Others", then that law is either misunderstood or has outlived its usefulness.
The "letter" of the law is irrelevent, always. It is only of value if it helps us to realize the spirit