John King asked Obama about his $91 million in earmarks with regard to possible debates with McCain about "pork barrel"
Obama: That's untrue. We have disclosed all of our earmarks. I believe very strongly in transparency. With a very conservative Republican, I passed a bill called Google for Government, where every single dollar of federal spending is published on the internet and voters can check that out. The idea is to open up the process. I'm in favor of more disclosure. I've pursued projects that I think are important, but I want to make sure it's not done in the dark of night.
John King said McCain has never asked for an earmark. Does he have a better case to make on this?
Clinton (on her $342 million in earmarks): No, because he supported the wasteful tax cuts of the Bush administration and the Iraq war. Bush inherited a balanced budget and a surplus. That is gone. We're looking at a 9 trillion debt. I'll get us back to fiscal responsibility. It's important that we look at where the money has gone under Bush. Who really is going to move us toward fiscal responsibility is the larger question. We can get back on the track we were on.
Jorge Ramos asked about Superdelegates possibly breaking rank with the delegate count
Clinton: These are the rules that are followed and I think it will sort itself out. We'll have a nominee, and we'll move on to victory in November.
Obama: Given how hard Clinton and I have been working, it's important that these primaries and caucuses count for something. The will of the voters should ultimately determine who the nominee is going to be. What's most important to voters is that we have a government that is listening to them. The Democratic Party, at its best, can summon a sense of common purpose - higher purpose.
Campbell Brown asked the candidates to each describe a moment of crisis that tested them
Obama: I look at the trajectory of my life. My father left when I was 2, and there were rocky periods where I was off course. What was most important was learning to take responsibility for my own actions -- how I can bring people together to have a n impact on the world. Working on the streets of Chicago, bringing people together, working as a civil rights attorney - rejecting Wall Street - that cumulative experience is the reason I have the judgment I do, and it's important that people get the government that is worthy of their decency and their generosity.
Clinton: Everybody knows I've lived through some crises and some challenges in my life, and I am grateful for the support of countless Americans. How do I keep going? I shake my head in wonderment because with all of the challenges I've had, they're nothing compared to the challenges I've seen the American people have had. The hits I've taken are nothing compared to what goes on every single day in the lives of people across the country. I was blessed and I was called to give the same opportunities I've had to others. I am absolutely honored to be here with Barack Obama. Whatever happens, we're going to be fine. You know we have strong support from our families and our friends. I just hope that we'll be able to say the same thing about the American people; and that's what this election should be about.
--------------
And that was it. The pundits are praising Clinton's last line as her best, but many are saying that it merely cleared the way for a graceful exit from the race if things don't go well for her in Texas and Ohio.
Clinton did very well but the blogosphere points out that her attacks on Obama for borrowing the words of others don't play well when she herself has borrowed words. Her last line was eerily similar to John Edwards' own graceful speech when he conceded.
Obama also did very well, especially in his deflection of Clinton's accusations and in stating his policy differences.
(Disclaimer: The context of this article is not meant to be an exact verbatim transcript but is substantially accurate.)


Comments: 43
It was clear she was impressed with how Obama handled himself, even when she tried to make points against him.
I must admit, Clinton's closing seemed more sincere than her teary-eyed comments in New Hampshire. Perhaps her contact with everyday people on the campaign trail and Obama's ability to connect with core American values has humbled her some.
In regard to Hillary's closing, I thought it was in character, that is she believes she is serving others as an obligation and she has always found it wearisome - a typical feeling of a manager or head of an organization, who has to deal with "politics" and "conspiracies," ( real or imagined).
As for Obama, his performance was more of the same. He has undermined himself as a potential leader in the way he has tried to present himself as credible and component. Whether he did this in a calculated way or not, he has gone down a negative path and no longer seems authentic.
All I hear still from Hillary Clinton's opponent even at this late date are words - and more meaningless words. He says I'm a serious guy who stands for this, this - being fewer and fewer meaningless inane slogans - take my word for it.
Did George Bush really teach people nothing?
In fact it was an outright lie when he claimed to say he would talk unconditionally with Cuba, provided certain conditions were met ... and none of the Obamanables even caught that. It just makes no difference to them at this point. ;-)
Yes, Obama performed well, but nothing much informative was said by him or Hillary about real issues: Edwards, Huckabee and Paul did that and frightened the establishment . I think Bloomberg may be thinking seriously of running based on the way things look now.
The neoliberal money and brain trust backing Obama suggest he has been selected as their chosen puppet.
Republican ticket: John McCain
Democratic ticket: Barack Obama
the only question -- who shall they pick as their running mates. That shall be my primary focus from here on out. The rest is merely peripheral, with all respect to Texas and Ohio.
Hillary was in daily contact with the executive for 8 years.
Her brain is familiar with the systems, and like anyone at any job to ramp
up takes years, check any CEO ... how many whiz kid CEOs are there out
there? One or two, Steve Jobs. This is number one for me. while Obama
is still sharpening his pencils Hillary would have the budget balanced.
Hillary has more Senate experience.
Hillary has more Business experience.
Hillary has better judgment that to screw the country by trying
to be president when she has done nothing.
Hillary has more life experience.
Hillary does not pander and lie to people, though it is
likely that because of that she will not win ... that can be a
plus for all you Obama supporters.
Hillary is also has less appeal to the far left, which would
probably translate into keeping more of the moderates.
Another thing, the first thing this country needs to do is
to get spending under control. That is something Bill Clinton
did in the White House, he handed George Bush a balanced
budget.
Hillary has an idea of what to do as President because she
has thought about it. Obama is rushing to backfull a platform
in place from polls and advice he does not know firsthand.
OK, I know, nothing but "yes we can" and "hope" mean anything
to you anyway, so why ask?
And even if all Hillary did have 35 years of words at least they are
her words and they are real words and to anyone with a brain
that beats 1 year of demogogic fluff anyway.
Obama was the last qualified candidate of any of the Democrats
up in any of those debates, including Kucinich.
...and it's worth repeating - no one person will ever have all the right answers...
When does the mainstream media start asking Obama real questions and demanding real answers? They still seem to be "fainting" over this cult of personality named Obama.
Her business experience started with being appointed to Walmart's corporate board which coincidentally had it's headquarters in the state that her husband just became governor in. that sounds like a conflict of interest more than an accomplishment. We all know what happened to the Rose Law Firm and failed land deals so her experience is in failure in that "business" venture.
I will admit that Hillary's husband has a lot more experience and connections than Obama but I just wish Hillary would stop running on HER credentials when she is really running on her husbands. her campaign is on the brink and they STILL refuse to release the White house records that would actually detail her experience and accomplishments. Doesn't that fact beg the question why?
"""Hillary does not pander and lie to people,""""
There is no way you said that with a straight face.
""""Another thing, the first thing this country needs to do is
to get spending under control. That is something Bill Clinton
did in the White House, he handed George Bush a balanced
budget.""""
That is a good argument and I still wish Hillary would admit that it is Bill that makes her more qualified not her or anything SHE has done.
Bruce I understand that you support Hillary and at least you are honest about why. Unfortunately the democrat voters want CHANGE. They don't want to go back to the 90's. there are way to many scores to settle and unfinished partisanship.
Hillary was in daily contact with the executive for 8 years.
Her brain is familiar with the systems, and like anyone at any job to ramp
up takes years, check any CEO ... how many whiz kid CEOs are there out
there? One or two, Steve Jobs. This is number one for me. while Obama
is still sharpening his pencils Hillary would have the budget balanced.
Hillary has more Senate experience.
Hillary has more Business experience.
Hillary has better judgment that to screw the country by trying
to be president when she has done nothing.
Hillary has more life experience.
Hillary does not pander and lie to people, though it is
likely that because of that she will not win ... that can be a
plus for all you Obama supporters.
Hillary is also has less appeal to the far left, which would
probably translate into keeping more of the moderates.
Another thing, the first thing this country needs to do is
to get spending under control. That is something Bill Clinton
did in the White House, he handed George Bush a balanced
budget.
Hillary has an idea of what to do as President because she
has thought about it. Obama is rushing to backfull a platform
in place from polls and advice he does not know firsthand.
OK, I know, nothing but "yes we can" and "hope" mean anything
to you anyway, so why ask?
And even if all Hillary did have 35 years of words at least they are
her words and they are real words and to anyone with a brain
that beats 1 year of demogogic fluff anyway.
Obama was the last qualified candidate of any of the Democrats
up in any of those debates, including Kucinich.
Hillary was in daily contact with the executive for 8 years.
Her brain is familiar with the systems, and like anyone at any job to ramp
up takes years, check any CEO ... how many whiz kid CEOs are there out
there? One or two, Steve Jobs. This is number one for me. while Obama
is still sharpening his pencils Hillary would have the budget balanced."
Please, there are millions of wives and husbands of spouses with important jobs in this country, and none of them absorbed their spouses job by osmosis, or would claim they had, but Hillary. She has zero experience in the executive branch, other than living in the White House and ordering the servants around.
"Hillary has more Senate experience."
Take a look at that record, my friend, it's pretty bare.
"Hillary has more Business experience."
WalMart and Whitewater are hardly the credentials I am looking for in a president.
"Hillary has better judgment that to screw the country by trying
to be president when she has done nothing."
Funny, I thought she was trying to screw the country because OF the experience selling her votes to the highest bidding lobbyist.
"Hillary has more life experience."
Again, not a plus, considering.
"Hillary does not pander and lie to people, though it is
likely that because of that she will not win ... that can be a
plus for all you Obama supporters."
Hillary has pandered, and pandered, and pandered some more. You haven't seen Obama adopting a southern accent to impress a crowd, and Hillary has constantly guaged her oratory to her audience, sometimes making seemingly opposite stances with different crowds in the same day. Pandering is not something she can even remotely claim she has not done. Like Jeff said, I cant believe you could say that with a straight face.
"Hillary is also has less appeal to the far left, which would
probably translate into keeping more of the moderates."
Hillary, obviously, has less appeal to everyone, at this point.
"Another thing, the first thing this country needs to do is
to get spending under control. That is something Bill Clinton
did in the White House, he handed George Bush a balanced
budget."
Are you suggesting Bill should run again, because Hillary had nothing to do with that? Actually, Bill had less to do with that than the Congress, at the time, anyway.
"Hillary has an idea of what to do as President because she
has thought about it. Obama is rushing to backfull a platform
in place from polls and advice he does not know firsthand."
Whaaat? Hillry and Obama both since the early days of this campaign constantly have had to address new issues they hadn't thought about, generally ones Edwards or Kucinich championed, now is no different.
"OK, I know, nothing but "yes we can" and "hope" mean anything
to you anyway, so why ask?"
Has nothing to do with it. No we can't, business as usual does.
"And even if all Hillary did have 35 years of words at least they are
her words and they are real words and to anyone with a brain
that beats 1 year of demogogic fluff anyway."
Uh, see my comment above, she used Bill's speech for her last comments.
"Obama was the last qualified candidate of any of the Democrats
up in any of those debates, including Kucinich."
Kucinich was probably the most qualified, if you aren't looking for a corporate shill.
Hillary Clinton: "Whatever happens, we're going to be fine. You know, we have strong support from our families and our friends. I just hope that we'll be able to say the same thing about the American people, and that's what this election should be about."
John Edwards: "But I want to say this to everyone: With Elizabeth, with my family, with my friends, with all of you and all of your support, this son of a millworker's gonna be just fine. Our job now is to make certain that America will be fine."
John Edwards: "What's not at stake are any of us. All of us are going to be just fine no matter what happens in this election. But what's at stake is whether America is going to be fine."
Bill Clinton, 92: "The hits that I took in this election are nothing compared to the hits the people of this state and this country have been taking for a long time."
Hillary Clinton, Austin debate: "You know, the hits I've taken in life are nothing compared to what goes on every single day in the lives of people across our country."
Let us speak of Hillary's Senate experience.
I want to apologize to you, Ron, and Bruce B., for I know you shall be disappointed in me if Hillary does win the Democratic nomination, knowing that I shall NOT vote for her.
But I digress. We must SPEAK of Hillary's "Senatorial experience", for it keeps coming up as something for which may qualify her as a good President. As I pound the pavements here in California, I am afforded the honour and opportunity of meeting wonderful New Yorkers. At first, their responses to Hillary surprised me, but their responses no longer surprise me.
The one thing I am unable to do is to prove to Gatherers what these New Yorkers say. Well, no longer. Here is one who speaks, for he himself IS a Gatherer:
"He [Barack Obama] is a breath of fresh air. Hillary is my State Senator.. The only time she has come to Buffalo is to raise funds, not to create the jobs she promised 3 years ago.. Before she can run for president, perhaps she should carry through on her senatorial promises... Go Barack!
Ken K., Feb 20, 2008, 8:21pm EST
Typical of what I hear as I walk the streets here in the Bay Area. They cannot stand Hillary, for they see that she has done nothing -- absolutely NOTHING for them.
There is your Senatorial experience! There is your so-called President!"
Very insightful commentary.
Winston, Now that would be interesting. George Soros is a very saavy man who I have a great deal of respect for.
Obama's rhetoric and speeches appeal, yet his record has consistently shown he is no supporter of change. He has often supported the wealthy and politically powerful interests since he has been a US Senator. This article by Matt Gonzalez examines his record:
http://quartz.he.net/~beyondch/news/nucleus/plugins/print/print.php?itemid=5413