|
by
Bill's Spirit
Member since:
March 3, 2006 VOTERNATOR 2008 -- Battle Against The Machines
February 21, 2008 02:33 AM EST
views: 145
|
rating: 10/10
(17 votes)
|
comments: 21
Jennifer Brunner is HOT !!! ...and I mean smokin'... You can check-out her video * here * Doing a news search (on the big trademarked search engine), 168 results returned for Jennifer Brunner's name; the first thirty of which had been posted in the past seven days. She even made * The New York Times *. Jen is in the news for her work in the area of voting machine security. She has been leading the edge on voting machine testing, and her results are effecting people across the country. Brunner is * Ohio's Secretary of State * and oversees Ohio's election boards. A Democrat, Jennifer Brunner ousted incumbent Republican Ken Blackwell in Ohio's 2006 state elections. A year that many Ohio Republicans lost their seats to Democratic challengers. One of Brunner's campaign promises was to thoroughly investigate the security of Ohio's voting machines. A promise that rang with the populous in answer to concerns from the countless irregularities, both documented and reported, through out Ohio in the 2004 election cycle. Brunner commissioned a $1.9 million dollar study (nicknamed * EVEREST *) which discovered that machine data could be easily corrupted with something as simple as a magnet. Other problems were discovered as well. One result of the study has been the ordering of several districts to not use the machines, and use paper ballots instead. The paper ballots are of the type that are optically scanned for tabulation. A method which still seems sketchy to voters who have worked with document scanners in work places; they are notorious for making errors. As a result of Brunner's investigations, other states have also engaged in testing and decided to not use certain machines. The insecurity of voting machine methods is, of course, not news to anyone who has seen the 2006 documentary * "Hacking Democracy" * by HBO. For my salt, I have always balked at the idea of trusting some unknown computer code writer to be responsible for the proper tabulation of my vote, and the votes of my friends and neighbors. In November of 2006, I had a bad experience voting on a touch-screen machine. The printing head on the paper spool was not working, and thus not recording votes into a paper trail. I was assured by a poll worker not to worry, my vote had been recorded on the little magnetic card. I wasn't assured. I wrote an article about this and posted it to Gather at the time (* "My Diebold Done Somebody Wrong Song" *). Let's be clear. We know we can't trust all our fellow citizens. There are always some who will want to manipulate the political process for personal gain or ends. The only defense we have is safety in numbers. The more people involved in the process of counting and recording votes cast, the less likely someone will be able to get away with the fraud of miscounting. It is not the Republic that makes this nation the great country that it is. It is "The Public" that does this. Because of that, anything to do with The Public's business should be completely open to scrutiny by the public and answerable to the public; for which our government supposedly stands. Voting, especially. Paper and hand counting may take longer, but it is much easier to layer with security and achieve complete and documentable accuracy. For your consideration. -- 21 February 2008 -- Bill's Spirit is honored to have been selected as a member of Gather's "Election 2008 People's Press Corps" Bill's Spirit is an Artist, Writer, Poet, Philosopher currently wordsmithing from a humble digital forge in small town Ohio. The works of the man behind Bill's Spirit have been published in small alternative and amateur presses since 1986. Before that, they just filled notebooks, decorated walls and gathered dust in piles and boxes. --
Tags:
jennifer brunner,
e-voting,
ohio,
news,
voting,
government,
ohio secretary of state,
touch screen,
voting machines,
election 2008,
everest study,
electronic voting,
politics
To Groups:
A Place for Opinions, Affairs of the State, Americans 4 America, Americans for America, Comment the news, Current Events 2, Democracy 2.0, Democratic Vision, Election 2008, Free Thinking, Freedom Cafe, Freedom Vent Forum, Gather News Essential, Gather Politics Essential, Gatherers for a More Perfect Union, Independent Bent, Independent Minds, Intelligent politics, It is my Opinion, Journal of Social Commentary, Nonconformists, Open Debate, Opinionated Opinions, Political Boxing, Political Moderates, Political Ohio, Political Open Discussion, Political, Social, and Religious Views Forum, PolitiCat, politics and international news, Politics and Social Justice, Politics Today, Progressive Politics, Public Forum, Purely Political, Social Consciousness, Sunshine: Freedom of Information, The Family Diner, The Intellectual Activist, The Political Middle, The Polling Place, The Posting Station, The Reader's Lounge, The Real True Americans, The Renewed Activist, The View By You, TrueAmericans, Under the Sun :), United We Stand to Protect Our Liberty, Our Borders and Our Constitution, Vote 2008!, What's on your Mind, Writers Get Noticed, YaDaYadaYada
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
|
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16836, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 21
In all of my voting experiences with punch card voting (and that would be every year I voted previous to 2004) I never found a chad hanging from my punch card. The method in which the cards were slid in and then out of their holding place always skimmed or scraped loose hangers off.
My only concern with punch cards was in trusting that the makers and counters of the cards were not scamming, or would not scam, me.
Lunatic Fringe - LOL - But seriously, computerized voting could be done. It could be done with secure servers, open sourced code and layers of redundant re-verification; including a hard paper trail.
A couple of thing keep me from going back to the non-voting practice. One, is that by voting I can stand strongly up to those who would dismiss my voice or accuse me of having forfeited my right to voice an opinion by not exercising my right to vote. Two, is that voting is a quintessential American activity. And three, having served my country, I feel like maybe I should exercise this right, seeing as how I had been willing to offer my life to help defend it.
What the heck, if my vote doesn't count I'm only wasting a few hours of my time every year or two. At worst, that costs me less than fifty dollars in lost work time and travel expenses.
Kay M. - AMEN to that !!!
I am 100% for more security around voting counting to ensure that what we are selecting is actually getting recorded.
I will try and check out the documentary on HBO.. I love a good DOC!
Thank you for this.
More eyes, more scrutiny, a little redundency...let's do it.
AND, let's make sure, if at all possible, that it is fair, and accurate.
Wilka
That was interesting to learn what is happening in your extremely important state....The machines were thrown out of a lot of precincts here in California as well. I agree, I'd rather sacrifice speed for paper ballots any day.
It seems that the era of the Republican control of dirty machine tricks may be coming to an end, hopefully, although we'll probably still read of horror stories in the general election.
Meanwhile, can't wait for the Ohio (and Texas) primaries of March 4.
In accounting for money the auditor is the linchpin. Voting needs the same security measure.
A U D I T -- sample at least 5% of all precincts, and audit the voting and the machines. Make it mandatory before an election can be certified. Make it FEDERAL law, even though elections are a state responsibility. AUDIT the machines, the ballots, the voter registrations and you end most of the problems with fraud. It also becomes absolutely necessary to have a permanent, tamper proof record of every vote cast. So the problem of votes being lost in cyberspace is gone. Fast may be satisfying, but it is not necessary. Vote counting was once all done by hand by a team of three people, from different political parties if there was more than one team there was an overseer it was slow and cumbersome and not one hundred percent accurate, but it was trustworthy. People can do what machines can do.
Thanks for commenting.
Elsie Duggan - Yup. Voting is always an act of faith. Personally, I had little trust for the booths with levers or knobs. Granted, their mechanical nature made them hard to fiddle with, but they could still be arranged to miscount people's selections. Paper and pen (or even punch card) would be just fine with me.
Thank you for commenting.
Kathy W. - Thanks so much. E'spirit de Wilka. :-)
As for Jen Brunner and Ohio; there is a lot of fear that if to much is actually made over the voting irregularities it would create havoc. Disaffecting voters being one; another would be that companies who provide voting materials would fold, leaving the state in a lurch for future voting cycles.
The Ohio irregularities will only be pursued if someone with significant backing pushes it all the way through to the end. Nobody wants to handle it.
Devin Barber - I find your remark to be uncharacteristically Pollyanna-ish. I know that you know, no one can be truly or completely trusted when it comes to power, money, position or prestige. Some adults will always try and cheat. That's why monitoring, accountability and transparency are always necessary.
Carol (La La Land Queen) D. - It sounds like you voted scan-tron in Oklahoma. Thanks for commenting.
David McGill - Thank you for commenting. It's nice to know I'm not the only person who favors paper ballots and hand counting. As for Ohio's upcoming primary and the impending national election; Yup, I expect there will be plenty of complaints.
Karl Leuba - Right On !!!
BTW - Could you write that up and submit it to the lawmakers for their approval? I'll sign a petition for it. :-)