|
by
Bill's Spirit
Member since:
March 3, 2006 Fixing The U.S. Economy -- Stop Squeezing The Bottom
January 25, 2008 12:20 PM EST
views: 321
|
comments: 39
Here's something government officials (both federal and state) can do to get the economy chugging stronger again: Loosen things up on the struggling classes, again. It is well documented that the wealthy classes have been getting candy and roses for the past seven years. Six figure beneficial tax cuts. Record oil company profits. Huge severance packages for transitional CEOs. Here's a theme that cranks me up: today's CEOs. Hired in, to restructure the company for profit. Usually accomplished by cutting benefits, hours, pay and positions, mostly among the lowest tiers; or they create shut downs in American manufacturing in favor of contracting or purchasing overseas products for less. CEOs that cause great increases in market shares over short runs, then seem to so often sail off in treasured ships just as calculatable storms come assailing company's ports. The tops of the middle classes have been progressing well along; but their bottom half is increasingly afflicted by the sub-prime mortgage crisis, the loss of jobs from downsizing and overseas competition and the vagarities of wage and benefit reductions, when they too often end up with the transitioned role in restructurings. Traditional economic generators for the unemployed in this country were focused on by recent tax enforcement mentalities. Americans managing to earn a few thousand per year by smartly or doggedly working flea market circuits suddenly came under scrutiny and enforcement. The true burden of the fines and licensing requirements place by the government on these minimal earners caused devastating changes in the lives of the groups traditional majority; while the paranoia which enforcement's tactics instilled in the management of these circles caused a tightening of wagons that increasingly shut people out. The action was to require that these people be licensed and suddenly start charging, banking, and forwarding sales taxes for every meager market selling; with receipts and book work all properly marked. The mathematical and paper headaches this caused to the traditional majority of flea marketeers left many suffering from hours lost from other pursuits, and relatively healthy fines for mistakes that we're made. For demographics: if you've been to a flea market consider the number of people who "sell" at flea markets that are economically fringed folks; retired, disabled, no longer usefully skilled. Consider the numbers of aspiring middle class income earners that have been playing their way in. Many discovered these generating markets while suffering a lack of employment. They came to sell the things they'd collected, and discovered a workable world. The lure of making an additional five to ten thousand per year for an average of two weekends per month is very appealing; to the homeless, the transient, the limited income, and to those with house payments, kids in school, and college to buy. The state's motivation, of course, is to increase income by making sure they tap in to every trickle of every economic generator. Let no money be made that the government doth not charge a fee for. Sadly, the bureaucratic overlay stifled many of our nation's struggling (a majority of the traditional players in these generators) right out of participation in these markets. Mathematics indicates that this could only lead to a lowering in the overall economic flow within the state. This is based on the fact that the money those people "were" making before being trapped out, was being circulated into the economy by allowing these folks to pay utilities, rent, something on their debt, and allow them to buy food, clothing and make all manner of other purchases. Without access to these generators, many of these folks will have had to have turned to social services for some, or more, help. It is safe to bet, that the loss to the state by the restrictions placed on these lowest levels of economic flow, has far exceeded what ended up being raised by collecting from those who were capable of adjusting to the hoops. Money is dynamic. If you want to better the economy, you've got to have free flow through ALL of the people, not just the top fifty-one percent. -- 25 January 2008 -- Bill's Spirit is an Artist, Writer, Poet, Philosopher currently wordsmithing from a humble digital forge in small town Ohio. The works of the man behind Bill's Spirit have been published in small alternative and amateur presses since 1986. Before that, they just filled notebooks, decorated walls and gathered dust in piles and boxes. --
To Groups:
!!! The World Is Crazy !!!, .....The Educators Review....., A Place for Opinions, Affairs of the State, Americans 4 America, Americans for America, Both Sides of the Coin, Change the World, Clear Minds Create, Cultural Marxism... and other fun stuff, Deep Thinking and Meanings, Democracy 2.0, Democratic Vision, Devils Advocate, Differing Views, Disabled Veterans, dumping ground for good and bad, Etcetera, Etcetera, Etcetera, Ethics and Life, Fluent Thinkers, Free Thinking, Gather Money Essential, Gather Soup, Gatherers for a More Perfect Union, Gathering on Common Ground, Good ideas, Idiology, Independent Minds, IS IT NICE TO POINT - WELL YES IT IS !!!, It is my Opinion, Journal of Social Commentary, Live Informed, Making A Difference, ONE HUMAN FAMILY, Open Debate, Opinionated Opinions, Our Neighborhood, our neighborhoods, Political Moderates, Political Ohio, Political Open Discussion, Political, Social, and Religious Views Forum, Politics and Social Justice, Post stuff of any kind - whatever comes to your mind!, Progressive Politics, Public Forum, Random Musings, Social Consciousness, Speak your Mind~Anything Goes, Subprime Meltdowners, The Family Diner, The Intellectual Activist, The Political Middle, The Posting Station, The Reader's Lounge, The Real True Americans, The Renewed Activist, The View By You, TrueAmericans, Under the Sun :), United We Stand to Protect Our Liberty, Our Borders and Our Constitution, What's on your Mind, ! Whatever Floats Your Boat (Post Almost Anything), ZZZ Article, ZZZ Photo, ZZZ Video, ZZZ Anything! Points for it all!
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
More by Bill's Spirit |
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 39
I can understand why Hillary side-steps it; much of the mess was left by her husband. But the others should be using that to show us step-by-step plans.
John P - The attitude you expressed "(other than Ron Paul, who, unfortunately, has no chance to win)" could be the thing that defeats him. That is exactly what the Corporate Main Stream Media and the Corporate Politicians in both parties WANT everyone to think and not vote for Ron Paul.
It's the return of the Revenuer mentality.
Although "Professional" Flea Market vendors have always been liable for license, taxes, etc; the rules (or perhaps just the enforcement) was changed to pull those who earned less than twelve thousand per year from this type of endeavor into the sales-tax collecting fold.
Four years ago in Ohio, the then Secretary of State's office sent agents out to the flea markets. They wrote down the license plate numbers of folks marketing, then came back two weeks later, and hassled every person who was repeat selling.
Most of those folks had less than two hundred dollars in sales each weekend; meaning the individual's profit was probably one hundred-fifty dollars or less. Dozens of retired and homeless folks were pressured out of the life building activity that these markets provided by the increased regulatory pressures and headaches (a loss of a few thousand dollars income per year to their pockets), all so that the state could collect a seven percent tax; less than twenty-eight dollars per individual per weekend.
Collectively; I can project that the state quashed a couple hundred million or so in economic flow within its borders (per year) which has to have decreased the state's overall sales-tax revenues, in exchange for forcing a mere one or two million directly from these low income marketers.
Whenever people are pressured out of money making ventures, there is a decrease in the flow of money in the society, and thus, a decrease in the amount of money government entities can pull in, off of monetary transactions.
The pressure on getting their percentage from these markets has led to a downturn in economic activity.
Try again, the largest stockholder in Exxon/Mobile is the New York State Teachers' Retirement System.
The largest stockholder in MOST U.S. companies are retirement systems, primarily civil service retirement systems.
Who supports civil service pension systems?
Taxpayers - little flea-market taxpayers.
All that wealthy just don't fall from the heavens you know.
thanks, Bill, great article!
Several years ago I was eyed by a CEO as the primary candidate for taking over the company's management. Their view was that I had a broad and forward scope of vision, personal attention to detail, and a firm, compassionate, courteous demeanor when dealing with co-workers; the very things that this CEO saw as necessary for handling the multiple fronts of company management effectively.
I made it clear that I wasn't interested.
Moggy K. - You are certainly right. The "wealthy" have always received candy and roses. They've just been getting more of it from the various forms of government in our nation over the past seven years.
Greg Schiller - Thanks for pointing that out, but Cheney is not a member of that investment system; nor, most likely, are any of the other CEOs and high ranking company board members. They, as individuals, have benefited skyrocketingly.
Cheri Cabot - Thanks for the praise.
Jeff H. - 935 lies makes one skeptical; not to mention DDT, Agent Orange, Diebold salesmen and all the Financial-Scandal Gates.
I found it very expected that all the Republican candidates in last nights debate were calling for lower taxes as a way to strengthen the economy. Sure, that's why our economy is doing so dandy right now. For the Republicans, that was sarcasm.
Great comment, micky d. Poorly-written and without any discernible logic.
micky d....the true secret to succees is spellcheck!!!!...just what did you drink for lunch???
You got MY vote!
Kay M. - Glad to hear it.
Kay K. - More like the agony of thoughtless bureaucracy.
micky d. - Thanks for being on topic.
paul w. - You seem to say that as if you didn't think I could do it. :-)
Eric Spindler - Oh God, No !! I don't like spiders, snakes and sharks.
Rex T. - Thanks for sharing your little story. You are exactly right. Personally, I can't understand why the economists the states hire to calculate how well this or that plan will work seem to miss the synergistic side-effects that actions so often bring about.
Too much theory; or blinded by dollar signs?
Interestingly, despite all the increases in fees and regulations, and those same that were impressed on new niches in the medium and low dollar earning ranges, Ohio now finds itself in a crippling budget crunch.
Who would have thought that putting the squeeze on the smallest of monetary trickles would have led to pinching those low and moderate income flows right off of the state's economy. So, it turns out, that in the scheme of a multi-million "people" economy, when one million or so stop spending, selling, providing services for low-level money, the overall economy actually does suffer greatly.
I assume that since the laws didn't directly effect "The Limited" or "Nationwide Insurance Company" or the interests of "Value City" they thought the state's economy would be safe, and that they'd just rake in a few oodles more.
Surprise!!
This is true; but I'm having trouble seeing the relevance of the statement in regards to this article of mine.
The lower earners in our society do have "some" cash that can be squeezed out of them. The problem is that by squeezing them too tight, the government ruined their ability to continually generate low income flows. The method gave some short-term windfalls to the government at the cost of pinching off what was a consistent trickle. A trickle that was magnified in the grand scheme of a state's (or national's) overall economic flow, but that has now dried up considerably.
The Republicans that were in office five years ago in Ohio enjoyed an infusion from their increase in enforcement, and now the state is experiencing the detrimental after-effects of those actions.
There are many things I cannot do, sing soprano, play professional football or dance like Barishnokov(?), but be a CEO? Of course I could! The next question is, would I want to? And in many cases, the answer is no, I don't want to put myself in the position where I must hurt others on a regular basis. Look at Jack Welch. Fantastic manager, but he certainly took actions that hurt others with impunity. To climb the ladder successfully one must put their personal ideals into a blind trust.
Great article! I did not realize the change had been made in this area, negatively effecting many persons.
It is well documented that the wealthy classes have been getting candy and roses for the past seven years. Record oil company profits.
Here is my multiple choice question.
How are "record profits" defined for any company, not just the oil industry???
1) simply add up total receipts, if number is greater than last year it is a record.
2) it is the difference between net and gross, as applied to taxes. By deducting all expenses from total receipts, you discover a "return on investment." (ROI)
Well ??
You are absolutely correct that our "free enterprise" and capitalistic system is such that a corporation will, when it can, build profit. How much? The sky is the limit. One cannot expect these corporations to worry about the best interests of the nation of the best interests of the people as that is not what they were created to do!
And that is why, in order to have a truly civilized society, there must be limitations imposed by the governmental powers to limit this natural progression to insure it is not detrimental to the nation and it's people!
When the oil companies profits exceed the GDP of most nations it's sure to cause a question to arise in the minds of many persons as to whether that is in the best interests of this nation. Most, not all, would define that as excess profits but I acknowledge that ROI has to be a factor in the equation.
The answer is 2, and anyone unable to answer such a question has no business discussing a topic like this.
The fact is, a "record profit" as it pertains to the oil companies is a chimera, as reported.
They simply suggest the total receipts is all profit, when it isn't. Expenses to achieve those sales, MUST be factored into the equation. Exxon had about a 7-8% ROI last year, hardly a "record" year.
In fact, they were about 154 on the list of "most profitable" companies for the year. (2006, most recent year available so far)
YOU probably made a greater profit on your 401K or other investments.
What they mean when they say "record profits" is "a record number of dollars has been received as a result of a retail sale."
That ticket doesn't account for the cost to bring the product to market.
If you are saying that the reported facts are a lie and that oil companies profits were actually just receipts, then say it! It should be known. Truth is truth and does not have to apologize to anyone. Whether it agrees with my philosophy or your philosophy is irrelevant!
I think I did *chuckle*
Look, 10% ROI is 10%-- it doesn't matter what the gross, or even the net TOTAL is-- they're not expressed in constant dollars for one thing, and don't account for mere inflation.
Here's the story---- Exxon 40 billion dollar record profits
Okay, so focus on the 40 billion for a second-- this is the net number, after expenses, reflecting a return on investment.
Has Exxon ever achieved this dollar amount before?? Obviously the answer is NO--- which is why they are calling it a "record" profit, which is misleading.
That same 40 billion also represents a very modest 7-8% ROI--- it is the same number, expressed two different ways, with the 7-8% figure being the more accurate of the two, in that it quantifies the direct relationship between costs, as measured against total receipts.
Exxon invested more than 400 billion dollars to purchase the right to a 40 billion dollar profit. In short, they put up 400 billion, to receive in return, 440 billion. Not an extravagant return, for such an investment.
The reported facts aren't so much a lie, as a half truth, telling only one perspective of the story.
Thanks for the link. One thing we do not know with oil companies is just what their profit is because they can juggle their books, investments, etc. to where now one can follow. The persons the government has employed in the past to monitor the oil companies are ex oil company executives as no one else would understand it and the ex executives are as believable as a fox watching the hen house.
The information in the link was interesting.