Mathematics, Purpose, and Truth
Janna Levin is a professor of physics and astronomy at Barnard College with a special interest in the origins and shape of the universe. She's also the author of a fascinating, beautifully written novel, A Madman Dreams of Turing Machines, that explores boundaries where science presses on great questions of meaning more often taken up by philosophy and theology: the nature of truth, free will, and purpose in life.
SOF via Radio:
» Find your station
SOF OnDemand:
» Listen Now (RA)
» Download (mp3)
» Podcast
SOF via E-mail:
» Sign up for the newsletter
» Find your station
SOF OnDemand:
» Listen Now (RA)
» Download (mp3)
» Podcast
SOF via E-mail:
» Sign up for the newsletter
I picked up Janna Levin's novel off a table at a bookstore, drawn to it initially perhaps because we had just completed our program with Paul Collins and Jennifer Elder on autism. Mathematician Alan Turing ? known as the father of modern computing ? is one of the autistic personalities who was mentioned in that interview. I was immediately taken by Janna Levin's lush prose and the alluring, provocative ideas that she brings to life through human stories in space and time.
A Madman Dreams of Turing Machines sounds depths I had never considered before, between mathematical truths and great existential questions. It does so by probing the parallel lives and ideas of Turing and another pivotal 20th-century mathematician, Kurt Gödel. Turing's discoveries were made possible in part by Gödel, who shook the worlds of mathematics, philosophy, and logic in 1931 with his "incompleteness theorems." They demonstrated that some mathematical truths can never be proven. Or, as Gödel says in Janna Levin's novel, "Mathematics is perfect. But it is not complete. To see some truths you must stand outside and look in." This held unsettling scientific and human implications; it posited hard limits to what we can ever logically, definitively know.
Janna Levin is an atheist, if we care to categorize her. And while that simple fact informs our conversation along with her exquisite intelligence and her mathematical training, we cover territory that can't be bounded by such definitions. Janna Levin's most certain "faith" is in the conviction that we can agree on basic realities described by mathematics ? that 1 plus 1 will always equal 2. Putting God into that equation, or barring God from it, is not her concern. Yet this conversation is a beautiful example of the deep complementarity of religious and scientific questions, if not of answers. The ideas and questions Janna Levin lives and breathes open my mind to new ways of wondering about purpose, meaning, and ultimate reality.
There is much in her thought that I struggle to comprehend and will continue to ponder. I'm intrigued, at the same time, by echoes with the wisdom of ordinary life. Gödel's idea that there are some truths we can only see at an angle ? by standing outside, looking in ? is a fact even in the work I do, of speaking of faith. The deepest truths are usually impossible to see and articulate straight on.
And I feel a kindred pull to Janna Levin's delight and passion in the great narrative of the world and humanity, epitomized in these lines from her book that we read in the program:
"I am looking on benches and streets, in logic and code. I am looking in the form of truth stripped to the bone. Truth that lives independently of us, that exists out there in the world. Hard and unsentimental. I am ready to accept truth no matter how alarming it turns out to be. Even if it proves incompleteness and the limits of human reason. Even if it proves we are not free."Of all the ideas Levin presents, the most provocative and disturbing, perhaps, is her doubt that there is free will in human existence at all. She cannot be sure that we are not utterly determined by brilliant principles of physics and biology. Yet she cleaves more fiercely in the face of this belief to the reality of her love of her children and her hopes and dreams for them. She sees "evidence of our purpose" in figures like Gödel and Turing, even though they did not the find the clarity in life that they wrested from mathematics on all our behalf.
Paradoxically, perhaps, the world feels more spacious to me after this conversation with Janna Levin ? even, to use her words, if it suggests incompleteness and the limits of human reason and faith; even if it suggests we are not free. She possesses a quality that keeps me interviewing scientists as often as a I can ? a delight in beauty, a comfort with mystery, a limitless ambition for one's grandest ideas combined with a humility about them that many religious people could learn from.
I Recommend Reading:
A Madman Dreams of Turing Machines
by Janna Levin
This is a novel of provocative, challenging ideas and an original reflection on human life. It evokes time the way physicists know it ? as relative and curved, with past, present, and future in a fluid interplay. I am a lover of words, and Janna Levin is an artist with words. This is a sophisticated and complex novel, but a delicious read that will energize your mind.



Comments: 13
Sounds like an interesting read.
I'll put it on my ever-growing list of things I'd ilke to read.
Thanks
There is so much what has been thought of and discovered
as sentient beings and written down somewhere, versus
the low level that 99.999 percent of the humans that
exist function at. Someday we'll have to start using our
brains for more than just playing tricks on the world and
each other.
Now he is at MIT consumed with figuring out how to tell where earthquakes originate, partly so the world can know who is testing nuclear weapons where. His body has problems from the hours he spends with his computer. It is this that leads him to spiritual practices such as yoga, as yet for the body wisdom. He was such a hyperactive child, I used to talk him to sleep with progressive yoga relaxation exercises.
I come from a tradition that makes me feel relieved that mathematics is incomplete. As an individual, I am clear about only knowing slivers of "truth" from outside. Maybe I am relieved about that because I am a social person. My curiosity leads me to seek out other slivers.
Though my son's ability to concentrate on code and math verges on seeming as if he has a hyperfunctioning form of autism, he is social as well. He learns best interactively, by his own testimony, though his confidence in his own work lands him in some trouble in the top-down political world of academia.
I am reminded of the work of Temple Grandin, who identifies herself as having Asberger's, a form of autism. While the social issue was more challenging for her than for my son, she now packs in sold-out speaking engagements. One I attended was full at 1,000. When you consider that neurologically typical people (a pejorative for normals by a famous autism researcher) are afraid of public speaking, Temple Grandin's accomplishments by doing this are extraordinary.
It is interesting to contemplate what Turing could have accomplished in times that are gentler for many people who are different.
Thanks.
RE: "Mathematics is perfect. But it is not complete. To see some truths you must stand outside and look in."
One could just as easily substitute "Human Being, Life, Existence, Consciousness or any other relative state of Mind one might care to name for "Mathematics" in this "wonderful quote" and it would be equally Truth.
For a "human being" presently self-identified with a relative state of mind or consciousness, however, to "stand outside and look in" (and thus have the "non-self-referential perspective" necessary to recognize the Innate Perfection of All, including One Self), however, implies a degree of "dying to myself as I think I am" most are as yet unwilling to chance.
PS: A bit of an aside, but not really: I will never be able to think outside the box, until I realize "thinking is the box" and I am not that.