My job and the shorter daylight has made it hard for me to get outside with my camera. Last night, I decided to pull out a box of rocks and shells that I've collected over the years and see what I could produce. I have done very little photography of this sort (well, actually I've done none) so I recognize that these are rather primitive attempts that I hope will evolve into something more interesting with time.
Sea Shell

Rocks

Black Rock on Sea Glass

I am very interesting in receiving feedback and opinions about this.


Comments: 42
John - you don't need to know a thing about photography. It's all about whether something appeals to you or not.
Faith - I still have a lot of work to do on the lighting. I am thinking of experimenting with a lightbox (which is exactly what it sounds like - a box with a light in it) to see if I can get better results. These were taken with only the lights that are above the kitchen table.
Deb - I think the others were too much and so decided to go with the simpler shots. Yes, it will be interesting to see what Pam has to say.
John - that idea intrigues me - I think I'll play around with it - thanks.
Old Crow - I really don't know much about photography either - I only know what I like and what I don't like. It's all about experimentation and learning what works and what doesn't. Last night I took 79 photos and only feel really good about these three.
The Photographers Review
John - it is good to see you in these parts again - I hadn't realized how much I'd missed your quirkiness until now.
CC - I guess the beauty of photography as that it is up to the viewer to define what they are seeing ;-) And thanks for adding the second comment.
Rose - they are primitive, awkward attempts to move into a realm in which I am not yet comfortable - inspired but not comfortable. I was thinking today that it would be fun to play with different textures in the background and that piece of amethyst is very interesting if I can get the light to hit it just right. And no doubt, I will keep sharing :-)
The shots are clear.
On the shell I would take a shot of the end of the shell where it spirals.
Try taking a picture of just one side of the rock with the crystals in it, the black and the sparkle of the crystal would be interesting.
The pile of green and black rocks need to be mixed up a bit more, maybe two green and the one black stacked on top of each other in a tower type shape.
I am no expert, not even close, but I would experiment from all angles, close ups on just a part of the stones that are multi colored...perhaps the shell sitting in sand partially buried. Just ideas....do what feels good.
The first one, the snail shell, did not impress me. The angle was off for me and the monotones didn't highlight the shell as much as detract from the overall photo. I like the shell well enough and the fact that it was matte and not shiny but it seemed to lack texture that I know you could capture but wasn't quite all the way there for me.
The second photo, (as if I know what I'm talking about), is a good juxtaposition of rocks within a trio but the background texture led my eye away from the focal point. I wanted to concentrate on the trio of rocks yet that textural background kept drawing me away. Have you considered placing these objects on a piece of glass or mirror or even shiny tile? If I ignore the textural issue, I am pleased with the composition of the rocks with the color standing aside and the marbling taking center stage. I would have liked seeing more than the cut sides of these objects as well though.
Ah, now the last photo. As an aging woman with bifocals, it was too upclose and in my face. I didn't like the angle. Rather than feeling like I was gazing down onto the stones, I would have preferred a lateral view highlighting the green colors and black but also adding more shadowy pockets in the composition.
Have I been critical enough? I'm feeling feisty, my friend. I like the general direction but I know you are capable of better images than these in a still life study. Yep, I'm sure of it. I love your work.
Have you tried to photograph the green sea glass and black stone under a bit of running water? I saw one of pebbles that you did under water, and liked it a lot. I'd be tempted to create simple scenes as a background for these images. I know nothing about photography so feel free to ignore these ideas.
She's right on. I'm impressed with her eye for details. I couldn't have been as thorough or as coherent. She's more than a great cook, ain't she?
These photos look more like close-ups to me. As with any subject that is worthy of our lens' attention, lighting, focus, composition, etc., are always contributing factors that can make or break an otherwise great still life or close-up shot.
You start by telling us straight out that this is your first attempt at this genre. This type of observation is so different from panoramic or nature photography. Take your time. Shoot thousands of images in variant compositions. Count your blessings that it is digital and you're not having to buy film and development gear. And let your talent and good eye guide you.
And, of course, share your progress with us.
But I think that placement means a lot in these shots. I like the shell best, somehow there is a lot of movement in this still shot.
And it reminds me of the Divine Proportion!
This is very different from most photography because taking a lot of pictures isn't much help.
Laurun - I'm hoping that I will be inspired at some point to find the beauty in the mundane. For now, I think that starting with objects where the beauty is already apparent will allow me to retrain my eye for this different style of photography. Who knows if it will be successful but I do know I'll have fun trying.
Nippy - you are quite right that different backgrounds would be quite useful. I used what was on hand for these (a white paper towel) but will look around and see what else may provide more interest.
d m - I suppose placement is everything, as is lighting, as is perspective, as is...... :-)
Ina - I'll be sure to keep y'all posted :-)
Pam - they are close-ups, but can't they also be still life? I've always been fascinated with the details so that is probably where my attention will wander.
Duckie - yes, Madame D is certainly more than just a great cook :-)
Ruth - I love the idea of introducing water - I will play around with that - thanks.
Madame D - I love it! Thanks for taking so much time to critique these. As always, I do value your input and you've expanded my thinking in terms of backgrounds and texture. I also realize that I am going to have really experiment with lighting as the camera I use does tend to create grainier images with lower levels of light, especially if it is artificial.
Thanks Roy - I guess I am drawn to simplicity as well and honestly the shot I like best is the shell.
Lisa - if you have a moment, I'd love to hear more about the lightbox you made.
Jan - now that's an interesting take on it - I wondered whether the green sea glass would suggest some kind of jelly candy.
Thanks flit.
Thanks Bob - I am intrigued to see where this goes.
Anne - thanks - I am hoping to improve on that a little with better lighting. We'll see.
Katherine - thanks - it helps to see these through another's eyes. I think I will definitely play with different angles on the shells and me just take those rocks one at a time to see what I can create.
CC - no worries. John does that to people :-)