
My son-in-law called me from Northeast Iowa as soon as he got home from his caucus this evening. It was the first time he and his folks had participated in a caucus. In the past they has always supported Republicans, who do a simple straw vote in Iowa, but decided they wanted to support Obama, so the process was new to them.
He said it was reported to be the largest caucus turnout ever in his district, a report that seems to be reverberating throughout the state. When the tally was done, he said 40% supported Obama with Edwards coming in second and Clinton close behind. He also mentioned that Edwards picked up the most "second choice" votes, a strategy the he had been counting on.
Shortly after speaking to my son-in-law, both of my Iowa correspondents, Bruce in eastern Iowa and Larry in central Iowa, checked in via e-mail. Here are their reports.
I just got home from my caucus and I'm completely wiped out. Cheri -- If you want to include any of my thoughts in your blog, you may have to tweak my comments and smooth out the rough edges because I'm exhausted and I'm probably not making a lot of sense right now. It was probably the largest neighborhood caucus I've ever attended, with an official count of 273 packed into the multi-purpose room at Fellows Elementary School. There were a lot of newbies there and the precinct leader, although a veteran of these events, had a hard time in controlling the huge crowd. I won't go into all the details, but the Hillary people really ticked me off with their obnoxious and pushy attitudes --- but that's another story for another day. Unfortunately, our Richardson preference group wasn't viable and we were unable to pick up enough people during the thirty-minute re-alignment period. Most of us in the Richardson group -- including yours truly -- moved over to the Edwards camp. I won't even go into the mess we had with the numbers counting because I'm too tired and I need to have a light snack and hit the hay. When the dust finally settled, it was Edwards 92, Obama 92, and Clinton 89. Obama picked up an extra delegate on the coin flip, which is a whole other story. My wife, Pat, who has been a Edwards supporter all along will be moving on as delegate and I'm going to be an Edwards alternate. I'm tired, I'm hungry.....and that's all for now.
--Larry
Hi guys,
We had 292 people at our precinct which was far and away a record. This bodes good for the Dems. We ended up distributing the 10 delegates by awarding 4 to Obama, 3 to Clinton, and 3 to Edwards. I think Edwards and Obama picked up more of the groups that weren't viable. My son-in-law went to observe and got to see some interesting things. Their were about 24 people for Richardson and they really hung together hoping to make a deal. He said the Biden people had about 22 and Dodd only 4. Three of the Dodd people were our friends and neighbors...the son came over to Obama and his parents went to Edwards. At the very last, some of the Richardson folks left in a bit of a huff and most of the rest went to Edwards. I think Obama picked up more of the Biden folks than did Hillary. I declined the opportunity to try to get a delegate or alternative delegate spot to the county convention. My neighbor across the street is going as an Obama delegate.
Bruce
A final note about the Iowa caucuses.
There are unending articles and comments that Iowa should not have such political clout because they are a small state and not a good representation of the rest of the country.
In reality, all the other states are pissed off that they didn't jump on that bandwagon years ago. Now, after years of hard work and nurturing, Iowa has made their caucuses an important political tool by locking in the First in the Nation status. It is now a huge financial boon to the entire state. Not only the candidates pouring in money, but all the entourage that follows. Food, lodging, and fuel all bring huge amounts of needed revenue into the state. Both the state and national Democratic Committees recognized the value of pointing the spotlight on the unique Iowa caucuses, and it has paid off.
Except for every four years, most of the country ignores Iowa. It's a place they fly over on their way to one coast or the other. It's often confused with Idaho, or Ohio. Most people are not even sure where it is, except "somewhere in the Midwest".
So, every four years, Iowans tolerate unending political calls, TV and radio ads, and campaigners knocking on doors. They are very polite to all the candidates and reporters and photographers. They work hard at campaigning themselves and work at the caucuses, and exhausting job as evidenced by the e-mails. They listen, read and discuss politics and take their job as "First in the Nation, Second to None" very seriously, because they understand that for a few months every four years the spotlight is on them, they have a great deal of influence, and for just a little while the rest of the world takes them seriously.
To all you naysayers I say, leave Iowa alone. Stop being a bully because your state is bigger, has a larger population and more money. That doesn't mean your state is better prepared or educated to host the earliest political vote. Instead of complaining that a smaller state has become a political powerhouse of sorts, why don't you listen to what they have to say, and maybe...just maybe, you might learn something.
Cheri Cabot, Politics Correspondent
Cheri's column, "Personal About Politics", published every week, will reflect on how the life of a 58 year-old, middle class woman is affected by politics, policy and the current state of the nation - a look at the personal aspects of politics. The articles will be posted to Politics.gather.com as part of Gather Essentials.
Cheri is a freelance writer, living in Southern California. She has two grown children, one in Iowa and one at Columbia University, and is the proud grandmother of two. Cheri is also a purveyor of fine coffee, warm chatter and dry wit.
You can find all of Cheri's columns on Personal About Politics at www.ccabot.gather.com.
|
by
Cheri Cabot
Member since:
April 4, 2006 Personal About Politics: Report From Inside the Iowa Caucuses
January 04, 2008 01:54 AM EST
(Updated: January 04, 2008 10:41 AM EST)
views: 115
|
rating: 9.6/10
(24 votes)
|
comments: 38
Tags:
essentials politics corp,
democrats,
politics gather essentials politics corp,
politics today,
politics gather essentials,
huckabee,
news,
edwards,
the news cafe,
clinton,
personal about politics,
government,
presedential elections,
iowa,
obama,
random musings,
affairs of the state,
us politics,
liberals,
gather essentials,
iowa caucuses,
people,
gather essentials us politics
To Groups:
Affairs of the State, Americans 4 America, Authors' Meeting Place, backtalk, California Yankee at Gather, Comment the news, Democratic Vision, Election 2008, Ethics and Life, Gather News Essential, Gather Politics Essential, Gathering on Common Ground, Intelligent politics, Mark's Point, Moments, Moonbats-R-Us, Political, Social, and Religious Views Forum, politics and international news, Politics and Social Justice, Politics Corps, Politics Today, Post anything from your life! I mean ANYTHING!!!~, Post! Post! Post! Post! Post! Anything - article, images, video, Purely Political, The View By You
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
You might also likeMore by Cheri Cabot |
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16836, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 38
As for the small state issue, the really early caucuses and primaries in small states used to be quaint, but that was days when before most voters had any say in the selection process and the delegates sent to the nominating conventions were selected by political machines and were not bound by the results of any elections. Give me one good reason why the votes of Iowans should count any more that the votes of the residents other states? Pennsylvania being the last big state to have a primary, I can only hope it makes any difference whether or not I vote in the presidential primary. Its a form of disenfranchment as far as I am concerned. Being able to vote has little meaning if the the results of an election can't affect the outcome! Yes. I am angry, and I have every right to be! I hope that as a result of the mess this election has become, we will finally establish a national primary day.
Unfortunately for the Democratic Party, they seem to be adept at picking losers, a lot, so I'm not sure I see how it has paid off, exactly for the party, but at least they saw through Clinton. I hope that particular trend holds true. I am, of course, disappointed Edwards did not win there, as it probably spells serious trouble for his campaign, Obama and Clinton being much better funded, and much better organized in New Hampshire, but then they were in Iowa, too. If there's any ting of sour grapes in this post, it comes by it entirely naturally, sorry.
I am pleased!
It was interesting to see that some people are really good about office work and calling people on the phone, other people are really good at intensely trying to recruit undecided folks, while I saw myself as welcoming people into our group and keeping an eye out for folks who might wander off. Others were good at doing the math to figure out how many folks were needed to get a certain number of the allotted delegates.
A Richardson supporter mentioned later that he was bothered by the fact that 6% of the people there supported Richardson but once the delegates are chosen he ends up with a zero. I can see his point. It was also sad that such fine people as Dodd and Biden have already had to drop out of the race.
Cheri - enjoyed the commentary. Thanks once again.
Hey, don't they grow potatoes in Iowa?
Great comments, Bruce.
As to the Democrats, the result was pretty much as I expected with the exception of Edwards and Clinton being so close. I never believed the polls, which seemed to come out almost every day. I thought all along that Obama would win but I truly believed Edwards would come in a strong second and Hillary would fair poorly. It goes to show you the polls are meaningless. You have to watch as much of the coverage as possible, listen to NPR, check out some of the lesser known websites who also offered live streaming coverage of the caucuses and who thought, as I did, the poll numbers would be meaningless in the end.
Thanks Cheri for all you have done and all you do. Change will be a continuing theme, not only in the Democratic circles but in the Republican as well. The turnout for Huckabee was a clear vote against George Bush and although I intend to push for the Democrats, I was glad to see those Republicans calling for change too.
"A Richardson supporter mentioned later that he was bothered by the fact that 6% of the people there supported Richardson but once the delegates are chosen he ends up with a zero."
Bruce, it's a point made in many systems, not a fault of the caucus method . . . it's reflected in most of the Primary elections as well. A candidate from California (my state) votes in a General election and even if 49% go for one candidate . . . he (or she) gets 0 . . . a true winner take all system.
Always a pleasure Cheri!
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
The Iowa caucuses gave us a fascinating political evening and though I'm not officially an Obama supporter at this point (I'm leaning towards Edwards right now), I'm thrilled to see that the huge failure of Bushco across the board has finally brought out the younger voters. Hopefully they will continue to turn out and we won't have to survive another failure of a repub presidency a year from now.
The people I met were amazing. There were alot of first time caucus goers....and not just the young people. I met a couple in their mid 40's who had never been to a caucus before. Considering it was cold and windy I think that says a lot about Iowans....we take our First in the Nation status serious enough to brave the elements to get out and vote.
I'm so encouraged by the turnout. Fantastic.
People are motivated and participating!
I have no problem with Iowa being the first political bellwether state. I have a much, much greater problem with NH, since it's a representative population of the wealthy and white, and since the entire attitude about having the "first in the nation primary" rubs me as wrong as it's possible to be (boy, am I looking forward to the response I'm sure that'll get). We'll never find a single state in the US that's representative of the country's entire population, so Iowa, for me, is as good as any and better than most. Thanks again for great reporting!
I talked to my mom tonight. She was out in western Iowa. Her precinct only had 20 people show up and were to elect 2 delegates. She and only one other person were for Obama. She first went to a small group of Biden folks but eventually only Clinton and Edwards got a delegate.