On November 2, 2007, news anchorman David Frost of Al Jazeera's international English language network, interviewed the now-deceased former Prime Minister of Pakistan, Benazir Bhutto.
If anyone reading this has never heard of this interview, you may probably find the fact that you haven't just as striking as I did when I first saw this video this morning.
The reason why this is striking is because at 3:57 into the video, David Frost asks Mrs. Bhutto to elaborate on a claim she had made earlier in the interview, pertaining to her having specific knowledge about certain individuals whom she suspected may have been invloved in a previous attempt on her life.
During her response to that question, beginning at 4:22 into the video, Mrs. Bhutto says:
"...and he also had dealings with Omar Sheikh, who murdered Usama bin Laden."
View the footage from the interview here
For some strange reason, the response one might expect from a Western news anchorman giving this interview -- something like: "Hold up, hold up, hold up... WHAT?! Murdered WHO?!" -- was conspicuously absent.
Even stranger still, the fact that on the BBC version of this interview, available on their website (view here), the only part of the interview that is edited out is the approx. 20 seconds where Bhutto makes the mention of Osama bin Laden having been murdered by a man named Omar Sheikh.
And, as anyone who is cognizant of the Twilight Zone-esque quality of the whole government/mainstream media Establishment state of affairs throughout the contrived, foisted "Global War on Terror" might expect; there has thus far not been so much as a single solitary peep about this on the American "mainstream" media -- despite the hours upon hours of coverage her recent asassination has received on all of the major national cable news networks.
It seems to me that this is Bigtime News and ought to be splattered all over newspaper headlines throughout the Western Hemisphere, and should have been the main topic of major media network newscasts since the day the interview was aired.
This interview happened way back on November 2nd!!!
One might want to ask themselves why hasn't this been all over the media? Why is this being covered up by the media networks, and presumably our government? What else might they be hiding from us?
And, in light of the fact that our government/media establishment has in the past tried to pawn off obvious fraudulent videos with Osama bin Laden look-alikes -- including the most obvious one in November 2001 with a 40 lbs. overweight, right-handed "bin Laden" wearing jewelry and claiming responsibility for 9/11 -- I for one would like to know; what the hell is going on?
Is there anyone in our entire federal behemoth who knows and is willing to tell the people the truth for a change? Is there anyone in the entire "mainstream media" apparatus with the guts and the integrity to tell the people just what in the hell is up?
And does this perhaps shed a different light on the assassination of Benazir Bhutto? Did her apparent tendency to let cats out of the bag prove to make her too much of a risk to keep around?
And of course, the one question that I would love most to have answered; How long has the real Osama been dead?
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 36
I gave up believing those guys long ago and I've known along along those tapes were bubblegum. They are an insult to our intelligence.
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977216608&nav=Namespace
Yeah, their whole masquerade has been coming apart at the seams for a while. But they've been able to keep up the farce for the most part; after all, they control the airwaves.
It is this kind of stuff, right here, that is the reason they're pushing through these "homegrown terrorism prevention" bills that will eventuially snuff out freedom of speech and the free flow of information on the Internet.
It is nothing less than astonishing......How did you discover it?....
Whether it is true or not, it is definitely an indication (like we needed more) of how gutless our mainstream media has become.
Wouldn't you just like to take them by the throat and shake them and say why don't you do your job?
On the other hand, it points up the value of blogs and the fact that a number of people wouldn't be aware of this without your expertise in bringing it out....
Thanks, Steve...this is the news scoop of the year, and on the very last day....
by jJack Midknight |December 30, 2007 09:24 AM EST
rating: 10 | comments: 9
I posted this story before the fecal matter known as bachman, and before Olga. Of course, I'm just some idiot-- the fecal matter known as bachman is a delicate genius.
If you want the news, while it's still news, you should be reading MY stuff.
And what has earned me such an unwarranted insult?
In all the threads where you and I have been in harsh disagreement, have I ever resorted to such childish namecalling?
Gee, I wonder why nobody wants to read "your stuff?"
"And what has earned me such an unwarranted insult?"
This is all he's capable of. He's an angry, frustrated, mentally disturbed, infantile, genetic defect who's simply not able to carry on intelligent conversations with anyone that dares to disagree with him. It stems from his pathetic lack of character.
My initial thought after Bhutto was killed was that the Pakistani government was involved, and that led me to recall that the former head of Pakistani intelligence had wired $100,000 to the alleged ring leader of 9/11, less than a month before the attacks. The US government never bothered to follow up on that "little" lead, and the 9/11 commission later said that they didn't find the link worthy of consideration. Imagine that. Somebody with a direct funding link to the alleged 9/11 attacks, and the group that was assembled to supposedly provide us with answers decided that it wasn't worthy of following.
This entire GWOT has been a fraud from the moment that they rolled out the catastrophic false flag event that triggered it. It's the critical tool that was required in order to pry our civil liberties from us, cripple our economy, and enslave us.
The 9/11 Commission's exact words were that the identity of the people who funded the operation were "of little importance."
Can you imagine? It is of monumental importance! I can't think of any aspect of the investigation that could possibly be of more importance!
The 9/11 Commission Report is a complete fraud. It's a whitewash cover-up; all the evidence required to recognize this fact is in the report itself.
But for anyone not completely convinced; I highly recommend David Ray Griffin's "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions" and also "Debunking 9/11 Debunking." Both books completely dissect every detail and aspect of the 9/11 Commission cover-up as well as the crime itself. They are both painstakingly researched and constitute a devastating blow to the official conspiracy theory; unraveling the whole shoddy web of lies one thread at a time.
what event, would THAT be super hero ???
I'm glad to see even you know the ISG was a joke in sage's clothing.
Of course; don't bother to even attempt to make a reasoned argument or bring up a specific point you disagree with.
That might entail some real independent thought, as opposed to just dismissing a priori anything that doesn't conform to the foisted media manuscript we've been fed.
Care to elaborate? or just toss out some ham-handed, petty insult and pretend like you made a point?
Anyway, nothing in your article shocks me. I watch the BBC alot - it's enlightening. Our entire mainstream media system is a joke now. They've been beaten into submission.
Why would anyone cover this? It would create cracks in the big boogyman we're all supposed to give up our civil liberties to be protected from.
I always like to see someone rolling around in the muck and mire just for kicks....
Fascinating article. Why aren't we celebrating in the streets about Bin Laden? After all, isn't this public enemy #1?
Apparently you are much like the dog in Pavlov's famous experiments. You must be hit over the head with information redundantly before anything sinks in and you are able to respond properly. *chortle*
He and so many other rabid knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing wingnuts around here are incapable of rational, intelligent response. After seeing this very predictable pattern for the past years, I've become convinced that a pre-requisite to becoming a republican is to undergo surgery to have large segments of the brain removed, so that they can blindly go along with an agenda that serves against their own best interests.
How else to explain the bizarre behavior of denigrating all that doesn't fit into their own tiny little world, without even so much as attempting to produce a rational thought to justify that position?
I suspect that these rabid, delusional wingnuts are here to remind us just how harmful a steady diet of reichwing propaganda can be.
There are blindingly obvious reasons why things are being covered up:
CIA/ US government support for the Mujahadeen and support for the Pakistani government and ISI during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. The Mujahadeen including amongst others Bin Laden.
ISI and Pakistani government support for the Taleban during the Taleban's years of terrorist rule in Afghanistan.
The 100,000....
What secrets do the Pakistani government hold which threaten Bush and/or the US government? It seems as though Musharraf has Bush's arm firmly up his back and we are left wondering why....
It seems MI6 has a real talent for provocateur operations and covert subversion.
British Special Forces Caught Carrying Out Staged Terror in Iraq?
Paul Joseph Watson | September 20 2005
"In another example of how the Iraqi quagmire is deliberately designed to degenerate into a chaotic abyss, British SAS were caught attempting to stage a terror attack and the media have dutifully shut up about the real questions surrounding the incident.
What is admitted is that two British soldiers in Arab garb and head dress drove a car towards a group of Iraq police and began firing. According to the Basra governor Mohammed al-Waili, one policeman was shot dead and another was injured. Pictured below are the wigs and clothing that the soldiers were wearing."
The Arab garb is obviously undeniable proof that the operation, whatever its ultimate intention, was staged so that any eyewitnesses would believe it had been carried out by Iraqis.
This has all the indications of a frame up.
This is made all the more interesting by the fact that early reports cited as originating from BBC World Service radio stated that the car used contained explosives. Was this another staged car bombing intended to keep tensions high? As you will discover later, the plan to keep Iraq divided and in turmoil is an actual policy directive that spans back over two decades.
The BBC reports that the car did contain, "assault rifles, a light machine gun, an anti-tank weapon, radio gear and medical kit. This is thought to be standard kit for the SAS operating in such a theatre of operations."
And are fake bushy black wigs and turbans standard kit for the SAS? What happened to the early reports of explosives? Why has the media relentlessly reported on the subsequent rescue effort and failed to address these key questions?..."
The two SAS agents were eventually broken out of a Basra prison by British military using a bulldozer, after the Iraqi judge apparently refused to play ball.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1037.htm
Just as phony as the one from December 2001 with the overweight, dark-skinned, wide-nosed, right-handed, jewelry-wearing "bin Laden" admitting responsibility for 9/11. Just as phony as the one with the trimmed-beared, Grecian formula-using "bin Laden" talking about neo-cons and Noam Chomsky from September of last year.