What impact will the assassination of Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto have on the US presidential race? The simple answer is: none at all. For sure, the presidential candidates from both parties, who may have had a couple of conversations with Bhutto in the past, are trying to score political brownie points over those opponents who cannot claim this dubious privilege. It may make them appear more 'presidential', but they know it is just a passing blimp that holds no interest for the average American voter. It is a sound bite that will soon be forgotten.
It may surprise them to know that what they say matters even less to the people most affected ? those living in South Asia (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh). The average Joe in this region knows that, whoever wins the election in 2008, the US Pakistan policy will remain the same. Yes, the new president will make all the right noises about how important it is to put Pakistan on the road to democracy, but he or she will continue to adopt a policy that is best for America; not what is best for Pakistan.
There is nothing wrong with that, per se. Almost all nations of the world give priority to their own self interest. What annoys people in this region is the ingrained hypocrisy in the pronouncements of the US government. Like now, for instance, the Bush administration is publicly urging President Musharaff to hold free and fair elections, blah-blah, while simultaneously reassuring the dictator that the billions of dollars of American aid will continue to flow; no matter what. The Pakistani public is not fooled. It knows that Musharaf remains in power only at the pleasure of the US President. If America is serious about restoring democracy in Pakistan, all it needs to do is withdraw the support that has propped up the general for the past six years.
The Pakistani public anger at the US is intermingled with scorn. For the past six years, Musharaff has deluded the US Administration into believing that all those billions of dollars and sophisticated armaments that have been flowing into his coffers like an open tap are being put to good use fighting the Taliban and Al Qaeda. The reality, which is apparent to everyone but Bush, is that most of the money has been diverted for domestic use and the bulk of the armaments are meant to face down Pakistan's traditional foe, India. This is not Pakistani scuttlebutt, but the findings of reputed American intelligence agencies.
Consider what is happening on the ground. The Taliban, far from being finished, are regrouping and stronger than ever. If they did have a safe haven in Pakistan's frontier region, into which they could escape and recuperate ? and where American and NATO forces are forbidden to pursue them - it is probable that the Taliban would have been decimated by now. The general has put on occasional shows of killing or capturing a few dozen Al Qaeda foot soldiers ? to make sure the money keeps coming from an obliging Bush - but the guys who call the shots and plan the attacks are safely ensconced in Pakistan's North West region. Yes, Al Zawahari and his "martyrs" are now biting Musharaff in the ass, but the resurgent Al Qaeda is a Frankenstein's monster the general himself has nurtured over the years.
It is possible that, subsequent to Bhutto's assassination, events in Pakistan may spiral out of control ? even for the US. What is increasingly clear is that, no matter which way the political situation resolves itself, it will not be good for America. If I may make an analogy, Musharaff is Bush's Enron. Billions of dollars invested, with zero returns. After Bush loses his day job, it is doubtful that he will be taken on as the CEO of a major corporation. The more likely scenario is that he will be put out to pasture. My heart bleeds for him.


Comments: 49
Bhuttos who talk about democracy in Pakistan don't seem to have democracy in their own party. Democracy is just label to be used to have western support on ur side when u r power hungry.
That's where his ass has needed to be for the last 4 yrs...Matter of fact he should have just skipped the Presidency and went straight to the pasture...My heart don't bleed a drop..
If this is, indeed, the case, and/or if Americans believe this is the case, then how can you say that her assassination will have no impact on the race?
I realize what I just said is a total contradiction to supposed policy but think about it...If the middle East is stabilized, then what excuse do we have for being there and stealing their shit....NONE....
God forbid we should not have a reason to f**k with people's govts/resources/land/property....
What would would the US GOVT do if they had to take care of their own for once....
Shit on themselves, that's what they would do....There is no money in taking care of our citizens just screwing the rest of the world....
Wake Up....
My rant against Musharraf can be found here on gather at "an election with only one candidate- Pakistan" Ultimately, I find myself thinking that some of Bhutto's blood is sticking to Musharraf's hands, and I do not want that blood to end up on the hands of the USA when we next shake his hand.
What a shame!!!
As my friend Alexander would say:
Keep Up the Watch......
The blood is already there. I would bet you my life on that!!!
The CIA has:
Corrupted democratic elections in Greece, Italy and dozens of other nations;
Been involved to varying degrees in at least 35 assassination plots against foreign heads of state or prominent political leaders.
Successful assassinations include democratically elected leaders like:
Salvador Allende (Chile)
Patrice Lumumba (Belgian Congo);
CIA-created dictators like Rafael Trujillo (Dominican Republic)
Ngo Dinh Diem (South Vietnam);
Unsuccessful attempts range from Fidel Castro to Charles De Gaulle.
Helped launch military coups that toppled democratic governments, replacing them with brutal dictatorships or juntas.
The list of overthrown democratic leaders includes:
Mossadegh (Iran, 1953),
Arbenz (Guatemala, 1954),
Velasco and Arosemena (Ecuador, 1961, 1963),
Bosch (Dominican Republic, 1963),
Goulart (Brazil, 1964),
Sukarno (Indonesia, 1965),
Papandreou (Greece, 1965-67),
Allende (Chile, 1973), and dozens of others.
Undermined the governments of Australia, Guyana, Cambodia, Jamaica and more;
Supported murderous dictators like General Pinochet (Chile), the Shah of Iran, Ferdinand Marcos (Philippines), "Papa Doc" and "Baby Doc" Duvalier (Haiti), General Noriega (Panama), Mobutu Sese Seko (Ziare), the "reign of the colonels" (Greece), and more;
Created, trained and supported death squads and secret police forces that tortured and murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians, leftists and political opponents, in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Haiti, Bolivia, Cuba, Mexico, Uruguay, Brazil, Chile, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Iran, Turkey, Angola and others;
And all in the name of Democracy....Gimme a f***in break.....Key word here folks is DEMOCRACY and yet they have taken out mutitudes of democratic govts because it didn't suit big business and this countries ELITE couldn't make money....
TRUE Democracy means law and order....as long as there are checks and balances the corrupt cannot survive....Why do you think we are in such horrible shape...
The checks and balances have disapeared in this country and so has TRUE DEMOCRACY
It's our fault this shit is happening...OUR FAULT....Cause you believe the "HYPE"....You believe the bullshit....
GOD, (and I don't even believe in him) AMERICA WAKE THE F**K UP and take our country back
I watched a panel discuss Bhutto on public tv the other day - there was a Pakistani gentleman on (wish I could remember his name) that insisted that most of Pakistani's people fared very poorly when Bhutto was in power in the past, that she ran an elistist type government, similar to Musharaff's goverment, where a small percentage of monied people were the only ones to really benefit from the government with their support of capitalism and the economy in the country. I find it interesting that Bhutto could actually bequeath the leadership of the party to her son - doesn't a true democracy allow the people to choose the new leader? Sounds more like a monarchy to me.
You are SO right, Todd. We are no longer a democracy - we are a pure capitalist society where the government is run by the corporations. Why do you think Cheney met with the heads of the energy companies prior to invading Iraq? To check and double check their wish list for taking over the oil in the region and dividing it up.
It's ALL about the money in this country. We are getting farther and farther away from a democracy and having the people have any sort of control over what happens. They are now able to take over and control the media with the latest FCC ruling. Information is power - they will now control the information that gets out to the people and with the dumbing down of the populace in this country, they will have completely annihilated any chance at having a democracy in the future.
And I wonder what Cheney has to say....Probably nothing, his boys just got new and better contracts, I'm sure...
Spot on, Todd.
The AWOL in Chief has already been enjoying the longest vacations of any President the nation has ever had.
Please, once again let me remind you all what this (Not Bush, but the govt itself) govt has done throughout time....Please wake up!!!!!
That should have read:
Please, once again let me remind you all what this (Not just Bush's, but all of them for the past 70 yrs) govt has done ....Please wake up!!!!!
What I hope, is that some people (even a few in each district) will use this as a wakeup call to listen more intently to the foreign policy sections of candidate platforms. All education is good.
Very blunt and to the point article. The picture of Benazir in your article is very flattering to her good looks...what a waste. She had no business sticking her head out of an armoured car. I just think this is a female version of Islamic martyrdom..equally bad for the average citizen of the world.
Ranger - I understand your frustrations - please run for the office of the President of USA. I may then get out and vote...the whole system is corrupt and controlled by the INVISIBLE HAND?
It pleases me to hear your collective anger and frustration with what is happening to our national identity. The tone of this discussion reminds me of 1968. It also reminds me that back then it took civil disobedience to initiate change.
Some of you sound like you might be about ready to pick up the brick that gets thrown the window at Haliburton... this too, I applaud.
Political assassinations often provoke violent responses and there is usually collateral damage. It will be interesting to see how the Bhutto killing plays out in the presidential campaign.
It is incredibly important that we all participate in the affairs of our country. Real change comes with a cost. I worry that most of us are so protective of our rich and cozy lifestyles that we have become too afraid to throw the brick.
There is a song on the "Beatles" white album that addresses exactly what needs to happen in this country, I'm sure those of you who are over 40 know what I'm talking about...Better yet, let me share this with you....
For a price I'd do about anything
Except pull the trigger
For that I'd need a pretty good cause
Then I heard of Dr. X
The man with the cure
Just watch the television
Yeah, you'll see there's something going on
Got no love for politicians
Or that crazy scene in D.C.
It's just a power mad town
But the time is ripe for changes
There's a growing feeling
That taking a chance on a new kind of vision is due
I used to trust the media
To tell me the truth, tell us the truth
But now I've seen the payoffs
Everywhere I look
Who do you trust when everyone's a crook?
Revolution calling
Revolution calling
Revolution calling you
(There's a) Revolution calling
Revolution calling
Gotta make a change
Gotta push, gotta push it on through
I'm tired of all this bullshit
They keep selling me on T.V.
About the communist plan
And all the shady preachers
Begging for my cash
Swiss bank accounts while giving their
Secretaries the slam
They're all in Penthouse now
Or Playboy magazine, million dollar stories to tell
I guess Warhol wasn't wrong
Fame fifteen minutes long
Everyone's using everybody, making the sale
I used to think
That only America's way, way was right
But now the holy dollar rules everybody's lives
Gotta make a million doesn't matter who dies
Revolution calling
Revolution calling
Revolution calling you
(There's a) Revolution calling
Revolution calling
Gotta make a change
Gotta push, gotta push it on through
I used to trust the media
To tell me the truth, tell us the truth
But now I've seen the payoffs
Everywhere I look
Who do you trust when everyone's a crook?
Revolution calling
Revolution calling
Revolution calling you
(There's a) Revolution calling
Revolution calling
Gotta make a change
Gotta push, gotta push it on through
From what I read Mr. Gouiduck should be off everyone's list as of now if not earlier.
......It is what we do best....
The idiotarian Carter allowed all this when he allowed Pakistan to enrich Uranium.
You seem intelligent. Why is the Islamic world so far behind in science and technology and medicine, etc... We all know Muslims are as smart as any other people.
I disagree that the next U.S. president doesn't make a difference for our policy toward Pakistan. I believe someone like Obama or Richardson realizes how harmful our support of Musharaff has been and is likely to stop supporting him and insist on a democratic alternative. Someone like Giuliani, on the other hand, will probably continue to support any dictator who acts like a tough guy and pretends to support the U.S.
I disagree with those who say the Bush administration had a hand in the assassination. I think that there are elements in the administration who genuinely believe in the push for democracy (even though the administration has not acted very democratic at home). Unfortunately when the going gets tough there is no follow-through. This happened in Egypt, where the U.S. encouraged the democracy movement, then left it stranded. Let's hope the same thing doesn't happen in Pakistan, but it's likely to.
The facts on the ground support that. How do you explain the fact that Osama Bin Laden is the most popular man in Pakistan ?
www.thereligionofpeace.com
India and China have more neighborly concern about Pakistan's nuclear capabilities than we. The other worry is for Pakistanis. Improper messing around with nuclear stuff can be hazardous domestically: Three Mile Island and Chernobyl come to my mind.
Pakistanis have themselves to think about right now. The people there who want the best good for the country have got their hands full, as do we.
The reason I don't think the assassination will have much effect here is the coming currency crisis. The bill is coming due for the outsourcing shopaholics. My sister says they are talking about the Federal Reserve 24/7 in the D.C. area right now.
Fortunately, massive grass-root Americans, from left to right, have understood we are going to have to start growing our own food, even in the cities, as our currency, ahem, "adjusts."
It's not just that our currency is in massive trouble. The climate is changing, and major highways get blocked by floods, with trucks loaded with food unable to get through.
I love chocolate, and I will buy it when I can get it. But in Portland, we are growing chickens, eggs, worms, kale, cabbage, fruit, and all sorts of stuff in our back yards.
It's more convenient than driving to the store anyway. Knowing and cooperating with your neighbors is a good idea in tense times, as well.
Nervous people with guns are less likely to shoot you if you are growing eggs for them.
If you want to scare yourself, check out what some people on gun sites are saying about the possibility of assassination of their favorite candidates. This is what really ought to scare our elitists. I am reminded of a Tale of Two Cities.
To be honest, if you look too unkempt, you could be a target. If you look to effete, you could be one also. I think I naturally fall in a middle ground as a gray-haired old woman.
Nobody would have much bragging rights by taking me out.
So I stand by busy thoroughfares with my rag-tag and clean-shaved community of left-right-green people, promoting my favorite candidate.
We marched down an elite boulevard, and this guy tried to tell us the government paid for the side walk. So I said, "So if we pay taxes, we can walk on it, right?" Another guy from our group said businesses pay too. The elite guy said, "Yeah, and they don't pay enough!" I said, they pay twice, don't they? once as a business and again as individuals? There were too many of us, so he graciously said, "Well, I'm glad you're bringing up the issues."
That's exactly what I say on Gather when I don't like somebody's specific remedy for what I see as a problem. This is what we should be doing: discussing remedies and trying them out, state by state and culture by culture.
Anyway, it was great fun.
My hand-lettered sign says HELP FREE FREEDOM. Everybody else's says something different, since the point is freedom.
Firoze, I always get stimulated by your postings. Thanks.
Organizing us is more difficult than organizing cats, but that's the beauty, to me. Even if they were to kill our candidate, we would grow ten new ones. Also, we genuinely like and support each other and are glad we have found each other through this common interest.