With the Iowa caucus' only days away both the voters and the candidates are gearing up.
The latest poll by KCCI in Des Moines show the top 3 Democrats running neck and neck.
Obama represents change and youth.
Clinton represents....well an extention of the Clinton (Slick Willy) days.
Edwards is perceived as the people's president.
On the Republican front.
Huckabee holds a slight advantage over Romney.
Guiliani has dropped to 4th place. I myself never saw him as a real contender. He is a bit too shady and frankly his claim to fame is and always will be 9/11. And as a country we need to learn from that and move on.


Comments: 34
How true.
I WANT MY EMAIL BOX BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They have taken control with all of the
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
Obama
. . .it is fervent
Yikes!
and each it gets worse!
Our ONLY hope.
Let Obama learn more in the senate , maybe run in 2016.
Thank God Yahoo! has unlimited storage.
Yikes!
I have left the house to the partying young ones, saying:
Y'all have a ball!
Oh brother, how do you fight that?
They shall decide this thing.
Prepare for a surprise, those who believe it shall be business as usual,
or politics as usual.
Haha!
How are you, today?
OBAMA FOR AMERICA!!!!!!!!!
Haha!
Edwards for President , our only hope
Among the Democrats I keep changing my mind--they have a number of strong candidates. I think Hillary Clinton would be less likely to fight corruption and so can't support her, but my guess is she'll take it all.
Duncan Hunter will get my vote.
Yeah I know. You are saying, "WHO???" Most people say they haven't even heard of him. But I believe he is the best canididate and I plan on voting based on my principles not on the canididate's "electibility."
It's laughable to see the local Democrats drooling all over Clinton and Obama when they come to town. They probably should move the Iowa caucus to a warmer month. Frozen drool is not a pretty sight.
I think Iowa just likes to screw with poll takers IMHO.
Edwards offers substance and experience, grounded in reality. Edwards is the only reasonable choice for President in 2008!
We have people gungho for Obama, Hilary, and Edwards for Number 1 -- but interestingly, people who are gungho for Obama --> are interested in Edwards for #2, people for Clinton, are also interested in Edwards for #2.
To me, that's pretty interesting.
My parents have decided that if they support a democrat, it'll be Edwards. They believe and I agree that on the democratic side, he seems to understand the working & middle class plight a bit better. ($400 dollar haircut aside).
They don't like his stance on immigration, but other than that -- they consider him the people's candidate.
I also think Edwards has been fairly consistent. I think Biden has more experience, but oh well. I saw him on two youtube videos giving two different spins on one topic. He may have been in Washington a bit too long.
I'll take a chance and say that Edwards is going to be #1 or #2 in Iowa. Even though, I know what the polls say.
1-Edwards, 2-Clinton, 3-Obama
Republican Side: Whew! Even tougher.
I think Huckabee will squeek by and be #1 -- Romney @ #2. Unless illegal immigrant opponents help Huckabee's numbers dive any further down.
And, barring him doing something else -- odd (I going to show the commercial that I'm not going to show, so you can see what I don't want seen.)
Note: I had initially said the race was Hilary's to lose. She hasn't had a good week since her driver's license fiasco. She just fell apart.
Perhaps Obama does have all those acheivements you mention, but the public perception of his campaign leads one to see a cult of personality, first and foremost.
When I checked out his website, it was difficult to find a "positions" page. Of his positions, the one he takes on using coal-based technology as altermnatives fuels worries me most. No amount of cleaning can make coal a viable alternative.
Speaking of his website, you have to register first before being able to explore what he offers. That in itself is a major turn-off.
you wouldn't be just a wee bit biased here would you?