A little while ago I set out in search of a number. I then discovered that there are 465,482 member accounts registered on Gather. But how many of them are active accounts?Â
If you click on the "People" tab at the top of the page it will bring to a page displaying recently updated profiles. I suppose if you never create a public profile you will never be added to this list. But according to the page, there are:Â
However, are even all of the "updated" profiles active? Maybe someone created a profile a year or two ago and then never logged back in.
And then are the variables. How do you define "active"? Logged in during the past month? Three months? During the last year? Posted an article or image? Made a comment? Or would just logging in and browsing around be enough? For that manner, what is "recent"? What time frame does Gather use to classify "recent" in cybertime?
It is very doubtful that 465,482 unique people are "recently active" on this website.
Most likely these numbers have changed during the time I was writing this.Â
How many active members do you think are on Gather?
Â

Â






Comments: 28
I think about 34.
What? You saying I can't get rich on this site?
OK, I am sorry, I did not mean to burst your bubble. LOL
You can become rich if you have nothing and you add something so I guess I am wrong. LMAO
thank you for your nice comments to me... Blessings...
And the total member count is about 1 million higher, at least 1.45 million last check.
I guess there are only 2,000 accounts that could be considered active- used within the past month or so.
See below for more commentary.
90 conservatives trying to wake people up / 10 socialists who are friends with Gather Support and are trying to get the 90 kicked off.
I don't know about the other groups on Gather.
ROFL
In spite of the ever-increasing member-roll on Gather, there seems to have been no appreciable increase in the number of truly active members on the site. The number of regularly active members
This post is aimed directly at Gather, but it is really applicable across the web where it has become acceptable for websites, especially social media sites, to "falsify - embellish - purposefully over-state" their membership numbers! While this practice may be "accepted" within the social media industry, the math is flawed, the logic is perversely self-serving, and the average person knows these reported numbers are complete bullsh_t! Chalk it up to the same group of bean-counters that think it is OK to lie to investors, clients, account-holders, and manipulate and report falsified information about financial transactions that caused the recession we are stuck in!
To me, an "active account" has recent activity - they have at least logged into the service within the past 30 days. Any member that has not logged into the site within the past year should be deleted from the ranks - that person is no longer a member - period! Those that fall within the other 11 months are at best "non-active" members.
This is reasonable. I agree, sites don't want to report these numbers because they would be considerably lower. As I said before, I can't imagine there being more than about 2,000 active accounts here, by this definition.
I don't want Gather to delete accounts after a year, but if there was some other action that could be taken for inactive accounts (such as marking them inactive?), that would be okay.