Thank you for participating in Gather's create debate. Below you can check out Senator Dodd's energy and evironmental plan yourself.
From environmentalists to the leading voices on the issue of global warming: Chris Dodd’s bold energy plan is setting the standard in the presidential race. With a Corporate Carbon Tax that makes polluters pay to his call for historic fuel efficiency standards that break America’s dependence on Middle East oil by 2015, Chris Dodd is the only candidate in the field with a plan to make America the world leader on climate change and bring energy costs down for families and businesses.
The Dodd Energy Plan
The Goals:
- Reduce 80 percent of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The Dodd Plan will begin to turn back the clock on global climate change, safeguard our environment, and protect American health.
- Enhance national security by eliminating our dependence on Middle East oil by 2015. We must end the cycle of fighting terrorists on one hand while financing their supporters on the other.
- Strengthen our economy and create jobs. From our university labs to our farms, from manufacturing to our technology entrepreneurs, the Dodd Plan will create jobs across the economic spectrum.
- Reduce 80 percent of greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. By mandating the framework of the Sanders "Cap-and-trade" legislation and the toughest, most transparent rules possible, we can make serious reductions to carbon emissions every decade. By 2020, the U.S. must reduce its emissions by 15% of 80 percent below 1990 levels; by 2040, emissions must be reduced by 2/3 of 80 percent; and by 2050, emissions must be reduced to a level that is 80 percent.
- A portion of the allocated credits will be auctioned off and revenues directed to the Corporate Carbon Tax Trust Fund.
- Enact a Corporate Carbon Tax. A Corporate Carbon Tax will discourage big corporate polluters and stimulate innovation. The revenues of a corporate carbon tax—estimated at over $50 billion annually—will be placed into a Corporate Carbon Tax Trust Fund (CCTTF) to fund:
- Fast tracked research, development and deployment of renewable technologies such as wind, solar, as well as ethanol and other biofuels;
- Efforts to expedite the process for bringing energy efficient technologies to market;
- Increase efficiency standards for consumer products. The Dodd Plan would adopt stronger standards for appliances, light bulbs and other electricity powered consumer products to reduce energy costs for consumers.
- Reduce costs of energy efficient consumer products such as lighting, automobiles and appliances, making them price competitive.
- Freeze electricity usage from 2010 onward through efficiency.
- Raise fuel economy standards in automobiles to 50 mpg. Under a Dodd Administration, America will lead the world in fuel economy standards ensuring all cars get 50 miles per gallon by model year 2017, lowering our emissions.
- Impose tough standards for construction of new coal plants. The Dodd Plan requires all new plants capture and sequester CO2. No exceptions.
- The Dodd Administration would not invest in "coal to liquid" technologies and programs -- turning coal into liquid fuel does not support the overall goal of turning the clock back on global climate change and is not consistent with reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
- Increase renewable electricity standard to 20% by 2020. The best proven method to reduce costs of renewable sources of energy is to set tough but achievable renewable electricity standards.
- Make Historic Investments in Biofuels and other Clean Energy Technologies Produced Out On Our Farms. In a Dodd Administration, we will substantially increase investments in biofuels such as ethanol and biodiesel produced on our farms, perpetuating not tyranny and hate, but the values of America’s Heartland. The Dodd Energy Plan would set the goal of renewable fuel usage in cars and homes at 8.5 billion gallons of renewable fuels by 2008 and steadily increasing to 36 billion gallons by 2022. By 2016, an increasing portion of renewable fuels would be advanced biofuels like cellulosic ethanol, biobutanol and others.
- All biofuels must be produced in a sustainable way consistent with driving down carbon emissions, from production to use.
- Make the Production Tax Credit permanent for clean and renewable sources of energy. The permanent production tax credit is a powerful economic incentive for energy producers to increase their use of clean and renewable technologies. By making the Production Tax Credit permanent, energy companies will continue to develop alternative energy sources like wind and solar power with the knowledge that they will continue to receive an economic incentive for their innovation.
- Make high-efficiency automobiles affordable for every American family. Americans will purchase more efficient cars and trucks like hybrid if they are competitively priced. By providing an array of incentives and tax rebates, we can speed the transition from traditional cars to much more efficient hybrid vehicles.
- Require that all new government vehicles use hybrid, plug-in, or other fuel efficient and alternative technology.
- Require that all new and existing federal buildings be equipped with the latest energy efficiency technologies. With the Federal government one of the world’s largest purchasers of vehicles and America’s single largest energy consumer, we have a remarkable opportunity to lead by example and create markets for emerging technologies. In a Dodd Administration, every federal building will be built or retrofitted with the greenest technologies, from light-bulbs to power generation, and every vehicle will run on E85, biodiesel or other sources of clean energy.
- Create a technical education curriculum that trains a new generation of automobile mechanics, electricians, plumbers, and construction workers to install, repair and maintain energy efficient goods across the spectrum, from cars to lamps. Training programs will:
- Assure consumers that they can use their energy efficient products without having to worry about what happens when they break.
- Create a new sector of jobs to meet the newly created demand for workers with specialized skills.
- Increase access to affordable and convenient mass transit systems across all regions of the country. Mass transit saves families money in fuel costs and lowers pollution by reducing the number of cars on the road during rush hours.
- Export safe renewable energy technologies to, friends, allies and developing nations. We all know renewable and clean energy technology will allow America to achieve energy independence. A Dodd Administration would understand the power of that technology to transform not only American society, but others. By sharing that technology with other nations, we can allow them to end their alliances of necessity with dictators from oil-producing nations like Venezuela and Iran and once again begin to take up America’s role as a responsible world leader.


Comments: 14
2050-2008 = 42 years to cut emissions? Are you serious?
Why would the US or any nation wait 42 years to cut emissions that are destroying our planet?
I do not like this idea.
I see little about renewable energy sources that are green friendly. I see a lot of taxes, lots of mandates, but where is solar power, hydrogen power, wind power, etc. included in your plans?
The one part that sounds good is the requirement to force all government buildings to become alternative fuel equipped, and required to utilize alternative fuels.
As a retired environmental manager whose company has been a leader in decreasing carbon emissions, I'm favorably impressed with the scope of your energy goals and your plan.
I add the following considerations.
-Ensure that there that our new energy paradigm consists of diverse energy sources so that we do not get into the situation we are in--almost 100% reliance on petroleum-based energy that has created huge and powerful vested interests resulting in poor and expensive policy decisions, as well as climate change.
-In number 13 of the Plan, include consideration of public transportation stations. Often in our country, stations are dirty and unsafe. Make the stations pleasant, safe and clean as they are in a number of countries I've been in. Subway stations in Moscow have public art and chandeliers in them.
I do think that every citizen should be working towards using energy more efficiently while we develop multiple, renewable energy sources so we are not dependent on any one type.
I also agree that the United States really needs to work on the public transportation systems we have. Most of our cities' systems are far below the standard that other countries have when it comes to mass transit.
I also like that the government would set an example with the cars and buildings in this plan.
To me, 2050 is just too far off into the future. I can't imagine that there isn't the knowledge, technology and science to do this now. Maybe there needs to be a bit more incentive ($$$) to force big business to do what they should have been doing all along.
Maybe I'm being a little simplistic but I wonder how much further along we would be if the money spent on lawyers and lobbyists fighting the changes was spent on getting the job done instead.
Well, let me take off my rose colored glasses and get back to work. I need the paycheck to pay for gas to get to work.
I'm with you. I started reading and that is far as I got, and stopped. I thought, "Why rerad any further? That says it all."
I would say that he just wants to make sure he is dead and gone and won't have to bother with it long after he has made all the money he can, and everything that goes with that. But between now and then, and after, I don't think he'll ever get one of those blessings those guys are always talking about. He may think so, but I wouldn't agree. Of course, I don't have a problem with admitting to some things either. Or speaking openly and honestly with integrity that matters to ones' other than my own kind. Of course, I'm not a church-state presidential candidate either. Seeking to impose a farceful religion at gunpoint.
I think the public needs to be educated and encouraged to conserve, upgrade appliances to energy efficient ones and replace incandescent light bulbs with the new energy saving light bulbs. Once people realize that they can save money and the environment at the same time, they will be more likely to try harder. We replaced an old refrigerator with a new energy efficient one, started washing laundry in cold water, and have replaced almost every light bulb in the house. Our electric bill has been cut almost in half. I had no idea. I can't help but think that if a majority of people began looking at what they can do, it would make a big impact.
Dear Lord, we have enough corruption to last 'til the end of time.
Incentives provoke people with money to spend it in the belief in future savings and in good will from the community. In the meantime, workers get to work on projects they can be proud of.
Incentives are also more direct and immediate. If there's a deadline on the incentive, companies have to hire people to get the job going in order to harvest both the immediate incentive and the savings that improvements will bring.
It is my understanding that some California companies are already making money selling photovoltaic power back to the grid, a certain improvement from the Enron days.
What's more, this solar-generation is now spread around California, so if earthquakes sever lines, power is more decentralized, so there is a hope of less disruption in particular locations that may have been remote from power generation previously.
Money that might have been left as retained earnings or paid out to already-rich people is more likely to go to workers, who will pay income taxes on it.
What is not to like about this for ordinary people?
A policy that appoints me or someone better than me, to watch for best-practice world-wide and who then figures out how to incentivize the best stuff, now that would be a plan...
Sebastian Burckhardt switzerland.
First, set up a meaningful code of ethics.
Thank you.
You also need to understand, Chris, that we need more electricity, to enable the shift from fossil fuel in transport to electricity. We need more electricity to stimulate economic growth. We need more electricity to feed the growing need for desalination plants, greenhouses, air-conditioning, hydrogen, streetlight, etc. To obtain more electricity from clean and safe sources, we need to stop government support for fossil fuel and nuclear industry, and instead give support to renewables like solar and wind power.
The standards and the support for bio-fuel that you propose are in many ways ineffective, moreover, they allow polluters to continue to pollute and they subsidize the wrong parties at the expense of the solutions that we really need. We need to tax emissions, with the proceeds used to support local supply of better alternatives. Market mechanisms can further sort out what works best where.
There are a number of common sense energy choices that should be explained to the general public; for a simple example, expanding the use of locomotives for transporting trailers. One train consist can haul over 100 trailers across country @ 70 mph with more than a 60% reduction in diesel fuel useage vs using 100 semis. This is old technology that needs a little money and support to reduce fuel use, numbers of trucks on the highway, and road wear & tear.
We're in the Dark Ages when it comes to mass transit. This issue better get addressed soon before it's too expensive to support. It would create a lot of jobs and, if done properly, can compete with aircraft in many populated areas. Everyone knows that the aircraft business is overused and inefficient in terms of fuel costs.
I recently saw an article on one of the educ. channels about using photosynthesis to convert carbon dioxide to oxygen. Could we be using our tremendous coal reserves in combination with this tecnology?
England is planning an enormous 'wind mill' project that will significantly reduce their oil dependancy. What are we doing to implement this technology? I know GE is very involved.
The government must support these types of programs with subsidies and educating the public. We appear to be lagging far behind the rest of the world on energy conservation. Lets stop talking about abortion, gay rights, and religion and start working on issues, like energy, that can, and must, be greatly improved. Our future depends on it.