I was looking through my articles trying to find a blog I could recycle for a guest appearance I'm doing next week at Killer Fiction (shameless, I know...haha) And I came across this one. It was written in December during the Crime Fiction contest. Anyway...it has some great info, so I thought I'd repost. If you've read it already....thanks. ;-)
As most of you may know, I've been following the First Chapter Crime contest and reading/rating the entries sent to me via personal invitation. Before accepting any invitations I posted a caveat for everyone to read so there would be no misunderstandings where my comments on the work are concerned.
For me the hardest part of the contest has been commenting on an entrant's story, because in no way do I want to discourage or hurt anyone with my opinion. However, for anyone who "knows" me, they know I also prefer to be honest in order to help the writer improve.
Now, something I noticed during the contest. The guidelines state that the chapters can be up to 10K words. Well, it appears several of the contestants (at least from what I've read) decided to combine a few chapters. Their reasons, I assume, are so the reader will have more to read and will be more drawn to the story.
Well, for me, for the most part, having to read such a long chapter only put me off a lot of the stories. Why? Because, aside from the time constraints, it made the chapter feel overwritten.
Like with anything in writing, there are no clear cut rules on chapter length. Your first chapter should be as long or as short as you want it to be...but it should also grab you within the first few pages and end with such a cliffhanger that you have to turn to next chapter.
I understand, more than anyone, no writer is going to have a perfect draft. There will always be edits for grammar or punctuation. However....it doesn't mean you should toss your manuscript "out there" and hope no one notices or cares that you misplaced all your commas, or even used too many.
On an entry (I didn't particularly care for because of the amount of edits I felt the story needed) someone (who's work I didn't care for either) posted this comment in regards to my critique:
Yes, we all know that there will be revisions and more editing; however sometimes we need to look past that and just read the story.
Uh....No. Agents and editors aren't going to look past bad writing so they can find out where your story is going. If you can't grab them in the first few pages your story is history....it doesn't matter if it's the best thing since microwave popcorn!
Now, I read close to a hundred of the entries because for some crazy reason people wanted me to....their reasoning being, they want to learn and I'm known as the resident Hard ass where my comments are concerned and I tend to give detailed feedback (when I can), without sugar-coating. I didn't set out to get such a reputation, but I do know, if you can't take it from me (when I'm trying to help) how are you going to take it from an agent or editor??
So, here is my advice to new writers based on what I've read of the entries and the comments I left on the works I felt aren't quite there yet..
To those who chose to write in first person...and for some reason, thriller and/or crime fiction newbies seem to think they're supposed to...I would suggest, unless you've read works by the pros who know how to write first person exceptionally (i.e.; Lee Child, Robert Crais, Rick Rhiordan, Joe Konrath)...don't try it at home.
The mistakes I see a lot of new writers make with first person are they tend to spend too much time in the narrator's head, explaining the who's and why's of everything until it becomes monotonous to read. Granted, with first person your main character is telling you the story....but the reader doesn't need to know the background of every single thing that affected the character's life....because it's really not that important (and if it is, it can be woven in as secondary character's are introduced. But at a minimum. Less is more.) Telling us: John met Jane twenty years ago at the vet when they were waiting for the free rabies shots given each year and the dogs fell in love so it was natural they would too but it didn't quite work out because...blah blah blah! None of that has anything to do with who the character is as a person or why the reader should relate to him/her. All it's doing is taking the reader out of the story. And once you do that...you've lost your reader because (unless they're related to you) they aren't going to want to go back and read to figure out what the heck you're talking about.
With first person, you have to tell the minute details as they are happening to you (the MC) because you want the reader to have the same pieces of the puzzle so they can also try to figure out who dun it...assuming it's a mystery you're writing...but regardless, with first person, you don't want the reader a step ahead of the character.
Here are a few tips for writing scenes. (And several Don't's)
First and foremost, make sure the scene you're writing is necessary to the plot.
Don't throw in a description of the scenery for the sake of trying to tell the reader you character is now standing on top of a mountain. In other words don't open with a panoramic view of your setting just to introduce your character sitting in his study smoking a pipe by the fire.
Don't give a history lesson on your setting (saying when the town was founded, or who founded it, unless it plays an important part in the story.)
Don't overdo your prose by using too much descriptive narrative or exposition-such as going through the minute details of the character's everyday mundane life (she went home, made a cup of tea, put on some opera and went to bed--y a w n.)
Don't do a prologue (most agents and editors really hate them!)
And Don't open in present day with something exciting happening, then jump back in time to explain how the character came to that part. It's not only annoying, it's intrusive. When you do that you're basically doing this:
... Jane stepped off the curb, the street vibrating under her feet. She barely had time to register the danger before the truck rammed into her. She flew through the air, her last thoughts of Jacob as she landed with a heavy thud against the concrete.
But, wait....let me tell you what happened first....
Don't describe your characters through their own eyes, build them through someone else's eyes. (meaning, when you're in Jane's pov she could describe John's traits...and so on)
Don't start sentences with THEN, FINALLY, SUDDENLY (because nothing ever really happens suddenly).
Don't use too many AND's or THAT's...you don't want your sentences reading like a grocery list of action.
Don't use any of the following words or variation of these words--see, hear, feel, taste, smell---to explain what the characters saw, heard, felt, tasted, or smelled...SHOW it.
Don't introduce too many characters in one scene. If each of the characters are integral to the story, introduce them in their own chapter and in a way that shows how they're affected by the incidents that have happened so far (meaning, how are their lives changed by what happens) And again, don't give the everyday mundane actions they go through each day.
For any novel (regardless of genre), something has to happen immediately. Usually something life-changing for the main character. You can not spend the first ten pages introducing a character and giving us his/her life story (as it was or is now) because you will bore the reader (especially this reader). Just give the minimal facts that are relative to the character (who s/he is/what's his/her job/what type of personality s/he has) and weave the rest in as you go to further develop him/her...but do it in a way that isn't TELLING. In other words, don't say, John is a cop. Instead, show what makes him a cop....maybe open with him at work. Don't say Jane has a soft heart for stray animals, instead show her sneaking a can of tuna fish from her mother's cabinet and leaving it in the bushes for the cat that's been prowling around at night.
When writing your dialogue try writing it as you speak (unless you're writing historical or period pieces of course.) Don't have your characters constantly say each other's names when speaking to them.
"Hi Jane."
"Hi David."
"How was your night, Jane?"
"It was fine, David. I went to a movie."
"That's nice, Jane. What did you see?"
"Well David, I don't remember because I fell asleep."
Annoying huh.
Another thing to look out for in dialogue are your tags. If your writing strong dialogue, it isn't necessary to use a tag to identify how the character is speaking. You don't need to say..."They're coming back," she proclaimed! The dialogue and the previous action should convey the emotion in the character's voice.
When starting a novel, figure out who your main character is and write from their POV. Show everything through their eyes as they see it unfolding. Otherwise, your story will read like an article in a magazine with no real emotional connection for the reader. And, don't talk at your reader. As a reader, I want to be pulled into the story, I want my emotions challenged...not my intelligence (which is what I mean by talking at me like you're trying to explain everything.) You don't need to hold the reader's hand. As Dave King states in his book SELF-EDITING FOR THE FICTION WRITER, resist the urge to explain! Because, really, if you have to explain the who's and why's of your story...then you're not doing your job.
Here are a few more tips from the comments I made on entries in regard to what to look out for when writing.
Don't put thoughts in quotes. Quotes are for actual speaking dialogue only. Thoughts should be in italics.
Don't use adverbs when a stronger verb will work.
She pleadingly looked around the empty city
How do you look pleadingly? Show it better.
She searched the empty streets, her heart pounding, searching for someone, anyone who would help her.
Watch out for too literal descriptions (sometimes referred to as flying body parts...rolled her eyes; threw up her hands, etc)
For example:
She ducked into an alley, pushing herself up against the wall as far as she could go.
Try saying she ducked into an alley, pressing against the wall...etc)
Don't start your story with a dream if you can avoid it because it can piss off a reader. It's like a tease. They think something exciting is happening only to find out it's a dream.
And one more very important thing: READ! Read everything...fiction, non-fiction, graffitti on the bathroom wall...(heh...just kidding..unless it's really good. ;-)) The point is, if you don't read, you can't learn.
A few more things to look out for when you're writing: (and some is repetitive, I know)
Passive voice.
Sentences starting with AS.
Sentences that read like a grocery list (this AND this AND this happened....you know?) Watch out for too much exposition--meaning too much back story too soon (or worse, going into back story to explain what happened previously)
Show don't tell ...in other words, don't use the words: saw/heard/felt/smelled/tasted...just say what it was. (instead of this: She heard the beep of the answering machine and hung up.
say, she hung up the phone when the answering machine clicked on. It's not necessary to say it beeped since that's a given on all machines. And sometimes you gotta give the reader the benefit of the doubt to know what you mean. Like, don't tell them someone closed the door after they opened it.
In other words, don't hold the reader's hand.
Another no-no with exposition is putting it all in dialogue.
"Leave John and come away with me."
" You know I can't do that. I own him. He is the one who made it possible for me to attend law school. Before he showed up I had to work long weekend shifts. I was almost ready to give up the crazy idea of becoming a lawyer while working as a stripper so that I could give my mother and Johnny a decent place to live. Now John is about to go to college and Mom doesn't have to work so hard as a maid in order to pay for everything because her arthritis is so bad."
"Yes, I know. You told me this a zillion times."
This is called info dump through dialogue. Never have one character say something to another character that they already know. If any of this is important, feed it in later.
Another thing I've noticed is sometimes writers will chose to use their first chapter as an introduction to the story, then tell the reader, "but wait, the second chapter will explain everything."
Well, I'm sorry but I have to reiterate...unless you grab the reader in the first few pages of the first chapter they aren't going to bother looking for the next chapter!
Okay....rant over. :) I hope those of you who made it to the end have found something useful to consider when going back to your work.
Regardless....I wish you only the best in you endeavors.
Terri
Help me reach my goal of 10,000 readers in a month!




Comments: 80 ( 2 removed by terri molina )
Here on Gather, we have an amazing array of groups to help hone our skills and tighten our writing. Even so, writing for a challenge here is much easier than submitting to a publication. When you enter into the big First Chapter's competitions, you must treat it very seriously and put in a great deal of preparation. A publisher is much less likely to toss a well polished story than one that has a great story line, but a lack of adherence to guidelines which are always readily available.
Terri, I hope you will consider posting this to Deadline, as my group members are serious about their writing, dedicated and would appreciate such an article.
Thanks for reading. I sent to most of my groups...I thought Deadline was one of them...I know I accepted the invite... hmmm.
I'll look again. ;-)
Now, let me see . . . . How many of them did I violate in my own story? Hmmm . . . .
My particular peeve is the one suggested by this comment "however sometimes we need to look past that and just read the story." I have made comments about spelling and style and am routinely attacked for having done so. Someone actually made an article out of a rant about my comment on one article.
If you can't write it correctly, then, no matter how good your ideas are, you cannot consider yourself a writer. That works in business and in the publishing world. Those errors cause the readers' opinion of you to go down dramatically. I wouldn't buy a book with all those errors and I wouldn't do business with someone who couldn't be bothered to write properly. No one takes pride in their work anymore. The Google toolbar has an excellent spell checker. If you write in MS Word, it will even make suggestions about your grammar.
Okay, enough of a rant. Again, excellent article. I hope many read it and take it to heart.
So true alison. How else can you expect to be noticed and possibly win?
I agree with you about the long chapters. I generally list my chapter outline as close as possible, divide the total word count I'm shooting for but the number of chapters and try to stick close to that for each chapter. I cringe at long chapters but also at those mini first chapters that are over before they get started. Less than 1000 words, for example, is not enough to get your teeth into a story.
Great article with lots of help for serious writers.
GG
Maybe, do not try entering a contest using first person without the necessary experience. But my all means, do not give up on writing in the first person - even if you just journal it. First person writing can be fun. Even Joe Konrath was once inexperienced, as are we all.
Everyone will benefit from what you have offered--not only in this article, but by reviewing all of the comments you have spent time to compose.
Thank you from all of us.
Deborah J Ledford
STACCATO
(I would never, at this point, enter a contest using first person, so folks, Terri does have a point)
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977047736
Kate
Well, it's been quite a while since you wrote your constructive words of doom and I have since gotten over it. I now realize that you weren't "out to get me" and were just being honest. Being a recent addition to the Gather community, it took a while for me to learn that you are a respected critic who knows what she's talking about. (I have also noticed that once you mentioned certain first chapters with less than stellar votes they suddenly soared to the top of the heap like a rocket. That is clout, folks!)
I have one comment to make, though. I've struggled through the first chapters of several excellent, acclaimed books and ended up being thankful that I didn't put them down in spite of a less than riveting start. I've learned that just as you can't judge a book by its cover, you can't always judge it by its first chapter, either. Most of the time perhaps, but not always.
It is definitely a big plus and a desirable goal to grab someone right from the get-go and never let them go in the very first chapter of a novel. But like a song with a soft, mellow intro that eventually explodes into a terrific crescendo, sometimes it's nice to "ease into" a story instead of being blown away right from the start. In this regard, I feel that some of the chapters in this contest are being misinterpreted and unfairly judged, depending on what the author's intent is for the rest of the story.
I'm not trying to make excuses for poor writing, however. Your tips and suggestions are valid for every serious writer out there. But to lump all of these tips together into one big pile results in an "ideal" that may be worth striving for but is not necessarily the only route to go. That is my humble opinion, for what it's worth.
At any rate, thanks, Terri, for your honesty and the incredible amount of time you have taken to offer your experience and insight to us throughout the contest so far. My greatest hope now is that I can make it to the second round so I can hear from you again after you've read my second chapter. And don't think I won't be looking forward to that!
The May Day Murders - Chapter One
If a writer submits to a contest they must expect criticism and not every chapter can be voted a ten or there will be no way to chose a winner. I think writers need to develop a tough hide and make constructive use of criticism even if they believe it is unfair.
Thank you all for the wonderful comments....I'm glad this article helps.
Robert, I didn't say (or didn't intend to say) a writer shouldn't try writing first person....I said, a writer shouldn't try writing first person without first studying how to do it correctly and the four authors (two of whom I've had the honor to meet in person, the other two I just know through online interaction) I mentioned are the best ones to learn from.....and the only ones who write in first person (next to Cornwell) I'll read. (although...Cornwell isn't on my MUST READ list anymore).
Hehe, Scott, Sorry, I know you were less than pleased with my comments...but you asked for honesty and I gave it to you...and as I've always said, it's only my opinion.
;-)
In regards to your comment I have one comment to make, though. I've struggled through the first chapters of several excellent, acclaimed books and ended up being thankful that I didn't put them down in spite of a less than riveting start. I've learned that just as you can't judge a book by its cover, you can't always judge it by its first chapter, either. Most of the time perhaps, but not always. keyword here is acclaimed. You're speaking of books that have already been published, have already gone through the whole committee process at a major publishing house by people who knew the book would sell. (although I'm sure the whole acclaimed thing threw them...haha). So....to counter-argue your point....for new, first time writers, yeah....you're going to have to grab with the first chapter.
Of course....sometimes even that isn't enough (says the girl who's had an editor pass because of a sagging middle...uh, the story's, not mine..yuk yuk)....but that's another article. ;-)
First, take even the best tips with a grain of salt. One of the irritating things about many of the things tips warn against is that, when someone does one of these things, they tend to do it LOTS. I would not take these (or any tips) as YOU MUST NEVER EVER DO IT, but I would definitely take it to heart to not only not overdo it but not make them part of your style.
Secondly, while I agree with avoiding exposition in dialog, there are few methods more effective for revealing character. Good dialog can bring a character to life in a few lines in the hands of someone skillful. However, bad dialog can muddy a character just as quickly, especially if what a character says and how they act are at odds. Dialog, done poorly or overemphasized can also bring the story to a halt (something I have to watch myself). Like every aspect of writing, make every thing you add to your story add something, not just fill pages. If it isn't contributing, let it go.
Thirdly, starting is essential. I like to start by making my characters alive to a reader, but characterization is one of my strengths. And that's the key - figure out what you do best and lead with that. There are books that manage to overcome a weak beginning, but they are few and far between and often are so exceptional... Go with your strength, whether it's painting a scene, breathing life into a character, injecting riveting action or touching an emotional chord.
Fourth, starting isn't everything. You've got to be able to keep up pacing and story to the end, so don't do a few chapters and then let things slide. If you are really interested in a career in writing, you have to have a quality product, cover to cover. Mickey Spillane said, "Nobody reads a mystery to get to the middle. They read it to get to the end. If it's a letdown, they won't buy anymore. The first page sells that book. The last page sells your next book."
Fifth, nothing finds things that don't ring true like reading it out loud. It catches bad dialog, awkward wording, clumsy descriptions and often grammar and typographical errors. I never send anything until I've heard how it sounds.
Have fun and enjoy what you write. If you don't, the reader can tell. It should be distinctly yours but but also polished into a finished work. It's not just the inspiration, it's the hard work and craftmanship that distinguishes the best books, the kinds of books that stay published long after the author is gone.
My-uh-fifty cents?
I must admit I haven't been paying attention to the writing contests on gather. I don't feel like building the reputation for harsh criticism when too many people don't know how accept honestly constructive criticism.
Your article was fantastic. It was informative and enlightening, and an enjoyable read in it's own right!
The tips I posted should be kept in the back of your mind while writing your first draft and at the front of your mind when editing and revising.
And, keep in mind....no writer ever has a perfect first draft. If they say they do...they're lying....or just needy.
Thanks again for reading!
Hah....that's true. I can write a salable story...but I'm not writing anything the publishers think they can sell...(make sense?) It pretty much means, I'm ahead of or behind the times. Oh well....I enjoy the books I wrote. ;-)
Flooding agents and publishers with early drafts or works when you haven't honed your craft is no way to help your case when you do have something worth selling.
I'll add one piece of advice to your excellent assemblage. I've read maybe 30 of the entries and can probably count on one hand the number of metaphors and similes I came across. To quote Noah Lukeman from The First Five Pages, "Comparison is one of the few devices that really put a writer's skill in the spotlight because it offers the most room for a writer to 'turn it on,' to indulge the limits of his creative expresion ... The proper use of comparison will enable you to cut a tremendous amount of description ... and make for a much tighter read."
The Prophet Motive
For FCC, I was happy to see you get involved like you did in the others. I've leaned so much from your comments that in this contest, I regularly checked out your space to track down and read your comments on the various chapters. You notice and point out things that educate me in general in issues of craft. You sharpened my eyes.
The thing about your feedback is that you do not just say, "this doesn't work" -- you say why something should be done differently or changed completely. You often give an example of how an improvement could be approached. I commented once before and I mean it -- what is good about critiques like yours is that they are about the writing -- NOT the writer. They are never personal.
I echo your statement on not starting a novel off with a dream (unless, like Stephen P., your novel centers on dreams). In FC1, I got to the point where I stopped reading immediately if it was a dream that started it. I cannot imagine the number of novels submitted to agents that begin in dreams. It must get so trite.
My pet peeve about comments remains as it has through the other two FCs: the family and friends who come along after a commenter has pointed out grammar, spelling, punctuation or logic problems to say variations of "that's what an editor is for -- just ignore these jealous people." Give me a break. Why would any writer not want to learn they're making those mistakes unless they're just too lazy to try their hardest to polish their material?
Terri, you've made this a better contest.
Stephanie, I wish you'd gotten involved but I can understand why you didn't. We needed more reviewers without an agenda to make this a more meaningful contest for us writers. I was privileged to get an incredible group of people to review mine (including Terri) so I have a huge platform to fly off in the next edit.
Cheers!
______________
Two Birds, One Stone
:+)
June your article is a hoot....hopefully no one takes it seriously. haha
Thanks for stopping Yvonne.
Very true Ruth. No one likes to hear the story they spilled blood for needs improvement. I'm not sure who's worse about getting critiqued...men or women. ;-)
I'm looking forward to seeing who goes to the next round...most especially who the Gather staff picks.
Good luck you ya!
There's someone out there right now saying "Well, that doesn't apply to me." Well, yes it does. Everyone of us who puts words together risks getting so caught up in our story that we overlook the craft. The editors won't. Editing, rereading, putting aside and coming back to edit again is part of the job description. Writing on the fly is writing a draft. A draft is the foundation for reworking, not for submitting.
Please keep on reminding us, Terri. We all benefit when you do.
Writing on the fly is writing a draft. A draft is the foundation for reworking, not for submitting.
Great quote btw....thanks for posting it. ;-)
I wish I'd read more of Round 1 - mysteries are my favorite genre reading - but after FCR (and trying like hell to polish up my own book) I just couldn't do it.
I plan to be an active participant in Round 2.
Gather Admins, if you are reading this - please, please have mercy on us interested readers and don't start a new contest fresh on the heels of another one. It's way too much.
thank you so much for taking the time to remind all of us what is important in writing. I don't have a "thick" skin but I do appreciate someone telling me what they think doesn't work rather than just getting a "good job" comment.
We all seem in so much of a hurry these days that nothing is done "right" and helpful suggestions can bring us back to what counts.
I will be saving this article to read and
Don't know why the sentence got dropped.
I've just done a first read of your article.
What you've written here makes great sense but it's so bountiful that I'll have to come back and go through it thought by thought.
It looks a gold mine for a writer. Thank you.
At this point, I don't give a damn about pov and passive sentences (Terri M., give it up and do some actual fiction writing, please!!)
I guess he thinks doing 53 drafts and self-publishing makes him an expert. Yeah right...so why'd it take 53 drafts and his own money to publish?? Idiot.
Sorry readers...my rant.
Antoine I'm glad they'll help. Feel free to ask questions on anything that didn't make sense. =) Good luck with the final draft (not that there really is such a thing...haha)
Not everyone who wants to write a book should. Good job on the list, Terri. People should use this.